Digital humans

is turning to computetized human images instead of using real people? Is it financial?

There is life after TV.

Sweden used a fully computerized "human-looking" visage of a 10 year-old Philippine girl to catch 1000 on-line child predators. It was a clever trap and the image did fool all of those men. When I saw the computerized image, though, I was able to discern immediately that it was a digital image of a human.

There is something about a digitized human image that is unsettling and unbelievable to my eyes. Maybe that will change in the future as the technology gets better. But right now, if the image trying to sell me a product or position isn't believable, then what the image is saying automatically becomes unbelievable too.

Street cleaning, toxic clean-up, political dissident disposal, Monsanto objector collection, etc.

Persistent late night tapping, gently rapping, rapping at your chamber door.

(full movie)

There are getting to be a lot of computer generated life like human images in print ads, online and on TV. Can you discern when the images are digitized or real and does it bother you in any way if they are digitized?

It's The Incredible Hulk #277 all over again, people!