Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:46 PM Mar 2012

serious question about trayvon, zimmerman and stand your ground

ok, i have raised this in other threads with very little response but:

if trayvon did in fact initiate the physical altercation, as zimmerman alleges AFTER zimmerman chased him down and illegally detained him, as zimmerman admits, doesn't the stand your ground law apply to trayvons actions and not zimmerman's?

wouldn't trayvon be the one who had the right to stand his ground under florida law against someone committing a felony against his person?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
serious question about trayvon, zimmerman and stand your ground (Original Post) arely staircase Mar 2012 OP
Crazy man with a gun chasing you for no reason is legitimate cause for self-defense. n/t Ian David Mar 2012 #1
My guess is that in Florida randr Mar 2012 #2
They will always side with the WHITE person with the gun Empowerer Mar 2012 #20
well, we could ask the opinion of both Zimmerman and Martin. provis99 Mar 2012 #3
no, there are 9/11 tapes, forensic evidence, arely staircase Mar 2012 #5
Zimmerman said it was him screaming, not Martin. provis99 Mar 2012 #9
well then if his gf is unreliable because of familiarity arely staircase Mar 2012 #12
the screaming Sedona Mar 2012 #13
I think you are spot on! Trayvon was being arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #4
I was saying this to my SO XanaDUer Mar 2012 #6
Seems that way to me. eom uppityperson Mar 2012 #7
Yes, Sir: The Only Person With A Legitimate Claim To Self-Defense Here Was Young Mr. Martin The Magistrate Mar 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author arely staircase Mar 2012 #10
that's kinda how i see it arely staircase Mar 2012 #17
"wouldn't trayvon be the one who had the right to stand his ground..." No. He was Black. nt gateley Mar 2012 #11
please pardon and educate ignorance crazycanuck Mar 2012 #14
The text of the law has been posted on other threads, but in a nutshell a SYG law petronius Mar 2012 #16
And while it probably has not yet been tested in court . . . Empowerer Mar 2012 #21
Despite the amount of discussion, I think SYG is irrelevant here petronius Mar 2012 #23
some states have laws that say that if you are threatened by a bully arely staircase Mar 2012 #18
gun nuts paranoia turned into law Skittles Mar 2012 #19
Especially if they're black men, because they are really scary Empowerer Mar 2012 #22
oh absolutely Skittles Mar 2012 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author crazycanuck Mar 2012 #15
If he were alive he could use "stand your ground" argument, sure. LisaL Mar 2012 #24
didn't say he could "use it" i said it "appl(ied)" to him arely staircase Mar 2012 #26
Yes, but we've already determined that he didn't have a gun to defend himself, Baitball Blogger Mar 2012 #25
You are confusing different parts of FL law... ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #27

Empowerer

(3,900 posts)
20. They will always side with the WHITE person with the gun
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:00 PM
Mar 2012

If the scenario were flipped and Zimmerman were black and Trayvon white, Zimmerman would have been immediately arrested and charged with murder, few questions asked.

And we all know that if Zimmerman were unarmed and Trayvon had a gun that he used on Zimmerman in self-defense after Zimmerman chased him through the subdivision and wrestled him to the ground, Trayvon would be under the jail by now.

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
3. well, we could ask the opinion of both Zimmerman and Martin.
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:51 PM
Mar 2012

oh wait, Martin's dead, so only Zimmerman's opinion matters.

Hundreds of other fatal shootings in Florida follow the same pattern. What went on is judged solely by the claims of the survivor.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
5. no, there are 9/11 tapes, forensic evidence,
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:56 PM
Mar 2012

witnesses who heard some of it and possibly someone who was on the phone with trayvon. im pretty sure the grand jury will hear all of that. there is all kinds of evidence other than zimmerman's word.

though it is true that that is all the local backwater cops were willing to entertain.

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
9. Zimmerman said it was him screaming, not Martin.
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:06 PM
Mar 2012

Witnesses only heard "screaming", not who was doing it. Now if Martin were alive, he might be able to deny that. But he's dead, so the only witness to this is Zimmerman. Martin's girlfriend is an unreliable witness, since she had a relationship with him. And the cops seem to be on Zimmerman's side. The chances of a successful indictment of Zimmerman, let alone a conviction, are pretty close to zero, given the content of the stand-your-ground Florida law.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
12. well then if his gf is unreliable because of familiarity
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:11 PM
Mar 2012

what does that make zimmerman's testimony, since he was infinitely more familiar with himself than trayvon's gf was with him?

Sedona

(3,769 posts)
13. the screaming
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:25 PM
Mar 2012

I'm pretty sure the FBI can analyze the 911 tape and determine without a doubt they were NOT Zimmerman's screams. If Trayvon's voice is recorded anywhere, like a voicemail, they may even be able to determine the screams were Trayvon's. Voices are like fingerprints, each unique.

http://www.infra-techuk.co.uk/infratech-forensic-speech-analysis.html

edited for typos

arthritisR_US

(7,283 posts)
4. I think you are spot on! Trayvon was being
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:53 PM
Mar 2012

stalked which, by its very nature, is aggressive. I would think that his parent's lawyer would be pursuing this line of logic.

XanaDUer

(12,939 posts)
6. I was saying this to my SO
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:00 PM
Mar 2012

If Trayvon had a gun maybe he could have shot Zimmerman? Who the hell is Zimmerman to question/detain ANYONE? Isn't that kidnapping?

The Magistrate

(95,241 posts)
8. Yes, Sir: The Only Person With A Legitimate Claim To Self-Defense Here Was Young Mr. Martin
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:04 PM
Mar 2012

Zimmerman's claim rests on his having a reasonable belief he was, when he began the confrontation, preventing commission of a forcible felony. He may have believed he was doing so, but cannot have met legal standards of reasonable belief he was doing so. This means that his confronting Mr. Martin was the commission of a crime, and young Mr. Martin would certainly have had a reasonable belief he was in imminent danger of serious harm of death from a stranger forcibly accosting him on the public way.

Response to The Magistrate (Reply #8)

crazycanuck

(3 posts)
14. please pardon and educate ignorance
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:39 PM
Mar 2012

This Canuck is gingerly entering the waters. This case sounds like a textbook racist murder, but what on earth is a stand your ground law? How does it relate to other law, such as citizen's arrest, which, I believe, is a criminal law concept on both sides of our shared border, and how does it apply to this case? if at all?

petronius

(26,597 posts)
16. The text of the law has been posted on other threads, but in a nutshell a SYG law
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:50 PM
Mar 2012

says that you are not obligated to attempt to flee or disengage before using deadly force in self-defense, even if an (apparent) escape route is available. However, your use of force must still be based on a reasonable (to an ordinary person, not just your opinion) fear that you face imminent harm to yourself or others...

Empowerer

(3,900 posts)
21. And while it probably has not yet been tested in court . . .
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:03 PM
Mar 2012

it's likely that chasing an unarmed person through the streets invalidates a self-defense claim, even under the Stand Your Ground law.

petronius

(26,597 posts)
23. Despite the amount of discussion, I think SYG is irrelevant here
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:15 PM
Mar 2012

That law really only matters if it's shown that Zimmerman was legitimately defending himself, but perhaps had an opportunity to retreat. The question however, is whether or not self-defense was lawful at all - and SYG has nothing to do with determining the (il)legality of a particular decision to use deadly force...

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
18. some states have laws that say that if you are threatened by a bully
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:54 PM
Mar 2012

or whomever you must run away if you can (duty to retreat) laws in other states say you can defend yourself even if running away is an option (stand your ground.)

Skittles

(153,111 posts)
28. oh absolutely
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 04:34 AM
Mar 2012

I remember when I first moved into my current apt complex and my cat took off, and I would come home from work before sunrise and be looking for him with a flashlight - it occurred to me people would have called the cops on me if I'd been a black man - yes INDEED (fyi my cat returned after 17 days...grrrrrrrrrrr)

Response to arely staircase (Original post)

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
26. didn't say he could "use it" i said it "appl(ied)" to him
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:25 PM
Mar 2012

in that those sorting this out, now that it has been removed from the hands of the local yahoos, could view it through that lense.

Baitball Blogger

(46,682 posts)
25. Yes, but we've already determined that he didn't have a gun to defend himself,
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:20 PM
Mar 2012

and even if he did, the police would have probably shot him and asked questions later.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
27. You are confusing different parts of FL law...
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 12:49 AM
Mar 2012

To use deadly force in FL (and all the other states) you have to be in reasonable fear of GBI/death. Stand Your Ground has nothing to do with it.

SYG does not require retreating in the presence of an armed attacker, which was ALSO required previously.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»serious question about tr...