General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse intelligence chair says Edward Snowden backs Russian expansionism
Source: The Guardian
Martin Pengelly in New York and agencies
theguardian.com, Sunday 23 March 2014 14.06 GMT
The chairman of the House of Representatives intelligence committee, Mike Rogers, on Sunday stood by his claim that the former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who last year provided thousands of secret documents to media outlets including the Guardian, had been helped by Russia.
On Saturday, in the latest disclosure from such documents, the New York Times and the German magazine Der Spiegel reported that the NSA had obtained sensitive data form the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei.
Asked on NBC's Meet the Press if he had been irresponsible in making such a charge without evidence, Rogers said: First of all, I see all the evidence and intelligence, from everything in the activities leading up to this event to very suspicious activity during the event. When you talk to the folks leading the investigation they cannot rule it out.
No counter-terrorism official in the United States does not believe that Mr Snowden is not under the influence of Russian intelligence services. We believe he is, I certainly believe he is today.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/23/nsa-chinese-company-defends-independence-huawei
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)as the name Mike Rogers.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)when a few journalists asked him for PROOF.
I suppose he thinks people will forget his last disastrous appearance on what passes for the news media here.
He reminds me of an internet troll.
The ones who engage in drive by personal attacks people, and when challenged, disappear for a while then come back with more of the same.
alsame
(7,784 posts)new bogeyman for every event now.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)that he got out of one of the boxes in his garage.
omg... how do these morons get elected???
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)and that person is completely serious.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)G_j
(40,366 posts)Mike Rogers now?
Whisp
(24,096 posts)guess I can't love him then if I don't know who he is.
he is mentioned in the first paragraph of the OP.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)???????????????????????????
Too many cheap novels have apparently clouded thinking.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Despite efforts to derive him of his rights, he's an American.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Asked on NBC's Meet the Press if he had been irresponsible in making such a charge without evidence, Rogers said: First of all, I see all the evidence and intelligence, from everything in the activities leading up to this event to very suspicious activity during the event. When you talk to the folks leading the investigation they cannot rule it out."
Notice that when pushed he can now only say that they "cannot rule it out." Geez, I cannot rule out that Rogers is a rapist.
No counter-terrorism official in the United States does not believe that Mr Snowden is not under the influence of Russian intelligence services. We believe he is, I certainly believe he is today."
No doubt Russian intelligence is trying to get what they can from him. That doesn't mean he is willingly helping them.
He (Rogers) said: He [Snowden] is under the influence of Russian intelligence officials today [and] he is actually supporting, in an odd way, the brazen brutality and expansionism of Russia. He needs to understand that and I think Americans need to understand that in its proper context.
So now Snowden "in an odd way" supports Russian brutality and expansionism? I guess that by the same logic Michelle Obama supports, in an odd way, Chinese brutality. Ridiculous stuff.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Shameful.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)You can ignore everything else after those words.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but I really do not want to take on the issue either. So will take on somebody who is no longer the issue.