Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 08:45 PM Mar 2014

The Chris Christie Scandal Just Got Worse

BY ALEC MACGILLIS

When there is still snow on the ground past St. Patrick’s Day, thoughts turn longingly to the beach. Say, the Jersey Shore. Which in turn brings to mind the extreme yet comically ham-handed efforts of Governor Chris Christie’s administration to keep secret the process that led to the controversial selection exactly one year ago of a firm to run a $25 million ad campaign for last summer’s tourist season touting the Shore’s comeback from Superstorm Sandy.

As you may recall, Christie came under criticism during his reelection campaign last summer for having inserted himself and his family into the rousing “Stronger than the Storm” ads encouraging tourists to come back to the Jersey Shore. The ads had been funded by federal Sandy recovery aid, and it seemed eyebrow-raising, at the least, for them to feature beaming pictures of a governor in the middle of a reelection campaign, rather than just your average smiling New Jerseyans. The eyebrows shot up quite a bit further when it emerged that the firm that had gotten the job after proposing to feature Christie in its ads, public relations giant MWW, had bid at a much higher price—$4.7 million versus $2.5 million—than a well-regarded New Jersey ad firm that had proposed ads that did not feature the governor. Making matters even more interesting was that the award had been made by a selection committee led by Christie’s very close longtime aide, Michele Brown, whom Christie appointed to run the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, a $225,000 post. Also noteworthy was that MWW had hired just a few months earlier the former executive director of the influential Burlington County Republican Party. (It was also hard not to notice that MWW's founder and CEO, Michael Kempner, who is normally a loyal Democratic donor, was not writing any big checks to Barbara Buono, Christie's opponent, last year.) New Jersey congressman Frank Pallone, a Democrat, in January asked the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to audit the awarding of the job to make sure federal contracting rules were followed.

Further raising the intrigue around the “Stronger than the Storm” ads has been the lengths to which the Christie administration has gone to keep secret the relevant documentation. When Shannon Morris, the president of the New Jersey company, Sigma Group, that came in second to MWW, last summer requested the state’s evaluations of the proposals to better understand why her firm had lost, she received almost nothing in response. “Typically when you have a state-run bid like that you have…it fully transparent, it’s all posted online,” Morris told me. “There was nothing like that in this case.” When Asbury Park Press reporter Bob Jordan made an open-records request for the scoresheets that the selection committee members filled out to rank the ad proposals, the state returned to him in January the scoresheets—with the names of the committee members redacted.

Knowing this, I was heartened to find that my own request for the scoresheets was returned to me later in January with the names of the committee members fully disclosed. I planned to include details from the scoresheets in a cover story on Christie that I was in the process of writing, but the piece’s main thrust veered away from the Sandy ads, and I decided to revisit that issue later. This week, when I went to do just that, I discovered that the Internet link the Economic Development Authority had given me for the reams of documents I had requested was no longer operable. I asked that the documents be resent. They were, and lo, this time the names of the committee members were redacted from the scoresheets. When I asked the authority’s legal officer, Shane McDougall, about the discrepancy, he replied that “if the original documents had been disseminated without these redactions, it was done inadvertently.” He added that the redaction of names was done “on the basis of the advisory, consultative, and deliberative privilege, the expectation of privacy and the protection of the competitive bidding process.”

more

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117066/christies-stronger-storm-jersey-shore-post-sandy-ad-cover

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
12. I don't think so
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 11:03 PM
Mar 2014

Christie has survived this episode, if he were leaving the scene he's already be gone. And in two years none of this will much matter.

I don't like this fact, I abhor that man. But he's still Governor, as a matter of fact there was very few calls for his resignation in the national news cycles.

Will it hurt his chances to become POTUS, probably to a point. But if he wins a few early primaries, which he's apt to do, it'll be water under the bridge.

He' has survived, sadly. I don't know if he can actually win. But he will be a force.

George II

(67,782 posts)
15. You're assuming, of course, that there will be no indictments, trials, or convictions...
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 11:46 PM
Mar 2014

If even one of Christie's close advisers goes on trial, two years will not be enough time for everyone to forget these incidents.

Response to Doctor_J (Reply #5)

Cha

(296,848 posts)
6. Now it's .. "Stronger Than Corruption?".. I sure as heck hope not.. Christie's
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 09:26 PM
Mar 2014

actions cannot stand any light being waved over them.. his scandals have more tentacles than a squid..

mercymechap

(579 posts)
7. By hook or by crook
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 09:36 PM
Mar 2014

it seems.....Christie determined to get top-billing has acquired that goal.....only not in the direction he was expecting....

delrem

(9,688 posts)
9. I felt very uncomfortable watching US politics during hurricane Sandy.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:14 PM
Mar 2014

I didn't feel comfortable watching the political spin with Pres Obama and Gov Christie doing photo-ops. I *understand* the reasons why political spin like that happens in the wake of a "shock", and I understand that behind the scenes machinations are very inbred.

But the saturation coverage of it? I was offended, and I am continuously offended by the negligence of our North American culture at how poorly events are reported on. So poorly, in this case, that stone cold contradictions were "overlooked". Everything that might suggest those contradictions was "overlooked". And this case accords with the standard case in that regard.

I'm right to be offended! We ought to be doing better than this, as a culture.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Chris Christie Scanda...