Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:06 PM Mar 2014

The Third Party That’s Winning

http://billmoyers.com/2014/03/04/the-third-party-thats-winning/


That was just one of several big successes for the Working Families Party around the country this fall, perhaps the most notable being the election of Mayor Bill de Blasio and a progressive slate of candidates in New York City — including Public Advocate Letitia James, the first black woman to hold citywide office, and Melissa Mark-Viverito, the first Latina Speaker of the Council. These WFP candidates are expected to push a progressive agenda for New York that includes expanding paid sick days, levying a tax on the wealthy to fund universal pre-kindergarten, and much more. The New York City victories have attracted new attention to how the WFP exercises power at the ballot box and in city and state legislatures, leveraging quirks in local electoral systems and existing progressive bases to make a third party viable.

But it is the ways that Working Families is wielding its power outside of liberal New York that deserve a closer look. As public discontent with mainstream Democrats builds, is it possible for a third party to grow — not by running a famous big name on a presidential ticket, but from the bottom up? And if it succeeds at that task, can Working Families pull national politics back in the direction of ordinary people and away from the one percent?

...

When the major parties agree, as they often do in supporting, say, corporate-style education reform, a third party can promote ideas and issues that would be otherwise neglected. In Oregon, for example, the WFP worked with local student groups to put forward a plan for rethinking college funding. They found a WFP-backed Democrat to sponsor it, and the measure wound up passing unanimously in the state legislature. The party is now working on a bill that would create a state bank to invest Oregon’s public money at home instead of with Wall Street and provide cheaper loans to state residents. Such proposals are unlikely to come from the major parties, which each receive massive campaign contributions from big banks, even at the state level.

...

It all comes down, in the end, to how power gets built. It requires coalitions and trust; institutional support and enthusiastic activists; lots of organizing, and perhaps most of all, a willingness to pick the right fights. Bertha Lewis knows perhaps better than anyone else how hard those fights can be. But she thinks they’re worth it. “Sometimes, in years past, you couldn’t tell a Democrat from a Republican. No one wanted to talk about race; no one wanted to talk poverty. This whole conversation that we’re having nationally about inequality is because [groups like WFP] kept to our principles and our ideas and kept saying, ‘There is inequality, there is inequality, there is inequality.’ ”
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Third Party That’s Winning (Original Post) Scuba Mar 2014 OP
K and R (nt) bigwillq Mar 2014 #1
Inequality is going to be a huge issue this year. winter is coming Mar 2014 #2
I did not know this oldandhappy Mar 2014 #3
There is a vacuum, and it will be filled. Autumn Mar 2014 #4
someone said "scratch where it itches" but I forget who ... MisterP Mar 2014 #9
I don't know MisterP, scratch where it itches Autumn Mar 2014 #12
+1 woo me with science Mar 2014 #11
Thank you, I had not heard of them. But it was inevitable that people would jump at the chance sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #5
K&R liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #6
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #7
From the bottom up, either inside the party or in tactical alliance. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2014 #8
The Working Families Party almost always cross-endorses the Democrat. Jim Lane Mar 2014 #10
The WFP candidates were the same as the HappyMe Mar 2014 #13
Sounds great. Xyzse Mar 2014 #14

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
2. Inequality is going to be a huge issue this year.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:10 PM
Mar 2014

It will be entertaining to see if/how candidates will deal with it.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
3. I did not know this
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 12:55 AM
Mar 2014

and I am delighted to learn of Working Families Party. Will be alert to them. Thank you , lots.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
5. Thank you, I had not heard of them. But it was inevitable that people would jump at the chance
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:05 AM
Mar 2014

to vote FOR a candidate, IF they got the chance rather than we have been TOLD to do for so long, vote AGAINST someone. That party COULD grow, and I'll say this, if the Dem Party, and we see it here a lot, continues to disrespect the very voters who have been loyal to the party their whole lives, this could be an option.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
8. From the bottom up, either inside the party or in tactical alliance.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:43 AM
Mar 2014

This has the makings of a grassroots counterweight to the corporate interests that dominate both major parties.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. The Working Families Party almost always cross-endorses the Democrat.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:50 AM
Mar 2014

The WFP takes advantage of New York's "fusion" election rule -- which I think most states do not have. Fusion means that the same candidate can appear on multiple ballot lines, and all votes for him or her on all lines will be added together.

All the successful "WFP candidates" named in the OP were, in fact, Democratic candidates who got most of their votes on the Democratic Party line.

The WFP has occasionally cross-endorsed a Republican instead. I can remember only one case where the WFP elected its own candidate. It was in a City Council district in Brooklyn, very heavily minority, where there is essentially no Republican Party. There the usual problem with third-party politics -- splitting our side's vote so that the Republican wins -- didn't apply. The WFP wasn't a third party there, it was the second party.

Does the WFP help push the Democrats to the left? I don't think so. Consider, for example, that Bill de Blasio, who has impressed many DUers, is Mayor now only because he won the Democratic primary. People who registered as members of the WFP couldn't even vote in that primary. In the general election, whoever won the Democratic primary would have won easily. The Republicans had no Giuliani or Bloomberg this time around. The extra votes de Blasio got on the WFP line made absolutely no difference.

In most of the important respects, the WFP is not a third party, at least not the way the Greens or the Libertarians are. Certainly the enthusiasts of the Green Party shouldn't think that the gushy prose quoted in the OP means that Green-type third-party politics has suddenly, miraculously become viable. Running your own candidate against the Democrat is still, in almost all cases, a recipe for Getting Republicans Elected Every November.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Third Party That’s Wi...