Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 02:53 PM Mar 2014

The E-cig poll thread

I want to see where DU stands on this.

Personally, I think they should be regulated to ensure the safety of the product.

Feel free to post your reasoning in this thread too, I'd like to know more about the nuances of opinion on DU regrading this issues.


43 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
E-cigs should not be regulated in any way
4 (9%)
E-cigs should be regulated to ensure product safety only
37 (86%)
E-cigs should be regulated to ensure product safety and sweet flavors like fruit should be banned
0 (0%)
E-cigs should be regulated to ensure product safety, sweet flavors should be banned and fines established for vaping in public areas
2 (5%)
E-cigs should be regulated to ensure product safety, fines established for vaping in public areas, but sweet flavors should be allowed
0 (0%)
E-cigs should be banned outright
0 (0%)
i like 2 vote
0 (0%)
Do not wish to provide an answer
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The E-cig poll thread (Original Post) Kurska Mar 2014 OP
How about ... surrealAmerican Mar 2014 #1
As of current, I know of no one who sells e-cigs to under 18's anyway. Kurska Mar 2014 #2
"nuisances of opinion" Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #3
Lol nice catch Kurska Mar 2014 #4
Apparently some people are selling to kids somewhere Warpy Mar 2014 #7
So they say. Mariana Mar 2014 #9
Exactly. Regulations can slow it down but not stop it Warpy Mar 2014 #18
they still look like toys to me. yurbud Mar 2014 #80
E-cigs should be regulated to ensure product safety only bigwillq Mar 2014 #5
Product safety and advertising. Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #6
Should they be permitted to advertise zero-nicotine e-cigs? Mariana Mar 2014 #8
I have mixed feelings on that. Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #26
no they should not. Sunlei Mar 2014 #56
How hard is it to convert a zero-nicotine e-cig into a nicotine-containing one? jmowreader Mar 2014 #79
I'm in between the first two. nt ZombieHorde Mar 2014 #10
I'm against flavored e-cigs... penultimate Mar 2014 #11
add "not sold to those under 18" .... etherealtruth Mar 2014 #12
You beat me to it LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #15
I'm 53, I dont smoke and I have an e-cig that I use for my migraines McCamy Taylor Mar 2014 #21
You are right for the non-nicotine etherealtruth Mar 2014 #22
Why does a lack of nicotine make them safe? CreekDog Mar 2014 #53
I agree with you. I don't see any reason to have kids inhale 'scents' or 'flavors' other than they Sunlei Mar 2014 #67
agree 100% CreekDog Mar 2014 #75
I can't imagine why energumen Mar 2014 #77
For product safety and age restriction Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #13
I enjoy smoking as well, as bad as that sounds bigwillq Mar 2014 #14
Why is enjoyable about smoking? I understand the addiction. But cannot understand how..... Logical Mar 2014 #28
I find the process of smoking enjoyable and relaxing bigwillq Mar 2014 #30
Hmmm.... one of those things I guess I will never understand. Like people snorting coke, etc. n-t Logical Mar 2014 #31
Cool. I won't bore you with another story then...... bigwillq Mar 2014 #32
I appreciate your story though. Thanks!! nt Logical Mar 2014 #44
Same with me. I think it's the whole ritual and the anticipation as much as LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #63
It's an acquired taste Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #42
That's a little difficult to answer. sibelian Mar 2014 #61
Since people have been smoking Mariana Mar 2014 #64
I second the product safety and age restriction meow2u3 Mar 2014 #16
Since I'm not sure what "sin" means, except contextually, I can't vote in this poll... CTyankee Mar 2014 #17
Vaping is not a sin meow2u3 Mar 2014 #19
OK, I am really talking about the science attached to this... CTyankee Mar 2014 #23
I hate the sin tax on cigs in CT bigwillq Mar 2014 #20
I don't understand a tobacco tax when you have no health system Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #43
Not sure about soda but isn't fast food taxed? CTyankee Mar 2014 #50
They are taxed bigwillq Mar 2014 #57
Healthy food should be taxed MORE than bad food? Can you clarify that? CTyankee Mar 2014 #58
Fast food should be taxed more than healthy food (nt) bigwillq Mar 2014 #59
that's what I thought... CTyankee Mar 2014 #60
This time change messes with me bigwillq Mar 2014 #62
I probably misread...I don't think I could really claim the time change cuz I've been this way for CTyankee Mar 2014 #73
Me too, but I got a really good e-cig for Christmas and haven't smoked since. rucky Mar 2014 #27
They sound tempting Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #40
What do you want to regulate? krawhitham Mar 2014 #24
I think some folks just want to control others and their choices The Straight Story Mar 2014 #25
It's counter to libertarianism gollygee Mar 2014 #34
not opposed to regulation but choice limitation in things The Straight Story Mar 2014 #37
The government regulates cigarettes because they don't want children to use them gollygee Mar 2014 #38
You can't tell if someone around you is using one Mariana Mar 2014 #69
The control are the major tobacco firm's stranglehold on those who smoke. TheBlackAdder Mar 2014 #39
+1,000,000,000!!! Ghost in the Machine Mar 2014 #74
Most of the voters here want to regulate product safety, Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #35
Question remains, what do you want to regulate? What do you believe is currently unsafe? krawhitham Mar 2014 #47
It really is simple. Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #49
I want to regulate the nicotine Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #41
safety only. make sure the product doesn't have fungus/bacteria in the liquids, small parts that Sunlei Mar 2014 #51
It's not about the flavor it is about the nicotine. Tikki Mar 2014 #29
If you use an E-Cig... Just admit the nicotine dependence and oral fixation needs. nt TheBlackAdder Mar 2014 #33
I'll admit it and I'm not a damn bit ashamed of it. phleshdef Mar 2014 #45
I admit it - although I use zero nicotine fluid now. Mariana Mar 2014 #65
Why would anyone want to ban vaping in public places? Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #36
Some folks have problems with mouths; the things going in them... Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #46
Why should people be allowed to use a tobacco product in a way that doesn't smell or bother anybody Douglas Carpenter Mar 2014 #48
It seems that those who are opposed to public vaping Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #72
design one that looks like an "asthma inhaler" could solve the in public problem. Sunlei Mar 2014 #52
I'll give you one better Revanchist Mar 2014 #54
That's pretty noticeable too :) who wants to carry a coke can around. Sunlei Mar 2014 #55
People already do that. Mariana Mar 2014 #66
I have thought the same thing, but not an asthma inhaler Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #68
Most of the kits come with batteries that have LED's on them. Mariana Mar 2014 #70
If people stop smoking cigarettes and instead smoke ecigs, isn't that am improvement? ... spin Mar 2014 #78
Sure - let's get the government to regulate them like they do ohheckyeah Mar 2014 #71
I say reglulate for product safety. Mojo Electro Mar 2014 #76
How about this: jmowreader Mar 2014 #81
A very thoughtful post Kurska Mar 2014 #82
I can only think of one thing I missed jmowreader Mar 2014 #83
Where I buy mine locally here in Tucson, AZ Michigan-Arizona Mar 2014 #84
I will follow what local authorities decide to do in the matter nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #85
Almost 4 years without a cigarette thanks to Vaping Vidi Mar 2014 #86

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
2. As of current, I know of no one who sells e-cigs to under 18's anyway.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 03:00 PM
Mar 2014

However, that might have been a good option.

I'm 100% sure everyone on DU agrees with that anyways. I've never seen someone opposed to that idea when it has been mentioned.

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
7. Apparently some people are selling to kids somewhere
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 04:18 PM
Mar 2014

which is always somewhere other than where you live but you just know they are.

I say fine, stupid kids are going to do stupid things and when they run out of juice and try the real thing, there is no way they're going to switch to it, it tastes nasty.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
9. So they say.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 04:36 PM
Mar 2014

Of course, kids get regular cigs if they want them, so whatever methods they use to do that (fake ID, older brother, whatever), they can also use to buy e-cigs.

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
18. Exactly. Regulations can slow it down but not stop it
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:49 PM
Mar 2014

and sometimes that's the best you can do and that's not a bad thing.

It's like those apocryphal cyanide laced Halloween candies that have parents throwing out all the apples and home made caramel corn the kids bring home. While some sleaze somewhere might be selling the things to kids without fake IDs, there aren't that many of his brethren.

And it will still turn kids off to the real thing when they try it. That's a good thing.

Ms. Toad

(35,540 posts)
6. Product safety and advertising.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 03:58 PM
Mar 2014

Nicotine is highly addictive. Advertising of the kind which created generations of people addicted to cigarettes should be regulated. Tobacco companies are already employing the same tactics they used so successfully to create generations of people addicted to cigarette smoking to entice people to use e-cigs. In order to survive, they need a new (addicted) client base - and they know very well how to create one since this is not their first time at the ball.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
8. Should they be permitted to advertise zero-nicotine e-cigs?
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 04:34 PM
Mar 2014

Since they're NOT addictive in any way if they have no nicotine.

Ms. Toad

(35,540 posts)
26. I have mixed feelings on that.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:12 PM
Mar 2014

But I think ultimately I would subject it to the same restrictions - in the way that non-alcoholic beer and wine are often subject to the advertising restrictions placed on alcoholic beverages.

It isn't that the zero nicotine e-cigs are addictive, but that they are indistinguishable in appearance and source from ones which contain nicotine. Nicotine addiction is such a powerful addiction - and the money behind e-cigs is the same money which deliberately targeted minors, and women, and any new audience which it perceived would provide it with a financially lucrative future as long as it hooked them young. I don't trust them.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
56. no they should not.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:25 AM
Mar 2014

In no way should an advertised candy or sweet look like a person is smoking a cigarette.

jmowreader

(51,506 posts)
79. How hard is it to convert a zero-nicotine e-cig into a nicotine-containing one?
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 01:31 AM
Mar 2014

The disposable ones may pose a problem, but the refillables and the ones where the battery and tank/cartridge separate are pretty easy to switch between nicotine and non-nicotine.

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
11. I'm against flavored e-cigs...
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 04:48 PM
Mar 2014

particularly those ones Po-210 flavored ones imported from Russia... I don't trust Putin when he say's there safe.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
15. You beat me to it
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:37 PM
Mar 2014

In Utah you have to be 19 to buy, the same as for regular tobacco, and I have no problem with age restrictions.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
21. I'm 53, I dont smoke and I have an e-cig that I use for my migraines
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:59 PM
Mar 2014

as aroma therapy. The liquid has no nicotine. One is green apple. The other is lavender. I don't see why someone under 18 can't have no nicotine e-cigs.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
22. You are right for the non-nicotine
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 06:02 PM
Mar 2014

Nicotine is a particularly tough addiction to beat ... I hate the idea of making it easier for kids to become addicted to anything.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
53. Why does a lack of nicotine make them safe?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 07:07 AM
Mar 2014

There are chemicals and compounds, you should never assume something's healthy to put deeply into your lungs on purpose, and for the developing lungs of child? Have you thought as deeply as you've inhaled. I don't think so.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
67. I agree with you. I don't see any reason to have kids inhale 'scents' or 'flavors' other than they
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:06 PM
Mar 2014

'copy' adults smoking.

I do understand the use of (NON- tobacco) e-cig nicotine to get off regular 'cancer stick' smoking. e-cigs are a huge aid to quit cigarettes.

I don't understand why adults would want to inhale flavors or scents either

energumen

(76 posts)
77. I can't imagine why
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 10:52 PM
Mar 2014

Adults would want to inhale scents either. The people using those Glade/Febreeze air freshener things are insane

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
13. For product safety and age restriction
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:33 PM
Mar 2014

My SO keeps trying to get me to try e-cigs as I'm one of those people who actually enjoy smoking.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
14. I enjoy smoking as well, as bad as that sounds
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:35 PM
Mar 2014

and is. I quit several times. I even tried the e-cig for a bit; it was pretty good. But still nothing better than a real cigarette.


 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
28. Why is enjoyable about smoking? I understand the addiction. But cannot understand how.....
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:22 PM
Mar 2014

breathing in smoke is fun.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
30. I find the process of smoking enjoyable and relaxing
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:31 PM
Mar 2014

It starts with opening up the pack, the smell, pulling a fresh smoke out of the pack.

Then, getting a lighter out, clicking the spring a few times (I like that sound). Moving on, I find the act of lighting a cigarette kind of hypnotic.

I like the feel of a cigarette in my hand. I also enjoy inhaling and exhaling the smoke out of my lungs and mouth. You get used to the taste and the burn of the smoke.

I guess I just really enjoy the whole process of smoking.

I've tried other methods (lollipops, E-Cigs) when I quit, but nothing satisfied my oral fixation like smoking an actual cigarette.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
31. Hmmm.... one of those things I guess I will never understand. Like people snorting coke, etc. n-t
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:35 PM
Mar 2014
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
32. Cool. I won't bore you with another story then......
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:37 PM
Mar 2014

I enjoy rolling the dollar bill.......



Have a good one.

LuvNewcastle

(17,030 posts)
63. Same with me. I think it's the whole ritual and the anticipation as much as
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:52 AM
Mar 2014

the act itself. Sort of like sex, I guess. I have a bit of a fire fetish, too, so I'm sure that's part of it as well. It's very hard for those of us who genuinely like smoking to quit. I did quit with e-cigs for 3 weeks, and that is by far the longest I've gone without smoking since I started at age 15. I plan to try again, but I can only do it when I'm determined. I'm pretty fed up with the cost (again), so I think I might be quitting soon.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
42. It's an acquired taste
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:13 PM
Mar 2014

As bigwillq said, it's the whole process. The idea with e-cigs is that they replace the nicotine we're hooked on without all the nasty chemicals in tobacco and also replace the action of smoking.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
61. That's a little difficult to answer.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:31 AM
Mar 2014

I know it smells awful, but the taste isn't the same as the smell. It becomes an acquired taste, like whiskey. People end up with favourite brands for this reason.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
64. Since people have been smoking
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 10:49 AM
Mar 2014

various kinds of plant matter for centuries or perhaps millennia, there must be something they all liked about it.

meow2u3

(24,927 posts)
16. I second the product safety and age restriction
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:42 PM
Mar 2014

I nix the "sin tax" on an activity that's not a sin.

CTyankee

(65,085 posts)
17. Since I'm not sure what "sin" means, except contextually, I can't vote in this poll...
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:46 PM
Mar 2014

I really don't have enough information to make an informed vote...

CTyankee

(65,085 posts)
23. OK, I am really talking about the science attached to this...
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 06:57 PM
Mar 2014

I know next to nothing about vaping but I do have an aquaintance who uses an e-cig device. I don't condemn her at all...I consider her a very concerned person who wants to quit smoking and I am supportive.

But I don't know anything about the science about this. I can't vote as a consequence...

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
20. I hate the sin tax on cigs in CT
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:54 PM
Mar 2014

I get it:
They tax a product that is known to be unhealthy and they tax a product that most folks choose not to use. If you don't want to pay the tax, don't smoke.

Following this logic, though, I feel they should tax other unhealthy products like soda, fast food, etc.
We know these items can lead to disease, and folks can choose not to consume those items.
So why not include those items as part of the sin tax?
Government is being discriminatory towards smokers.

Taxes are so high in CT. Even with all the tax money, the state never seems to have enough money. They are wasting our money if you ask me.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
43. I don't understand a tobacco tax when you have no health system
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:20 PM
Mar 2014

I get why the government taxes smokes here (UK). We have the NHS, smoking costs the NHS around £6.8 million a year so we're taxed to make up the funds. That makes sense to me (although we actually pay more in taxes than we cost in treatment). But I don't understand it when you don't have a healthcare system to support.

CTyankee

(65,085 posts)
50. Not sure about soda but isn't fast food taxed?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:20 AM
Mar 2014

I don't buy/consume either one except very occasionally...so what do I know. But I know restaurant meals are taxed, no matter how healthy they may be...

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
57. They are taxed
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:52 AM
Mar 2014

I just feel they should be taxed more heavily than non-fast food. Just like how they add additional taxes on to cigarettes.

CTyankee

(65,085 posts)
58. Healthy food should be taxed MORE than bad food? Can you clarify that?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:57 AM
Mar 2014

Sorry if I misinterpreted what you said...

CTyankee

(65,085 posts)
73. I probably misread...I don't think I could really claim the time change cuz I've been this way for
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:05 PM
Mar 2014

a while now.

rucky

(35,211 posts)
27. Me too, but I got a really good e-cig for Christmas and haven't smoked since.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:18 PM
Mar 2014

I enjoyed smoking, but this is even better. Get one that uses the drops, a glass chamber and has a good battery. Then the trick is to find a flavor that gives you that same "hit" feel when you inhale. I sway between a cinnamon one and a mint-based mix, but had to try a lot of formulas before I found some that I liked better than smoking.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
40. They sound tempting
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:08 PM
Mar 2014

What I think I'm going to do is try a bunch of disposables until I find a brand I like.

krawhitham

(4,889 posts)
24. What do you want to regulate?
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:01 PM
Mar 2014

99% of the people here want regulation

Do you want to regulate the batteries?
Do you want to regulate The Mods (what the batteries go in)?
Do you want to regulate the tanks?
Do you want to regulate the atomizers?
Do you want to regulate the cartridges?
Do you want to regulate all in one units?
Do you want to regulate the flavors?
Do you want to regulate the Nicotine?

Do you want to stop users from making their own e-juice?

Regulation = taxation plain and simple and in order for the FDA to regulate E-Cigs they will have to classify them as a tobacco product. Last time I checked my vaper has ZERO tobacco in it. Nicotine can be sourced from other plants besides tobacco.


What do you want to regulate?

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
25. I think some folks just want to control others and their choices
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:03 PM
Mar 2014

Which seems counter to liberalism in general imho.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
37. not opposed to regulation but choice limitation in things
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:42 PM
Mar 2014

like abortion (though some do like to push for more regulation in the name of health) would be a little over the line don't you think?

Just because some regulation makes sense does not mean all of it does.

The government can know what is best for people but that does not mean it has the right to limit your freedom to do it.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
38. The government regulates cigarettes because they don't want children to use them
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:46 PM
Mar 2014

and I think e-cigs should be regulated like them, but I don't understand why people shouldn't be allowed to use them outside or whatever one of the choices was. Can you even tell if someone around you is using one?

I wouldn't want kids to have them available, I'd rather they not be advertised on TV or to kids, but otherwise I don't care and don't see why people shouldn't be able to use them. Or marijuana for that matter. I don't see why society at large is affected or would be affected much by either one. It really just affects the individuals using them. Alcohol has a worse effect on society than either e-cigs or marijuana IMO.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
69. You can't tell if someone around you is using one
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:37 PM
Mar 2014

unless they're blowing huge clouds of vapor around. It's very easy not to do that. People vape all the time in all kinds of places, discreetly, and no one notices.

TheBlackAdder

(28,960 posts)
39. The control are the major tobacco firm's stranglehold on those who smoke.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:55 PM
Mar 2014

Besides that, one of those firms was the co-founder of the Tea Party.

That's where your money is going. Fighting health care, the environment, and the many laws that protect Americans.

===

Even it you get those cigs from an American Tribe, thinking you're not funding them... you are, as they're owned by the big tobacco firms.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
74. +1,000,000,000!!!
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 05:50 PM
Mar 2014

I always thought that "Live and let Live" was one of the founding principles of being a Liberal. Let people live their lives as they see fit, as long as they aren't hurting anyone else in the process, and keep the Government out of our *personal* lives so they could stay focused on keeping the corporations in check, making sure they weren't mistreating their workers, were paying a fair wage for labor/services provided, providing safe workplaces, providing proper breaks per hours worked, making sure our air, waterways and groundwater weren't being polluted intentionally or unintentionally.. and many other things to protect our freedoms and rights to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness".

We wanted the Government out of our bedrooms, out of our homes and taking care of the Country first and foremost! What's they difference between a woman saying "my body, my choice" in regards to abortion and *me* saying the same thing about hitting a joint, or hitting a nicotine-free E-Cigarette?? The Federal Government has more, and bigger, things to worry about right now. Things like creating jobs, fixing our infrastructure, helping the homeless, needy and poor fixing Health CARE, not friggin, Health Insurance Companies! I could keep going, but I think you get the gist of what I'm saying...

Peace,


Ghost

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
35. Most of the voters here want to regulate product safety,
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:38 PM
Mar 2014

which is not an FDA issue. And since we have (and should have) agencies to regulate consumer product safety, taxation is not necessarily a result. I don't see many people advocating regulation of anything but product safety.

krawhitham

(4,889 posts)
47. Question remains, what do you want to regulate? What do you believe is currently unsafe?
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:55 PM
Mar 2014

An e-cig is a simple object. A case/mod holds a battery, it has a switch that supplies power to a metal coil that when heated vaporizes a liquid

Do you want to regulate the batteries?
Do you want to regulate The Mods (what the batteries go in)?
Do you want to regulate the tanks?
Do you want to regulate the atomizers?
Do you want to regulate the cartridges?
Do you want to regulate all in one units?
Do you want to regulate the flavors?
Do you want to regulate the Nicotine?

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
49. It really is simple.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 09:12 PM
Mar 2014

All of the components should be safe to use. No fires, no explosions, etc. I am not saying that any parts or units are unsafe right now, since I do not know. But I think that there should be some regulation that says these problems, if they do occur, are not acceptable to be sold.

A lamp is a simple object as well, but I do not want to worry whether it will start a fire when I plug it in.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
41. I want to regulate the nicotine
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:10 PM
Mar 2014

Neat nicotine is a drug and phenomenally poisonous. I want to see that part regulated in the same way as we age restrict alcohol. If your personal mix doesn't include nicotine, good luck and more power to you.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
51. safety only. make sure the product doesn't have fungus/bacteria in the liquids, small parts that
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:46 AM
Mar 2014

could be inhaled into the lungs. The nicotine part is toxic in high doses if say a child gets ahold of it and drinks it all, decent child proof packaging on nicotine part of the products.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
65. I admit it - although I use zero nicotine fluid now.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 10:51 AM
Mar 2014

So now that I've admitted it, what, exactly, has that accomplished?

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
48. Why should people be allowed to use a tobacco product in a way that doesn't smell or bother anybody
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:59 PM
Mar 2014

or hurt any bystanders? That's cheating.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
72. It seems that those who are opposed to public vaping
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:04 PM
Mar 2014

have no reasons as to why they are opposed. Talk about cheating.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
55. That's pretty noticeable too :) who wants to carry a coke can around.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:21 AM
Mar 2014

what I meant is a way for nicotine addicts to take their oral dose without the 'public regulators' freaking out. There is always gum like President O uses or used to use People seem to like inhaling their dose.

People could always hold their 'hit' until no vapor comes out or exhale into their sleeve lol.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
66. People already do that.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 11:02 AM
Mar 2014

Stealth vaping is very easy to do. A rig that doesn't resemble a cigarette, and that has no glowing LED on it, helps a lot, as does not holding the same way a smoker holds a cigarette. If someone doesn't look like they're smoking, and they don't blow huge clouds of vapor around, no one pays any attention.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
68. I have thought the same thing, but not an asthma inhaler
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:16 PM
Mar 2014

(although that is excellent, since who would confront someone with an asthma inhaler). I am at a loss as to why it has to look just like a cigarette, and light up like a cigarette. A pen shape was what I was thinking. When I went looking for e-cigs, I at least wanted one that was black or had a color to it and did not have a red light. I only found one type like that and when I ordered it online, it was out of stock....and after a few months of "out of stock", I just gave up. But I still want something that does not look like a cigarette. For years, before patches or gum or e-cigs, I have said that all I want is a nicotine delivery device....meaning I did not need to have a cigarette with all the other chemicals and the dangerous smoke. Someone was listening to me, I guess, but these cigarette replicas make no sense---they still draw attention.

Mariana

(15,157 posts)
70. Most of the kits come with batteries that have LED's on them.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:53 PM
Mar 2014

That's a fact. But you can buy compatible batteries separately that don't have them. You can also buy black replacement LED covers (very inexpensive) that hide the light, for some types of batteries. You can even cover the LED with a bit of electrical tape and it won't interfere with the operation of the device.

I don't know how long it's been since you looked, but black e-cig kits are very popular and they shouldn't be hard to find.

spin

(17,493 posts)
78. If people stop smoking cigarettes and instead smoke ecigs, isn't that am improvement? ...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 11:55 PM
Mar 2014

Ecigs for one thing do not endanger others.

Even better is that ecigs allow some people to totally quit smoking who might have been unable to do so.

One big advantage of ecigs is that they don't contain 3000 different chemicals like cigarettes and another advantage is that the buyer can step down the level of nicotine in his ecig to zero and be only inhaling water vapor.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
71. Sure - let's get the government to regulate them like they do
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:03 PM
Mar 2014

food. They can allow the juice to have rat feces in it, just like hamburger. The juice can be made from GMO products, just like our food. The juice can be sold past it's expiration date, just like our food. Hell, they can even declare some of the juices as vegetables, just like they did catsup.

Mojo Electro

(362 posts)
76. I say reglulate for product safety.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 07:34 PM
Mar 2014

I bought a vape setup to quit smoking cigs. I'm very happy with the results so far. Even though sometimes I still feel like I want a real cig, I have not bought a pack. I'm starting to feel the benefits of not smoking anymore, not being winded, having more energy, and I no longer worry about my clothes smelling like smoke. So far so good.

jmowreader

(51,506 posts)
81. How about this:
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 02:08 AM
Mar 2014

1) No sales to under-18.

2) The part of the charger that plugs into the wall must meet electrical safety standards published by an organization like Underwriters Laboratory. (There are UL-approved USB chargers on the market that aren't expensive.)

3) E-liquid can contain only purified water, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, food-grade flavors, and nicotine. (I've seen reports that Chinese liquid contains metals like tin.) E-liquid may not contain controlled substances.

4) Liquid must be labeled with nicotine content, and the labeling must be accurate. (IIRC someone was selling shop-made liquid with insanely high levels of nicotine and it was making people sick.) Liquid must also be labeled with the name and physical address of the producer.

5) Anyone may mix their own liquid for personal use. Nicotine liquid sold to individuals must be labeled with an accurate statement of nicotine concentration. Crystalline nicotine, due to its hazardous nature, may not be sold to individuals. Individuals who prepare e-liquid for sale as a "cottage" business must have the capability to meet the composition and labeling requirements listed herein.

6) Retail establishments that produce e-liquid for sale on the premises must have appropriate weighing and measuring equipment, personal protective equipment for the employee performing the mixing operation, and a sink to clean equipment before and after mixing.

7) Any container of bulk e-liquid holding one ounce or less will be taxed at the rate of twenty-five cents per container. Any container of e-liquid holding more than one ounce will be taxed at the rate of twenty-five cents per ounce. Any pre-filled cartridge, cartomizer or tank will be taxed at the rate of five cents per unit. Containers of nicotine liquid will be taxed as e-liquid, and the tax will be calculated as follows: determine the number of ounces of 24ml e-liquid that can be produced from the contents of the bottle, subtract three ounces to compensate for nicotine liquid clinging to the walls of the bottle, and apply a 25 cent per ounce tax to the bottle.

jmowreader

(51,506 posts)
83. I can only think of one thing I missed
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:59 AM
Mar 2014

Bottles of liquid nicotine would be required to come with an MSDS and instructions telling you how much nicotine to add to your e-liquid to get various nicotine levels in the final product.

Michigan-Arizona

(762 posts)
84. Where I buy mine locally here in Tucson, AZ
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:39 PM
Mar 2014

You can not even enter the building with a minor. You can't even bring a new born baby into the store. No kid's period....


The charger that come's with any e-cig I've bought I can use part of my cell phone charger with it....


My bottles of juice are labeled with the nicotine level, stated on the bottle if I get extra flavor, their company name , address & phone number....

I pay 8 1/2 percent tax on my total bill. I was paying over 9 percent till they lowered the rate down to over 8...

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
85. I will follow what local authorities decide to do in the matter
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:41 PM
Mar 2014

and will not bother people with their decisions. Suffice it to say, regulations are coming.

Vidi

(7 posts)
86. Almost 4 years without a cigarette thanks to Vaping
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:40 PM
Mar 2014

Four years ago, I was a mess.

I had tried everything to quit smoking over the years and failed miserably. I couldnt laugh without it descending into a coughing fit. I couldnt climb a flight of stairs without being forced to sit and catch my breath when I reached the top. In the winter, when I went outside, I couldnt breathe and would end up coughing so badly I would vomit.

I had tried everything to quit and failed. I had resigned myself to the idea that cigarettes were going to kill me and kill me very soon.

Then I heard about electronic cigarettes. I tried one...it was ok...but I was still smoking. So I went to a forum ( the biggest e cig forum in the world ) and asked a few questions. The answers came quickly...yeah...the e cig I bought was not very good..try this one here.

And I did.

And since that day four years ago, I havent had a single cigarette. I can climb stairs again, I can laugh again, I can walk out into -30 weather without ending up doubled over coughing my brains out.

Electronic cigarettes changed the quality of my life...and gave my my life back...all without the horrible effects of the 4,000 plus chemical tobacco companies have pushed into cigarettes to make then even more addicting.

If you are a smoker, I strongly urge you to make the switch and get back your life.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The E-cig poll thread