General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDigital humans
in TV commercials are just creeping me out. I have to switch the channel when commercials like Ocuvite or Maytag come on that feature digitized humans instead of human actors. Something about the faces are so unsettling that I can't stand to watch them. Are these companies too cheap to hire actors or is something else going on?
TheJames
(120 posts)Javaman
(62,521 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)is turning to computetized human images instead of using real people? Is it financial?
Trillo
(9,154 posts)There is life after TV.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Sweden used a fully computerized "human-looking" visage of a 10 year-old Philippine girl to catch 1000 on-line child predators. It was a clever trap and the image did fool all of those men. When I saw the computerized image, though, I was able to discern immediately that it was a digital image of a human.
There is something about a digitized human image that is unsettling and unbelievable to my eyes. Maybe that will change in the future as the technology gets better. But right now, if the image trying to sell me a product or position isn't believable, then what the image is saying automatically becomes unbelievable too.
NBachers
(17,107 posts)Street cleaning, toxic clean-up, political dissident disposal, Monsanto objector collection, etc.
Persistent late night tapping, gently rapping, rapping at your chamber door.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)(full movie)
There are getting to be a lot of computer generated life like human images in print ads, online and on TV. Can you discern when the images are digitized or real and does it bother you in any way if they are digitized?
Orrex
(63,203 posts)It's The Incredible Hulk #277 all over again, people!