Putin’s Man in Crimea Is Ukraine’s Worst Nightmare

[okaawhatever]

A month ago, when Ukraine’s old regime was just starting to crack under the pressure of a revolution, few people in the country had ever heard of Sergei Aksyonov. He was then a marginal figure even in the local politics of the region of Crimea. His Russian Unity party had only three seats in the regional legislature and no representation anywhere else. But that has not stopped him from taking charge. In late January, as the protesters in Kiev began seizing government buildings, Aksyonov started to form an army on the Crimean peninsula. Now he is the de facto leader of the entire region, a post that has thrust him into the center of the most dire political crisis Europe has confronted in years.

SNIP

So far, the most revealing aspect of his time in power has been the way he came to possess it. Before dawn on Feb. 27, at least two dozen heavily armed men stormed the Crimean parliament building and the nearby headquarters of the regional government, bringing with them a cache of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades. A few hours later, Aksyonov walked into the parliament and, after a brief round of talks with the gunmen, began to gather a quorum of the chamber’s lawmakers.

It is not clear whether the parliament was seized that day on his orders. On the one hand, the masked gunmen identified themselves as members of Crimea’s “self-defense forces,” all of which are, according to Aksyonov, directly under his control. On the other, he claims the seizure of the buildings was done “spontaneously” by a mysterious group of fighters. “We only knew that these were Russian nationalist forces,” he tells TIME in an interview Sunday. “These were people who share our Russian ideology. So if they wanted to kill someone, they would have killed the nightwatchmen who were inside.”

Instead, they let the guards go, sealed the doors and only allowed the lawmakers whom Aksyonov invited to enter the building. Various media accounts have disputed whether he was able to gather a quorum of 50 of his peers before the session convened that day, and some Crimean legislators who were registered as present have said they did not come near the building. In any case, those who did arrive could hardly have voted their conscience while pro-Russian gunmen stood in the wings with rocket launchers. Both of the votes held that day were unanimous. The first appointed Aksyonov, a rookie statesman with less than four years experience as a local parliamentarian, as the new Prime Minister of Crimea. The second vote called for a referendum on the peninsula’s secession from Ukraine.

Continued at Link: Very interesting article that also explains his background and what may be his motivation
http://time.com/19097/putin-crimea-russia-ukraine-aksyonov/

[Igel]

1. Impossible.

You're describing a coup in terms much more clear than anything that happened in Kyiv.

Nationalism? Independent armed militia?

(Rather like Georgia in a lot of ways. Not the US state. And not from 2005 or thereabouts. More like 1922 and the following couple of years. Have a small government set up by coup with no real power. Then have the Russian Army come in, declaring that small government to be the only true government there. The rest is history. Come to think of it, that was also history.)


Then again, we can't let the rhetoric ratchet up too much. Volume 22 of the Russian dictionary I subscribed to years ago finally showed up--they may be bowdlerized under Putin (not under El'tsyn), but they're being printed regularly and on paper that's worthy of the greatness of the Russian language (/snark). They're up to rasplokh ("off guard, unawares&quot and I'd hate to miss out on the rest of the Rs, or S through Ya. Probably take 2-3 volumes for R, 2 for S, 2 for T, but U through Ya should go quick. 8 or 9 volumes? They should be done by 2020, maybe even by the end of 2017.