Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So if I am a Jewish employer can I require that all of my male employees (Original Post) undeterred Mar 2014 OP
That would be a great subject for a letter to an editor somewhere. Skidmore Mar 2014 #1
I'd be sure that the company chooses a plan that covers it, of course. undeterred Mar 2014 #2
Or a Christian employer demand all employees not to watch football on Sunday LanternWaste Mar 2014 #3
Footballs aren't made of pigskin anymore. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2014 #32
What about working on the Sabbath? Bandit Mar 2014 #55
It ain't work to watch the Cowboys play on Sunday OriginalGeek Mar 2014 #64
Hmmm. Does employer health insurance have to pay for circumcision? FarCenter Mar 2014 #4
Yeah undeterred Mar 2014 #8
I was really thinking about circumcision of newborns by pediatricians FarCenter Mar 2014 #9
Unless you get one who COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #28
I think you win a DUzy for that comment dlwickham Mar 2014 #35
Thank you. Thank you. I believe it's COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #39
OY (nt) KaryninMiami Mar 2014 #40
OY (x 2)!!! COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #41
OY (x3)!!! ROFL!!! calimary Mar 2014 #57
Are you a restaurant owner? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #5
Deli undeterred Mar 2014 #7
I just watched your sig line through for the first time, had noticed before but not watched. uppityperson Mar 2014 #33
You mean the cosmos evolution gif? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #37
thanks to uppity for drawing my attention to your evolution gif, that is superb Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #42
It's only "mine" in that I saw it trending on imgur, and linked it. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #45
ok I will try to steal it. Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #49
Heh. Right click and save. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #51
Warren DeMontague Diclotican Mar 2014 #67
Oh, btw, I'm orthodox undeterred Mar 2014 #6
You could refuse to allow women to work when they are menstruating frazzled Mar 2014 #12
So long as it's paid leave. A three week work month. I'll vote for that one! n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #17
Nah: no work, no pay (employer's decision) frazzled Mar 2014 #18
Hell no! I'd be there with bells on and full you-know-what then! Take that, boss! freshwest Mar 2014 #22
There could be a Cramps and Menstruation Leave Act undeterred Mar 2014 #21
Finally get equal pay through the law of unintended consequences. Those who don't get 'em, fake it! freshwest Mar 2014 #25
I certainly wish we had menstrual leave. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2014 #62
or refuse to hire them at all, if they have children, Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #44
According to Roberts and Scalia, yes Gothmog Mar 2014 #10
Well, no, because when idiots yell religious liberty and freedom... joeybee12 Mar 2014 #11
Great point. jwirr Mar 2014 #13
or withhold taxes that go to the war machine spanone Mar 2014 #14
I think that one would do it Politicalboi Mar 2014 #16
Good point, LakeVermilion Mar 2014 #24
I can't remember the specifics, but there was a court case dealing with this issue. white_wolf Mar 2014 #79
I can get behind that one. Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #48
It's not the same thing, and you know it customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #15
I object to bacon and cheese on burgers myself. It's a Biblical thing, ya know. n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #19
Whats interesting is that its only fundamentalist Christians who seem to want to impose undeterred Mar 2014 #20
In this instance customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #23
The employee already paid for their health care with their labor. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #70
Do you know of scientific proof customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #83
Yes. This hasn't really been up for debate among sane people. Go google. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #87
So, you're saying customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #90
Of course some do. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2014 #34
Does their Rabbi own a fast food restaurant? Thor_MN Mar 2014 #38
If he did customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #84
That's an incorrect analogy. cui bono Mar 2014 #72
Their employees customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #86
Ouch, I'm good, but for others…OUCH…nt uriel1972 Mar 2014 #26
No, of course not! Small Accumulates Mar 2014 #27
It seems to me you could. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #29
Maybe, but you can't prohibit the insurance you Have to provide, orpupilofnature57 Mar 2014 #30
Perhaps a better analogy... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #31
I think that question goes to Justice Kennedy. nt TBF Mar 2014 #36
How about you require it of all their children too? jtuck004 Mar 2014 #43
With that aside, circumcision shouldn't be allowed. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #46
I don't believe the Court would ever find that the government can compel circumcision but.... Swede Atlanta Mar 2014 #47
or a Christian Scientist boss would dictate no medical insurance for anyone? TeamPooka Mar 2014 #50
Sure, no problem! In my company I will require all employees worship Satan, seems RKP5637 Mar 2014 #52
Great argument Mnpaul Mar 2014 #53
You plan on paying for it? Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #54
Employers shouldnt have anything to do with insurance. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #56
+100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 undeterred Mar 2014 #89
Jehova's witnesses nietzschean Mar 2014 #58
Well way ahead of you, buster! CFLDem Mar 2014 #59
If Rastafarians require ganja breaks? moondust Mar 2014 #60
Man, these analogies get sillier and sillier. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #61
Nope. blackspade Mar 2014 #69
How would you check? Sounds like something out of Porky's badtoworse Mar 2014 #63
Yes libodem Mar 2014 #65
Or an Islamic employer that veils women and requires them to be escorted by family members seveneyes Mar 2014 #66
We don't look for converts. You have to realllly want to be Jewish to be one. mucifer Mar 2014 #68
Beinga mohel doesn't pay much, but at least you get to keep the tips! George II Mar 2014 #71
I understand your point, but that's not a good example ... surrealAmerican Mar 2014 #73
The law only applies if it messes with Obamacare. Kablooie Mar 2014 #74
What does the Torah say about Obamacare? undeterred Mar 2014 #82
You could say that christx30 Mar 2014 #75
A SLIGHTLY more adept analogy would be whether they could refuse to cover heart valve replacement... Hippo_Tron Mar 2014 #76
Ouch - What Barbarism cantbeserious Mar 2014 #77
That could maybe set up an interesting job interview situation. longship Mar 2014 #78
Why not the medical care that would be required for all Hobby Lobby employees... icarusxat Mar 2014 #80
Well, the Rabbi who offered me a job (his assistant) HockeyMom Mar 2014 #81
Are all your employees Jewish? dilby Mar 2014 #85
No, but I'd like to apply my religious beliefs to my company, like the Hobby Lobby does undeterred Mar 2014 #88
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
3. Or a Christian employer demand all employees not to watch football on Sunday
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 04:56 PM
Mar 2014

Or a Christian/Jewish employer demand all employees not to watch football on Sunday (skin of unclean animal and all that).

(Not that I'd mind too much as I stopped watching football once Vick was let back into the league...)

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
55. What about working on the Sabbath?
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:45 PM
Mar 2014

God said anyone that worked on the Sabbath (even gathering wood for a fire) should be put to death.

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
64. It ain't work to watch the Cowboys play on Sunday
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:04 PM
Mar 2014

Although lately it has been downright tiresome.


Growing up in Dallas the only thing we loved more than potluck supper in the church basement was the Cowboys - our pastor often planned earlier services if the Cowboys had an early game so we'd be out in time to watch it.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
9. I was really thinking about circumcision of newborns by pediatricians
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:04 PM
Mar 2014

I'd think that if you have a mohel do the job, you have to pay for it yourself?

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
39. Thank you. Thank you. I believe it's
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:16 PM
Mar 2014

as old as vaudeville, although I don't have a specific source for it. Probably from one of the great Jewish comedians of yore.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
37. You mean the cosmos evolution gif?
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:12 PM
Mar 2014


Yeah, its a classic. So glad NDGT ran it again- it was one of the best parts of the original series, too.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
45. It's only "mine" in that I saw it trending on imgur, and linked it.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:20 PM
Mar 2014

Certainly wouldn't want to take credit for it. Whoever did that animation back in 1979 or whatever, did a great job.

Feel free to take!

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
67. Warren DeMontague
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:18 PM
Mar 2014

Warren DeMontague

I think it was also used in the intro to Il était une fois l'homme A french animations serie - who basically was about humankind from the earlist of times - to the present (1978). It was one of my first introductions to the world of history by the way - even though the serie is somewhat dated by now - it was mutch more nice back in the days when I was a child - than today when it have seen it again (I found it in a DVD box, and just had to get it)..

Diclotican

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
6. Oh, btw, I'm orthodox
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 04:57 PM
Mar 2014

So I get to choose their sexual preference too.

And no premarital sex. They should check with me for acceptable contraception.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
12. You could refuse to allow women to work when they are menstruating
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:08 PM
Mar 2014

If you're really that Orthodox.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
22. Hell no! I'd be there with bells on and full you-know-what then! Take that, boss!
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:35 PM
Mar 2014

You should have seen my male supervisor cower under his desk back in the day. I only granted the privilege of my presence for prevailing wage., LOL.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
21. There could be a Cramps and Menstruation Leave Act
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:34 PM
Mar 2014

which gives female employees 5 paid days off a month.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
25. Finally get equal pay through the law of unintended consequences. Those who don't get 'em, fake it!
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:53 PM
Mar 2014

That's the only thing the GOP has ever seen in the sexual department anyway.

Like Elaine in Seinfeld: 'Fake, fake... fake, fake, fake!'

Acting is one of life's survival skills. Just look at the tears of Boehner and Beck:






 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
62. I certainly wish we had menstrual leave.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:00 PM
Mar 2014

Since I had horrendous disabling cramps my entire reproductive life, 13 times a year.
It's not just about cramps, it's also about feeling like a wet dishrag as well, barely able to move.

There are countries in Asia that I have read have one day per month for menstrual leave.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
44. or refuse to hire them at all, if they have children,
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:20 PM
Mar 2014

believing women should stay at home with the kids.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
11. Well, no, because when idiots yell religious liberty and freedom...
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:07 PM
Mar 2014

they only mean Christians...all other relgions are fake, dontcha know???

LakeVermilion

(1,039 posts)
24. Good point,
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:45 PM
Mar 2014

I have wondered about this, when people shout that they don't want their tax monies funding abortion/women's health. I have items that the government funds that I don't agree with also. Why are their concerns addressed, but not mine?

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
79. I can't remember the specifics, but there was a court case dealing with this issue.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 08:06 PM
Mar 2014

If I remember correctly the Supreme Court essentially said that they would not hear tax-related challenges because it would clog up the entire judicial system. The exception is that if you can find where the government is using your tax dollars in direct violation of a specific clause in the Constitution. Keep in mind this is all off memory of an undergrad Constitution Law class I took a couple of years ago so I may be off on the details.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
48. I can get behind that one.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:23 PM
Mar 2014

wouldn't they change their minds quickly.

Or back to peyote and other nature-given hallucinogens.

Or human sacrifice, for crying out loud. Neoconservatives
and pundits, for they offend the spirit and the lord my
dog doth declare them liars full of evil.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
15. It's not the same thing, and you know it
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:18 PM
Mar 2014

Since you brought up being Jewish, I have a number of Jewish friends who don't keep kosher, but they'd probably have a problem with a law that required their rabbi to buy the ingredients for and cook them up a bacon double cheeseburger.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
20. Whats interesting is that its only fundamentalist Christians who seem to want to impose
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:26 PM
Mar 2014

their morals on everyone else.

My example is preposterous. Jews do not impose their religious beliefs on other people.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
23. In this instance
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:44 PM
Mar 2014

there is no compulsion on the part of any employee to refrain from the use of any contraceptive, including the ones that they're willing to pay for that they do not consider abortifacients.

My guess is that Hobby Lobby and Conestoga convinced Anthony Kennedy, so we know what's going to happen in June if I'm right.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
70. The employee already paid for their health care with their labor.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:29 PM
Mar 2014

Further, entertaining debunked non-science in order to limit the health care options of employees is odious. There's no trade off because the negative effect is imaginary.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
83. Do you know of scientific proof
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:55 PM
Mar 2014

of the four questioned contraceptive methods NOT being abortifacients? I thought the science was still in question about how they work.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
90. So, you're saying
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 07:15 AM
Mar 2014

you have no such references, that the government's attorney would have theoretically Googled to present to the SCOTUS that Hobby Lobby and Conestoga were flat out wrong in their beliefs?

We do know that Plan B does work in exactly that way, by preventing implantation.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
84. If he did
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:57 PM
Mar 2014

would you think it would have bacon double cheeseburgers on the menu?

My point is, there are a lot of things that we ourselves do that we would not force another to do, or even subsidize. That's the argument made at the SCOTUS, and I think it swayed Kennedy.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
72. That's an incorrect analogy.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:32 PM
Mar 2014

First: No one is asking priests to do anything hands on. This is about employers/corporations.

Second: No one is asking the employer - not priest - to make the contraceptives, much less unwrap the condoms for them.

What is in question is what they are allowing their employees. Not that they are being forced to actively participate in making something for them.

Religious exemption is not supposed to harm a third party. If it does you are imposing your religious beliefs on someone else and we're supposed to have freedom from religion.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
86. Their employees
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 10:04 PM
Mar 2014

are ALLOWED to do anything they want to as regards contraception. It's the employer who doesn't want to pay for or otherwise facilitate it, if it goes against their religious beliefs.

You have to admit, the OP was way off base as to what an employer could possibly require under the slipperiest of slopes after a decision in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga. Maybe my analogy is flawed, but that one was totally absurd.

I predict a narrow ruling in favor of the aforementioned parties. One of the things the SCOTUS takes into account is legislative intent, and they look to how a law was formed in determining that. When the President signed the executive order that nothing under the ACA was to be used to construe any sort of support for abortion, it could be argued that it included drugs and devices which have the possible effect of causing abortions. Just because some executive-appointed bureaucracy cooks up a list of "what must be covered" doesn't mean that the law (as intended) approves that list in its entirety.

Small Accumulates

(149 posts)
27. No, of course not!
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 05:56 PM
Mar 2014

Because when the corrupt supremes rule in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga it will be because this is actually about denying women the right to appropriate healthcare. No one is ever going to propose or accept anything that diminishes men's human rights. Silly!!

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
43. How about you require it of all their children too?
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:20 PM
Mar 2014

If you are gonna light a fire, might as well make it a big one

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
46. With that aside, circumcision shouldn't be allowed.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:21 PM
Mar 2014

Period.

It's barbaric and it's a practice that isn't needed.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
47. I don't believe the Court would ever find that the government can compel circumcision but....
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:23 PM
Mar 2014

depending on their holding the law could well be that you have every right to make your male employees drop their pants and show they have been circumcised. You can then give the hooded men a week to get it cut and if they don't comply you fire them. Why? Because god told you so.

Or unmarried female employees must personally demonstrate to you, the lecherous old business owner, that they are virgins. So you make them disrobe and you stick your finger or whatever in to confirm. If they aren't virgins they are fired because god told you so.

The list is endless...........This is the American version of the Taliban.......

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
52. Sure, no problem! In my company I will require all employees worship Satan, seems
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:38 PM
Mar 2014

that should be no problem. If not, I'll just fire them for insubordination! The church of Satan. It's a church, seems no problemo!

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
53. Great argument
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:43 PM
Mar 2014

Another would be a Muslim business owner requiring women to cover their heads. The right would go beserk. This is a Christian version of Sharia law.

These "Christian" corporation owners want to have separation of personal liability through the corporate laws but want to bypass that separation to inject their personal "morality"/religion.

If the SC rules for Hobby Lobby it will open up a whole new can of worms. The Democrats should be all over this right now showing the public how troublesome this could get.

nietzschean

(6 posts)
58. Jehova's witnesses
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:55 PM
Mar 2014

I think a better example and one that should be brought up in court is the refusal of Jehova's witnesses to accept blood transfusions.

Should we violate their religious freedom too by forcing them to cover those procedures?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
61. Man, these analogies get sillier and sillier.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:59 PM
Mar 2014

No employee of Hobby Lobby was ever required to refrain from using contraception as a condition of employment. It never happened. If HL prevails in its case before the USSC then things will simply revert to status quo ante.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
69. Nope.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:25 PM
Mar 2014

If hobby lobby wins there will be a precedent set giving corporations religious rights.
That is insane.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
66. Or an Islamic employer that veils women and requires them to be escorted by family members
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:10 PM
Mar 2014

Yeah, religion and government should never be mixed.

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
73. I understand your point, but that's not a good example ...
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:33 PM
Mar 2014

... because Judaism doesn't work that way. What goyim do doesn't make any difference to Jews, and they don't want converts.

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
74. The law only applies if it messes with Obamacare.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:45 PM
Mar 2014

That's the hidden part that they don't want you to know about.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
76. A SLIGHTLY more adept analogy would be whether they could refuse to cover heart valve replacement...
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 07:50 PM
Mar 2014

Since the valve comes from a pig. However I say SLIGHTLY, because the vast vast majority of even orthodox Jews agree that there's exceptions to just about every rule in the Torah when it comes to saving a life.

icarusxat

(403 posts)
80. Why not the medical care that would be required for all Hobby Lobby employees...
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 08:51 PM
Mar 2014

and the Fundie Christian psuedo owners by their true owners, Fundamental Islamic oil producing countries...mandatory female circumcision for all of their women employees?

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
81. Well, the Rabbi who offered me a job (his assistant)
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:10 PM
Mar 2014

said I could roast a pig in my backyard and invite the entire neighborhood as long as I didn't bring a sandwich to the synagogue and eat it there. I am not Jewish, turned down the job offer, but he was a cool, and very funny man.

Yes, that really happened.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
85. Are all your employees Jewish?
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 10:04 PM
Mar 2014

Because that rule only applies to Jews and since even most secular Jews get circumcised you probably would not have too many people to circumcise.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
88. No, but I'd like to apply my religious beliefs to my company, like the Hobby Lobby does
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 10:30 PM
Mar 2014

My employees can become honorary jews. Religion in the home, religion in the workplace.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So if I am a Jewish emplo...