Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Income Inequality Is Going to Get Catastrophically Worse
http://www.alternet.org/economy/inevitability-income-inequality***SNIP
Today, the focus of this power structure is so skewed that any notion of public good is mere campaign fodder for presidents or presidential hopefuls, and nonexistent for the banking elite. Thats why inequality for the rest of the population has leapt back up to 1928 levels and will continue to rise from there. Thats why Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton or both may run for president, while JPMorgan Chase, J.P. Morgans legacy, remains the most powerful bank in the world, as it was designed to be more than a century ago.
In the Economic Policy Institutes February 2014 report The Increasingly Unequal States of America, authors Estelle Sommeiller and Mark Price chronicle income inequality on a state-by-state basis from 1917 to 2011. Starting in 1979 until 2011, as the average income of the bottom 99 percent of U.S. taxpayers rose by 18.9 percent, the average income of the top 1 percent rose by 10 times more, or 200.5 percent. Conversely, between 1928 and 1979, the share of income held by the top 1 percent fell in every state but one.
More recently, their results show that between 2009 and 2011, not only did income inequality grow in all 50 states, but all income growth went to the top 1 percent in 26 states. New York and Connecticut led the pack in terms of income inequality by virtue of their disproportionate share of financial industry millionaires and billionaires, whose fortunes were in turn bolstered by federal and Fed policies that championed the banks that had first access to cheap money and a place to dump their toxic assets. In these states, the average income gap in 2011 had the top 1 percent making 40 times more than the bottom 99 percent. (The gap in California was 26.8 times, confirming that on average Wall Street money trumps tech and entertainment money. The smallest average gap was in Hawaii at 12.1 times.)
Not only are current income inequality levels near the 1928 peak, but the systemic risk posed by this inequality is worse now. There is no counterbalance to the banking elite who possess no imbedded public spirit underlying their political influence and command more instruments of leverage capital than ever before. Theres no strong labor force, no large swaths of the population demanding reform by any means necessary, no revolution. Instead, we have an overhang of debt, stagnant wages and inferior jobs, all exacerbating income inequality.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 692 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Income Inequality Is Going to Get Catastrophically Worse (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2014
OP
politicman
(710 posts)1. same old, same old
And as long as you have 10 -20 lobbyists for every congress person, the income equality will just grow and grow.
Even Obama who was a community organizer who championed helping the poor, has fallen prey to the corporate money that infests politics.
This is not a dig at Obama, its just to illustrate that no matter how empathetic the politician is, they end up being beholden to corporate money as they need this to survive in politics.