General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Is It That So Many Reporters Seem to Know So Little about Obamacare?
Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesnt mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar.~ Edward R. Murrow
Long before the advent of the Internet, Edward R. Murrow, the newsman who stood up and exposed the lies spread by Senator Joe McCarthy in the early 1950s, understood that while the speed of communication is wondrous to behold, it is also true that speed can multiply the distribution of information that we know to be untrue.
Murrow was right. Today, as traffic on the information highway has picked up speed, it often seems that, the Information Age that we celebrated in the 1990s has become an Age of Misinformation .
Today, not only CBS, the network that brought us Murrow, but the media as a whole seems to have forgotten his plea to his fellow journalists: Just once in a while, let us exalt the importance of ideas and information.
The Media and Obamacare
When it comes to covering the Affordable Care Act (ACA), not only televison networks but our major newspapers have fallen far short of Murrows fearless standards. Instead of ideas and information, the mainstream media serves up opinions and anecdotes.
Tall tales about Obamacares victims have become standard fare. In recent months I have deconstructed two faux fables: one that appeared in the Ft. Worth -Star Telegram,(URL), another that aired on CBS stations nationwide.
- See more at: http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2014/03/why-is-it-that-so-many-reporters-seem-to-know-so-little-about-obamacare-part-1/
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)unblock
(52,196 posts)to the extent they are judged, it is on the basis of access, vaguely accurate quoting, and entertainment value.
knowledge is not considered particularly useful, and to the extent it interferes with entertainment value, may even be a liability.
it is a sad state of affairs.
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Why do so many reporters know so little about anything. Well they might know what tie to wear or the latest hairstyle.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)And 1%'ers don't tell the truth about anything.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)1) they are NOT journalists. They are pretty boys and girls put in front of a camera.
2) They are PAID not to know, or at least pretend so.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)We had a prominent poster recently get hundreds of recs for an anti-Obamacare OP. He didn't seem to understand that drug formularies weren't an invention of the ACA, but have been in use for decades in single-payer systems; and he passed along false information a friend had told him, that insurers outside of the exchanges can still deny people for preexisting conditions.
Another active DUer insisted that under the ACA people with health conditions have to pay more for their premiums than healthy people-- which is also untrue. Whether on or off the exchanges, only two factors affect premiums (aside from subsidies based on income, which can only be obtained on the exchanges): age and smoking status.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)lies and misinformation when you've been corrected many times?
Yeah, it's a clear habit.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)1. Their boss is a 1 per center.
2. Most of them are at least 10 per centers.
3. The Obama administration, the ACA administration and the Democrats have done a terrible job of promoting the positives of the ACA.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)The true journalist produces a product that is not acceptable to the rightward movement in the country. So he/she is relegated to some inconspicuous spot where the dissenting word is never heard.
Just like that piece I saw on the Newsroom of the guy following the pres candidate. He didn't report the "news" as he was told so he was cast out.
Starts early. If he/she manages to get hired, it won't be for long.
Our political candidates follow the same paradigm.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)tblue37
(65,324 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Their mission is propaganda and distraction not informing the public.
They represent the forces of ignorance and lies not truth and knowledge.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Today's reporters aren't. They just don't look for facts, just for other people's opinions.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)It has gotten to the point that most of them spend about 5 minutes doing an Internet search and then think they know enough to write their story.
Welcome to the 24/7 news cycle and 60 second sound bites, where ratings are more important then ethics.