Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe IMF (Finally) Admits That Inequality Slows Growth
posted on TheNation.com by Kathleen Geier
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178726/imf-finally-admits-inequality-slows-growth
A big surprise this week was the
"release of a new IMF report that found that lower inequality is correlated with faster growth. This marked an amazing reversal. The IMF made itself notorious over the years through its strong support of anti-equality economic policies such as austerity budgets and radically weakened labor lawsall in the name of economic growth and development."
While this seems obvious to me
"Unsurprisingly, conservative economists and pundits continue to insist that high levels of inequality are necessary for economic growthyou dont want things so equal that those sainted job creators go Galt on you, do you? But a growing number of economists are coming to believe the opposite.
Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman, for example, argue that inequality has slowed growth. Late last year, Jared Bernstein wrote this excellent report about the impact of inequality on growth. The report zeroes in on three theories about the relationship between growth and inequality that are particularly promising."
See the article for the three theories.
Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman, for example, argue that inequality has slowed growth. Late last year, Jared Bernstein wrote this excellent report about the impact of inequality on growth. The report zeroes in on three theories about the relationship between growth and inequality that are particularly promising."
The definition of economic growth from Dictionary.com is "steady growth in the productive capacity of the economy" It seems obvious to me that you cant have growth if 99% of the population is poor. IMO the major factor in continuing the wealth disparity gap is that the 1% have learned it's easier to gain wealth (their idea of growth) than actually create it via production.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 471 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The IMF (Finally) Admits That Inequality Slows Growth (Original Post)
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
OP
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)1. Kick for the dinner crowd. nm
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)2. The IMF has been moving in this direction for a while.
The Chicago Boys faction (and Austrian school as well) have been losing control since the 2008. What you are seeing is the rise of a neo Keynseian faction. Oh and recommend
Agony
(2,605 posts)3. DUrec