General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJPMorgan Chase Refuses to Process Payments for Women Entrepreneurs' Condom Company
Mortgage fraud is NOT a "reputational risk"?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/23/1286853/-JPMorgan-Chase-Refuses-to-Process-Payments-for-Female-Entrepreneurs-Condom-Company
A news story today made me wonder if I had woken up in 1955, in the starched and sexually repressed world of Back to the Future or Pleasantville. I snapped back to reality as I realized I was reading it online, on Huffington Post:
A representative for Chase Paymentech, the payment processing platform offered by JPMorgan Chase, told Lovability founder Tiffany Gaines over the phone this week that the company considers it a "reputational risk" to handle online payments for condoms, which it classifies as an "adult-oriented product."
For some reason, Chase Bank thought doing business with this company would be a "reputational risk."
madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)a stupid decision. I would think this is going to be reversed.
mercuryblues
(14,530 posts)pretty sure it isn't the condoms they object to. I am willing to bet that anyone with a Chase card can walk into a CVS store and buy as many condoms that they want. A quick look at their website reveals that they are those evil and wicked feminists, who promote women to take charge of their sexual health.
from their site: Why "The Lovability Movement?"
http://www.lovabilitycondoms.com/
We believe that women who love themselves can love everyone else around them more fully. We believe that women who love themselves are more likely to be respectful and considerate of their bodies. We believe that women who love themselves have the confidence to pursue their dreams. If more women pursue their dreams the world will become a way better place. Yep
Can't have that now, can they?
they have a petition:
http://www.change.org/petitions/chase-paymentech-process-credit-cards-for-online-condom-purchases-and-end-the-stigma-against-condoms
pipoman
(16,038 posts)She should milk this for all the bad press for Chase she can then choose one of the many other processing companies.
JustAnotherGen
(31,811 posts)And it's why I rec'd the op. This is really good publicity - I hope they use some asshole at Chase as a pawn to make a boat load of money. And I bet that boat load of money ends up benefitting a LOT of American women in the long run.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)and kicking people out of their homes isn't?
Talk about out of touch...
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Iris
(15,652 posts)Because I am an adult.
I also wonder if this would be an issue if the adjective in front of "entrepreneur" were "male".
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The bank was concerned about SAEs bad publicity, according to Anthony Alberico, a JPMorgan vice president who dealt with the foundation. SAE has had 10 deaths linked to drinking, drugs and hazing since 2006, more than any other fraternity.
...
The bank, which has said it would pay more than $23 billion to resolve regulatory and criminal investigations, has cut ties since last year with about 2,000 clients that could attract scrutiny, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Emily Sackett, a JPMorgan spokeswoman, declined to comment.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-27/fraternity-chief-feared-for-son-as-hazings-spurred-jpmorgan-snub.html
Given that they are already "too big", they can be choosy about what customers they serve.
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)And, I'm willing to bet that 99.99% of the people in this country had no idea, either. And, why would we up until these assholes had to announce it to us? This is the most asinine thing I've read in ages.