General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo if I am a Jewish employer can I require that all of my male employees
get circumcised next weekend? Not that I would, I just want to know if I could.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Or a Christian/Jewish employer demand all employees not to watch football on Sunday (skin of unclean animal and all that).
(Not that I'd mind too much as I stopped watching football once Vick was let back into the league...)
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)God said anyone that worked on the Sabbath (even gathering wood for a fire) should be put to death.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)Although lately it has been downright tiresome.
Growing up in Dallas the only thing we loved more than potluck supper in the church basement was the Cowboys - our pastor often planned earlier services if the Cowboys had an early game so we'd be out in time to watch it.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)These are adults, so...
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)I'd think that if you have a mohel do the job, you have to pay for it yourself?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)works for the tips.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)as old as vaudeville, although I don't have a specific source for it. Probably from one of the great Jewish comedians of yore.
KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)calimary
(81,212 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm just clearing the deck for the inevitable onslaught of "tip" jokes.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)Whatever you like.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)VERY neat
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yeah, its a classic. So glad NDGT ran it again- it was one of the best parts of the original series, too.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Certainly wouldn't want to take credit for it. Whoever did that animation back in 1979 or whatever, did a great job.
Feel free to take!
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)have to go get some scissors and tape.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and here's the link location:
http://i.imgur.com/ToaXKCM.gi
just stick an "f" on the end of the "gi" and you're good to go.
Diclotican
(5,095 posts)Warren DeMontague
I think it was also used in the intro to Il était une fois l'homme A french animations serie - who basically was about humankind from the earlist of times - to the present (1978). It was one of my first introductions to the world of history by the way - even though the serie is somewhat dated by now - it was mutch more nice back in the days when I was a child - than today when it have seen it again (I found it in a DVD box, and just had to get it)..
Diclotican
undeterred
(34,658 posts)So I get to choose their sexual preference too.
And no premarital sex. They should check with me for acceptable contraception.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)If you're really that Orthodox.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)That's the ticket here, isn't it?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)You should have seen my male supervisor cower under his desk back in the day. I only granted the privilege of my presence for prevailing wage., LOL.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)which gives female employees 5 paid days off a month.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)That's the only thing the GOP has ever seen in the sexual department anyway.
Like Elaine in Seinfeld: 'Fake, fake... fake, fake, fake!'
Acting is one of life's survival skills. Just look at the tears of Boehner and Beck:
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Since I had horrendous disabling cramps my entire reproductive life, 13 times a year.
It's not just about cramps, it's also about feeling like a wet dishrag as well, barely able to move.
There are countries in Asia that I have read have one day per month for menstrual leave.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)believing women should stay at home with the kids.
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)they only mean Christians...all other relgions are fake, dontcha know???
jwirr
(39,215 posts)spanone
(135,823 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)9-0
LakeVermilion
(1,039 posts)I have wondered about this, when people shout that they don't want their tax monies funding abortion/women's health. I have items that the government funds that I don't agree with also. Why are their concerns addressed, but not mine?
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)If I remember correctly the Supreme Court essentially said that they would not hear tax-related challenges because it would clog up the entire judicial system. The exception is that if you can find where the government is using your tax dollars in direct violation of a specific clause in the Constitution. Keep in mind this is all off memory of an undergrad Constitution Law class I took a couple of years ago so I may be off on the details.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)wouldn't they change their minds quickly.
Or back to peyote and other nature-given hallucinogens.
Or human sacrifice, for crying out loud. Neoconservatives
and pundits, for they offend the spirit and the lord my
dog doth declare them liars full of evil.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Since you brought up being Jewish, I have a number of Jewish friends who don't keep kosher, but they'd probably have a problem with a law that required their rabbi to buy the ingredients for and cook them up a bacon double cheeseburger.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)their morals on everyone else.
My example is preposterous. Jews do not impose their religious beliefs on other people.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)there is no compulsion on the part of any employee to refrain from the use of any contraceptive, including the ones that they're willing to pay for that they do not consider abortifacients.
My guess is that Hobby Lobby and Conestoga convinced Anthony Kennedy, so we know what's going to happen in June if I'm right.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Further, entertaining debunked non-science in order to limit the health care options of employees is odious. There's no trade off because the negative effect is imaginary.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)of the four questioned contraceptive methods NOT being abortifacients? I thought the science was still in question about how they work.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)you have no such references, that the government's attorney would have theoretically Googled to present to the SCOTUS that Hobby Lobby and Conestoga were flat out wrong in their beliefs?
We do know that Plan B does work in exactly that way, by preventing implantation.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Your analogy isn't great either... Just saying.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)would you think it would have bacon double cheeseburgers on the menu?
My point is, there are a lot of things that we ourselves do that we would not force another to do, or even subsidize. That's the argument made at the SCOTUS, and I think it swayed Kennedy.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)First: No one is asking priests to do anything hands on. This is about employers/corporations.
Second: No one is asking the employer - not priest - to make the contraceptives, much less unwrap the condoms for them.
What is in question is what they are allowing their employees. Not that they are being forced to actively participate in making something for them.
Religious exemption is not supposed to harm a third party. If it does you are imposing your religious beliefs on someone else and we're supposed to have freedom from religion.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)are ALLOWED to do anything they want to as regards contraception. It's the employer who doesn't want to pay for or otherwise facilitate it, if it goes against their religious beliefs.
You have to admit, the OP was way off base as to what an employer could possibly require under the slipperiest of slopes after a decision in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga. Maybe my analogy is flawed, but that one was totally absurd.
I predict a narrow ruling in favor of the aforementioned parties. One of the things the SCOTUS takes into account is legislative intent, and they look to how a law was formed in determining that. When the President signed the executive order that nothing under the ACA was to be used to construe any sort of support for abortion, it could be argued that it included drugs and devices which have the possible effect of causing abortions. Just because some executive-appointed bureaucracy cooks up a list of "what must be covered" doesn't mean that the law (as intended) approves that list in its entirety.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Small Accumulates
(149 posts)Because when the corrupt supremes rule in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga it will be because this is actually about denying women the right to appropriate healthcare. No one is ever going to propose or accept anything that diminishes men's human rights. Silly!!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Depending on the supreme court.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)from paying for it .
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Refuse to pay for insurance which covers shellfish allergies.
TBF
(32,047 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)If you are gonna light a fire, might as well make it a big one
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Period.
It's barbaric and it's a practice that isn't needed.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)depending on their holding the law could well be that you have every right to make your male employees drop their pants and show they have been circumcised. You can then give the hooded men a week to get it cut and if they don't comply you fire them. Why? Because god told you so.
Or unmarried female employees must personally demonstrate to you, the lecherous old business owner, that they are virgins. So you make them disrobe and you stick your finger or whatever in to confirm. If they aren't virgins they are fired because god told you so.
The list is endless...........This is the American version of the Taliban.......
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)RKP5637
(67,104 posts)that should be no problem. If not, I'll just fire them for insubordination! The church of Satan. It's a church, seems no problemo!
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)Another would be a Muslim business owner requiring women to cover their heads. The right would go beserk. This is a Christian version of Sharia law.
These "Christian" corporation owners want to have separation of personal liability through the corporate laws but want to bypass that separation to inject their personal "morality"/religion.
If the SC rules for Hobby Lobby it will open up a whole new can of worms. The Democrats should be all over this right now showing the public how troublesome this could get.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)nietzschean
(6 posts)I think a better example and one that should be brought up in court is the refusal of Jehova's witnesses to accept blood transfusions.
Should we violate their religious freedom too by forcing them to cover those procedures?
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)Who's ahead of who now?
Haha hahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
moondust
(19,972 posts)Put that in your pipe, Scalia.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)No employee of Hobby Lobby was ever required to refrain from using contraception as a condition of employment. It never happened. If HL prevails in its case before the USSC then things will simply revert to status quo ante.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)If hobby lobby wins there will be a precedent set giving corporations religious rights.
That is insane.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Smegma is no one's friend.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Yeah, religion and government should never be mixed.
mucifer
(23,527 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... because Judaism doesn't work that way. What goyim do doesn't make any difference to Jews, and they don't want converts.
Kablooie
(18,625 posts)That's the hidden part that they don't want you to know about.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)Wait, what Law are we talking about?
christx30
(6,241 posts)requiring a Muslim barber to cut the hair of a lesbian might fit in here.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/121854946
What would you do in that case?
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)Since the valve comes from a pig. However I say SLIGHTLY, because the vast vast majority of even orthodox Jews agree that there's exceptions to just about every rule in the Torah when it comes to saving a life.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
longship
(40,416 posts)But, you have a pretty good point.
icarusxat
(403 posts)and the Fundie Christian psuedo owners by their true owners, Fundamental Islamic oil producing countries...mandatory female circumcision for all of their women employees?
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)said I could roast a pig in my backyard and invite the entire neighborhood as long as I didn't bring a sandwich to the synagogue and eat it there. I am not Jewish, turned down the job offer, but he was a cool, and very funny man.
Yes, that really happened.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Because that rule only applies to Jews and since even most secular Jews get circumcised you probably would not have too many people to circumcise.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)My employees can become honorary jews. Religion in the home, religion in the workplace.