Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

burfman

(264 posts)
2. Seems so republican to me..... winner take all - everybody else eat dirt....
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:40 PM
Mar 2014

Or perhaps..... what's mine is mine and F*** you!



 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. And what is Congress and the President doing about this. At the least the
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:49 PM
Mar 2014

bleeding must be stopped. This should be bipartisan.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
5. It's bipartisan. Look at the signatures and votes that are on the policies that made it this way.n/t
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 05:59 PM
Mar 2014

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
11. At this point in America's history, nothing good can ever be bi-partisan
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 07:15 PM
Mar 2014

That's dealing with the devil in the most literal sense that actually exists.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
12. At the level of the 1%, I agree, but if the 99% were to get smart
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 07:42 PM
Mar 2014

they'd see that they have common ground.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
14. At least a third of the 99% have a llloooonnnnggg way to go just to get UP to stupid
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:41 PM
Mar 2014

Before 2000, I had some confidence in my fellow citizens.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
15. Seems like it's that baseline 25-30% (or so) of Americans who are terminally stupid.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:57 PM
Mar 2014

And I can't think of any "solution" that isn't flagrantly unethical, so...

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
4. I have hopes for the human race when getting out there in public.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:53 PM
Mar 2014

Individuals are figuring it all out.

My hopes are increasing when dealing with local people at teh GroceryOutlet where I am tabling on a med marijuana issue.

Sadly, I find it harder and harder to come on topics here at DU and find such wisdom. (For instance: I am very surprised at the large number of fellow DU'er's, who delighted in letting Will Pitt know that he should simply suck it up. It was almost as if they were telling him that his wife deserved the ill treatment regarding the drugs, since Will is no longer an Obama enthusiast. Just wait until one of them has a relative get a $ 79,000 heart bypass, only to die, on account of not being able to afford the $ 7,500 to 15,000 bucks worth of antibiotics!)

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,955 posts)
7. Good point by a good man. Bad use of arithmetic. Good propaganda.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 06:05 PM
Mar 2014

Good point: Wealth is much too over-concentrated.

Good man: Bernie Saunders.

Bad use of arithmetic: The figures are used deceptively.

Since the entry point to the list is fixed and does not increase as global wealth increases, so the "billionaire aggregate net worth" expands more than the actual concentration of wealth expands. In fact, it is possible for the percentage of wealth in the top 1% to decrease while the world's total wealth increases and have the same kind of figures as in the quote.

Good propaganda: Most people won't see the deception and won't care when it is pointed out.

Reality based thinking people don't need such deceptions to be convinced of the good point (back to the top).

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
9. Will money in politics disrupt the cycle this time ?
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 06:17 PM
Mar 2014

Economist John Kenneth Galbraith had an interesting theory. He noted that our economy follows 80 year cycles. He believed that the oligarchs would crash the economy and the people naturally rise up and demand reform. Like Teddy Roosevelt before him, in the wake of the excesses of the Great Depression, FDR had a mandate from the American population to initiate a series of reforms, re-regulation of banks, dissolution of monopolies, stronger worker rights and a strengthening of the social safety net to name a few.

Galbraith observed that when the American generation most directly affected by an economic collapse dies out over a 40 year period, the replacement generation was ripe to fall for the deregulation of banks, weakening of anti-trust action, marginalization of worker rights and a weakening of the social safety net ideology. We witnessed the second 40 year oligarch power grab starting with Reagan and culminating in the most recent economic collapse. Galbraith plots these 80 year cycles throughout American history.

The question I proffer to you, the people is: Has special interest money so corrupted our government that the promise of a rebirth of a nation after an economic collapse been denied the people for the first time in our history ? This time the banks have carried on without missing a beat, monopolies are continuing to grow, worker pay and rights have not rebounded and the social safety net is being disassembled before our eyes. In other words, as Galbraith pointed out, money has always won it's fair share of the battles, but, has money won the war this time around ?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is not what America ...