Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:37 PM Mar 2014

Elderly couple kicked out of Va. McDonald's for sitting too long

Elderly couple kicked out of Va. McDonald's for sitting too long


WASHINGTON -- After an elderly couple got the boot from their local McDonald's for sitting too long, management and the owner are not answering the question if there really is a 30-minute sitting limit at the Culpeper, Va. fast food restaurant.

Carl Becker, 87, a World War II veteran, and his wife Barbara Becker, 81, say they both were at the Culpeper McDonald's on Feb. 21 at about 2:30 p.m. when they were approached by the manager.

The location is a place the pair has frequented for years.

"And he says 'You two are going to have to leave.' He said 'Your half hour is up and we need to clean this floor,'" says Barbara Becker. The restaurant was not crowded at the time, she says, and the two were stunned. This was the first time they had ever been asked to leave a McDonald's.

http://www.wtop.com/41/3577900/How-long-is-too-long-to-sit

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elderly couple kicked out of Va. McDonald's for sitting too long (Original Post) The Straight Story Mar 2014 OP
I see a problem is sitting too long. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #1
Rudeness abounds. There's no excuse for Laurian Mar 2014 #2
Why do they point out that he's a WWII vet? Orrex Mar 2014 #3
As are all posts on DU, especially yours The Straight Story Mar 2014 #6
Mine especially, yes. Orrex Mar 2014 #12
Well played then The Straight Story Mar 2014 #15
Anyway, 30 minutes definitely seems like an arbitrarily short allotment. Orrex Mar 2014 #17
and the jury results In_The_Wind Mar 2014 #22
Enough to get the passive-aggressive squad to ineffectually storm the proverbial and petulant beache LanternWaste Mar 2014 #9
I love it when the subject line makes up most of the body of the post that follows. Orrex Mar 2014 #14
That's an impressive thought. LanternWaste Mar 2014 #19
Whoa. Orrex Mar 2014 #20
It's like you're reading my mind... LanternWaste Mar 2014 #21
No kidding. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #16
Because good patriotic Americans have a sad when they imagine someone fighting in heated combat... JVS Mar 2014 #18
McD's run a time clock on customers? Downwinder Mar 2014 #4
Easy solution to problem. Do not eat there. Ever. Again. CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #5
^^^^^This^^^^ riqster Mar 2014 #7
:nods in agreement: Ed Suspicious Mar 2014 #8
That's just what is going to happen. Repeatedly. 1000words Mar 2014 #13
Interesting. MineralMan Mar 2014 #10
"We were kicked out unnecessarily and we're just not that kind of people." JVS Mar 2014 #11

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
2. Rudeness abounds. There's no excuse for
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:45 PM
Mar 2014

treating people this way. More and more, I prefer to stay home to avoid the hustle, bustle and rudeness that seems to permeate much of society. This intolerance and rudeness even shows up when you're in the car. I'm developing a bunker mentality!

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
3. Why do they point out that he's a WWII vet?
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:46 PM
Mar 2014

Is that part of why he got booted? Or why he shouldn't have gotten booted?


In any case, this is an earth-shaking news story of intense of national significance.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
6. As are all posts on DU, especially yours
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:47 PM
Mar 2014

"In any case, this is an earth-shaking news story of intense of national significance."

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
12. Mine especially, yes.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:02 PM
Mar 2014

I guess my point is that I expect that the same people who objected to the SI cover because it wasn't "of national interest" will object to your post with the same enthusiasm.

I just wanted to be first in line.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
22. and the jury results
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:24 PM
Mar 2014

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

this is a deliberate smear and call out to the people who objected to the SI cover.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:19 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
9. Enough to get the passive-aggressive squad to ineffectually storm the proverbial and petulant beache
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:58 PM
Mar 2014

"this is an earth-shaking news story of intense of national significance..."

Enough to get the passive-aggressive squad to ineffectually storm the proverbial and petulant beaches to find new and improved things to trivialize for the glory of Pretense.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
14. I love it when the subject line makes up most of the body of the post that follows.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:04 PM
Mar 2014

I love it when the subject line makes up most of the body of the post that follows.

JVS

(61,935 posts)
18. Because good patriotic Americans have a sad when they imagine someone fighting in heated combat...
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:08 PM
Mar 2014

back in the big war only to have their freedom savagely violated seventy years later by being told that they should have finished their egg mcmuffin before mid afternoon.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
5. Easy solution to problem. Do not eat there. Ever. Again.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:47 PM
Mar 2014

I guarantee you that any establishment that invites me to leave will get their wishes for the rest of their lifetimes.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
7. ^^^^^This^^^^
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:49 PM
Mar 2014

"I guarantee you that any establishment that invites me to leave will get their wishes for the rest of their lifetimes."

Damn skippy.

Muck FcDonald's!

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
10. Interesting.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 03:58 PM
Mar 2014

Of course, this will lead the evening local news and make the local papers. Lots of people are not going to be pleased by this manager tossing a couple of oldsters from his store. It will not work out well for that McDonald's location, I'm sure.

I wonder if this was the top manager or one of the many "assistant managers" every McDonalds seems to have. Lots of those are managers in name only, and cannot even manage themselves very well. If that was the case, that assistant manager will probably lose his job over this gaffe.

If the restaurant isn't crowded, let the old folks sit there. Who cares, really? Is there a 30 minute rule? Maybe there is, but still. Leave the old folks alone.

My parents are both 89 years old. It can take them almost half an hour just to get into a McDonalds and place their order, sometimes. Not really, but they move slowly these days. People over 80 who are still getting out and around deserve a little forbearance, as far as I'm concerned. They've earned it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elderly couple kicked out...