General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Third Party That’s Winning
http://billmoyers.com/2014/03/04/the-third-party-thats-winning/But it is the ways that Working Families is wielding its power outside of liberal New York that deserve a closer look. As public discontent with mainstream Democrats builds, is it possible for a third party to grow not by running a famous big name on a presidential ticket, but from the bottom up? And if it succeeds at that task, can Working Families pull national politics back in the direction of ordinary people and away from the one percent?
...
When the major parties agree, as they often do in supporting, say, corporate-style education reform, a third party can promote ideas and issues that would be otherwise neglected. In Oregon, for example, the WFP worked with local student groups to put forward a plan for rethinking college funding. They found a WFP-backed Democrat to sponsor it, and the measure wound up passing unanimously in the state legislature. The party is now working on a bill that would create a state bank to invest Oregons public money at home instead of with Wall Street and provide cheaper loans to state residents. Such proposals are unlikely to come from the major parties, which each receive massive campaign contributions from big banks, even at the state level.
...
It all comes down, in the end, to how power gets built. It requires coalitions and trust; institutional support and enthusiastic activists; lots of organizing, and perhaps most of all, a willingness to pick the right fights. Bertha Lewis knows perhaps better than anyone else how hard those fights can be. But she thinks theyre worth it. Sometimes, in years past, you couldnt tell a Democrat from a Republican. No one wanted to talk about race; no one wanted to talk poverty. This whole conversation that were having nationally about inequality is because [groups like WFP] kept to our principles and our ideas and kept saying, There is inequality, there is inequality, there is inequality.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)It will be entertaining to see if/how candidates will deal with it.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)and I am delighted to learn of Working Families Party. Will be alert to them. Thank you , lots.
Autumn
(44,980 posts)Rec
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Autumn
(44,980 posts)is an automatic reflex to me.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to vote FOR a candidate, IF they got the chance rather than we have been TOLD to do for so long, vote AGAINST someone. That party COULD grow, and I'll say this, if the Dem Party, and we see it here a lot, continues to disrespect the very voters who have been loyal to the party their whole lives, this could be an option.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)This has the makings of a grassroots counterweight to the corporate interests that dominate both major parties.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The WFP takes advantage of New York's "fusion" election rule -- which I think most states do not have. Fusion means that the same candidate can appear on multiple ballot lines, and all votes for him or her on all lines will be added together.
All the successful "WFP candidates" named in the OP were, in fact, Democratic candidates who got most of their votes on the Democratic Party line.
The WFP has occasionally cross-endorsed a Republican instead. I can remember only one case where the WFP elected its own candidate. It was in a City Council district in Brooklyn, very heavily minority, where there is essentially no Republican Party. There the usual problem with third-party politics -- splitting our side's vote so that the Republican wins -- didn't apply. The WFP wasn't a third party there, it was the second party.
Does the WFP help push the Democrats to the left? I don't think so. Consider, for example, that Bill de Blasio, who has impressed many DUers, is Mayor now only because he won the Democratic primary. People who registered as members of the WFP couldn't even vote in that primary. In the general election, whoever won the Democratic primary would have won easily. The Republicans had no Giuliani or Bloomberg this time around. The extra votes de Blasio got on the WFP line made absolutely no difference.
In most of the important respects, the WFP is not a third party, at least not the way the Greens or the Libertarians are. Certainly the enthusiasts of the Green Party shouldn't think that the gushy prose quoted in the OP means that Green-type third-party politics has suddenly, miraculously become viable. Running your own candidate against the Democrat is still, in almost all cases, a recipe for Getting Republicans Elected Every November.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Dem candidates. It seemed kind of pointless to me.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)If their candidates run for Congress or Senate, I'll give them a serious look over.