Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:31 AM Mar 2014

My wife will get her meds

Those of you who suggested we go through the drug company directly were bang-on correct; our insurance company is still futzing around, but the drug company has hooked us up for enough time to get the issue permanently resolved.



Thanks for all your (mostly) kid words and advice.

Still hyper-pissed.

But my wife will get her medication.

And that is enough for today.

372 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My wife will get her meds (Original Post) WilliamPitt Mar 2014 OP
Great news.... sendero Mar 2014 #1
I'm so glad, will. You both must be tremendously relieved. cali Mar 2014 #2
Glad to hear jsr Mar 2014 #3
What a relief. K&R myrna minx Mar 2014 #4
Wonderful news! derby378 Mar 2014 #5
I'm so glad that the drug company is going to help your wife with her meds. Autumn Mar 2014 #6
Exactly, no one should have to jump through hoops to get life-saving meds. KittyWampus Mar 2014 #11
A sick woman on her own with the same disease and no one to care Autumn Mar 2014 #16
+1. The drug companies *count* on this. Every person who gives up tblue37 Mar 2014 #106
The insurance cos, not the drug cos Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #159
Yes, of course. I was being sloppy in my phrasing. I had "drugs" on my mind because tblue37 Mar 2014 #179
Access to health care should not enlightenment Mar 2014 #69
This is not about "access" theboss Mar 2014 #103
If you cannot afford a medical treatment, enlightenment Mar 2014 #108
I work in healthcare and here is the over-riding question regarding it: theboss Mar 2014 #114
Well, I'm sorry enlightenment Mar 2014 #146
Given that we already pay twice per capita what other developed countries pay-- eridani Mar 2014 #304
This post is sad Generic Other Mar 2014 #319
Do you think that every person should be provided with whatever care they want regardless of cost? theboss Mar 2014 #330
You are the death panel personified by your own words Generic Other Mar 2014 #348
So, that's a "yes" theboss Mar 2014 #363
Yes you are a burned out cynical healthcare provider Generic Other Mar 2014 #365
+1 No one should have this added burden. n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #14
Excellent news! 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #7
A journalist might take this as a great topic for an article- I'd like to know how KittyWampus Mar 2014 #8
Well, he got the meds by going around the insurance company. Which would be single payer, sort of. djean111 Mar 2014 #22
Not really ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #28
Oh, the pharma will take that free medicine cost off of whatever taxes it pays..."free" is kind of djean111 Mar 2014 #35
No they will not. There is nothing to deduct for donated drugs, other Hoyt Mar 2014 #43
Well Free is better than not getting any. JEB Mar 2014 #89
Don't get me wrong ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #95
The issue is drug costs - plain and simple theboss Mar 2014 #102
Some drugs are expensive because of the greed. Look at what happened truedelphi Mar 2014 #172
Pharma is certainly taking advantage of demand. BadgerKid Mar 2014 #307
Glad she's getting her meds. City Lights Mar 2014 #9
god damn mother f@#%ing throw mad used car asshole piece of 4236@#$^^$!!! snooper2 Mar 2014 #10
great pic ! nt steve2470 Mar 2014 #36
Yeah betsuni Mar 2014 #38
"This person is not of interest anymore." Sez the person commenting in that person's thread... truebrit71 Mar 2014 #50
Yeah, that struck me as an odd comment to make too. Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #53
Exactly my thought also! n/t sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #356
I understand your response - yet - let me say Mira Mar 2014 #58
I sure don't trust his anger Schema Thing Mar 2014 #92
Well I suggest you put him on ignore, unless you relish the self righteousness of telling rhett o rick Mar 2014 #207
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #233
He is currently a member of DU. He should be treated with respect until he is no longer a member. rhett o rick Mar 2014 #257
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #269
Then you have no business posting on a message board for "politically liberal" posters. rhett o rick Mar 2014 #275
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #285
Of course you totally missed my point. I dont always agree with Will Pitt, and I thought his rhett o rick Mar 2014 #291
I agree DU members should be treated with respect. sheshe2 Mar 2014 #300
He certainly didn't treat DU or the President with respect now did he? nt brush Mar 2014 #290
Sorry, but I have no idea what that means. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #292
Try it now. There were a couple of typos brush Mar 2014 #301
He lost ANY respect I had for him.... VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #282
People should be able to express their justifiable anger when they live in one of the wealthiest sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #258
+1000000000000000000000 nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #303
I trust Will Pitt's anger Generic Other Mar 2014 #320
That's probably because you're not one of his sycophants LordGlenconner Mar 2014 #328
Sez you. SammyWinstonJack Mar 2014 #265
Well played. JNelson6563 Mar 2014 #60
? Skittles Mar 2014 #101
They'd have the same problem before ACA and/or with single payer. This is a formulary msanthrope Mar 2014 #118
This issue is specifically about the ACA. Before ACA is irrelevant. n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #144
The ACA does not mandate formularies theboss Mar 2014 #145
What I was trying to say was that it's not about comparing before and after ACA cui bono Mar 2014 #293
Saying she can't get meds is wrong. theboss Mar 2014 #312
Formularies are not new. Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #346
PS The ACA is not a health insurance plan theboss Mar 2014 #147
Of course, but it states what needs to be covered or not. cui bono Mar 2014 #294
Do you want it to have a "Will Pitt's wife" exception? theboss Mar 2014 #313
I do, I want an "average taxpayer who needs meds" clause Generic Other Mar 2014 #321
That exists theboss Mar 2014 #333
It is called speaking with a "forked tongue" to me Generic Other Mar 2014 #347
This message was self-deleted by its author jeff47 Mar 2014 #287
What system allows every person to get the $5K a month med of their choice? theboss Mar 2014 #121
see you address the real issue, which was NOT addressed Skittles Mar 2014 #188
That's the discussion we need to have theboss Mar 2014 #314
Celebrities? Generic Other Mar 2014 #323
Great pic +1 Politicub Mar 2014 #155
That's awesome!! PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #12
I found the replies on that thread really really illuminating. djean111 Mar 2014 #26
So it's more about hyping negativity ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #31
I have seen snide remarks about WP's OP all over DU this morning. djean111 Mar 2014 #37
I suspect ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #42
You suspect quite wrongly. djean111 Mar 2014 #54
Yeah ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #63
Bullshit. You know what you said. nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #67
how the fuck is post 52 a Hide ? JI7 Mar 2014 #187
Shouldn't the main concern have been for the fact that someone's loved one needed medication and sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #249
I completely agree ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #270
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #52
Will deserved all he got and more theboss Mar 2014 #104
Your posts on his actual problem rocked. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #130
Yea....I'm awesome theboss Mar 2014 #139
Indeed. ConservativeDemocrat Mar 2014 #150
"these people"? grasswire Mar 2014 #170
And.....we're off theboss Mar 2014 #174
are you one of "these people"? grasswire Mar 2014 #178
All I know is that it is so good to see old time posters suddenly posting on DU3 again! Rex Mar 2014 #193
You know, non-conservatives. morningfog Mar 2014 #226
LOL, whining much? n-t Logical Mar 2014 #152
....and...it completely characterized how Obama is viewed by the OP and many others Sheepshank Mar 2014 #153
The problem is that people--Will included--get crazy and not thinking straight mnhtnbb Mar 2014 #157
And the proper response is to correct once you've cooled down. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2014 #288
If I'd served on a jury for the original post, Denzil_DC Mar 2014 #164
+1 Rex Mar 2014 #194
Agreed. That OP probably soured me on WP for the foreseeable future. stopbush Mar 2014 #204
I really like WP but the OP was somewhat disappointing, even understanding his situation. nt kelliekat44 Mar 2014 #213
When your mother, wife, husband, sister, child's lives are at stake and you first learn that you sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #242
I don't disagree with what you say. I disagree with the brunt of the blame being placed at the kelliekat44 Mar 2014 #279
I bet half the people here have had to jump through those hoops at some point theboss Mar 2014 #315
People in other developed nations do not have to jump through any hoops to get what IS a RIGHT. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #358
Do you really think no one in Canada has ever been denied something related to healthcare? theboss Mar 2014 #360
Thanks Obama! treestar Mar 2014 #13
Awesome news ! nt steve2470 Mar 2014 #15
Thank God...good luck to all of you... First Speaker Mar 2014 #17
Glad to hear it, WilliamPitt! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #18
Good to hear. Now work on an expedited appeal. See info here... sinkingfeeling Mar 2014 #19
^^ A great example of what's best about DU! ^^ You're awesome Catherina Mar 2014 #24
That's wonderful! djean111 Mar 2014 #20
Thanks for the followup Will. I hope the insurance companies are forced to stop Catherina Mar 2014 #21
Glad to hear it Will! Marrah_G Mar 2014 #23
That's great news ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #25
That's great news, Will. In_The_Wind Mar 2014 #27
Have you contacted the National MS Society? JoePhilly Mar 2014 #29
I had someone sort of helping me from the MSAA (Multiple Sclerosis Assn. of America) CountAllVotes Mar 2014 #338
My friend worked with ... JoePhilly Mar 2014 #343
Good news. ctsnowman Mar 2014 #30
I'm glad your wife will get the meds she needs. LibDemAlways Mar 2014 #32
Glad to hear it mcar Mar 2014 #33
Great news! ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #34
Great. Hoyt Mar 2014 #39
Good news, for now. boston bean Mar 2014 #40
Great news sobenji Mar 2014 #41
very relieved to hear it shireen Mar 2014 #44
That's great news Will. Blue Diadem Mar 2014 #45
Yay! GoldenMezzoDiva Mar 2014 #46
Good new. We have enough struggles in life, healthcare should not be one of them. mountain grammy Mar 2014 #47
Good Half-Century Man Mar 2014 #48
That is good to hear Will! truebrit71 Mar 2014 #49
Apology accepted Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #51
Welcome to DU, Mr. President. Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #56
you know, PBO should have an account here, seriously steve2470 Mar 2014 #59
you assume Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #72
busted ! steve2470 Mar 2014 #74
DU is for the "politically liberal". Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #209
for Democrats too steve2470 Mar 2014 #210
Since this is a message board for the "politically liberal" there are some Democrats (e.g. the rhett o rick Mar 2014 #212
. libodem Mar 2014 #55
Wonderful news. Puglover Mar 2014 #57
Now you've found at least temporary help, I'll point out that "single-payer" isn't a panacea. Denzil_DC Mar 2014 #61
yes thanks for that info ! nt steve2470 Mar 2014 #65
Very good info...been reading about the creeping privatization of the NHS.. KoKo Mar 2014 #75
Any universal system is going to be problematic. Denzil_DC Mar 2014 #81
Exactly...this isn't an ACA problem, it's a formulary one. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #119
Yup. Denzil_DC Mar 2014 #122
Precisely...so attacking the President was both inefficient, and incorrect. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #128
Imagine that. People actually LEARNING from the experiences of people that live in other Number23 Mar 2014 #176
Great news PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #62
A most excellent development Will. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2014 #64
+10000 CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #318
Excellent. 840high Mar 2014 #66
glad to hear it blindersoff Mar 2014 #68
I'm so happy for you both in getting necessary meds. But did Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #70
sometimes insurance doesn't cover a drug until they are convinced you need it and have 2pooped2pop Mar 2014 #71
Another suggestion along that line... OmahaBlueDog Mar 2014 #82
Wonderful! ashling Mar 2014 #73
Thankfully she had a person of passion who cared about her Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #76
What a relief. truebluegreen Mar 2014 #77
Happy for your wife, and for you as well. QuestForSense Mar 2014 #78
And that is enough for today--it sure is! CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2014 #79
That's great news! bigwillq Mar 2014 #80
Good to hear. I hope your wife does well. Prayers and hugs nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #83
Wishing you both all the best. joanbarnes Mar 2014 #84
I don't understand the responses thanking Obama and the ACA for this. BlueCheese Mar 2014 #85
Did you understand the posts blaming Obama and the ACA when things seemed bad? BklnDem75 Mar 2014 #93
I don't think Obama is to blame for the sorry state of American health care that existed before 2008 BlueCheese Mar 2014 #161
CORRECT Skittles Mar 2014 #189
Thank you for your nuanced reasoning. You and I share the same thoughts. n/t myrna minx Mar 2014 #196
First...it was never an ACA/Obama problem. It was a formulary one. The ACA, however, msanthrope Mar 2014 #125
You owe Obama an apology Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #140
Yes, you are right Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #156
Most are sarcasm after the rant yesterday blaming Obama and the ACA for the issue uppityperson Mar 2014 #163
"if the ACA hadn't blocked him, WP wouldn't have had to go around them!" MisterP Mar 2014 #359
Great news. I would also suggest looking into an overseas source. grahamhgreen Mar 2014 #86
That is good to know nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #87
I always try to add some hfojvt Mar 2014 #88
Great news! emsimon33 Mar 2014 #90
Will, I want to thank you... Wait Wut Mar 2014 #91
I am very sorry that you have to fight, woo me with science Mar 2014 #94
Yay! TBF Mar 2014 #96
Great news, really glad to hear that. But... Zorra Mar 2014 #97
Great post. woo me with science Mar 2014 #105
You're welcome. Comes from several decades of various unpleasant experiences I wish I'd never had, Zorra Mar 2014 #126
I think the issue in this case is also the huge price the drug companies try to charge. pnwmom Mar 2014 #113
Yes, all of this about how our fucked up system is not to blame is ridiculous Doctor_J Mar 2014 #237
Pssst....that drug isn't on Canada's formulary either. jeff47 Mar 2014 #289
Cool! greytdemocrat Mar 2014 #98
I'm delighted to hear this. Maybe it would be a reasonable thing now to delete your FU Obama OP. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #99
Will, i missed your earlier post. Downwinder Mar 2014 #100
I wonder what day you are going to be on FOX? Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #107
Glad to hear it Will NCTraveler Mar 2014 #109
Great news! Now how about an apology to DU for the big shit you took on our President? tridim Mar 2014 #110
Don't hold your breath nobodyspecial Mar 2014 #111
Exactly. Tomorrow's another day. FSogol Mar 2014 #117
So. WilliamPitt Mar 2014 #115
Will, allow me to explain this again theboss Mar 2014 #120
Excellent explanation mcar Mar 2014 #138
And Anthem could have denied the MS drug with any policy they wrote even sinkingfeeling Mar 2014 #186
Did we set up negotiation for prices? Shorten patents so more generics could come to the market? TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #366
Did they do it for Medicare Part D? Things move slowly. We need to sinkingfeeling Mar 2014 #371
No, Medicare D is a TeaPubliKlan boondoggle that should have never been passed despite the benefits TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #372
Thank you Sir Estevan Mar 2014 #228
Obama's such a sweetie, the boss.. He thanks you for apologizing for him causing Cha Mar 2014 #230
Weird ProSense Mar 2014 #123
LOL. Now you're a shill for big pharma? Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #124
Yes, Will. It's one thing to be angry and fly off the handle, another to be unable to admit error. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #132
I wasn't going to post on this thread. But I HAVE to commend this from NYC_SKP. calimary Mar 2014 #180
Agreed. Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #244
Again, Obama is not running against Rand Generic Other Mar 2014 #349
good post and thank you steve2470 Mar 2014 #195
Will's dug in his heels and will not apologize to that @%%^^&*(((%$ Obama!!1111 Cha Mar 2014 #239
+1000000000000000000000000000 LordGlenconner Mar 2014 #335
Yes since you apparently haven't learned anything from this, you should apologize. tridim Mar 2014 #133
Apology accepted Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #143
BTW ProSense Mar 2014 #134
Will..as the mother of a disabled child on two non-formulary drugs, I say you are wrong. msanthrope Mar 2014 #136
It's sad to be still pissed at Obama for putting you in this situation. lumpy Mar 2014 #149
Obama never promised to abolish formularies. joshcryer Mar 2014 #166
+10000000. nt ecstatic Mar 2014 #129
That ain't gonna happen. The ODS is too strong with that one. Cha Mar 2014 #225
People will massive, almost immeasurable egos don't apologize LordGlenconner Mar 2014 #342
Great news Will! 90-percent Mar 2014 #112
So glad you wife is getting her meds magical thyme Mar 2014 #116
Glad to hear it Will.. You know when we are having issues paying for meds SomethingFishy Mar 2014 #127
That is good news. Sorry that you had to go directly to them, though I Dorian Gray Mar 2014 #131
Awesome news!!!! CFLDem Mar 2014 #135
Humm...perhaps an article detailing what to do Historic NY Mar 2014 #137
Obamacare is better than what we had ... JEFF9K Mar 2014 #141
So happy to hear that! BuelahWitch Mar 2014 #142
Pitt wins!!! KamaAina Mar 2014 #148
Perhaps you should have done this first before cursing the President (nt) question everything Mar 2014 #151
How did this change anything in his OP? n-t Logical Mar 2014 #158
let me see if I recap this properly: Whisp Mar 2014 #160
Your subtlety is your strong suit Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #162
you can fill in any missing pieces, feel free. Whisp Mar 2014 #165
It must be mystifying to try to comment... grasswire Mar 2014 #171
hahaha! Whisp Mar 2014 #173
I hold dual citizenship, U.S. and Canada. grasswire Mar 2014 #177
that's really big of you. Whisp Mar 2014 #181
nice dodge. nt grasswire Mar 2014 #184
poor attempt at recovery. nt Whisp Mar 2014 #185
Then you'd be more than Welcome by the OH on DU.. I saw someone Cha Mar 2014 #264
One of the DU owner/admins is Canadian. JTFrog Mar 2014 #191
This happens when they don't have a new Cat Food Commission Whisp Mar 2014 #201
Are you talking about EarlG? I think he's British, not Canadian?? Number23 Mar 2014 #203
Nice to see you too. JTFrog Mar 2014 #215
Why remain a foreigner? How about coming to live here as a citizen where you too can enjoy our sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #182
This message was self-deleted by its author Whisp Mar 2014 #202
How many times have I a US citizen wished Generic Other Mar 2014 #353
I'm very happy to read this Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #154
I'm really glad for you Will. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #167
That's a good thing. bravenak Mar 2014 #168
Very pleased. Feral Child Mar 2014 #169
Wonderful! A big Duval Mar 2014 #175
Excellent news (though it should never have even been a danger)! Best thoughts to her! LeftishBrit Mar 2014 #183
Will, I thought you should know a thread was started in MIRT about your other thread. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #190
My my my... Rex Mar 2014 #192
The jury system is a democratic process. I don't see why it should drive anyone crazy. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #232
Serious, I so agree with you. I've had far more shutouts when I do actually send an alert. Rex Mar 2014 #268
This has been an eye opening week, but that's not the first time Autumn Mar 2014 #198
I should have stated sometimes threads are started, absent hide, on newer low post..... Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #199
Yes on newer low post count DUers "pinging" the troll-dar Autumn Mar 2014 #200
Will is not a zombie or troll and yes, there have been threads started on old timers. Why post thisq uppityperson Mar 2014 #229
I always thought MIRT was only supposed to deal with new members. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #234
I encourage everyone to do a turn on MIRT to see how it is, what happens. Mostly it is DUers working uppityperson Mar 2014 #236
How many members on the MIRT team? sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #238
I think this is the current list - TBF Mar 2014 #243
Thank you. n/t sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #246
Announcements forum has the lists and posts sign ups every 3 months. Looks like 38 right now. uppityperson Mar 2014 #245
Thank you for the information. n/t sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #260
40. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #296
MIRT can only ban new members- TBF Mar 2014 #241
Why does MIRT need to discuss long-term members now that every alert goes to Skinner? Lars39 Mar 2014 #248
Alerts come in and folks post them in the TBF Mar 2014 #253
But an alert didn't "come in" on Pitt. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #252
Sign up for a term and you'll quickly see why the MIRT forum is restricted-access. winter is coming Mar 2014 #255
McCarthyite feel to that exchange Generic Other Mar 2014 #354
Thank you for sharing this Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #206
Yea, the thread started out with an alert almost after it started Wash. state Desk Jet Mar 2014 #217
thank you much for posting thiss grasswire Mar 2014 #220
It is disgusting. demmiblue Mar 2014 #305
They are the pool for the death panel or Cat Food Commission? Generic Other Mar 2014 #355
Answers Renew Deal Mar 2014 #362
That's totally uncalled for and I hope the Admins put their foot down on these power trips Catherina Mar 2014 #222
you know I am a pretty staunch advocate for transparency and there is no rule against this Kali Mar 2014 #223
This message was self-deleted by its author Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #227
Yes that's exactly what it looks... one_voice Mar 2014 #235
Agreed. Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #250
You know what is certain to undermine the teamwork in MIRT? Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #262
But DU3 was supposed to be all about Transparency.... Lars39 Mar 2014 #267
Re: This..... Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #274
So you thought going after one_voice Mar 2014 #278
This is clear in the instruction page from Skinner. Autumn Mar 2014 #280
Where did I say HBS was one_voice Mar 2014 #283
I was simply addressing your privacy concerns Autumn Mar 2014 #284
Oh..my bad.. one_voice Mar 2014 #286
Yeah because posting a thread from MIRT is the same as trying to get a long term duer banned. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #298
Admin did not give their reasoning for locking the thread muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #317
I would have voted to hide Doctor_J Mar 2014 #240
Horrible RobinA Mar 2014 #251
Thanks for that.. I think NYC_SKP's post is key.. bolding mine.. Cha Mar 2014 #254
Looks like some of Team MIR went out of their jurisdiction. Lars39 Mar 2014 #256
So what? If a newbie would have posted that it would have been trolldom but since Cha Mar 2014 #261
MIRT only gets hides, Pitt's thread was 3-3. Skinner now gets all alerts. Lars39 Mar 2014 #263
I think you are missing that poster's intent. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #266
I see that now. Lars39 Mar 2014 #272
Whatever.. ooops it got MIRTED.. some good thoughtful replies, nonetheless. Cha Mar 2014 #273
As you totally missed mine. Rather than addressing me or Admin directly, you chose to do this which uppityperson Mar 2014 #299
This message was self-deleted by its author ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #324
I don't know what will have to be done, but I don't envy Skinner Lars39 Mar 2014 #325
I wouldn't want the job. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #340
I think it's pretty clear they want him gone... Lars39 Mar 2014 #345
What agenda? one_voice Mar 2014 #334
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #276
Isn't Transparency a wonderful thing! Lars39 Mar 2014 #277
Yes it is! It keeps people honest! Rex Mar 2014 #326
Indeed. Lars39 Mar 2014 #331
All families have meltdowns and dirty laundry they don't want the public to see. Rex Mar 2014 #336
Lol...amen Lars39 Mar 2014 #339
This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Mar 2014 #295
I understand your point but this was not a good idea. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #297
No, it is the abuse of MIRT as a gossip engine used against those who are not part Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #327
I am sorry I was on mirt for 6 months and never saw secret attack meetings. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #329
This message was self-deleted by its author Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #341
Because there weren't any.... Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #350
Yes they should sign up. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #351
This. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #369
Thank you, Hassin Bin Sober. Heidi Mar 2014 #316
Thanks for posting this here, Hassin Bin Sober. City Lights Mar 2014 #322
My respect for a few DUers just went to zero. Two-faced backstabbers LittleBlue Mar 2014 #332
Agreed. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #368
having served about three different terms on MIRT I have witnessed some MIRT members who get this Douglas Carpenter Mar 2014 #337
I don't think it's right for MIRT to gossip A-Schwarzenegger Mar 2014 #357
That wasn't so bad Renew Deal Mar 2014 #361
Just be grateful that: Denzil_DC Mar 2014 #197
I am glad that your wife will get her medications Gothmog Mar 2014 #205
So glad to hear that Will passiveporcupine Mar 2014 #208
I am very glad your wife got her meds. I also think your post was a little on the strong rhett o rick Mar 2014 #211
Great news! KatyaR Mar 2014 #214
Your wife's illness cafanto Mar 2014 #216
Live Long, and Prosper. yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #218
Yay! (n/t) a2liberal Mar 2014 #219
Great news! Happy for her! cheapdate Mar 2014 #221
The politics of prior authorizations and the games both insurance and pharma play... HuckleB Mar 2014 #224
Great news! Brigid Mar 2014 #231
Great news on the meds... ReRe Mar 2014 #247
Good news! SammyWinstonJack Mar 2014 #259
I don't think you can see this Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #271
Good news. Rincewind Mar 2014 #281
I am glad for her hotrod0808 Mar 2014 #302
I am so very glad to hear it. May it ever be so. nt Hekate Mar 2014 #306
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #308
How would Will's situation CJCRANE Mar 2014 #309
So very pleased for you and your wife, your story has a HAPPY ENDING! secondwind Mar 2014 #310
Thank goodness, so glad to hear this is resolved for your family. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #311
I'm glad that your wife will get the meds that she needs. Beacool Mar 2014 #344
I'm happy to hear this, Will. Blue_In_AK Mar 2014 #352
Good. randome Mar 2014 #364
Glad you guys got a little relief, good luck moving forward. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #367
While I'm grateful Will's wife will be treated Ava Gadro Mar 2014 #370

Autumn

(44,980 posts)
6. I'm so glad that the drug company is going to help your wife with her meds.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:36 AM
Mar 2014

But it does suck to have to jump through hoops.

Autumn

(44,980 posts)
16. A sick woman on her own with the same disease and no one to care
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:40 AM
Mar 2014

enough to do the leg work would be in serious trouble. It should not be this way Kitty.

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
106. +1. The drug companies *count* on this. Every person who gives up
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:30 PM
Mar 2014

in despair before managing to break through the layers of red tape and seemingly insurmountable obstacles represents profit to those greedy jerks.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
159. The insurance cos, not the drug cos
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:45 PM
Mar 2014

The drug cos don't make a dime if patients can't get their medicine.

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
179. Yes, of course. I was being sloppy in my phrasing. I had "drugs" on my mind because
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:26 PM
Mar 2014

that is what Will's wife needed and couldn't get, so I conflated "drugs" and "insurance companies" to produce nonsense. Thanks for the correction.

This past weekend I kept doing something similar when trying to warn a friend that exposed fiberglass insulation in his basement could be dangerous to his cat. I KNOW that the insulation is fiberglass, but because in my mind the dangers of insulation are closely connected to the reasons why asbestos was outlawed in insulation, I kept referring to the insulation as asbestos rather than fiberglass--repeatedly, despite being corrected each time by my friend!

I have a similar issue when referring to or even thinking about my daughter and my youngest sister. Obviously memories about them are stored close together in my braine or tightly intertwined in some way, because I continually refer to them by the other's name AND by the wrong label (sister vs. daughter). Even more bizarre: I sometimes ask about or attempt to reference with one of them something that is known only to the other one! I momentarily forget that my 32-year-old daughter doesn't share the childhood memories I share with my 59-year-old sister.

I have long been interested in neuroscience, and this sort of cross-connection of memories and conflation of references to words or concepts that are not linked to each other, but that are independently linked to a third, separate though related, concept, strikes me as a clue to how memories are encoded in the brain. I wonder how much research is focused on such conflations.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
69. Access to health care should not
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:28 AM
Mar 2014

have to rely on whose squeaky wheel is loudest - or the largesse of drug companies (who, with their obscene profits, can well afford the charity) - or whether or not an individual has the time, ability, and assistance to discover these narrow avenues of relief.

Will, I'm delighted that your wife has access to her medications, but we as a nation simply cannot ethically afford to accept this kind of individual "fix" each time an individual in need runs up against the wall of for-profit health "care".

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
103. This is not about "access"
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:25 PM
Mar 2014

The drug is right there in the pharmacy. She has a prescription for it. It is quite accessible.

It's about paying.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
108. If you cannot afford a medical treatment,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:37 PM
Mar 2014

you cannot access it.

In this sense, the word access means the right or ability to benefit from something that is available. I am surprised you are unfamiliar with this usage of the term - it is quite common.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
114. I work in healthcare and here is the over-riding question regarding it:
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:57 PM
Mar 2014

How do we pay for all this shit?

Having actually seen the invoices for countless medical products, I can tell you that a lot of the stuff that we now consider essential (put in many cases did not exist 25 years ago), is really really really really really really expensive.

It goes without saying that a purely capitalistic model of you buy what you can afford is utterly immoral.

But, on the other end of the spectrum, you can't eliminate scarcity. You can't make everything available at no cost for everyone.

I tend to shudder when someone says, "No one should be denied any of this......." because I know - fundamentally - that everyone having access to everything is an impossibility. It simply is. There aren't enough healthcare professionals on earth and if there were, there is not enough money.

I'll give you a practical example from own career: Silver bandages. Every healthcare provider in the universe right now is scared out of their minds over antibiotic resistant bacteria. Practically every hospital has had a crisis of some kind regarding either MRSA or C-dif or some other nasty hospital-acquired infection that is a nightmare to treat.

There are ways to greatly limit these problems, but they are incredibly expensive.

One of the products that is great is Silver bandages. So...shouldn't we use these all the time? Yes...if you a) don't mind paying $33 for a Band-Aid and b) don't mind not having silver in 100 years. So...we...wait for it...ration the bandages. Use them only in certain cases in certain patient populations. Kind of like a...wait for it...formulary.


Dun....dun.....duuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.........................

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
146. Well, I'm sorry
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:52 PM
Mar 2014

that the phrase "no one should be denied any of this" makes you shudder, but don't see how your argument is applicable to what I said - since I didn't say that in any way.
Perhaps you have me confused with another poster?

eridani

(51,907 posts)
304. Given that we already pay twice per capita what other developed countries pay--
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 05:31 AM
Mar 2014

--paying isn't a problem. Just cut insurance companies out of the deal and regulate prices like those other places do. Dennis Kucinich once said "We are already paying for universal health care, we just aren't getting it."

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
319. This post is sad
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 11:42 AM
Mar 2014

It costs tooo much how dare you expect to be provided with care? This is a policy you promote?

Do you know how hardened and callous you sound?

I will die on my own without a hospital billing me for it thanks to people like you.

Have a nice day. I hope you sleep well at night. And that the specter of catastrophic illness never crosses your threshhold to harm you or those you hold dear because you can't afford a lousy bandaid.

Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch!

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
330. Do you think that every person should be provided with whatever care they want regardless of cost?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:33 PM
Mar 2014

I think healthcare should be based on need not want. (Which is actually a pretty Marxist thought, come to think of it). I just know from the inside that if every person was treated with the most expensive treatment available you may see a marginal at best increase in results with a catastrophic increase in costs.

(And - frankly - after working in or with hospitals for 15 years, my belief is that I will die in a hospital, it will be the hospital's fault, and they will screw up the bill to my wife).

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
348. You are the death panel personified by your own words
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:02 PM
Mar 2014

You are too cynical to be trusted with my healthcare needs -- way too cynical.

Is it possible you have given up the struggle and are too burned out to bother anymore? I hope you find another career as you seem powerless to do much to improve your attitude. I am not trying to be mean or anything, it just seems like you should be unhappy given your perception of the state of healthcare in the US.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
365. Yes you are a burned out cynical healthcare provider
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 12:39 PM
Mar 2014

That was your question, right?

Because you think you are qualified to determine who gets care or not. I hope no one I care about ever faces you trying to deny them access to care because of your awful notion that you get to decide who gets life saving care or not.

I wouldn't trust you to treat a hangnail with your attitude. I grew up with universal healthcare provided by the US military. I know what is and is not possible. The medical personnel in the military saved lives. They did not ask for cash up front. They do not send in people like you to bill people $800 for saline solution in an IV. They do not hover like vultures over sick people's beds with a ream of paperwork to be filled out, with plans to send people home before they are well, their eye on the next deep pocket in line.

Hospitals are making huge profits but can't even sterilize the rooms well enough so people don't die of infections related to their stay in these institutionalized death factories.

37th in line for best healthcare according to Doctors Without Borders. What the hell do we have to brag about? And whose fault is it? Largely people like you who side with crooked insurance, big pharma, and the Catfood Commission.

And to answer your question, yes, I believe that every penny deducted from my pay stub should entitle me to needed lifesaving medical care on demand. It entitles me to expect that you do not make an exorbitant profit off my misery. Universal affordable healthcare is a human right. It's way more important of a concept worth defending and saving than the bloated insurance industry that has attached itself to the periphery like bloodsucking leeches of old. And the administrators of hospitals with their excessive salaries. The crooked lobbyists, the overcharging and gouging of people at every level, the sense of power, the rush over having the ability to make life and death decisions about people's lives.

Yes, yes, yes, I think it is criminal and should end. A state that cannot provide for the welfare of its citizens at this basic level has no inherent right to exist.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
8. A journalist might take this as a great topic for an article- I'd like to know how
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:36 AM
Mar 2014

the system could be changed most immediately… which means fixed with the system we have, not wishing for Single Payer which we don't have.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
22. Well, he got the meds by going around the insurance company. Which would be single payer, sort of.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:42 AM
Mar 2014
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
35. Oh, the pharma will take that free medicine cost off of whatever taxes it pays..."free" is kind of
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:54 AM
Mar 2014

relative. Hopefully free expensive medicine doesn't have to be reported to the IRS!
But I see what you mean.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
43. No they will not. There is nothing to deduct for donated drugs, other
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:05 AM
Mar 2014

than regular business expenses they have already deducted.

The drug company -- in this particular case, not necessarily other cases -- deserves some good PR.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
95. Don't get me wrong ...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:14 PM
Mar 2014

I'm all for Free Healthcare (which is unworkable), Government financed Universal Healthcare, Not-For-Profit healthcare ... in that order.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
102. The issue is drug costs - plain and simple
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:23 PM
Mar 2014

The issue is not ACA or even the insurance system. The problem is that some drugs are really really expensive (and, frankly, may not be the "life savers" people claim they are.

No system - single payer, Medicare for all, Medicaid for all, NIH-style, etc - is going to be able to give everybody all the free drugs they want, because some drugs are very very expensive.

The drug Will is talking about is around $5K a month. How does that drug become readily available under system unless the cost comes down dramatically?

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
172. Some drugs are expensive because of the greed. Look at what happened
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:52 PM
Mar 2014

To the cost of doxycycline. Back in the mid Nineties, it would cost you about $ 30 to $ 45 a month if you were fighting an infection and needed it.

Now that Big Pharma has realized that so many tens of thousands of Americans who need this drug for their battle against Lyme's disease, the cost has sky rocketed. It can cost a person around $ 2,000 a month.

For a drug that is simple to produce.

When the situation with regards to how the government helps subsidize the production costs of many drugs, it is appalling that Americans are forced to pay so much money for their drugs.

BadgerKid

(4,549 posts)
307. Pharma is certainly taking advantage of demand.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 07:17 AM
Mar 2014

But I have to wonder about the extent to which they are shifting costs around, i.e., make one drug more expensive in order to keep the cost of other drugs lower. Perhaps this limits an even greater outcry. I don't know.

From pharma's point of view, like that of banks, they will simply not stand for losing money.

betsuni

(25,377 posts)
38. Yeah
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:00 AM
Mar 2014

"My good opinion once lost is lost forever." It really is for the "Fuck you ... you piece of shit used-car salesman" comment. This person is not of interest anymore.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
58. I understand your response - yet - let me say
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:19 AM
Mar 2014

I prefer WP's honesty and the fact he has a temper to lose. When furious like that I'm not interested in reading a milque toast's angry outburst
You will learn - if you have not already - that some of the most important and well thought out posts come from this very DU member, we would not be as well rounded without him. He has earned my trusting his praise, and his anger.

And a hearty welcome to you!

Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
92. I sure don't trust his anger
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:10 PM
Mar 2014


and he's only earned my distrust.



People with a natural ability to turn a phrase should take care with that ability.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
207. Well I suggest you put him on ignore, unless you relish the self righteousness of telling
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:25 PM
Mar 2014

us about your distrust. No one is asking you to accept him or his rantings, but under the circumstances I would hope you might cut him some slack.

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #207)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
257. He is currently a member of DU. He should be treated with respect until he is no longer a member.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:47 PM
Mar 2014

It's easy to put him on ignore if you dont like him. But to continue to disparage him is not very progressive.

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #257)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
275. Then you have no business posting on a message board for "politically liberal" posters.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:08 PM
Mar 2014

Everyone here should be treated with respect.

Calling WilliamPitt a prick is really low. Name calling is just childish.

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #275)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
291. Of course you totally missed my point. I dont always agree with Will Pitt, and I thought his
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:26 AM
Mar 2014

rant was too strong (but I was willing to give some leeway because of his situation), but my point is that all DU members should be treated with respect. That's what "politically liberal" people do.

sheshe2

(83,654 posts)
300. I agree DU members should be treated with respect.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:05 AM
Mar 2014

Not that it always happens.

Yet I have a question for you?

DU members should be treated with respect. That's what "politically liberal" people do.


So it is okay to say to the Democratic President on Democratic Underground "Fuck You" "you piece of shit used car salesman". Is this what "liberal" people do?

I know Barack Obama is not a member of DU, However he is our Democratic President. It's not like you have to agree with him, yet does he not deserve some respect?

Please do not tell me one is okay and the other is not.

There are other people on DU that are hurting, it's not just about Will. Do you see them calling out the President in such a crass way?

BTW, he did not stop at that post, he is doubling down now. After he got the meds for his wife he continues. That's just sad rhett.

brush

(53,741 posts)
290. He certainly didn't treat DU or the President with respect now did he? nt
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:25 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:10 AM - Edit history (1)

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
282. He lost ANY respect I had for him....
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:39 PM
Mar 2014

to not admit he was wrong and eat his words is NOT very Progressive of him!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
258. People should be able to express their justifiable anger when they live in one of the wealthiest
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:48 PM
Mar 2014

countries in the world that spends obscene amounts of money on war machinery, while depriving the people they CLAIM they are 'protecting' from life saving treatment. Especially when someone finds out their loved one needs medication and in this nation where money appears to be no object for certain priorities, she didn't have it.

The lack of anger is why we cannot what should be a right in this country. They are not afraid of a people who will tolerate anything they do to make the rich richer, even when it is selling their lives to Private Corps for profit.

Health Care should never be for profit. And yes, it can be done, but not while there are people unwilling to fight for it.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
320. I trust Will Pitt's anger
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:09 PM
Mar 2014

more than I trust the used car salesman's flashy pitch. Sorry, it is what it is. Why blame Will. We who have lost faith in our president are all Will on this trust issue.

Skittles

(153,111 posts)
101. ?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:23 PM
Mar 2014

Will sounds like they are getting the medication DESPITE our current system, not BECAUSE of it

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
118. They'd have the same problem before ACA and/or with single payer. This is a formulary
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:09 PM
Mar 2014

problem, which is frustrating, but has an appeals process. It has almost nothing to do with the ACA...except that you have rights of appeal under the ACA you didn't have before.

Pitt's outburst yesterday targeted the wrong people....and once he actually listened to other DUers, he got help.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
145. The ACA does not mandate formularies
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:52 PM
Mar 2014

And even if it did, there is no guarantee this drug would be included.

Do you want the ACA to demand that everything be covered at all times for everyone?

Because that would - in fact - be a pathway to insolvency.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
293. What I was trying to say was that it's not about comparing before and after ACA
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:44 AM
Mar 2014

since I was thinking that yes, it should guarantee that the necessary meds are made available.

If that's a pathway to insolvency then bring on single-payer!

But to tell people pre-existing does not matter anymore and let them get a plan and pay for it only to find out they can't get the meds they need is just wrong. It needs to be fixed. What's the point of paying for coverage then? Especially if it's mandated.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
312. Saying she can't get meds is wrong.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:28 AM
Mar 2014

She can get MS meds.

She could not get the meds she had been getting before. And - yes - that is an issue. But it's an issue having to do with health insurance and formularies and is quite common and has NOTHING to do with the ACA.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
346. Formularies are not new.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:53 PM
Mar 2014

And anyone on MS meds should know that.

And anyone with MS would have been denied coverage entirely before the ACA - that means nothing would have been covered. Break an arm? Out of luck - no insurance because you had MS and couldn't be covered. Need a heart transplant? Out of luck - no insurance because you had MS and couldn't be covered. Have a baby? Out of luck - no insurance because you had MS and couldn't be covered. Need MS care other than the particular medicine in question? Out of luck - no insurance because you had MS and couldn't be covered.

Get the point? Pre-existing conditions meant zero coverage for any condition - regardless of whether it was related to the pre-existing condition or not. The ACA banned that practice - and now insurance is available including for treatment of the pre-existing condition. I suspect even the particular drug in question is covered by going through the proper procedure. From what has been described in the other threads, it doesn't look to me as if it was.

And, back to the formulary question - that is how prescription coverage has been managed for at least a decade now. Obtaining medication not on the formulary has NOTHING to do with the ACA.

That doesn't mean it is ideal - but it is orders of magnitude better than what we had before the ACA.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
294. Of course, but it states what needs to be covered or not.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:45 AM
Mar 2014

And set age limits for children etc... so it's not like it's not involved in some policy regulation.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
313. Do you want it to have a "Will Pitt's wife" exception?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:30 AM
Mar 2014

Section 28, subparagraph 18

"Anything she needs, she can get."

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
321. I do, I want an "average taxpayer who needs meds" clause
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:12 PM
Mar 2014

Especially for the catastrophic coverage thing. Anything else is bullshit.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
333. That exists
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:37 PM
Mar 2014

Will's wife can get meds under her plan. Not necessarily the meds she always gotten - though that is likely possible if she follows an appeal process.

Will's post created the impression that Anthem said, "Go die, you hag. Hahahahahahaha." That's not what happened.

Look, this is an endlessly frustrating experience. I've gone through it myself, and I deal with it professionally pretty much every day. But mischaracterizing it as a plot between Obama and Anthem to kill people for profit is something out of Sarah Palin's fever dreams.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
347. It is called speaking with a "forked tongue" to me
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:57 PM
Mar 2014

and our president has perfected the language. Or at least he may be viewed this way by many Americans as the new plans unfold and they turn out to be the same as the old plans or worse.

Of course, what do I know? I can see Sarah Palin's house from my house.

Response to cui bono (Reply #144)

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
121. What system allows every person to get the $5K a month med of their choice?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:12 PM
Mar 2014

Because that would be a cool system.

Skittles

(153,111 posts)
188. see you address the real issue, which was NOT addressed
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:53 PM
Mar 2014

why our medicine and our health care COSTS SO MUCH

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
314. That's the discussion we need to have
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:31 AM
Mar 2014

Mineral Man and I both posted threads about this.

We aren't DU celebrities so both died at around 100 posts or so.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
323. Celebrities?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:21 PM
Mar 2014

What the hell does that even mean? Will Pitt is one of the earliest members of this group. Many of us read his rants before Gore threw in the towel in 2000. We have a history. Daily. We know Will like an old neighbor or coworker. And as a media voice from the left. One who has represented our voices many times -- and well.

And yet, people here act like there is not a person behind the keyboard in their race to be snarky and cruel. Who are you to chastise anyone for caring about Will's wife? To act like it is some sort of fawning celebrity status he has here. He earned his lib creds as far as I am concerned when he stood in Harvard Square and passed out anti-Bush literature, when he spoke against and wrote about Iraq. How dare you act as if his opinions shouldn't matter except that he is a celebrity you envy? What did you do during the Bush years?

Please trot out your vita. Cause you clearly aint the boss of me.

Wow.

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
155. Great pic +1
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:41 PM
Mar 2014

There are some DUers who should get credit for having a gift for writing subject lines. They are very talented at the art of link baiting. I know I fall for it.

They could make a good living writing headlines for Buzz Feed. Or whatever the conservative version of Upworthy is.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
12. That's awesome!!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:38 AM
Mar 2014

Any chance you may consider self-deleting that other thread? Not that I am super team sportsy, but I do really hate Repukes and the less ammo they have the better.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
26. I found the replies on that thread really really illuminating.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:46 AM
Mar 2014

Plus, if it gets deleted, there won't be any blue link for all the snide comments to refer back to.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
37. I have seen snide remarks about WP's OP all over DU this morning.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:55 AM
Mar 2014

THAT is spreading the negativity.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
42. I suspect ...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:04 AM
Mar 2014

most of the snide comments were/are more about what many (including myself) considered WP's over-the-top, and misdirected, rant about calling out President Obama for something that he (nor his administration) had nothing to do with.

But that said ... was it not you that argued that WP should not self-delete the posts so that you could use some of the comments for (what I suspect will be) later attacks? That was my "hyping negativity" point.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
63. Yeah ...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:22 AM
Mar 2014
Plus, if it gets deleted, there won't be any blue link for all the snide comments to refer back to.


That doesn't mean what that means.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
187. how the fuck is post 52 a Hide ?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:50 PM
Mar 2014

on edit, i'm only replying to this post because it's close to the post 52 itself. this is not directed at the person i am replying to.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
249. Shouldn't the main concern have been for the fact that someone's loved one needed medication and
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:28 PM
Mar 2014

didn't have it? Why on earth would anyone, under those circumstances, be worried about ANYTHING else?

Stunning to see people's priorities frankly.

Response to djean111 (Reply #37)

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
104. Will deserved all he got and more
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:27 PM
Mar 2014

He mischaracterized the problem from the beginning, criticized the wrong people, acted like he was the only person in history to ever deal with this issue, and basically behaved liked a horse's ass.

And yet, a lot of bright people (like me!!) gave him really good advice that will likely solve the dilemma.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
150. Indeed.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:19 PM
Mar 2014

But I doubt WP will ever give you or anyone else thanks for helping him.

He'd rather be "pissed".

It's just the way these people are.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
193. All I know is that it is so good to see old time posters suddenly posting on DU3 again!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:50 PM
Mar 2014

Glad they came back!

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
153. ....and...it completely characterized how Obama is viewed by the OP and many others
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:22 PM
Mar 2014

just look and all the rec's the original insulting thread garnered.

That original thread was an angry, misdirected outburst for sure, but ACA was mis-used as was the President to further a completely unrelated agenda to (to the problem at hand). The fact that the correction never appeared in the OP on this thread bares that out.

The disease is despicable.....WP's aversion to correction is rotten to it's core.

mnhtnbb

(31,373 posts)
157. The problem is that people--Will included--get crazy and not thinking straight
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:45 PM
Mar 2014

when loved ones are being denied health care. It is enough to make you crazy.
You can be so emotionally involved that you lash out at anyone--whether it's the
right person or not.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
164. If I'd served on a jury for the original post,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:03 PM
Mar 2014

I might have been persuaded to hide it.

If that had happened, you and others would probably never have had the chance to unravel what was actually going on and offer your invaluable assistance.

So it was very close to being a totally counterproductive OP. Props to you and others for putting that aside and trying to help.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
204. Agreed. That OP probably soured me on WP for the foreseeable future.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:05 PM
Mar 2014

He displayed the self-centered, uninformed crap we expect out of Rs. And he wonders why the Rs don't get it. Look in the mirror, Will.

Worst of all, his problem WAS SOLVED IN LESS THAN A FUCKING SINGLE DAY!

He owes President Obama a huge apology.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
242. When your mother, wife, husband, sister, child's lives are at stake and you first learn that you
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:19 PM
Mar 2014

live in a country where you have to jump through hoops even though you are paying for insurance, there is no describing the anger people feel.

Will's reaction was perfectly understandable. No one should be put through that stress especially when they are dealing with someone who is sick.

And he is one of the lucky ones, who was able to navigate the complex system in the end. But I KNOW people who would not be able to do that, in fact I have taken care of a few of them. They don't know how to use a computer, are already sick and tired, some are alone in the world.

Whether this legislation is better than what we had or not, it is still a disgrace that anyone has to deal with this in a country that has billions to spend on wars and war machinery.

There should never be a question in this country as to whether someone gets their medication or not. Not for a second. I've dealt with it on behalf of others, and quite frankly it is sickening and heart breaking..

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
279. I don't disagree with what you say. I disagree with the brunt of the blame being placed at the
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:26 PM
Mar 2014

President instead of the drug companies and the system in place that allows the drug companies to do what they do...the system put in place by our legislators who are owned by the lobbyists.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
315. I bet half the people here have had to jump through those hoops at some point
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:34 AM
Mar 2014

Either for themselves or their loved ones.

I was originally denied a necessary surgery in 1989 because it was going to be done by a specialist in Baltimore rather than a random orthopedic surgeon in Pittsburgh. I had to get that approved.

My mother fought breast cancer in 2008. We had to write several letters to get various treatments approved.

You know who I never blamed? Random people that had nothing to do with it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
358. People in other developed nations do not have to jump through any hoops to get what IS a RIGHT.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:49 PM
Mar 2014

You should not have had to. And so long as we are willing to accept what is unacceptable, the obscene notion that people's Health Care is nothing more than a commodity to be bought and sold in a 'marketplace', that's all we'll get. Some of us respect YOU and your mom as human beings far more than to accept that when facing such incredibly stressful issues, you should have to add the extra worry and distraction of jumping through any hoops.

It all comes down to how we as a society view our most valuable resource, as human beings or as merely a profit making commodity.

Apathy has a tendency to set in when people have been abused over a long period of time. Acceptance, no more awareness of their actual RIGHTS. But people looking in from the outside, watching the abuse, expressing their disbelief helps to jolt some people out of their sense of feeling 'this is all I deserve'.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
360. Do you really think no one in Canada has ever been denied something related to healthcare?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 05:31 PM
Mar 2014

Seriously?

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
17. Thank God...good luck to all of you...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:40 AM
Mar 2014

...and I think your outburst was understandable, to say the least...

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
20. That's wonderful!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:40 AM
Mar 2014

And maybe some have forgotten - all politics is personal, all politics is local. Cheer-leading no matter what is for sports. And, I have noticed, sports teams that get booed get new players and/or new plays, or lose support and go out of business.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
21. Thanks for the followup Will. I hope the insurance companies are forced to stop
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:41 AM
Mar 2014

putting people through the stress you two just went through. This was great news to read first thing in the morning.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
27. That's great news, Will.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:47 AM
Mar 2014

My insurance's co-pay was so high on a new prescription that I was unable to fill it. My doctor was able to give me samples until he can write a script for something different. This is our third try. The first two meds didn't work.

CountAllVotes

(20,866 posts)
338. I had someone sort of helping me from the MSAA (Multiple Sclerosis Assn. of America)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:49 PM
Mar 2014

She was helping to a point and I called back to ask her for more help.

Much to my surprise, I was told that "She is no longer here".

Makes me wonder who's side they are on as the guy running that association dumped his own wife into a nursing home!



LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
32. I'm glad your wife will get the meds she needs.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:50 AM
Mar 2014

However, no insurance company should have the power to interfere in doctor/patient decisions regarding the best course of treatment. You are spot on in declaring that the ACA is not healthcare. It's ultimately a scheme to enrich the coffers of the insurance industry at the expense of the public - one more way to screw the little guy.

shireen

(8,333 posts)
44. very relieved to hear it
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:06 AM
Mar 2014

As someone with a chronic illness, I have deep empathy for her, and I hope this matter will be resolved permanently so you can focus on happier things.

Blue Diadem

(6,597 posts)
45. That's great news Will.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:06 AM
Mar 2014

How I wish things weren't this difficult. I do hope you write about it, you could help someone else by doing that.

mountain grammy

(26,598 posts)
47. Good new. We have enough struggles in life, healthcare should not be one of them.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:08 AM
Mar 2014

It's the most frustrating thing for most Americans and it doesn't have to be this way.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
59. you know, PBO should have an account here, seriously
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:19 AM
Mar 2014

Granted, he would get thousands of responses but talk about traffic for this site !

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
74. busted !
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:39 AM
Mar 2014

Damn Warren, you are just too smart for me.



"Michele, stop bothering me, I'm posting on DU ! Putin can wait, damnit ! "


ok ok Michele is bugging me, see ya soon Warren !

PBO

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
212. Since this is a message board for the "politically liberal" there are some Democrats (e.g. the
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:37 PM
Mar 2014

Lieberman Wing) that should not be welcome.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
61. Now you've found at least temporary help, I'll point out that "single-payer" isn't a panacea.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:22 AM
Mar 2014

For instance, under the UK NHS, stories about having problems accessing certain drugs and treatments similar to your family's aren't unheard of, though there the gatekeepers aren't insurance companies, but local health authorities. We've been discussing this in the UK forum here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10885614

In answer to a question from steve2470 about NHS medication coverage, muriel_volestrangler replied:

For most medications, there's a standard per prescription charge of £7.85

Various groups get free prescriptions, such as children, over 60s, pregnant women, and people on benefits. If you're getting a lot of prescriptions, you can pay for a period for all of them.

http://www.nhs.uk/nhsengland/Healthcosts/pages/Prescriptioncosts.aspx

The controversy comes in because some medications are not covered by the NHS. NICE,the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, evaluates treatments such as drugs, and decides if they are effective enough for a type of treatment - an evaluation which considers the price to the NHS as well as the clinical effectiveness (and can also mean a drug is approved for some circumstances, but not others - it might be accepted as effective for one type of cancer, but still thought unproven for another, and so restricted to the first).

http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=AboutGuidance


I replied:

Related to NICE's role that m_v's mentioned, there's also the pop phrase "postcode lottery."

See Google for its prevalence.

Basically, even if NICE approves a drug or treatment, if it's new and/or expensive, there's no guarantee a patient in a particular administrative area will be able to receive it, depending on the policies and priorities of their regional health authority.

You'll maybe notice if you visit that link that the term's especially popular with the UK's RW press as a means to pick away at the foundations of the NHS, but it's a real phenomenon, and here's a brief explanation from The Guardian (over ten years old, but not too inaccurate in principle):

What is the postcode lottery?
The postcode lottery is shorthand for seemingly random countrywide variations in the provision and quality of public services - the huge gap between the best and the rest. Where you live defines the standard of services you can expect. So if you live in the "wrong" area, and, in extreme cases, on the "wrong" side of a road, you may get a poorer service than your neighbour or you may not get the service at all and have to pay for it privately. The postcode lottery is a big issue in the NHS, where the gap between the rhetoric of a comprehensive and universal "national" service and the reality is increasingly stretched.

Some problems are universal, even with single payer healthcare systems (especially when they're subject to creeping and not so subtle privatization).

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
75. Very good info...been reading about the creeping privatization of the NHS..
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:42 AM
Mar 2014

by RW in GB... Austerity, Privatization...in tandem it seems.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
81. Any universal system is going to be problematic.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:54 AM
Mar 2014

The NHS is Europe's largest employer, and demands on it from patients are increasing as folks live longer and more advanced medicines and treatments become available. This inevitably leads to "rationing" in some respects. All systems do it, none have a bottomless purse.

The NHS isn't the only healthcare model out there, and not necessarily one the US should copy. The US system will evolve over the years, like every other, unless people go along with moves to abandon positive reforms in the face of problems. Whether it'll end up improving is up to the people and the politicians they elect.

The important thing, IMO, in either country, is to resist calls to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Despite constant griping in the UK media and the budget cuts and management snafus over the years, overt moves to go for total privatization would be electoral suicide. Instead, in the UK the danger is the constant drip-drip of partial privatization (not just under the Tories - Labour has been guilty of mismanagement too) and the increasing involvement of for-profit healthcare, which is gradually devaluing and degrading the service. This is being resisted at regional levels, and the problems are generally worst in England.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
176. Imagine that. People actually LEARNING from the experiences of people that live in other
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:01 PM
Mar 2014

countries and seeing how they've dealt with the issues instead of demanding that they shut up.

What an awesome concept...

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
64. A most excellent development Will.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:23 AM
Mar 2014

FWIW this DUer sees lashing out in desperation and anger when the well being of one's other half is at stake as perfectly acceptable and feels it needs NO apology whatsoever.

Excellent news.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
318. +10000
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 11:34 AM
Mar 2014

Yeah they call him self-centered for caring about his wife. My wife almost died a few years ago and I would have and did do every thing I could to save her. She could keep no food down. The doctors here kept trying to tie it to another condition she has. We finally had to send her to Switzerland to find a competent doctor who diagnosed her condition correctly within ten minutes of seeing her. It is a rare condition that screwed up her esophagus. There is a simple surgical procedure she underwent back here. She weighed about ninety pounds by the time she was fixed. Fortunately she was a little overweight when it began and she had begun supplementing her food with nutritionally packed liquids just to keep her alive.

I was fortunate that she has sisters living in Europe who helped. It only cost about 250 dollars for the doctor visit and diagnosis because no motherfucking insurance companies had their greedy shit-covered fingers stuck in the pie.

Probably shared a little too much but the point I wanted to make was god damn it when your loved ones are dying the rest of the world hardly matters. To call someone self-centered for that is bullshit.

ACA is an improvement but healthcare insurance will always be an obscenity to me.

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
70. I'm so happy for you both in getting necessary meds. But did
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:30 AM
Mar 2014

ACA have anything to do with it? Could you be getting them without ACA in effect?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
71. sometimes insurance doesn't cover a drug until they are convinced you need it and have
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:34 AM
Mar 2014

exhausted the cheaper drugs first. Your doctor should be able to assist you. Also there should be an insurance board in your state to contact.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
82. Another suggestion along that line...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:55 AM
Mar 2014

Sometimes, to get a drug, there are hoops the doctor has to jump through. Sometimes, it's filling out a q-aire that demonstrates that they've checked for this, ruled out that, and done whatever else is they need to do to to prove the drug is medically necessary. The doctor may not know about the hoops.

Glad to hear the pharma company hooked you up.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
76. Thankfully she had a person of passion who cared about her
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:44 AM
Mar 2014

Not everyone has such a person. Anger is an energy. Use it.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
85. I don't understand the responses thanking Obama and the ACA for this.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:58 AM
Mar 2014

This seems to be an act of generosity by the drug company, and nothing systemic.

BklnDem75

(2,918 posts)
93. Did you understand the posts blaming Obama and the ACA when things seemed bad?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:13 PM
Mar 2014

100% blame and 0% credit seems ok with some.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
161. I don't think Obama is to blame for the sorry state of American health care that existed before 2008
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:57 PM
Mar 2014

I think the ACA is a significant piece of legislation that will do a lot of good, and Obama and the Democratic Congress deserve credit for that.

However, I think we all agree it also doesn't go far enough. Most of the blame for that--the tremendous majority of it-- is on the Republicans, of course. But unfortunately, some of it belongs with Obama, who negotiated away the public option and took too accommodating an initial stance, at least in my opinion. I know other people will have different, reasonable viewpoints on this.

In this particular instance, however, it seems like a private act of charity or goodwill or public relations, and nothing to do with anything political or systemic.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
125. First...it was never an ACA/Obama problem. It was a formulary one. The ACA, however,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:13 PM
Mar 2014

gives Will's wife two options she didn't have before...

1) She can't be denied health insurance due to preexisting condition; and

2) She has rights of appeal of the formulary restriction under the ACA.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
156. Yes, you are right
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:44 PM
Mar 2014

The problem with MS drugs was one brought up before ACA "went live".

Will's wife is still uninsured for this purpose!

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
359. "if the ACA hadn't blocked him, WP wouldn't have had to go around them!"
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 04:06 PM
Mar 2014

that's literally their thinking

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
91. Will, I want to thank you...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:04 PM
Mar 2014

...despite my disagreement with how you brought your wife's situation to light, I appreciate you reminding us that there is still one giant healthcare problem that needs to be addressed. The insane overcharging for prescription medication.

It was a subject that was hot a few years ago, but we've been sidetracked by other problems. I don't know how to bring it back into the spotlight, but I'm going to start writing letters/emails to anyone that might listen.

I'm so glad you found a solution.

TBF

(32,004 posts)
96. Yay!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:16 PM
Mar 2014

I'm so glad that worked out for the short-term and hopefully their will be a plan to meet her needs for the long-term as well.

I certainly will not rest until we get single payer. ACA is a start, but we've got much more work to do.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
97. Great news, really glad to hear that. But...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:17 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:49 PM - Edit history (2)

none of us should have to deal with the frustrating maze that is for profit health insurance.

It's such a frustrating, emotional energy blasting waste of time. Most of us have busy lives, and don't need every second of our free time consumed by things like being put on hold for a half hour when trying to find out if our health care needs will be covered, and then struggling with bureaucracy ("I'm going to transfer you to Irma Gardnotagin over in Customer Care&quot as you scream while really shitty digitally detracted music begins to play, music that is designed to get you to give up while you are on hold for another half hour waiting for Irma over in Customer Care to pick up as she does her nails while not answering your call for the half hour prescribed in the corporate protocol manual under the section entitled "101 Ways To Make The Mark Customer Give Up Trying So We Can Burn Them And Increase Profits".

As you put speakerphone on and wonder, "Geez, this company made record profits in the gazillions of dollars range last year...you'd think they could hire more staff to expedite customer service!"


One problem (among many problems) people commonly have is not understanding deceptive for profit health insurance terminology. When dealing with for profit health insurance companies, what you don't know can, and probably will, hurt you. For profit health insurance companies rely on customer ignorance for increased profits.

The devil is in the details, and things don't always mean what they appear to say. And even people who are educated, literate, and have relatively high IQ's get duped sometimes. Every US health care provider's intake staff has stories about nightmare time consuming dealings with the deviousness, evasiveness, and doublespeak of for profit health insurance companies. If they can even scam the professionals, imagine what old Mack DeNife in Sales & Marketing does to folks who can't read all that well.

I wonder how much extra profit is generated for these companies per day through customer ignorance and error. I suspect it is millions of dollars, collectively.

Health care in Canada

Health care in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded health care system, which is mostly free at the point of use and has most services provided by private entities.[2] It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984.[3] The government assures the quality of care through federal standards. The government does not participate in day-to-day care or collect any information about an individual's health, which remains confidential between a person and his or her physician.[citation needed] Canada's provincially based Medicare systems are cost-effective partly because of their administrative simplicity. In each province each doctor handles the insurance claim against the provincial insurer. There is no need for the person who accesses health care to be involved in billing and reclaim. Private health expenditure accounts for 30% of health care financing.[4]

Competitive practices such as advertising are kept to a minimum, thus maximizing the percentage of revenues that go directly towards care. In general, costs are paid through funding from income taxes. In British Columbia, taxation-based funding is supplemented by a fixed monthly premium which is waived or reduced for those on low incomes.[5] There are no deductibles on basic health care and co-pays are extremely low or non-existent (supplemental insurance such as Fair Pharmacare may have deductibles, depending on income).

A health card is issued by the Provincial Ministry of Health to each individual who enrolls for the program and everyone receives the same level of care.[6] There is no need for a variety of plans because virtually all essential basic care is covered, including maternity and infertility problems. Depending on the province, dental and vision care may not be covered but are often insured by employers through private companies. In some provinces, private supplemental plans are available for those who desire private rooms if they are hospitalized. Cosmetic surgery and some forms of elective surgery are not considered essential care and are generally not covered. These can be paid out-of-pocket or through private insurers. Health coverage is not affected by loss or change of jobs, health care cannot be denied due to unpaid premiums (in BC), and there are no lifetime limits or exclusions for pre-existing conditions.

Pharmaceutical medications are covered by public funds for the elderly or indigent,[7] or through employment-based private insurance. Drug prices are negotiated with suppliers by the federal government to control costs. Family physicians (often known as general practitioners or GPs in Canada) are chosen by individuals. If a patient wishes to see a specialist or is counseled to see a specialist, a referral can be made by a GP. Preventive care and early detection are considered important and yearly checkups are encouraged.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Canada


US patients again look to Canada in quest for affordable medication

Why pay more?

Everybody wants Canadian drugs for one reason: Brand-name meds are cheaper there. A 2012 report found, for example, that a 30-day supply of Cymbalta (used to treat depression or chronic pain) typically costs $149 in the United States, compared with $113 in Canada; Nasonex (used for allergies) was $105 in the U.S. and only $29 in Canada.

These price differences are due to the unique way that the U.S. handles its pharmaceutical marketplace. In most other countries, governments either set pricing caps or negotiate lower prices directly with drugmakers. In the U.S., pricing is determined by market competition among pharmaceutical companies, which have little incentive to keep prices down.

When accused of price gouging in the U.S. market, the companies claim that the high costs are required to pay off sunken research and development costs — averaging over $1 billion per drug, according to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. The claim has been debated, with some studies estimating the cost at more like $50 million to $75 million. Regardless, because other countries force pharmaceutical companies to sell drugs cheaply abroad, U.S. residents are stuck with the bill, essentially subsidizing the affordable prescription drugs in other countries.
snip---
When he was drafting what would eventually become the Affordable Care Act, President Barack Obama considered adding a section that would enable Medicare to negotiate drug prices. However, he gave that away as a bargaining chip to gain the overall support of the pharmaceutical industry.

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/11/7/is-canada-the-answertohighpriceofmedsinus.html


Free Market Capitalism: Let The Buyer Beware.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
126. You're welcome. Comes from several decades of various unpleasant experiences I wish I'd never had,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:13 PM
Mar 2014

from the standpoint of customer, employer, employee, citizen, neighbor, relative, and now ACA insured.

My ACA supported insurance is excellent, relatively speaking, but still, I go to great lengths ensuring that I don't get deceived or ripped off, and these great lengths include triple checking everything and recording every conversation I have with anyone in the health insurance industry. This way, the chances of my getting burned are minimized.

I've been extremely healthy over the course of my lifetime. I can only imagine the insurance nightmares many folks with chronic illnesses have had to deal with, and this is very wrong, and should not be.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
113. I think the issue in this case is also the huge price the drug companies try to charge.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:50 PM
Mar 2014

For now, the drug company has appeared to buckle, but it's hardly the white knight in this situation.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
237. Yes, all of this about how our fucked up system is not to blame is ridiculous
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:09 PM
Mar 2014

your last quoted paragraph is a perfect example of how this president is either clueless or just another operative of the 1%. He made all of these "concessions", like this one which is going to cost Americans a fortune, and got not a single Republican vote. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt and consider that he really didn't have any idea what was happening, but the fact that he promised the PO during the campaign is suspicious

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
289. Pssst....that drug isn't on Canada's formulary either.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:20 AM
Mar 2014

The problem is the drug is expensive. All insurance systems, be they single-payer or private, require hoop-jumping to get that drug covered.

Our system has plenty of shortcomings. There's no need to invent more.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
99. I'm delighted to hear this. Maybe it would be a reasonable thing now to delete your FU Obama OP.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:21 PM
Mar 2014

I mean, really.

If you didn't know at the time you wrote it how wrong you were, you certainly do now.

And, sincerely, the news about your wife's medication is magnificent.

Be well, Sir.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
100. Will, i missed your earlier post.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:21 PM
Mar 2014

I have been on the manufacturers Patient Assistance Program for my MS drugs for over five years.

You might also check out "Patient Access Network"
http://www.panfoundation.org/
for assistance with co-pay.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
107. I wonder what day you are going to be on FOX?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:30 PM
Mar 2014

I'm sure they will be happy to air your success with your health care.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
109. Glad to hear it Will
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:37 PM
Mar 2014

One day we will get people in office who will completely transform our current for profit health insurance system.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
110. Great news! Now how about an apology to DU for the big shit you took on our President?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:43 PM
Mar 2014

That's what people tend to do when they are wrong.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
115. So.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:58 PM
Mar 2014

Obama somehow magically got the drug company to help us after his legislation delivered us to an insurance company that fucked us over...thus, I should apologize?

Truly magical thinking.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
120. Will, allow me to explain this again
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:11 PM
Mar 2014

In 2008, if your wife dropped off COBRA, she would not have been able to buy an individual insurance policy. At all. Because she had MS. She would either have had to find a new job with health insurance coverage and hope that it covered her meds or stayed in her current job forever and hope that it never changed its policy.

If she quit her job and not found employment within 63 days, she would never be able to get covered anywhere ever again.

Under the ACA, she can get coverage. And - in looking at the Anthem policy - she can get treatment for MS.

The issue is that she can't - at the moment - get the treatment she has been getting for MS. Which is admittedly a frustrating problem. But it is one that could potentially be solved if you follow the steps that many people here have given you.

ACA provides your wife coverage and treatment - neither of which she could receive if she had made these same decisions in 2007.

I apologize on behalf of President Obama that he could not mandate free drugs for everyone at anytime. I also apologize on behalf of President Obama for all the snow this winter.

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
186. And Anthem could have denied the MS drug with any policy they wrote even
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:48 PM
Mar 2014

before ACA. They could approve it in one state they operate in and not in New Hampshire for all we know.

There is nothing new, created by the ACA, in what has taken place so far. Many, many people with Medicare Part D spend days trying to locate the 'best' provider that will cover their current prescription drugs and reading through dozens of formularies to find the 'plan' that best suits their needs.

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
366. Did we set up negotiation for prices? Shorten patents so more generics could come to the market?
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 03:53 PM
Mar 2014

How about reimportation? An MLR for pharmaceutical companies?

Or did that sector actually get a sloppy, wet kiss to pacify them into supporting the effort?

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
371. Did they do it for Medicare Part D? Things move slowly. We need to
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 09:45 AM
Mar 2014

continue to push for those changes, but you won't see any if the Republicans win in November.

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
372. No, Medicare D is a TeaPubliKlan boondoggle that should have never been passed despite the benefits
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 11:53 PM
Mar 2014

Now we must somehow replace the fucking thing because we can't get away with killing it and it can't be fixed any easier than constructing a brand new program because it is fundamentally a giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry. It can be improved from the user end and we made some headway there as the doughnut hole will close which will be a great help to many seniors but on the functional end we are really, really hogtied.

To do a little at a time you must set yourself up structurally, when you try to thread the needle and actually make yourself have to reinvent the wheel as an improvement you find that you have screwed the pooch and good.

You can add on to a house, I've seen folks do it a room at at a time off a trailer but you don't do it when it makes you have to find other property in different terrain, maybe in a different country.

The only plausible bridges are the community health centers and the state waivers, the actual meat of the law very much strengthens and reinforces the cartel and sets them up as a too big to fail entity with greater tie in to the full faith and credit of not only the US but each of us individually as well.

I do not like the permutation even as strictly market based reform, the argument that it is this or single payer is simple minded and untrue. That doesn't mean that some real good is being done or that critical relief is being provided but the negative drag is there.

Cha

(296,846 posts)
230. Obama's such a sweetie, the boss.. He thanks you for apologizing for him causing
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:54 PM
Mar 2014

all that snow and ice. And, I thank you.



ProSense

(116,464 posts)
123. Weird
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:13 PM
Mar 2014

"Obama somehow magically got the drug company to help us after his legislation delivered us to an insurance company that fucked us over...thus, I should apologize? "

Shouldn't that say:

Obama somehow magically got the drug company to help us after his legislation magically delivered us to an insurance company that fucked us over...thus, I should apologize?

I mean, Obama seems to be making your decisions for you so he should get credit for magically delivering you the the wonderful drug company that helped.

You know he controls the drug companies, don't you?

You asked if you had it "straight." Apparently, the answer is that you don't want to and never will.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
132. Yes, Will. It's one thing to be angry and fly off the handle, another to be unable to admit error.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:19 PM
Mar 2014

The arrogance is unbecoming a progressive.

On this matter, I think you're hopeless.

Obama created a life far better for probably millions than existed before.

He had a fucked up Congress to deal with.

This is the best he could get and he didn't CREATE out of thin air the insurance treachery that you encountered.

I swear, you're blind and you're stubborn and your angry posts, recommended by your choir of sycophants, do nothing to advance the cause.

Not a God Damned thing.

calimary

(81,110 posts)
180. I wasn't going to post on this thread. But I HAVE to commend this from NYC_SKP.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:27 PM
Mar 2014

Every shit someone takes on the President, as described farther unthread, is tantamount to another vote for "President rand paul" or heaven forbid - "President jebbie." Okay. Be angry. But how dare someone here lacerate President Obama like that and call him some fucking used-car salesman. That's what one would expect from the Pox Noise crowd. Or trolls. And I know enough about Will Pitt's body of work to know he is not a troll. But vitriol in that last thread was seriously uncalled-for.

All you Obama dumpers - you REALLY want another republi-CON getting into the White House? You REALLY want Dems at each other's throats so the overall result is we have a GOP House AND Senate too? Will you be happy THEN???????? Stop and think how THAT miserable outcome would work out for ya.

I will take a shitty Democrat over even a "good" republi-CON ANY DAY. It's not just them, it's who they bring in with them. And I myself will apologize here, too, because I'm probably gonna bore and piss off a lot of DUers here over the next months and years, because I'm gonna be nagging about this - again, and again, and again, and again, and AGAIN.

… and AGAIN!

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
244. Agreed.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:22 PM
Mar 2014

Right there with ya, Calimary.

They are going out of their way to shut us down with petty tactics, totally unbecoming of any decent liberal I've ever known.

Like you, I've been around here long enough to feel at home, and this latest band of chronic poo flingers aren't going to run me off with my tail between my legs. I plan on being a thorn in their collective side for the duration.

I'm a proud Democrat, and we have come too far to piss it away now.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
349. Again, Obama is not running against Rand
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:15 PM
Mar 2014

So we are starting with a clean slate. Right now, we need to make sure ACA fulfills the basic promises that were repeated Obamacare ad infinitum over the last few years. Now it is time to stand and deliver or he is our bold deceiver.

As for Rand, we cross that mudhole when we have to -- not before.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
195. good post and thank you
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:55 PM
Mar 2014

I totally understand his frustration and rage.

However...it was misdirected. President Obama, IMHO, is head and shoulders above any Republican and frankly some Democrats. The insurance companies and their backers, both seen and unseen, are the real villains here.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
133. Yes since you apparently haven't learned anything from this, you should apologize.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:20 PM
Mar 2014

Like a human fucking being.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
136. Will..as the mother of a disabled child on two non-formulary drugs, I say you are wrong.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:23 PM
Mar 2014

You don't have an insurance problem.

You have a formulary problem. You would still have a formulary problem, even under single payer.

But here is how your President has helped you...

You wife can't be excluded from coverage based on her MS.

You have new rights to appeal the formulary under the ACA.

NOW PLEASE CORRECT THIS POST.....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4686037

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
166. Obama never promised to abolish formularies.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:10 PM
Mar 2014

Or make everything magically work just the way you wanted.

As usual no apology, no backing down, and I expect another thread telling DU how bad Obama is using some trumped up insane reasoning.

90-percent

(6,828 posts)
112. Great news Will!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:48 PM
Mar 2014

Firstly, for the health and well being of your wife.

Secondly, an Obamacare horror story from somebody with Will's liberal progressive activist journalistic creds is just plain not good!

It does speak to the clumsy and sometimes ill informed start up of the ACA. And it shows if people persevere and get some help the ACA in the end is doing what it's intended to do; provide all of us with reasonably priced health insurance that actually provides actual health services instead of pre-existing conditions and lifetime ceiling caps and all the other crap the insurance company loop-hole-ologists used to deny people health converge when they needed it most.

THE FUCKING DEATH PANELS ARE GONE FOREVER, BABY!

-90% Jimmy

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
127. Glad to hear it Will.. You know when we are having issues paying for meds
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:14 PM
Mar 2014

we usually ask the doctor for "samples".. I don't know if that would work in your case but...

Dorian Gray

(13,479 posts)
131. That is good news. Sorry that you had to go directly to them, though I
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:17 PM
Mar 2014

am really happy that they are going to provide your wife with what she needs for the time being.

Good luck to your wife. Best wishes.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
135. Awesome news!!!!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:22 PM
Mar 2014

I do the same thing for Mrs. CFLDem's meds.

Proving once again that the for profit insurance companies are the main problem with our healthcare.

BuelahWitch

(9,083 posts)
142. So happy to hear that!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:40 PM
Mar 2014

I spent many years fighting with insurance companies and doctors trying to get care for my Mother's various ailments. It's not easy and it sure as hell ain't fun. Here's hoping the road is a little easier for your family from now on.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
160. let me see if I recap this properly:
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:47 PM
Mar 2014

1 - working for Months on phones for hours and days at a time. Getting no Where but frustrated

2 - ask a trusted friend about What Should I do? The smart (and probably Ron Pauler friend) says:
''You can't do nuttin', Will. Obama fucked you up good! Give up!''

3 - Post your rage and target on a forum: Why the dirty rotten piece of shit used car salesman Obama!

4. Problem solved in one day by knowledgeable people on DU.


hmmmmmm

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
165. you can fill in any missing pieces, feel free.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:09 PM
Mar 2014

It feels something like the missing Malaysian plane to me. One of those mystifying things.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
173. hahaha!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:54 PM
Mar 2014

another one!

tee hee haa haaa and more ha.

Us furiners sure are a pain in the arse, eh? We should just STFU unless it's something Your agenda needs us for.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
177. I hold dual citizenship, U.S. and Canada.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:03 PM
Mar 2014

But I would never think that I know enough about Canadian policies and politics to comment once on them in a public forum. To say nothing of multiple posts day in day out. It must be distracting.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
181. that's really big of you.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:30 PM
Mar 2014

What if I had a burning hate for the President - called him awful names and said he was a piece of shit and ACA was a piece of shit work and everything he says and does ends up in the shithouse?

Then would I have your permission to speak on the matter?

If I could be bothered I'd search and see if you ever commented or had an opinion on the goings on in other countries. Did you stay silent during the Iraq war, how about Palestinian/Isreali issues or the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries. I think Australia still has a very severe drought - I hope you didn't break your own rules!

Cha

(296,846 posts)
264. Then you'd be more than Welcome by the OH on DU.. I saw someone
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:57 PM
Mar 2014

from Canada yesterday Whining venomously about the President.. and strangely Welcomed with Open Arms by an OH.

They don't like it when a Canadian supports President Obama.. that's a big NO NO.

I do believe this is an International board? Peeps from all over the World?

Whisp~

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
191. One of the DU owner/admins is Canadian.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:41 PM
Mar 2014

And I believe that DU probably wouldn't exist or be the same without his input. So, this xenophobic baloney I'm seeing posted around here is rather baffling.


 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
201. This happens when they don't have a new Cat Food Commission
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:25 PM
Mar 2014

false story to flail and obsess over. That must have been a sad day on DU when that treasure had to be given up.

and I think it also has to do with Obama being a diplomat and not going for the latest possible invasive Bush like move that is dreamed about - that must have been discouraging that American soldiers are not headed for Ukraine so they could bash his skull in with vile words til the end of time.

I have seen the cycle quite a few times so these jibes are just part of the pattern. I think it's amusing, and almost entertaining that furiners get the treatment when there is not much else happening.


Number23

(24,544 posts)
203. Are you talking about EarlG? I think he's British, not Canadian??
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:34 PM
Mar 2014

But everything else in your post is spot on. But all you have to do is look at the caliber of the posters that making this "well, you ain't here so you need to shut up, I don't give a damn how Freeperish I sound" to know that this little foray into xenophobia is yet another desperate attempt to change the subject. When you know you're on the losing side of an issue, just try to limit the folks that can participate. Republicans have been doing that for decades.

It's really nice to see you, Agent Frog. Haven't seen you in a while.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
215. Nice to see you too.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:22 PM
Mar 2014

Been spending more time with the grandkids and less time here since it tends to make my head hurt so much these days.



sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
182. Why remain a foreigner? How about coming to live here as a citizen where you too can enjoy our
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:34 PM
Mar 2014

extraordinary benefits.

44, 000 people here die each year because they cannot afford HC. An acceptable loss in favor of the profits for Health Insurance Corps under our system.

Just curious, is it because you think the US Corporate Health Insurance system where people have to fight to stay alive, is so good that you feel the need to comment favorably on it?

What kind of HC system do you have and would like to see it substituted with the US System?

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #182)

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
353. How many times have I a US citizen wished
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:22 PM
Mar 2014

my grandparents had not given up their Canadian citizenship? MANY.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
190. Will, I thought you should know a thread was started in MIRT about your other thread.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:39 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:57 PM - Edit history (1)

The thread in MIRT was wayyyy out of line and wayyyyy beyond the job or mandate given to MIRT to deal with ONLY newbie trolls. On occasion, and only when a 6-0 hide gets emailed to the MIRT team, members will discuss a long time DUer - and only in the context of that specific hide prefaced by "not ours" or some such. That wasn't the case here. In fact, the member who posted the MIRT thread knew your thread survived a jury. (Btw, they also sent two sop alerts before starting the MIRT thread)

The mirt thread was rightfully locked by earlg.

As MIRT is access restricted, I feel it's only fair you should see this abuse of the system that went on behind the scenes.

This was a blatant abuse of the MIRT forum and overstep in an apparent attempt to get a member in trouble with the admins.


Note to jurors: the MIRT description specifically states MIRT content is not confidential and MIRT members don't pledge any confidentiality when they sign up. In fact, the description says your conduct is subject to discussion outside MIRT - Part of DU's transparency I guess.



From the MIRT guidelines:

MIR Team members can make use of a special access-restricted workspace which essentially functions like a forum or a group. This workspace is provided for the MIR Team only, in the event that they need help and/or advice from their colleagues when discussing potential intruders. While the Malicious Intruder Removal Workspace cannot be viewed by DU members who are not on the MIR Team, discussions that take place in the workspace are not considered privileged information and MIR Team members may talk about them elsewhere. However, MIR Team members should use their best judgment when doing so.




From the MIRT how to:


The MIR Team does not have blanket authority to enforce DU's Terms of Service wherever violations may occur -- that is the role of the Administrators. The narrowly-focused job of the MIR Team is to protect our members by removing malicious intruders.

From Skinners thread in MIRT:


As a member of the Malicious Intruder Removal Team (MIR Team), you have access to this access-restricted workspace. You can use this space to have discussions with other members of the MIR team, to help you make wise decisions. 

Please note that only MIR Team members have access to this workspace, but it is not a completely private forum. Other members with access to this forum have not signed any confidentiality agreement, and they are free to discuss with other people what goes on in this workspace and how you do you job. As long as you remain professional and polite in your postings here, you shouldn't have any problems. 


Your Job 

The Malicious Intruder Removal Team (MIR Team) is empowered to revoke the posting privileges of people who show up at DU with the intent to disrupt. This includes but is not limited to conservative trolls, spammers, and the like. 

The DU Administrators have deliberately selected the phrase "malicious intruder" instead of the more common term "disruptor," because we feel the term "disruptor" has become so broadly applied that it has become essentially meaningless. For reference: 

ma·li·cious adj. Characterized by malice; intending or intended to do harm. 
in·trud·er n. One who intrudes; one who thrusts himself in, or enters without right, or without leave or welcome; a trespasser.


The MIR Team does not have blanket authority to enforce DU's Terms of Service wherever violations may occur -- that is the role of the Administrators. The narrowly-focused job of the MIR Team is to protect our members by removing malicious intruders. 

If you signed up for the Malicious Intruder Removal Team in the hope that you could ban some other long-term DUer that you don't like, you will be sadly disappointed. The software won't even let you ban members with more than 100 posts unless that person has had a post hidden by the Jury in the previous hour. The emphasis is on removing malicious intruders who are actively disrupting. 

In other words: You get to be a hero. You aren't going to be banning beloved long-term DUers -- you're going to be taking out the trash. 


Please note that only MIR Team members have access to this workspace, but it is not a completely private forum. Other members with access to this forum have not signed any confidentiality agreement, and they are free to discuss with other people what goes on in this workspace and how you do you job. As long as you remain professional and polite in your postings here, you shouldn't have any problems.





The MIRT thread:
------------------------


Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:27 PM
uppityperson (83,170 posts)

WilliamPitt, jury 3-3, posting to make sure Admin sees

Last edited Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:53 PM - Edit history (2)

This discussion thread was locked by EarlG (a host of the Malicious Intruder Removal group).
Out of MIRT's pay grade by a lot but alerting to admin. Someone posted said it withstood a jury, 3-3.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024685964
What I've learned about the Affordable Care Act


What I've learned about the Affordable Care Act

What I've learned after a three-month war with these fiends: the ACA says the insurance companies cannot deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions, which is true as far as it goes. But they can deny coverage for the life-saving medications necessary to treat those conditions. The insurance company I signed up with through the ACA exchange just denied coverage of my wife's multiple sclerosis medication. We're "covered," to the tune of $700 a month...just not for what she really needs.

A cozy loophole, that.

Fuck you, insurance industry.

Fuck you, Mr. President, you piece of shit used-car salesman.

From my heart and soul, fuck you.
12

Anger is a gift.


A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Mar 18, 2014, 03:42 PM, and voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I sympathize with the poster's wife's medical situation; and if he'd even said 'fuck you Mr President for caving in' I would have voted to leave. But calling him a 'piece of shit used car salesman' is a step too far, and plays into the hands of the anti-healthcare Right.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: So because "many others are finding that ACA is a blessing," those who find problems should just shut up? I would never have used the words that this person used to describe the president, however, the president can take care of himself. If this poster had directed those words at a DUer I would vote to hide.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a long term poster. He is understandably upset by reality and angry, like many Progressives that the ACA was not enough, not sufficient, but was better than nothing. His outrage is understandable, a little over the top calling the President a used car salesman, but does not warrant disappearing the message.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: poster may be upset but this is over the top
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't blame the poster for railing at the insurance company and the president for producing an inadequate health care act that benefits the insurance companies.

-----------------------

Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:28 PM
Baitball Blogger (15,570 posts)
1. Yeah. Not sure how this is going to end.


For more insight into what passes for normal in Seminole County, FL, check out www.keystoneworksite.com
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers
--------

Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:29 PM
Sissyk (3,523 posts)
2. I'm starting to think the WPTroll

has really taken over WP's account.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers
Response to Sissyk (Reply #2)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:48 PM
In_The_Wind (55,363 posts)
9. almost looks that way


Never regret something that once made you smile.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers

--------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:30 PM
greatauntoftriplets (137,842 posts)
3. Thanks and I support alerting Admin about this.

Tiocfaidh ár lá
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:33 PM

------------------------------------
SidDithers (31,652 posts)
4. Kick it upstairs...

I also sent a CS alert, to add my vote that this isn't appropriate for DU.

There are certain lines at DU that shouldn't be crossed. Obviously, homophobia, racism, sexism, anti-Semitism are over that line.

IMO, so is "Fuck you, Mr. President, you piece of shit used-car salesman."



Sid

Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers

-----------------/
Response to SidDithers (Reply #4)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:40 AM
Violet_Crumble (31,640 posts)
18. Don't forget Islamophobia. I woulda thought that's a line that shouldn't be crossed n/t

"I'm disgusted by Dave Grohl. I mean it's (Foo Fighters) just boring fucking jock-rock, isn't it?.... What do you call them in Australia... Bogans isn't it?" - Ian Astbury, The Cult.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


------------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:38 PM
TBF (22,824 posts)
5. I feel for Will,

but as I said out in the thread he is attacking the wrong thing.

POTUS is an administrator and I do think he has tried to help where he can (limited ways - things like signing the Lily Ledbetter Act etc), but Will is apparently channeling all his anger towards him.

The problem is much larger and often discussed on leftist political boards (as opposed to liberal boards - this is largely a democratic/liberal board imo). Socialists/communists see the issue as an economic system that needs to be changed. We talk about it in small groups (both online and in person). I throw in a few words here & there to get people thinking ... but when push comes to shove we support one of two parties unless things majorly change in this country.

I hope this doesn't result in banning because I do love Will, but that was an unwise OP. I hope he re-thinks and deletes it.
The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening. ― Rosa Luxemburg
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


-------------------
Response to TBF (Reply #5)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:39 PM
uppityperson (83,170 posts)
6. I feel for Will too, but this is not acceptable

Gay, Straight, Black, White, Marriage is a Civil Right.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


---------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #6)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:41 PM
TBF (22,824 posts)
7. Yes, I know.

I am very sad for him but he is missing the forest for the trees.
The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening. ― Rosa Luxemburg
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




-----------------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #6)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:47 PM
one_voice (12,704 posts)
8. I feel for him too...

I just posted that. I've been 2 months without my meds and my husband had to get medication from the doc today to hold him over till our insurance is in effect, so I know the frustration. However what he said in the OP and what he continues to say throughout the thread is unacceptable on a Democratic board.

You can't separate peace from freedom, because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom. Malcolm X
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers






--------------------
Response to one_voice (Reply #8)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:12 PM
greatauntoftriplets (137,842 posts)
10. A subsequent post where he repeated that message got hidden.

Last edited Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:55 PM - Edit history (1)

Juries are so unreliable, IMO.
Tiocfaidh ár lá
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


---------------------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #6)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:20 AM
azurnoir (32,482 posts)
17. What would you like to see happen?

you wish admins to be aware but to what end? Admins are certainly already aware of this post, especially seeing how 'someone' got his post where he repeated the car salesman part hidden, I'm just curious about what result you'd like to see

As for myself Will Pit is a long time DUer and I do understand his anger over this, -a jury left his OP 3-3 and another post was hidden, yes it was OTT venting but nothing more IMO end of story or should have been

Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers

---------------------------
Response to azurnoir (Reply #17)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 09:21 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (10,541 posts)
20. I think it's pretty shitty of a MIRT member to start a thread on....

... a long time DUer that not a single person suspects of being a troll or MI.

It's one thing to discuss an alert that comes across our desk but THAT isn't even the case here.

So why is there a thread in MIRT?

Two SOP alerts and probably a CS alert weren't enough?

How about try an ATA thread?
Self-delete Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



-------------------------
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #20)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 09:30 AM
Kali (37,437 posts)
21. there was a CS hide, though not a 6-0 that would come to us

but from the way that thread started it sure could have gone to a melt-down status that we might have needed to look at.

I don't have a problem discussing a long-time member in that context.
the monkeys still control the cabana
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



---------------------------
Response to Kali (Reply #21)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 09:53 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (10,541 posts)
22. Oh bullshit. Anyone "could" go to meltdown status.

The guy has exactly ONE hide on his profile. One.

This thread was started over an hour after the alert was sent. Where was the "meltdown" when this thread was started? Don't' you think maybe we should wait for a meltdown before we start a gossip thread on a long term member non MI/Troll?
Self-delete Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




---------------------
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #22)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:39 AM
uppityperson (83,170 posts)
27. Who has gossiped here or said anything about Will beyond addressing his post, understanding his

frustration and hoping for the best for his wife? I see none and will not reply except to explain why I posted this, which I have done.

If it turns into a "gossip thread", I will self delete the OP to stop it.
Gay, Straight, Black, White, Marriage is a Civil Right.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




----------------
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #22)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:56 AM
Kali (37,437 posts)
30. also there is the auto "flagged" if they get a few in a row,

so we aren't as likely to deal with it anyway.

but I stand by it being OK to discuss disruptive behavior regardless of status.
the monkeys still control the cabana
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



---------------------
Response to azurnoir (Reply #17)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:15 AM
one_voice (12,704 posts)
23. I'd like to see it taken off the front page...

Venting is one thing...that it's on the front page is another.

Just my opinion.
You can't separate peace from freedom, because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom. Malcolm X
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



---------------------
Response to one_voice (Reply #23)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:19 AM
greatauntoftriplets (137,842 posts)
24. Yes.

Tiocfaidh ár lá
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




-----------------
Response to azurnoir (Reply #17)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:36 AM
uppityperson (83,170 posts)
25. To reply

I understand Will's frustration well. My mother was diagnosed with MS when I was finishing nursing school. She died of it 15 years later. 20 yrs later I am still working as a nurse, often with people with MS and often dealing with the damned insurance companies whose main purpose is to make money by paying out as little as possible. Rarely does a week go by without my talking to insurance companies, trying to figure out a way around their blasted ways. Rarely does a day go by without talking to and missing my mom.

I do not care who wrote the "fu...used car salesman...etc" bit. I do not care if it is a new member or even Admin. It is not acceptable to write that on DU. If it was a newbie, I would vote to ban. If it was out of out pay grade, I would alert to Admin.

There are often threads in MIRT of DU members beyond MIRT's purview written to bring attention to Admin.

If I saw EarlG write that, I'd start a thread on him. If I saw iamlg write that, I'd start a thread on her. "posting to make sure Admin sees" is what I wrote in the title of this thread and why I wrote it. I want to make sure Admin sees.

That is what this was for.

And I greatly appreciate the lack of gossip as has happened on other threads about long time members.
Gay, Straight, Black, White, Marriage is a Civil Right.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers





----------------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #25)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:21 PM
azurnoir (32,482 posts)
36. First I really can not see how admins were unaware-his post was on the front page most of yesterday

there was already a Host thread and not mention this

From now on, the DU administrators will be notified of every alert sent. In addition, the MIR Team will be notified whenever a post is removed under two conditions: 1) If the post is removed on a vote of 6-0, or 2) if the author of the post has fewer than 100 posts. We believe this will give the MIR Team all the information they need in order to keep DU clear of malicious intruders.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=2863

admins were already quite aware-in addition when we run threads on members the reason is to achieve a ppr of that poster


Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers





-------------------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #6)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:43 AM
Violet_Crumble (31,640 posts)
19. I'm not a fan of Will Pitt, but I do feel for him when I read his post...

Which is why I don't think his post should be kicked to admin. What should have happened is that the jury should have voted to hide his post and that should have been the end of it
"I'm disgusted by Dave Grohl. I mean it's (Foo Fighters) just boring fucking jock-rock, isn't it?.... What do you call them in Australia... Bogans isn't it?" - Ian Astbury, The Cult.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


-------------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:25 PM
Kali (37,437 posts)
11. meh, I don't care who it is

saying this to the Democratic POTUS on DU is over the top.

Fuck you, Mr. President, you piece of shit used-car salesman.

From my heart and soul, fuck you.


the monkeys still control the cabana
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



--------------------
Response to Kali (Reply #11)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:36 PM
uppityperson (83,170 posts)
13. that was my point in posting this, thanks for seeing it too.

I appreciate the backing.
Gay, Straight, Black, White, Marriage is a Civil Right.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


---------------------
Response to uppityperson (Reply #13)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 11:45 AM
NYC_SKP (57,961 posts)
33. You have my 100% support for posting this.

Despite what others may say, having just one or having four hides on one's record is meaningless in this case.

The jury system is weak protection against crazy talk, especially with "popular" members.

Had a newbie posted such crap, a jury result would have likely been quite different.

I'm all for open discussion in this forum, I don't see the harm.


Visit the new DU Progressive Media Resources Group>

---------------------



Logical (12,012 posts)
12. I think WP needs a temp ban. Not in our powers I know but he needs to have some time.....

to calm down.

I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



---------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 06:52 PM
MineralMan (62,331 posts)
14. I have nothing to say, really.

Will Pitt has let his temper override his good sense before. I would have voted to hide, because that would prevent further embarrasment, but there it is.
House Majority in 2014! I am a DFL precinct chair in Saint Paul, MN. http://saintpaulw6p13.blogspot.com My web content blog: http://twincitieswebcontent.blogspot.com/ Note: All posts written by me are my opinion only. Your opinion might differ.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



--------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 06:58 PM
OKNancy (31,495 posts)
15. I feel for him, but won't post in the thread for fear of "blaming the victim"

but for the life of me, I can't figure out why he didn't check his policy first to see if something so important was covered.
My daughter did on hers and picked a great Blue Cross policy. In fact she was here at the house, then said.. Well... I'm off to go pay $10.00 for my prescription!"

Before it was $267.00
“There is nothing in which people more betray their character than in what they laugh at.”
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



--------------------
Response to OKNancy (Reply #15)Tue Mar 18, 2014, 07:11 PM
TBF (22,834 posts)
16. Maybe he did and they've changed

the policy. Who knows. I had some shots for my arthritis a couple of years ago that were covered but then denied this winter. I haven't followed up yet because it has gotten warmer (thus less pain). I figured I can wait it out until fall and then call (these have expensive co-pays so even if they cover I'll probably pay $500 out of pocket so I'll wait until I'm desperate).

Health care in this country really is an abomination but people don't know unless they've had the unfortunate experience of becoming chronically ill, having to actually pay for the premiums (I remember when I started work and full insurance came with the job - no premiums!), or get a policy that doesn't cover as much as others. Ours is really pretty good but our premium is now over $2K a month.

I really would like to see single payer in this country.



The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening. ― Rosa Luxemburg
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




----------------
Response to OKNancy (Reply #15)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:46 AM
msanthrope (22,826 posts)
28. I feel for his wife...but I think posting false insurance information, and calling the President

what he did should get an admin look.

While the name calling is juvenile, the fact that he has not corrected his OP to correct his false claim regarding coverage is troubling.
I haven't changed my avatar once in my 12 years of being on this site. Until now. It's time.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers




----------------
Response to msanthrope (Reply #28)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:54 AM
TBF (22,834 posts)
29. I missed this part -

"the fact that he has not corrected his OP to correct his false claim regarding coverage is troubling".

Is there another thread on this or something?

The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening. ― Rosa Luxemburg
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



-------------------
Response to TBF (Reply #29)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:57 AM
msanthrope (22,826 posts)
31. Sorry---it is his post #8, that he has been repeatedly admonished on----

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4686037
I haven't changed my avatar once in my 12 years of being on this site. Until now. It's time.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers
Response to msanthrope (Reply #31)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:10 PM
OKNancy (31,495 posts)
34. and here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024687956
“There is nothing in which people more betray their character than in what they laugh at.”
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



------------------
Response to OKNancy (Reply #34)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:18 PM
msanthrope (22,826 posts)
35. After reading his second thread, I am gobsmacked--he apparently only appealed the decision today.

So the entire first thread was based on the initial 'no.' Apparently the doctor called twice, but this hasn't even escalated to the letter writing stage by the doctor.

I'm at a loss, here. I have my disabled daughter on two non-formulary drugs, and I've had to go through this process and know the feeling of frustration, but I really think these two threads are way, way, over the line.
I haven't changed my avatar once in my 12 years of being on this site. Until now. It's time.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers



----------------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 10:38 AM
ismnotwasm (15,285 posts)
26. I don't pay attention to the guy much

I do know he's not exactly a huge Obama fan-- which seems to describe a lot of DU. I also know he gets very angry on occasion.

As a nurse I suppose I could comment about these things, but I don't. And it's not appropriate for MIRT. There is more going on with healthcare reimbursement processes' than the ACA.

My husband has MS, so my heart goes out to him-- it's a frightening disease. So while his response was OOT, fear and anger will to that to people.

Cannot reply in locked threads
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink Super powers


---------------
Response to uppityperson (Original post)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 11:30 AM
NYC_SKP (57,963 posts)
32. Alert admins. This OP is so OTT that it really needs to be locked. TOS violation for crazy talk.

There's no clear violation of GD SOP there, but there is a violation of TOS.

"Don't go overboard with the crazy talk"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Visit the new DU Progressive Media Resources Group>


sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
232. The jury system is a democratic process. I don't see why it should drive anyone crazy.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:59 PM
Mar 2014

Looks like just a small group of people to me. Most DUers accept the jury decisions whether they go their way or not.

It certainly is eye-opening though to see what goes on behind the scenes.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
268. Serious, I so agree with you. I've had far more shutouts when I do actually send an alert.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:01 PM
Mar 2014

Doesn't stop me from doing it when I see something I think is wrong.

Autumn

(44,980 posts)
198. This has been an eye opening week, but that's not the first time
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:09 PM
Mar 2014

I have seen a thread started in MIRT on someone who has not had a post hidden.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
199. I should have stated sometimes threads are started, absent hide, on newer low post.....
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:17 PM
Mar 2014

...... count DUers that are "pinging" the troll-dar.

I don't think I've ever seen a thread started, absent a hide, on a long timer that no one suspects of being a zombie or troll.. Unless they are saying Pitt is a zombie or troll???

Autumn

(44,980 posts)
200. Yes on newer low post count DUers "pinging" the troll-dar
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:21 PM
Mar 2014

threads should be and are started. They know Pitt is not a zombie or troll. It was offensive to some. Others saw the fear and emotion behind it.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
229. Will is not a zombie or troll and yes, there have been threads started on old timers. Why post thisq
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:48 PM
Mar 2014

except to stir up trouble?

Maybe you missed the link at the top of the MIRT forum that gives specific instructions as to how to deal with things regarding MIRT that you disagree with?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
234. I always thought MIRT was only supposed to deal with new members.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:02 PM
Mar 2014

Maybe more people need to start signing up for MIRT.

And it's good to have transparency. We are often too trusting of a system we believe is working well. Imo, all forums should be readable to the general DU population including MIRT.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
236. I encourage everyone to do a turn on MIRT to see how it is, what happens. Mostly it is DUers working
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:05 PM
Mar 2014

together as a true team. MIRT only bans newbies these days, but there has been discussion about longer term DUers also as Admin are MIRT members and it is used as a way to send them a message rather than just emailing them.


TBF

(32,004 posts)
243. I think this is the current list -
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:19 PM
Mar 2014

Returning from previous term:

azurnoir
bluesbassman
boston bean
Grateful for Hope
greatauntoftriplets
hootinholler
In_The_Wind
mtnester
petronius
Sissyk
TBF
uppityperson
Violet_Crumble
winter is coming

New this term:

Baitball Blogger
Behind the Aegis
CreekDog
denbot
Go Vols
Hassin Bin Sober
hunter
ismnotwasm
Kali
Kingofalldems
Logical
MineralMan
msanthrope
muriel_volestrangler
NYC_SKP
OKNancy
one_voice
opiate69
pinto
progressoid
Purveyor
SidDithers
X_Digger
zappaman

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
245. Announcements forum has the lists and posts sign ups every 3 months. Looks like 38 right now.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:22 PM
Mar 2014

If I counted correctly. If I missed and miscounted, somewhere in the 300-40 range. If you scroll down Announcements Forum main page, you can see "Say hello to our new MIR Team!" when they get a new one.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10133512


Looks like the next sign up will be mid-April. After doing 1 term, you can sign up for a second if you wish and then need to take time off.

TBF

(32,004 posts)
241. MIRT can only ban new members-
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:18 PM
Mar 2014

sometimes discussions happen when alerts come in on long-term members. I think this one attracted more replies because Will is so well-known, normally folks say "NMI" and not much else.

"NMI" - not malicious intruder (meaning they are a long-term member and if any action is taken it is by admin).

And, yes, more people should sign up for MIRT.

Lars39

(26,106 posts)
248. Why does MIRT need to discuss long-term members now that every alert goes to Skinner?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:25 PM
Mar 2014

Seems like it would no longer be their jurisdiction.

TBF

(32,004 posts)
253. Alerts come in and folks post them in the
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:39 PM
Mar 2014

workspace & normally indicate "NMI" - meaning this is for admin and we don't need to look at it. I think it is more habit than anything else (because we also paste in all the alerts on new members and discuss those).

Sometimes if it is a long-term member with low post count or a post attracting attention (as this one did - I'm sure it came up in the Host forum as well) MIRT will alert on it to catch admin's attention. That happens very rarely. And in this case as you can all see EarlG did decide to lock the thread so he must've viewed the discussion as beyond scope.

Generally it is an interesting experience to serve on MIRT and see how many repeat trolls there are, how many spammers there are signing up, etc ... I'd encourage any eligible members to give it a try.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
252. But an alert didn't "come in" on Pitt.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:33 PM
Mar 2014

A MIRT member "brought in" a 3-3 leave that wasn't the business of MIRT.

That's a piece you may be missing.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
255. Sign up for a term and you'll quickly see why the MIRT forum is restricted-access.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:45 PM
Mar 2014

To give you an idea now of what a typical day in MIRT is like, I went back and looked at every thread that was started on Tuesday, the day Will started his other thread.

30 OPs were initiated in MIRT on Tuesday. Of that,

5 OPs were self-deleted as duplicates. When multiple MIRTers each start a thread about the same DUer, the first thread is kept and the others are deleted, in an effort to keep all discussion in the same place.

10 OPs were about trolls who have been PPRed.

5 OPs were about suspected trolls we're still watching.

3 were off-topic or meta OPs. One was good news a MIRTer had received, one was remarking on the number of noobs getting nuked this week, and one was remarking on a cool post a noob had made.

3 were about notifications we'd received that the admins had PPRed someone.

2 were about spammers who have been PPRed.

1 was a thread about a DUer who'd just gotten his fifth hide. Sometimes people who are on enforced "vacations" use sock accounts, so that's a useful thing to know.

1 was the thread about Will Pitt. Incidentally, two of the trolls we nuked were people trolling Will Pitt.

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
217. Yea, the thread started out with an alert almost after it started
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:28 PM
Mar 2014

sure it's rough wording up there at the top. As you read it you see what caused him to go off .
And I see the true value of leaving the thread stand. Through good advice forwarded he made the call and out of that call came relief .Whereas Bin Sober and I think we just might agree on this, if he hadn't received and in turn acted on the advice given through his thread,does it not stand to reason his wife and he would be no better off today than they were the day before ?

There are indeed wise members in the user base here.

Their issues are not resolved, at least they have breathing room now.

The way I see it ,the good that came out of it demonstrates that people helping people can make the difference where it counts the most.

Things get heated, than the heat cools down and that's when it's time to get down on the problem.
And that is exactly what went down.

However clearly division remains.







grasswire

(50,130 posts)
220. thank you much for posting thiss
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:30 PM
Mar 2014

I am pretty disgusted at the gossipy nature of the MIRT thread.

Is MIRT there to judge whether or not Will most efficiently meds for his family?

Is MIRT even there to judgethe words of an OP that has been adjudicated by the jury?

Wow. Does MIRT often judge the off-site actions of members and talk about them?

demmiblue

(36,823 posts)
305. It is disgusting.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 05:33 AM
Mar 2014

Those people should not be MIRT members.

Ya, ya people should step up and volunteer for MIRT, but who wants to deal this type of backstabbing assholeishness?! There is a reason META not longer exists. Truly ugly.

Renew Deal

(81,846 posts)
362. Answers
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 12:40 AM
Mar 2014

This is my opinion based on two stints on MIRT


Is MIRT there to judge whether or not Will most efficiently meds for his family? No

Is MIRT even there to judge the words of an OP that has been adjudicated by the jury? Maybe. For those that are possibly "malicious intruders." These are mostly low post count trouble makers or people with a long history of trouble that may actually be trolls.

Wow. Does MIRT often judge the off-site actions of members and talk about them? Mostly no. But I didn't notice that in that thread. The thread was about the post.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
222. That's totally uncalled for and I hope the Admins put their foot down on these power trips
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:32 PM
Mar 2014

You're going to catch hell for sharing that but I admire you for your integrity. Thank you.

Kali

(55,003 posts)
223. you know I am a pretty staunch advocate for transparency and there is no rule against this
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:33 PM
Mar 2014

but what exactly is your purpose for posting this? because it just looks like shit-stirring to me.

Response to Kali (Reply #223)

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
235. Yes that's exactly what it looks...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:02 PM
Mar 2014

like.

I've been on MIRT a number of times and I've never seen this done.

Let's not forget the members that do this volunteer their time. When there are big news stories that impact DU, it's MIRT that works behind the scenes to keep trolls to a limit.

Anyone that's been on MIRT knows it can get hectic and we have to be able to work as a group with a certain amount of trust. To do this is beyond the pale in my opinion.

We do this because we're all part of this community and want to help keep it a good place.

And for everyone that's tsk tsk'ing why don't you volunteer your time before pointing fingers.



Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
250. Agreed.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:31 PM
Mar 2014

I've done 4 MIRT terms, and this is most definitely a first. This move kinda undermines the "teamwork" effort, IMO....

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.......

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
262. You know what is certain to undermine the teamwork in MIRT?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:53 PM
Mar 2014

Going after long term DUers.

99.9% of the fun is throwing freepers, spammers and trolls out on their ears. It's fun because it is like having a trash tossing contest with dead ender shitheels as the trash.

I gauranfuckingtee you the landscape will change if it turns in to a lets see who we can get banned today forum. If that's the way it's going to be I would like to submit a few long timers who I think are shit stirrers.

But that's not REMOTELY what MIRT is about. That's why the admins locked the above referenced thread.

I can respect the collegial atmosphere that is supposed to take place in MIRT. Ironically, that's why I'm not going to go into the current thread in MIRT and argue my point where members are having a fit over me posting this information. Once again, MIRT is being used for purposes it wasn't intended for - of course that is being done under the guise of "let's talk about what is acceptable". We'll guess what. Skinner makes the rules about what is acceptable and if he wants to make a new guideline for confidentiality I'm all ears. Until then, I will abide by the collegial rule and keep off topic non MIRT business out of MIRT. Others should do the same.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
274. Re: This.....
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:07 PM
Mar 2014

"I gauranfuckingtee you the landscape will change if it turns in to a lets see who we can get banned today forum. If that's the way it's going to be I would like to submit a few long timers who I think are shit stirrers."

Wouldn't we all?

Shit stirrers are most definitely in the eye of the beholder, and some seem to have the run of the place to insult and gossip about members at will.

As far as MIRT is concerned, I'm not arguing the acceptable limits of their scope of duties, as I agree with your general point. I just disagree with the way you chose to "deal" with it, that's all.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
278. So you thought going after
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:17 PM
Mar 2014

MIRT'ers also LONG TERM members would help what exactly? That's exactly what you did by posting this here, you know it.

Why didn't you take your concern to Skinner?


"Unfortunately, there may come a time when a member of the MIR Team does not do the job in good faith, does not have the best intentions, or exercises bad judgment. If you think one of your fellow MIR Team members is not doing the job properly, please let the administrators know immediately. You can send us an email, or you can click the Alert Abuse link on a post here in this forum.


I will abide by the collegial rule and keep off topic non MIRT business out of MIRT


People talk about all sorts of off topic things in MIRT--guess you'll be sharing our personal stuff with people too.






Autumn

(44,980 posts)
280. This is clear in the instruction page from Skinner.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:28 PM
Mar 2014

Please note that only MIR Team members have access to this workspace, but it is not a completely private forum. Other members with access to this forum have not signed any confidentiality agreement, and they are free to discuss with other people what goes on in this workspace and how you do you job.

I think Hassin Bin Sober did what they felt they needed to do. And they are not prohibited from doing so.

"As long as you remain professional and polite in your postings here, you shouldn't have any problems."

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
283. Where did I say HBS was
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:46 PM
Mar 2014

prohibited? I'm pretty I didn't say anything even close to that.

Skinner also said this


"Unfortunately, there may come a time when a member of the MIR Team does not do the job in good faith, does not have the best intentions, or exercises bad judgment. If you think one of your fellow MIR Team members is not doing the job properly, please let the administrators know immediately. You can send us an email, or you can click the Alert Abuse link on a post here in this forum.


Use the link posted in this forum (MIRT) or email.

When you say this:

You know what is certain to undermine the teamwork in MIRT?

Going after long term DUers. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4700553


And then throw that thread out in GD, what exactly was the purpose, if not to go after the MIRT'ers who posted in that thread, also long term DU'ers--

And we're not supposed to be upset about that. I don't care what you say about a no confidentiality agreement, it was a below the belt hit.

That could have been posted without attaching names to it, but take it back a step, since you and HSB keep posting what Skinner said, why wasn't this taken to Skinner, in the manner he indicated.

You can argue that thread shouldn't have been started. The same as I can argue this post in GD shouldn't have been posted. This was not the manner in which Skinner said to let him know if there was a problem.








Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
298. Yeah because posting a thread from MIRT is the same as trying to get a long term duer banned.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:21 AM
Mar 2014

"Sharing personal stuff"

Spare me the drama. Your ATM pins are safe.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,265 posts)
317. Admin did not give their reasoning for locking the thread
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 10:27 AM
Mar 2014

so you should not claim to speak on their behalf. With an attack on the president (one that would get a short-termer banned at once), coming from Will Pitt (who was himself banned for a time for unacceptable behaviour), it's an acceptable topic of discussion among MIRT.

Did you take this up with the admins before copying the entire conversation here? Or did you just decide to do this by yourself?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
240. I would have voted to hide
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:17 PM
Mar 2014

I wasn't on the jury and rarely vote to hide posts, but that was a no-brainer

RobinA

(9,886 posts)
251. Horrible
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:32 PM
Mar 2014

Even more so because it's on what is supposed to be a liberal site. Demonstrates pretty clearly that there's not a lot of difference between many on the left and those on the right.

Cha

(296,846 posts)
254. Thanks for that.. I think NYC_SKP's post is key.. bolding mine..
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:39 PM
Mar 2014
Response to uppityperson (Reply #13)Wed Mar 19, 2014, 11:45 AM
NYC_SKP (57,961 posts)
33. You have my 100% support for posting this.

Despite what others may say, having just one or having four hides on one's record is meaningless in this case.

The jury system is weak protection against crazy talk, especially with "popular" members.

Had a newbie posted such crap, a jury result would have likely been quite different.

I'm all for open discussion in this forum, I don't see the harm.


Cha

(296,846 posts)
261. So what? If a newbie would have posted that it would have been trolldom but since
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:50 PM
Mar 2014

Pitt's been here for so long.. it's not MIRT. Glad it was brought up anyway.. some really thoughtful replies in there.

Lars39

(26,106 posts)
263. MIRT only gets hides, Pitt's thread was 3-3. Skinner now gets all alerts.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:54 PM
Mar 2014

Doesn't look like it concerned MIRT at all.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
299. As you totally missed mine. Rather than addressing me or Admin directly, you chose to do this which
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:03 AM
Mar 2014

is inappropriate.

I have no issue with Will, wish he and his wife the best luck and know how awful MS is from personal as well as professional experience.

My experience was personal information you have now shared with all of DU as well as DU's stalkers, allowing them more fodder for their mills and more information to track me down in real life. And yes, many MIRT members have now deleted other personal information in the "getting to know other mirters" thread as what was previously a work space for mirters where we could speak openly is now not. You have shared some personal information, who knows what else you will share?

As I told EarlG when I pm'd him, I was going back to self delete and lock that thread so it did not turn into a "gossip thread" like you were accusing it of becoming but he beat me to the lock. There was no gossip, just MIRTers addressed the issue of what was written. And one MIRT member writing "shitty" and "bullshit" which was you.

You refuse to join the mirt discussion as to whether or not this was appropriate? Instead you want to continue sniping in public?

I have no desire to do so with you here and will not reply further.

Response to Lars39 (Reply #256)

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
340. I wouldn't want the job.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:53 PM
Mar 2014

It saddens me that one man's pain spawned an uncalled for thread in MIRT. I respect those who can set differences and politics aside at the door. In fact, I made friends with a couple of my fellow MIRTers in the line of duty who are not people I normally agree with in the forums.

There are lot of good people here who take the job seriously.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
334. What agenda?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:41 PM
Mar 2014

I was pointing out the good that MIRT members do.

How is that an agenda?

Just so I'm clear on this

It's great to shine a light on something that may or may not have been ok. But it's an agenda to shine a light on the good things.

Just for the record, Skinner handled that thread in MIRT hours before HSB posted it. What was the point of posting it in an already contentious thread?

I have done 6 terms on MIRT and NEVER once have I been accused of overstepping.

So have at it...tell me how wrong I was for pointing out the good that MIRT members do/have done.

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #190)

Lars39

(26,106 posts)
331. Indeed.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:34 PM
Mar 2014

Doesn't prevent melt-downs after facts being revealed, but, hey, no system is perfect.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
336. All families have meltdowns and dirty laundry they don't want the public to see.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:45 PM
Mar 2014

I think we will be fine, agreed no system is perfect. The transparency here is as close to perfect as we can get.

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #190)

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
297. I understand your point but this was not a good idea.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:15 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:53 AM - Edit history (2)

There are ways to deal with this inside mirt. This creates bad feelings.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
327. No, it is the abuse of MIRT as a gossip engine used against those who are not part
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:31 PM
Mar 2014

of MIRT's purview that creates bad feelings, and frankly this attitude that MIRT has a right to secret attack meetings that are not part of MIRT's job does nothing to assuage those bad feelings. I have always suspected that MIRT and hosts are doing lots of gossip about DUers and now we know. The whole cry of 'transparency' seems to have been forgotten in favor of gossip and overreach of petty volunteer powers.
MIRT folks should not use that forum to gossip about long term members who are not part of their job. The jury spoke on Will's thread, MIRT should have accepted that and shut the fuck up.

Response to hrmjustin (Reply #329)

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
350. Because there weren't any....
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:16 PM
Mar 2014

People who have concerns about anything nefarious should sign up for a term instead of busting a spleen in GD to feed the drama.

My experiences with MIRT were nothing but above-board and task-oriented. I think the current bugaboo is much ado about nothing, and folks would see this first hand if they took the time to volunteer.

Right, justin?

Heidi

(58,237 posts)
316. Thank you, Hassin Bin Sober.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 10:11 AM
Mar 2014


In your post, I notice the text for the MIRT "Super powers" button, and it cracks me up (for obvious reasons).
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
332. My respect for a few DUers just went to zero. Two-faced backstabbers
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:36 PM
Mar 2014

trying to get a long-time DUer booted. Good thing you posted this so that their shame can be public. I disagree with Will Pitt often enough, but there is absolutely no way he is a right-wing disruptor, that is utterly absurd. For those who defended him, my respect went way up.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
337. having served about three different terms on MIRT I have witnessed some MIRT members who get this
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:46 PM
Mar 2014

goofy idea that MIRT is supposed to take sides and attempt to enforce a pro-Obama/pro-Democratic Party purity

A-Schwarzenegger

(15,596 posts)
357. I don't think it's right for MIRT to gossip
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:44 PM
Mar 2014

about Dave Grohl like that.

P.S. Objects in the rear-view mirror may appear more important than they are.

Renew Deal

(81,846 posts)
361. That wasn't so bad
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 12:36 AM
Mar 2014

It starts off gossipy, but most of the responses are actually thoughtful. It's not really right for MIRT. There is no way MIRT is handling a long time member like Will, so there is no need for the thread.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
197. Just be grateful that:
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:03 PM
Mar 2014

(a) your outburst didn't get your OP hidden or locked, so you wouldn't have been able to get constructive advice that's at least bought you some time.

(b) those who took the time and trouble to give you constructive advice on that thread didn't have you on ignore.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
211. I am very glad your wife got her meds. I also think your post was a little on the strong
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:34 PM
Mar 2014

side. However, under the circumstances I understand. Those of us not walking in your shoes should not judge.

For the record, I am glad we have the ACA. At this point it a whole hell of a lot better than what we had. Having said that, I am very disappointed that we dont have single payer and dont buy the bullshit excuses.

cafanto

(1 post)
216. Your wife's illness
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:27 PM
Mar 2014

Will, I'm glad to know that the drug company will work with you. I just wanted to throw out some information you might have some interest in. I have had great success with all sorts of health issues by seeing a Naturopath. I tried mainstream medicine (who are great for situations that require heroic methods, etc.) with little to no success. For instance, I had suffered with arrhythmias in both the upper and lower chambers of my heart. My M.D. took lots of tests and said, "Yup, you've got them alright," but offered no help. I went to the Naturopath and he said that people weren't sick and dying from a lack of drugs, but rather a lack of nutrition. He gave me 4 natural supplements to take and within a few weeks, the arrhythmias were gone. Another time, I was found to be in the beginning stages of kidney failure. Again my M.D. didn't offer any help. My Naturopath put me on 2 supplements and the turn-around was amazing. Just for information's sake, I spend around $150 to $200 a month on supplements. I know that M.S. is chronically progressive and there is no known cure at this time, but I think there's a really good probability that your wife may do infinitely better under the care of a Naturopath. Just my two cents. I wish you both good health and wellbeing in your journey.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
224. The politics of prior authorizations and the games both insurance and pharma play...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:42 PM
Mar 2014

... are ridiculous. They are, of course, not new to the ACA.

I'm glad to hear the good news!

Cheers!

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
247. Great news on the meds...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:25 PM
Mar 2014

... now the wait to see if not having her meds for a while did any damage. Glad you took the advice to go over the insurance company's head straight to the drug-maker itself. Hugs to all for now...

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
271. I don't think you can see this
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:02 PM
Mar 2014

but I'm going to congratulate both you anyway. I've been unable to obtain meds myself several times and I know that feeling of desperation at the possibility of not being able to obtain them. I'm happy for both of you.

hotrod0808

(323 posts)
302. I am glad for her
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 04:39 AM
Mar 2014

and for you as a caregiver. You have to hold on to what ever victories that you can score. I feel victory is hard to come by these days, and I hope she is well.

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
309. How would Will's situation
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:03 AM
Mar 2014

have been better before the ACA?

Also what have Republicans done to help the uninsured or those with preexisting conditions?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
364. Good.
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 09:09 AM
Mar 2014

Now since you shared with us the advice your friend gave you, how about sharing with us his reaction when you told him he was wrong? Did you get all pissy with him and call him a piece of shit like you did Obama?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]

Ava Gadro

(36 posts)
370. While I'm grateful Will's wife will be treated
Sun Mar 23, 2014, 01:27 AM
Mar 2014

Having to go begging to PHARMACEUTICAL companies to get drugs?

It's late and has been a long day for me, but I hope I don't ever have to go, hat in hand, begging to the filthy drug companies that have been sticking it to us for years to obtain my family's medications. We are in an alternate universe.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My wife will get her meds