General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen's the last time you've heard of a disease that's been cured?
And don't say polio
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)drug. Doctors examined me thoroughly and tried other therapies before putting me on the maintenance drug.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Looks like it is causing major remissions if not cure for hep C
Rabies, small pox, a lot things
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)it can't be cured.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)In 2004, American teenager Jeanna Giese survived an infection of rabies unvaccinated. She was placed into an induced coma upon onset of symptoms and given ketamine, midazolam, ribavirin, and amantadine. Her doctors administered treatment based on the hypothesis that detrimental effects of rabies were caused by temporary dysfunctions in the brain and could be avoided by inducing a temporary partial halt in brain function that would protect the brain from damage while giving the immune system time to defeat the virus. After 31 days of isolation and 76 days of hospitalization, Giese was released from the hospital. She survived with all higher level brain functions, but an inability to walk and balance. On a podcast of NPR's Radiolab, Giese recounted, "I had to learn how to stand and then to walk, turn around, move my toes. I was really, after rabies, a new born baby who couldn't do anything. I had to relearn that all...mentally I knew how to do stuff but my body wouldn't cooperate with what I wanted it to do. It definitely took a toll on me psychologically. You know I'm still recovering. I'm not completely back. Stuff like balance and, um, I can't run normally."
Giese's treatment regimen became known as the "Milwaukee protocol", which has since undergone revision with the second version omitting the use of ribavirin. Two of 25 patients survived when treated under the first protocol. A further 10 patients have been treated under the revised protocol, with a further two survivors.The anesthetic drug ketamine has shown the potential for rabies virus inhibition in rats, and is used as part of the Milwaukee protocol.
On April 10, 2008, in Cali, Colombia, a boy of 11 was reported to have survived rabies and the induced coma without noticeable brain damage.
On June 12, 2011, Precious Reynolds, an eight-year-old girl from Humboldt County, California, became the third reported person in the United States to have recovered from rabies without receiving PEP
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)1000words
(7,051 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Cured and wiped off the face of the earth in my lifetime.
Yup! It's true.
Enough anti-medicine clap trap.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)From 892,000 cases in 1989 to under 150 last year worldwide. It will be eradicated within 5 years.
It is now considered by the WHO to be a cured disease. Unlike other cured diseases of the 20th century, such as smallpox, which were cured by vaccines, the eradication of guinea worm disease (Dracunculiasis) has been entirely driven by improvements in sanitation.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)When we start talking about diseases like diabetes or various cancers or epilepsy, it gets a lot more complicated than prevent/kill this disease causing organism.
I think some folks believe there is some kind of linear curve when it comes it medicinal cures and while there have been significant breakthroughs in treatment of some diseases, there just aren't that many "magic bullet" breakthrough cures.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Do you mean a new cure for something we didn't used to have any treatments for? Do you mean a new vaccine for a disease formerly without a vaccine? Do you mean totally eradicating a disease?
We've only done that last one once, and that was smallpox.
Otherwise, people are cured of diseases every day.
Warpy
(111,236 posts)and that's only a few years ago. The latest vaccine is the new adult whooping cough vaccine and that's only been out for the last 5-6 years.
Diseases are cured all the time, the ones susceptible to the antibiotics we have. Unfortunately the bugs are fighting back and new models are being developed to fight them and a few are undergoing limited human trials now but nothing is as yet on the market.
There is still money in curing disease. The big advertising budgets are being spent on lifestyle drugs and that is the difference.
polichick
(37,152 posts)RichGirl
(4,119 posts)They make money from treatments not cures. Healthy people don't bring profit. The good news is that dead people aren't profitable either....so at least they keep you alive. Alive and sick...that's the big money maker.
There is so much profit in cancer that if it were cured our economy would tank.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 23, 2014, 08:57 PM - Edit history (1)
since people only take those for a short time.
They make the bucks on stuff you take for life.
Our gov't better get on the stick and make new antibiotics before super bugs wipe us out.
Learn herbals people!
Edited for accuracy.
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)2000 Linezolid
2001 Telithromycin
2002 Biapenem
2002 Ertapenem
2002 Prulifloxacin
2002 Pazufloxacin
2002 Balofloxacin
2003 Daptomycinb
2004 Gemifloxacin
2005 Doripenem
2005 Tigecycline
2007 Retapamulin
2007 Garenoxacin
2008 Ceftobiprole
2008 Sitafloxacin
2009 Tebipenem
2009 Telavancin
2009 Antofloxacin
2009 Besifloxacine
2010 Ceftaroline fosamil
2011 Fidaxomicin
2012 Bedaquiline
As of 2013 the ones below were in phase 1 clinical trials.
BAL30072
Exeporfinium chloride
NVB302 (47)
S-649266
POL7080b
LCB01-0371
MRX-I (49)
SMT-19969b
ACHN-975b
GSK-214094b
KPI-10 (50)
DS-8587 (51)
KRP-AM1977X
ATM-AVI
Carbavance
polichick
(37,152 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)That's just flat-out wrong.
The overuse of antibiotics is what is driving the need for new antibiotics. The notion that somehow, big pharma is saying, "Gosh, you know multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is easily manageable as a long term chronic illness with current treatments, we should probably not put any money into developing new treatments as it might hurt our bottom line." is somewhat laughable since untreatable TB tends to kill patients.
polichick
(37,152 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)healthcare industries?
Bryant
polichick
(37,152 posts)Unfortunately, the U.S. funds less research due to budget cuts.
"The scientific research investment gap continues to widen, jeopardizing potential new insights into diseases and, more importantly, new cures," said co-author Roy Zent, MD, PhD (Vanderbilt Medical Center). He and his colleagues noted that although the National Institutes of Health's annual budget doubled from $13.7 to $26.9 billion per year between 1998 and 2003, it has failed to keep pace with inflation since 2003."
http://www.sciencecodex.com/declines_in_funding_hamper_kidney_research_and_other_areas_of_medical_study-130162
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)and it's about profits - like everything else in the U.S.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)a lot of the newer antibiotics come out of Europe.
Certain ulcers can be cured with certain antibiotics, ulcers can be healed with Zantac or Tagamet, etc, which are over the counter
Many of effective treatments for bp are generic now
However, for new development the 5 to 10 years it takes to get a drug to market costs money, and yes, they make a hefty profit from it, but some of that profit goes back into new R&D
There are also orphan diseases which do not make money for the drug companies where some of those profits are used also
Does that mean they don't screw up and do wrong things? Of course not, but when they do, it becomes evident in a relatively short time, and it is costly to them also
As good or bad as the drug companies are, a lot of lives have been saved from their products
polichick
(37,152 posts)herbal antibiotics as well.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)....wouldn't make huge amounts of money marketing it?
Cancer isn't exactly something that people consider a chronic manageable disease.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Treatment for cancers used to focus on both healthy and malignant cells, it is changing to target the only the bad guys and leave the healthy ones alone
Whether its drugs or treatment progress is getting made
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)And the notion that a company wouldn't profit enormously from any type of cure of a particular cancer.
polichick
(37,152 posts)in treatments.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Prevention, active Surveillance, etc
As more knowledge is gathered
Texasgal
(17,042 posts)Huge leaps have been made. Thank goodness!
Frosty1
(1,823 posts)My granddaughter is now 5 years post remission. I believe that is considered cured.
Her type of leukemia has a 90% cure rate.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)That it's a futility?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The former being one of the worst infectious diseases known to man.
Once nanomedicine takes off as a field, cancer and AIDS could be on that list as well.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)What's your point?
Lex
(34,108 posts)Nice to hear.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)The new drugs are curing it
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)In the old days, peptic ulcers were treated with antacids and major surgery.
Now that we understand that ulcers are associated with helicobacter pylori, and doctors give patients a course of antibiotics. This is a huge advance.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,748 posts)I expect it all makes the baby Jesus weep.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)kids are no longer out of school for chicken pox, mumps, measles. Anectdotal 31 year view, of course. However, we are on the look out for whooping cough in my area.
Number23
(24,544 posts)flvegan
(64,407 posts)Not what you meant, I know. But couldn't resist.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)n/t.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)Far too many diseases are still alive and kicking in underprivileged areas. Syphilis has a cure, however, and that was the question I was answering. Eradicated? Now, that's a different story.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)uriel1972
(4,261 posts)getting said cure to the sufferers is a big problem. And yes the pharmaceutical industry could do better, a lot better, but it would require a lot of political pressure from around the world to shake it up and I don't see that happening in a hurry.