Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 01:42 PM Mar 2014

This Isn’t the First Time that a Giant Plane With GPS Tracking Has Vanished

The disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight 370 is the most bizarre story in aviation history. Or is it? A plane disappeared in 2003 under even stranger circumstances

Ever since planes were invented, there have been stories of them disappearing mysteriously. There was Amelia Earhart in 1937, Pan Am Flight 7 in 1957 and the Flying Tiger Line in 1963.

we live in the digital era. Thousands of satellites roam above the earth, shooting aerial images directly to our computers. How does a massive plane with built-in GPS and high-tech instruments meant to track and telegraph its every move suddenly disappear? It makes no sense. The story of Malaysian Airlines flight 370 resembles something closer to fiction; it could be the basis for a David Lynch movie, or an episode out of The X-Files.

But it’s not the first time a modern plane—with GPS and all the other trappings of 21st-century aviation—has disappeared. Before Flight 370, there was just one other jet of this size to have disappeared in modern aviation history: the Boeing 844AA.


more

http://www.vocativ.com/tech/machines/isnt-first-time-giant-plane-gps-tracking-vanished/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Isn’t the First Time that a Giant Plane With GPS Tracking Has Vanished (Original Post) n2doc Mar 2014 OP
Not comparable Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #1
not to mention all the passengers. Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #12
Fascinating, thanks! I'd never heard of that... (nt) petronius Mar 2014 #2
My question: moondust Mar 2014 #3
because it would drive the ground controller Corgigal Mar 2014 #4
What does the ground controller see/hear? n/t moondust Mar 2014 #5
the ground at that airports Corgigal Mar 2014 #6
I was thinking about that also Duckhunter935 Mar 2014 #7
I'm surprised moondust Mar 2014 #13
An "aviation expert" on a BBC Newshour program this week bobduca Mar 2014 #8
Remember transponders are for the ATC system Corgigal Mar 2014 #10
If you wanna know a whole lot more than you know abt equipment on truedelphi Mar 2014 #16
Aside from all the answers you got so far jeff47 Mar 2014 #18
What could make this disappearance even worse than it is JimDandy Mar 2014 #9
You mean an American AIrlines aircraft vanished under Bush and Cheney's watch? malaise Mar 2014 #11
Only a couple years after 9/11, too. Iggo Mar 2014 #15
Has everyone forgotten the documentary "Lost"??? Schema Thing Mar 2014 #14
Uh, apparently that documentary has been, how should we put it - truedelphi Mar 2014 #17
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
1. Not comparable
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 01:56 PM
Mar 2014

The plane was in the middle of Angola, flown by unlicensed pilots who took off in the middle of the night without permission and with their lights and transponder off.

moondust

(19,970 posts)
3. My question:
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:05 PM
Mar 2014

Why isn't the transponder hard-wired to stay on at all times so that nobody can turn it off? The pilot could still send signals with it, just not turn it completely off.

Anybody?

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
6. the ground at that airports
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:11 PM
Mar 2014

They are responsible for clearances to airplane to cross runways, and all directions on the airport grounds. Then you have the arrival controller, also at the airport, who is responsible for plane that are currently in the air, and are coming to runways.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
7. I was thinking about that also
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:13 PM
Mar 2014

And a pilot and investigator explained the same thing. They have to be turned off on the ground. There is another system that is coming online to get around this and will always tag a planes position that can not be turned off. With this I wounder if the present system could be modified to shut down at say 100-500 feet automatically without the pilot being able to switch it off.

The first piece of that system — which carries the cumbersome label of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast, or ADS-B — is a new form of transponder that broadcasts to ground stations more precise information than does radar.

ADS-B data will pinpoint a jet’s location using GPS technology and will also include the plane’s trajectory, which radar data does not.

And while long-range radar towers sweep around up to about once every 16 seconds to get a fix on an aircraft’s position, ADS-B will fix its location every second.

All the planes that roll off the Boeing and Airbus assembly lines now come with ADS-B preinstalled.

The technology will be mandatory for airliners flying in the U.S. by 2020, and two years earlier in Europe.


http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2023134658_airplanesflighttrackingxml.html

moondust

(19,970 posts)
13. I'm surprised
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 03:22 PM
Mar 2014

that Boeing or the FAA or somebody didn't mandate an always-on tracking system a long time ago.

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
8. An "aviation expert" on a BBC Newshour program this week
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:15 PM
Mar 2014

The expert explained the reason for allowing it to be shut off in-air, was also being a safety reason.
Specifically in case the component is malfunctioning, this can possibly cause shorting/electrical fires, so pilots need to be able to manually disconnect the transponder system.

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
10. Remember transponders are for the ATC system
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:19 PM
Mar 2014

it allows controllers, in all sectors, to know who they are and what they are doing. The plane/pilot already knows who they are. It also allows positive control from different ATC centers to pass off with little voice coordination.

Some airport will have a ground control radar, I don't believe most don't.

Below is a youtube video of how complicated ground control can be..

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
16. If you wanna know a whole lot more than you know abt equipment on
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 05:48 PM
Mar 2014

Modern day aircraft, here is a good read:

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

To get to his discussion about Malayasian Airlines Flight 370, you have to scroll down about half the opening page.

Very speculative, and pls feel free to ignore his political conclusions. But his information about equipment and what it does, and if it does or doesn't have a backup system, if it can or can't be tampered with by say, CIA, etc is probably one of the more informative items on the situation that I have found.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
18. Aside from all the answers you got so far
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:56 PM
Mar 2014

There's an even more basic answer:

If you remove the "off" switch on the transponder, the pilot can still turn off the circuit breaker.

And you can't remove that capability without introducing a rather large fire and electrical hazard.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
9. What could make this disappearance even worse than it is
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:17 PM
Mar 2014

is that the black box holds only 2 hours worth of data. Since the plane flew for five more hours after voice contact was lost and the plane changed direction and altitude, all of the data that could have told investigators what was happening during that time has been written over.

There may be no black box data available at all though, because the pilot or whoever hijacked the plane can simply switch off the black box!

malaise

(268,856 posts)
11. You mean an American AIrlines aircraft vanished under Bush and Cheney's watch?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:22 PM
Mar 2014

I thought they kept America safe.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
17. Uh, apparently that documentary has been, how should we put it -
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 05:50 PM
Mar 2014

"Lost."




(But please feel free to fill us in.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Isn’t the First Time...