Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
8. the OP's wasn't a typo
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 09:14 PM
Mar 2014

at least according to him.

the subsequent message wants us to believe that he searched for it using the wrong name.

now it sounds like you're more ready to believe than OP than anything I post.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
9. You seem more aggressively obnoxious than usual
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 09:45 PM
Mar 2014

Is there a problem? Why are you trying so hard to pick a fight over trivial shit? Give it a break.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
11. i choose to comment on the OP and since it's in error, i comment on the error
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 12:48 AM
Mar 2014

not only are you more upset at my response than the OP is, the OP isn't even interested in his own posted topic anyway.

1) not interested enough in it to actually participate
2) not interested enough in it to actually get the guy's name right
3) not interested enough in it to actually correct the name in his OP when he acknowledged he got it wrong

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. But my post was not addressed to you.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 06:14 AM
Mar 2014

Why couldn't you ignore it? And when I said it was a typo why did you have to make it about me believing you? That is what puzzled me.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
15. you were legitimizing the OP's post, even though it was wrong and careless
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 11:54 AM
Mar 2014

i could ignore it, why couldn't you ignore the OP when it was a crappy post, wrong, lacked substance or any information and was utterly ignored by the OP?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. You are trying too hard to be outraged
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 11:58 AM
Mar 2014

getting so.worked up about trivial shit makes you look petty. Remember that no one made you hall monitor - it is perfectly acceptable to ignore posts that you disagree with.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
13. Yee is an example of the scum that attach itself to a dominant political
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 12:59 AM
Mar 2014

party. They have no interest is the core values of the party. Yee is joined by to other California Democratic Senators, one who has been convicted, the other facing 128 charges. All three are fucking scum and are a disgrace to honest Democrats in the California Senate who have worked their asses off to bring that state back to financial soundness. BTW, Yee and the other two scum would be republicans if republicans in California were dominant, they are simply self serving shit.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
17. If you're gonna promote gun control, don't associate with gun runners
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 11:59 AM
Mar 2014

Especially not one who's known on the street as Shrimp Boy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senator Lee