Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenators Barbara Boxer and Sheldon Whitehouse on Tar Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1159 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (26)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senators Barbara Boxer and Sheldon Whitehouse on Tar Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline (Original Post)
Scuba
Mar 2014
OP
Barbara Boxer always stands up for the people, especially on environmental issues!
DesertDiamond
Mar 2014
#2
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)1. Good for Barbara
DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)2. Barbara Boxer always stands up for the people, especially on environmental issues!
Overseas
(12,121 posts)3. K&R. Glad to hear a frank declaration.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)4. I love Barbara Boxer..
I once worked on her campaign. She was super nice and bought everyone coffee at Starbucks.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)5. Scuba...I can't find a link? Just your subject line...
Folks are rec'ing and answering...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. Senators Boxer & Whitehouse Ask Sec. Kerry For Comprehensive Health Impacts Study On XL Pipeline
Senators Boxer & Whitehouse Ask Sec. Kerry For Comprehensive Health Impacts Study On XL Pipeline
by Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse
Senators Boxer and Whitehouse held a press conference today to "share dramatic new information that will shine a spotlight on the health impacts of tar sands oil - health impacts that are already being felt in communities exposed to one of the filthiest kinds of oil on our planet." (Link to Boxer's statement as prepared for delivery.) The senators are rightfully concerned that the "health impacts of tar sands oil are being ignored." They want to connect the dots between tar sands and health risks "from the extraction to the transport to the refining to the waste disposal."
In a letter to Secretary Kerry, Sen. Boxer and Sen. Whitehouse ask for an "immediate and comprehensive study on the human health impacts of tar sands and the proposed pipeline." The senators state how the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement is "woefully inadequate regarding human health impacts," and "peer reviewed research on these issues [should be] fully considered before any decision is made on the Keystone XL pipeline."
While the XL pipeline impacts will affect everyone, as I wrote about earlier this month, Racist 'Sacrifice Zones' With XL Pipeline are Grounds Alone for Rejecting Permit, yet the harm to people's lives is an issue missing from the debate on whether to approve the pipeline:
The XL has 3 sacrifice zones: First Nation communities in Canada, U.S. tribal communities, and West Port Arthur, which is 95% African American. The Senators cover briefly two of these sacrifice zones.
Boxer and Whitehouse presented a clear picture of how communities at each step of the "toxic tar sands oil process from the extraction to the transport to the refining to the waste disposal will be impacted."
Dr. John O'Connor from Alberta, Canada will address how his patients in First Nation communities, located downstream from the major tar sands extraction site, have faced increased cancer rates and other health issues. Tar sands are then processed after extraction. "Dr. Stuart Batterman, a Professor from the University of Michigan, will tell us about his research which found significantly higher levels of dangerous air pollutants and carcinogens downwind from a tar sands refinery near Edmonton, Alberta." Tar sands are then to be transported via the XL pipeline through communities in 6 states with environmentally sensitive areas, and the senators note the harm and difficulty of trying to clean up a spill. More than 3 years later, the Kalamazoo River in Michigan is still not cleaned up from the tar sands oil spill in 2010. "One resident living near the Kalamazoo River had to abandon her home because the stench from the spill made her feel dizzy and nauseous - classic signs of acute exposure to tar sands oil. Another resident who was pregnant reported having trouble breathing. "My eyes were burning, and my nose was burning. It smelled like a diesel tanker had turned over in front of my house."
Next in the XL tar sands chain is the transportation of this goop to Gulf Coast refineries, increasing the toxic pollution in communities like Port Arthur, Texas. "As we will hear from Hilton Kelley, a community representative, Port Arthur is on the EPA's list of cities with dangerous ozone levels, and its residents suffer from asthma, respiratory ailments, skin irritations, and cancer. Tar sands will add another threat to Port Arthur and other communities that are already in distress."
Final step in the tar sands process is waste disposal of the byproduct:
Last year I asked: Shouldn't We Know Whether Tar Sands Causing Cancer With First Nations Before XL Pipeline Decision? It's long past time to study this issue BEFORE approving this pipeline rather than waiting for decades of death to address what is happening now. For more information on the health impacts of the XL pipeline:
Mounting evidence that tar sands activity is causing health problems regarding studies and scientific reports on the air and water pollution from tar sands operations in Canada, rising cancer rates in First Nation communities, health impacts from tar sands pipeline spills in Michigan and Arkansas, tar sands refinery emissions and petroleum coke impacts.
We have until March 7 to express our views on what should be the outcome of the president's "National Interest Determination (NID)," that is, on whether or not building the big tar sands pipeline is in the interest of the United States. Please see my earlier diary on tips for writing public comments opposing the XL: Writing XL Public Comments: Focus on Obama's Test of Carbon Pollution & Climate Change Impacts
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/26/1280629/-Senators-Boxer-Whitehouse-Ask-Sec-Kerry-For-Comprehensive-Health-Impacts-Study-On-XL-Pipeline
by Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse
Senators Boxer and Whitehouse held a press conference today to "share dramatic new information that will shine a spotlight on the health impacts of tar sands oil - health impacts that are already being felt in communities exposed to one of the filthiest kinds of oil on our planet." (Link to Boxer's statement as prepared for delivery.) The senators are rightfully concerned that the "health impacts of tar sands oil are being ignored." They want to connect the dots between tar sands and health risks "from the extraction to the transport to the refining to the waste disposal."
In a letter to Secretary Kerry, Sen. Boxer and Sen. Whitehouse ask for an "immediate and comprehensive study on the human health impacts of tar sands and the proposed pipeline." The senators state how the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement is "woefully inadequate regarding human health impacts," and "peer reviewed research on these issues [should be] fully considered before any decision is made on the Keystone XL pipeline."
While the XL pipeline impacts will affect everyone, as I wrote about earlier this month, Racist 'Sacrifice Zones' With XL Pipeline are Grounds Alone for Rejecting Permit, yet the harm to people's lives is an issue missing from the debate on whether to approve the pipeline:
The public debate whether President Obama should approve Keystone XL pipeline is focused on the salient impacts to climate change, natural resources and wildlife. What is missing from this debate is the overriding issue of how does the pipeline directly harm people? Under the law, this is key to any decision. The pipeline should be rejected because it creates (or expands) sacrifice zones for Indians, other minorities and low-income communities. This violates the legal mandate of compliance with environmental justice principles that the State Department must consider when evaluating whether approving the pipeline is in the national interest, a process which is now underway.
The XL has 3 sacrifice zones: First Nation communities in Canada, U.S. tribal communities, and West Port Arthur, which is 95% African American. The Senators cover briefly two of these sacrifice zones.
Boxer and Whitehouse presented a clear picture of how communities at each step of the "toxic tar sands oil process from the extraction to the transport to the refining to the waste disposal will be impacted."
Dr. John O'Connor from Alberta, Canada will address how his patients in First Nation communities, located downstream from the major tar sands extraction site, have faced increased cancer rates and other health issues. Tar sands are then processed after extraction. "Dr. Stuart Batterman, a Professor from the University of Michigan, will tell us about his research which found significantly higher levels of dangerous air pollutants and carcinogens downwind from a tar sands refinery near Edmonton, Alberta." Tar sands are then to be transported via the XL pipeline through communities in 6 states with environmentally sensitive areas, and the senators note the harm and difficulty of trying to clean up a spill. More than 3 years later, the Kalamazoo River in Michigan is still not cleaned up from the tar sands oil spill in 2010. "One resident living near the Kalamazoo River had to abandon her home because the stench from the spill made her feel dizzy and nauseous - classic signs of acute exposure to tar sands oil. Another resident who was pregnant reported having trouble breathing. "My eyes were burning, and my nose was burning. It smelled like a diesel tanker had turned over in front of my house."
Next in the XL tar sands chain is the transportation of this goop to Gulf Coast refineries, increasing the toxic pollution in communities like Port Arthur, Texas. "As we will hear from Hilton Kelley, a community representative, Port Arthur is on the EPA's list of cities with dangerous ozone levels, and its residents suffer from asthma, respiratory ailments, skin irritations, and cancer. Tar sands will add another threat to Port Arthur and other communities that are already in distress."
Final step in the tar sands process is waste disposal of the byproduct:
The final step in this tar sands chain is the disposal of waste byproduct that is produced when tar sands is refined into oil. It leaves behind petroleum coke, known as "pet coke," which is a black dust containing concentrated heavy metals. Open piles of this waste began appearing at unprecedented levels in Midwestern communities last year, and it has sparked health and environmental concerns in many neighborhoods in Detroit and Chicago.
Last year I asked: Shouldn't We Know Whether Tar Sands Causing Cancer With First Nations Before XL Pipeline Decision? It's long past time to study this issue BEFORE approving this pipeline rather than waiting for decades of death to address what is happening now. For more information on the health impacts of the XL pipeline:
Mounting evidence that tar sands activity is causing health problems regarding studies and scientific reports on the air and water pollution from tar sands operations in Canada, rising cancer rates in First Nation communities, health impacts from tar sands pipeline spills in Michigan and Arkansas, tar sands refinery emissions and petroleum coke impacts.
We have until March 7 to express our views on what should be the outcome of the president's "National Interest Determination (NID)," that is, on whether or not building the big tar sands pipeline is in the interest of the United States. Please see my earlier diary on tips for writing public comments opposing the XL: Writing XL Public Comments: Focus on Obama's Test of Carbon Pollution & Climate Change Impacts
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/26/1280629/-Senators-Boxer-Whitehouse-Ask-Sec-Kerry-For-Comprehensive-Health-Impacts-Study-On-XL-Pipeline
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024569505
Note:
Kos Media, LLC Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified