General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor DUers who haven't lived somewhere with toll roads, technologies have advanced
You don't have to stop at toll booths, it's called open road tolling.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)if you don't make minimum wage.
But no, I'm happy. The the government can electronically collect tolls from people who can't afford to pay. So we can subsidize lower taxes for billionaires. Yay
Lars39
(26,109 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)the way we feel inside.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Speaking of minimum wage....
Currently sitting on Boehner's desk to rot, alongside unemployment insurance.
So yeah, let's throw a fit over the prospect of toll roads.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)For the most part, that's E-470/C-470, the highway that has mostly ringed the Denver metro area.
The electronic RFID toll collection devices are also used in the HOV/Lexus lanes.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)because I don't have the RFID pass and they don't man the tolls so if you don't have change you can't pay. Then they hit you with a $50 ticket.
It's a scam and I refuse to drive those roads anymore. I'll take the long way to the airport, thanks.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Nowdays, if you don't have the RFID pass, the automated readers use a camera to read your license plate.
In Colorado, at least today, rather than sending you a ticket, they send you a bill to pay the tolls. The toll rates are higher if you don't use the RFID pass.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)take 470 anymore because of the tickets
I hope they did change it, I'd be happy to pay the actual toll by mail...
sir pball
(4,741 posts)The Henry Hudson Bridge has had gateless tolling for a couple of years; it works exactly like that. You get a bill for $2.50 instead of $52.50, I'm not sure if it was actual fairness on the part of the MTA or just logistics, it would have been a nightmare to try and segregate traffic on that tiny bridge.
I do think tolls are going to be the New Way; a lot of people are just screaming "raise the gas tax instead!" even as I'm seeing more and more Teslas around the city. Logic fail right there.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The costs for your state's part of the interstate, come back to your state, in the form of tolls.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)That makes no sense to me. And believe me, these new toll booths will spell political doom for Democrats in states where people are not accustomed to paying tolls to use the Interstate Highway System.
I can not believe that Democrats are supporting this plan. In fact, it shocks me that it's even being considered.
-Laelth
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)How many Republican Senators?
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
themaguffin
(3,826 posts)to fund roads.
Get used to it.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Now I can have my tolls directly taken from my McDonald's pay card to the state. I never have to see my money at all.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)with gasoline and with our tax return.
The reason for the toll roads is because we can't get an infrastructure bill passed.
The fed government can borrow at zero interest from the Fed. Put that money into an infrastructure bank. Take that money and pay private companies to rebuild the roads paying workers at least $10.10 an hour. It fixes the roads and creates jobs.
New tolls only pay a private company our dollars and does not create jobs.
hlthe2b
(102,228 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,366 posts)Sorry, but....
I might ask where you got that notion, but I'm not sure I really care.
Atman
(31,464 posts)...put it in my right pocket. I got a 100% ROI to my right pocket!
BRILLIANT!!!
greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Obama suggested that the Bank would borrow US$60 billion of federal funding to invest in infrastructure over 10 years, while leveraging "up to $500 billion" of private investment.[
The original proposed legislation states that the "Bank" is actually "an independent establishment of the Federal Government, as defined in section 104 of Title 5, United States Code."[3]
A HERETIC I AM
(24,366 posts)I laughed because that is patently untrue.
Your post above is an entirely different matter.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)What in the hell do we pay gasoline tax for? This is just another grab by the 1%. "We can't afford to repair roads, but we sure as hell can afford to enforce gas taxes!!!"
Ridiculous for any number of reasons.
hlthe2b
(102,228 posts)based on your license plate registration. So, if you lend your car to anyone--beware. You could be out quite a bit of $$ from someone who unknowingly (or knowingly) hops on a toll road thinking it was not active because there were no functional toll booths and there really is no posting letting them know that is the case when they enter. I know MANY here in Colorado who have learned the hard way. And, if you ignore those bills, thinking they are in error which you'll address another day, you may find yourself owing some big late fees on top.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Many exits have unmanned toll booths. If you don't have two quarters to pay the toll, what do you do? If you run the toll, two things will happen: if it's a rental car, you'll get a $10 charge to activate the on-board Sun Pass, plus $2.50 a day service fee, plus the cost of the toll. If you don't have a Sun Pass, your license plate is snapped and you get a bill for about $50.
Gotta love those private highways! You already paid for them, but some douche bag politician sold them off to his brother's cousin's uncle.
Mika
(17,751 posts)... recently.
http://www.floridasturnpike.com/all-electronictolling/LocationAndTollRates.cfm
https://www.tollbyplate.com/rentalcar
TOLL-BY-PLATE tolls are billed monthly, plus a $2.50 administrative charge
[hr]
Not a fan of privatization myself, but your info isn't correct.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Family lives there. I grew up there. We travel there frequently. But what do I know?
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)or not.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)on the off chance that you were ever falsely accused of some crime, technology is pretty cool.
Like the guy some time back who was accused of committing a crime. He claimed he was at a football game.
Someone investigated tape of the spectators in the stadium, and lo and behold! There he was, at the football game, just like he said!
If not for that, he might have gone to prison for a long time.
If he ever slammed technology before, I'll bet he doesn't now.
kcr
(15,315 posts)Guess that makes privatizing our roads so much better
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)They will take a picture of your plate and track you down and threaten you with a fine.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Here in GA we had a toll section of GA400 with EZPass. There were 2 lanes for EZPass cars and 15 lanes for those who had to stop, dig out the 50 cent toll and continue on.
Guess which lanes were backed up for miles?
bunnies
(15,859 posts)We don't even have to slow down through ours. But we have plenty of EZPass lanes.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)it is that simple. I hate those toll roads, we pay high fuel taxes and that's how it should be done.
Go sell this to the right wing, it is the sort of thing they'd love.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)there was one.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)In Texas people end up on toll roads without realizing it and then bills show up in the mail.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)You'd have to seriously not be paying attention to the signs if you accidentally end up on a tollway. They say toll all over the place. If you're on a road that turns into a tollway, there's clear signage for "Last Free Exit".
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Plus, most people know exactly where the tollways are and plan their routes accordingly (usually for avoiding the tollway, unless it's the only route.) And most of the tollways here have free feeder roads.
This one seems to have a massive bone to pick with Texas and is constantly exaggerating what little they know of the state.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)makes Tx so damn nice live in if you poor. No it isn't a bone to pick with Tx. It is with Texas economics. I hated California when it was Reaganland. I am a disabled uninsured women. Can you really recommend Tx for someone like me. Her personal experiences as a middle class or wealthy texan don't over-ride those of others in the state. She seems to be following me around by the way.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)And to avoid crapping all over the ones you don't. Personally, I don't hate any particular state. They all have their problems, and I don't go out seeking to learn which ones are "worse" than the others. No problem complaining about things they may do, but they are still Home to many Liberals, no matter how you may feel about their state as a whole. That's how I look at it. Find the state that is best for you and see if anyone on DU would be willing to help you move there. If you do live here in Texas, then it seems you would be much happier in the state of your choice. We don't seem to be it in any way, shape, or form.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)as unfriendly to business. You have no problem with this. Why are they unfriendly. Well they have too many environmental regulations and their employees have too many rights, and the taxes are too high on the rich. The business men gaming this to reduce regulations and rights for everyone in all states, and if I say something I am trashing Texas and offending Texas liberals. Trouble is, if they aren't concerned about the environment, or Labor or the middle class there isn't much liberal about them.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)You've been focused on all the negatives about my Home, with never anything positive to state. And don't put words in my mouth, so to speak. I see you've edited this so I'll address your newest message.
Go ahead and search on my username and find out exactly how I feel about my "governor" and whom I'd like to vote for instead. Have a look in the Texas forum to start. I'm trying to be diplomatic here, though it's difficult when folks second-guess me without having been here long enough to have observed my "posting-life" on DU.
I've said absolutely nothing about California, good or bad (although, back in 2009, when I had to go through LAX, I found it to be the least-advanced airport I'd ever seen, though I know residents are trying to update it.) So again, don't state what I haven't said. I mentioned that you seemed to have a massive bone to pick with Texas strictly from observing your posts here so far. And they are still coming across that way.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)about jobs poaching from states with more labor protections to states with less labor protections. How states are being pressured to reduce environmental and labor standards, because of it, and your governor was a main offender. Texas was obviously the example. It was not an essay about the merits of Texas. It was about labor arbitrage and how this hurts the middle class. You and tammywammy made it a Texas thing. Niether of you could make the case that these things didn't happen. You just made the case that it wasn't that bad, or not happening to you personally. That completely misses the point, and turns it into Cal vs Tx boosting.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)and would ask that if you still believe that way, that you post links to posts where I supposedly said as much.
You continue to say what I have never said, state whom I do not support, and are generally doing your best to get me to put you on ignore. I will not do that, because I'd rather you apologize for even inferring I support pRick Perry or any of his actions.
I love my state. Yet you don't seem to understand that doesn't mean that I love the people in my government.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)but didn't talk about the environment, labor or women's rights, or was in a thread that wasn't discussing those things.
I don't know what I am supposed to apologize for.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)as are sales taxes so it won't be good for lower wage workers at all. The uninsured rate is high. There is no place to get birth control unless you are insured. There is no zoning so another explosion such as the sort that happened in West can happen again. The schools in Texas are bad unless you can afford private schools. Even in localities where they are good, science classes will likely teach creationism, and history classes will likely teach Dan Barton's revisionism.
(Major hyperbole over the entire post.)
18. I don't care about Texas or California
I care about states not getting rewarded for degraded environmental, labor standards, women's rights. Those conditions are all horrible in Texas and there is no hope they will ever improve, because of gerrymandering. All states will will eliminate, labor and environmental standards, and will gut women's rights to compete with Texas. That is awful for all non elites.
26. Pretty skeptical of that
If there is any social progress some state will undercut Texas in medievalism. They'd move to Mississippi or something.
27. I don't think that is nearly as awful as getting blown up
or not being able to use birth control.
(The post-title is the hyperbolic bashing part, as if "getting blown up" is a danger in every single part of the state.)
111. It is still in a republican state
and republican ideas are rewarded by the move. So everyone will have to imitate republicans and get rid of unions, minimum wage, zoning laws, and women's rights. Everything business finds inconvenient must go. Child labor laws, sexual harassment laws. All taxes, you name it. We all must elect Rick Friggen Perry, or somebody like him! Race to the bottom! Run faster!
(More hyperbolic bashing and unfounded assumptions about the population.)
The way you say things comes across loud and clear to most as bashing. If that's not your intent, then you need to take more time to parse your thoughts and word it without the hyperbole. You appear to be good at understanding the political problems, yet not so accomplished at avoiding the broad-brush, which is against DU's rules.
The apology I would like is for the totally unfounded stating of what I believe and whom I support in my government. You do not know me, yet seem content to say that I support pRick Perry and all the other repubs in Texas. I don't understand your logic in coming to those conclusions, yet your posts (edited or not, as there's a record of each version) have jumped to them several times so far.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Your just mad cause I find fault with Texas irrespective of whether my claims are true, and don't care about my concerns.
Go ahead and ignore me, if you can't handle it .
kentauros
(29,414 posts)otherwise, it's bashing. I don't know how to be more clear.
Stating that I support the repubs in my state is a major insult, same as it would be for anyone anywhere else on this board. I don't know how to be more clear about that, either.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)which of my claims aren't true?
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Do you even read your own posts before making them? (like for proof-reading)
Your just mad cause I find fault with Texas irrespective of whether my claims are true, and don't care about my concerns.
Go ahead and ignore me, if you can't handle it.
95. Where did I say your supported republicans?
76. Your governor trashes California
as unfriendly to business. You have no problem with this. Why are they unfriendly. Well they have too many environmental regulations and their employees have too many rights, and the taxes are too high on the rich. The business men gaming this to reduce regulations and rights for everyone in all states, and if I say something I am trashing Texas and offending Texas liberals. Trouble is, if they aren't concerned about the environment, or Labor or the middle class their isn't much liberal about them.
(No, you don't state outright that we support repubs, but you infer it, twice in this post.)
111. It is still in a republican state
and republican ideas are rewarded by the move. So everyone will have to imitate republicans and get rid of unions, minimum wage, zoning laws, and women's rights. Everything business finds inconvenient must go. Child labor laws, sexual harassment laws. All taxes, you name it. We all must elect Rick Friggen Perry, or somebody like him! Race to the bottom! Run faster!
(Again, back to this hyperbolic post, stating that we'll have to be like republicans if we want to continue to live here.)
Okay, I'm off to get something to eat, mostly because I'm tired of reiterating your own posts back to you. Perhaps you can go click on your "My Posts" tab and reread what you've written, pick out the hyperbole, and learn how to communicate without it. You'll go much further on this site that way.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)since saying someone is not liberal is not the same as saying they support Republicans. Democrats are often very conservative, particularly on economics, particularly if they admire new Dems like Bill Clinton.
As for your last inference. You might also infer I am saying that this promotion of arbitrage means, we all must support Rick Perry's policies to get jobs to come back to blue states, which would have been a correct one.
I stand by every last think I said. If you think you will make me feel guilt by reposting my stuff. You are wrong.
State boosterism is never liberal anymore than nationalism.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)You've just happened to post incorrect information and I've corrected you. I'm fact biased. And I've never discussed my income on DU, but I'll tell you I'm an administrative assistant that's in graduate school. Thankfully my employer had tuition reimbursement which covers the majority of my tuition and books.
I just happen to drive by a toll road every work day (drive by, I don't use it).
BTW, threads about Texas tend to draw in Texan DUers. Shocking.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I live in the Northeast and agree that toll roads are clearly demarcated around here.
I went to Dallas to speak at a legal conference, and it seems like there is a scheme between the rental companies and whomever is designating the toll road sections, because if there is some way to get to the rental return without using one (having decided not to use their overpriced electronic payment device rental system, and even having set my GPS to "avoid toll roads" , then I'll be danged if I could find it.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)The few times I've visited, I found the freeway signage to be the worst I've ever had the misfortune to experience. Whereas, I have to deal with idiot drivers in Houston that ignore the two miles of advanced warning only to suddenly realize they're in the wrong lane for exiting or not exiting.
Maybe Dallas has improved the advanced warning of what's about to happen in the last couple of decades, but I don't know personally.
The other big problem with Texas tollways is that so many of them are now built and operated by private companies, and not the State of Texas. A recent survey of tollway costs here resulted in us learning that corporate-operated tollways averaged 34-cents per mile, while State-operated tollways averaged 15-cents per mile. So, you can see why Perry went so out of control in making these things.
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)a toll road and it pisses me off.
First off, there are only TWO major highways here in Austin that run North and South. The traffic on both are terrible and have been getting that way for a number of years now. My workplace is just right off Loop 1 in the medical district. I'd love to move closer but 400,000.00 for a 2 bedroom bungalow in a highly prized area is out of the question.
I am a native here and I understand the need for growth, but this toll thing is just another sucker punch to the regular ol' Austinites of this city. Yes. I am angry about the toll issue. GRRRR.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)It's worse than the West Loop (Loop 610) at five o'clock!
I don't see where they can even put a tollway down MoPac unless they either bury it or go overhead, neither of which the railroad would approve. Shared lanes will just make the traffic worse.
Again, for those paper-pusher and digital jobs, telecommuting would solve so many of their traffic woes. Not to mention, pollution woes, and increase productivity. But no one seems to want to hear that, and I'm not sure why...
dionysus
(26,467 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)The government will know exactly when your E-Z Pass goes through a particular checkpoint. And will retain that information indefinitely.
It sucks.
Raise the damn gas tax instead.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)I never said they weren't allowed to do it; I'm saying they shouldn't do it.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Compared to ordinary traffic cameras when you have a numbered tag on the back of your car.
Knowing that "an E-Z pass went through a toll" is not even the same as knowing "this car went through a toll", much less "this person went through a toll".
krispos42
(49,445 posts)The tax-collection system is already in place. So, just increase the amount taxed.
The alternative you seem to be supporting would require (tens of? Hundreds of?) millions of dollars to build all these toll collection points, millions of more dollars annually maintain them and operate the bureaucracy to bill people... and we would STILL be paying for the current tax-collection system!
Add a fucking nickel to the federal gas tax; it's currently only 18.4 cents.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I'm waiting...
krispos42
(49,445 posts)that should do it!
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Nothing would get the bastards moving faster to fund our roads and bridges.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)they put in all gasoline.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)There is no plus side to it.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)that we therefore don't know what modern tollways are like, I give you this:
http://www.texastollways.com/
pRick Perry went "toll happy" not long after becoming resident of the governor's mansion here. My normally free, state-maintained U.S. Highway 290 (it's always been well-maintained without tollway funding) now has a section in Austin that's a tollway. I had to get one of those stupid electronic patch thingies just so I wouldn't get a ticket when I visit my family a few times a year. And so, they're now rebuilding that section and it looks like it'll be as massively overbuilt as the Katy Freeway in Houston (18 lanes wide for those that have never driven here!)
Austin could have avoided all that overbuilt roadway and tollway crap by just insisting more cubicle and office workers telecommute. We could avoid it nationwide if we just doubled the current number telecommuting.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/24/workers-telecommute_n_1228004.html
http://www.globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)in Liberaliarism nervana
Atman
(31,464 posts)So as long as I have money to deposit I can drive on the roads? Didn't I already pay for those roads via my taxes?
I live in CT, we have no tolls. None. Zero. Nada. I drive to Massachusetts, tolls are everywhere on the turnpike. Fast Lane for people with transponders, but I rarely drive in MA. Why do I need to put a GPS tracking billing device in my car? This is total bullshit. Total, 100% bullshit. I'm glad you think it's "convenient" for you, but we all aren't you. I already paid for the roads. I continue to pay for the roads through gasoline taxes. Now a private company will profit off the roads I already paid for. FUCK THAT.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts)I'm thinking it's the tolls themselves. But maybe I'm wrong?
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Or just letting other DUers know they are ignorant?
How helpful!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)let's raise the damn fracking taxes on those who obviously insist on not paying them, instead of keeping doing this regressive shit that affects those who really can't afford it.
Oh and I forgot, I thought we all paid taxes to maintain those roads already when we fill a tank.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I'm sure the current Congress will get right on that.
Meanwhile, roads and bridges are crumbling.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)or at least in my lifetime
And I know how much they are crumbling.
This is part of the plan... and the Libertarian, damn fracking right wingers are winning.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)How do we stop the crumbling infrastructure with no money?
I need an answer other than opening up the ability of states to make the interstates toll roads.
How do we do it?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that is how you get it going. And I know who controls the purse, so this is a short term measure.
You also need the President, and the democratic party, not that they will do it, to make all this part of campaigning.
I will be brutally honest, I don't believe they want to. Deep down, both parties want the end of the commons. I cover sausage making, so I know that lack of political will usually means, we also want to do it, but damn are afraid to say it.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)What can he do beyond opening up the ability for states to make interstates toll roads?
Give me the specific executive order he could issue that would move money to the crumbling infrastructure.
I need specifics, not something general, because I damned well know the white house counsel has been working this issue for months and one thing they came up with was an executive order opening up interstates to tolling at the state level.
So give me a specific executive order he could issue to get money to the crumbling infrastructure.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)this, I concluded a while ago, BOTH parties want to end the commons. Embrace it, and you have
Have a good day. It is NOT my job to give you the text of an EO. He is a lawyer, and has plenty of lawyers on staff.
So let's make all my local interstates toll roads... and watch the economy slow down. In fact, I can't wait.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Thank goodness the Office of the White House Counsel had at least one.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)you freaking serious?
You defend this shit. I will not. And what I said about the economy slowing I mean it. I can't wait in fact.
Would you like me to point you in the direction of economic studies and discretionary spending?
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Tax the fuckers who are not paying enough taxes. It is simple.
Rex
(65,616 posts)"I love the idea of paying more money to drive on freeways, let us change their name to chargeways! Weeeeeeee!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I will look into it.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)rudolph the red
(666 posts)they met their requirements and now it's toll free.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)the working poor and the middle class - people who are underrepresented and/or *not* represented at all in Congress?
dilby
(2,273 posts)When disposable incomes are so low why not suck every penny you can from families that are just trying to make it. I mean if you can't afford to drive on the roads you should not have a car anyways, am I right?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)They overcharged drivers by millions, refuse to give back any overcharges that are past six months old.
And they were well aware of the problem for years.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Do we really want to create anger and frustration in the 100+ million Americans who are not accustomed to having to pay tolls to use the Interstate Highway System?
I honestly can not believe that Democrats are taking this proposal seriously.
-Laelth
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Teh infrastructure is crumbling.
Give me a better answer and remember, this answer must circumvent the Republicans because they WANT the infrastructure to crumble.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I will not accept the "something must be done now" argument, nor will I accept the "something is better than nothing" argument.
There's nothing we can do right now about our crumbling infrastructure that is both reasonable and supported by Republicans. Therefore, the wise course of action is to do nothing.
I can not support a proposal that will cause 100+ million Americans to hate the Democratic Party, and that is exactly what's being proposed, here.
-Laelth
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)They would be shouting from the rooftops about how all these crappy roads are Republicans' fault instead of "well we have to find a way to pay for it so lets institute a regressive user tax". Why on earth would they ENABLE the Republican point of view? All this does is make republicans say, "see? our roads are fine. Infrastructure is fine. Look at how well the market works when left alone!" Meanwhile poor people, heck, lower middle class people, are forced to take the long way home...on crumbling roads. All toll roads do is maintain SOME roads...taxation maintains ALL roads. A 2-tier transportation system is not something Democrats should be hanging their hats on.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And by the way, lack of political will usually means, we really want to do that, but we know it is not really popular... way too much sausage watching. <------------
So yes, I will say it. BOTH PARTIES want to privatize whatever is not nailed down.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)of the roads that exist.
raise the gas tax, people say. sure, great idea, splendid. got anywhere near the votes for it?
so, because of congress being douchebags, we need to scrounge money to fix crumbling infrastructure.
since congress won't spend the money, where does it come from? it looks like there's two options here;
1) raise the gas tax
2) create more toll roads.
nobody is going to like EITHER of these ideas. "vote for me, i'll raise the price of gas!!1!!11" is about as much of a winner as "vote for me and pay more tolls!"
but where else are we going to get the money, if congress won't act?
Rex
(65,616 posts)When do the Haves get forced to 'sacrifice' for the greater good? Oh right...never...
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)If one views the impact to the working poor as "collateral damage" ... and the cost of a "free society" ... then it is a great idea.
I really do not think those supporting the idea are financially disadvantaged .... so as long as tremendous sacrifice is born by others ....its a great idea.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)If it were guaranteed that private companies would not set rates (e.g., TX SH 130 run by a concession company), I'd have little problem with it.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Toll rates on the I-85 Express Lanes are based on the concept of dynamic pricing.
The pricing for use of the Express Lanes varies between .01 cent and .90 cents per mile based on traffic flow. Ultimately, the price of the I-85 Express Lanes at a specific location and point in time is determined by consumer demand. As demand for use of the Express Lanes increases, the toll amount will rise to ensure that motorists using the Express Lanes will experience a more reliable trip time. As traffic in the Express Lanes decreases, the toll price will also decrease. Rates are recalculated at a configurable time period (minimum of every 5 minutes), 24 hours a day.
Toll rates are displayed at each Express Lanes entry point on changeable message signs (pictured above), allowing drivers to choose whether entering the Express Lanes makes sense for them at any given time. The top rate displayed on the sign is the fee from the upcoming entry point to the next exit, while the bottom rate is the fee from that entry point to the last Express Lanes exit. If a motorist exits in between entry points, the toll rate will be between the two displayed rates. Once a motorist enters at that point, his or her toll rate will not change.
- See more at: http://www.peachpass.com/peach-pass-toll-facilities/i-85-toll-rate-pricing#sthash.gYbqq7Ic.dpuf
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)At least we see the difference between it being completely privatized and the government running it.
Of course Chicago screwed up parking meters by entering into a screwed up contract with a private entity.
Any time the government outsources, it gets screwed up. The private sector almost never does these things better than government.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)But if this goes through, it would be up to each individual state to determine what is right and what is wrong.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)See my posts on Georgia.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Congress would ahve to pass a bill tying federal policy of government running the program to federal highway dollars and again, we are back to convincing Republicans to do anything that is the right thing.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Rate schedule. I have yet to see where the contractor is allowed to set any price they choose at any time.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)GA turned a one lane section of roadway into a toll road with a private company. The tolls are based on the traffic on the ENTIRE roadway and most days is more than $8.00 to drive 3 miles on this toll section. Yes, I said eight dollars.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Glitterati
(3,182 posts)For real.
Originally, there was no limit on how much they could charge. When it reached that crazy price, the lanes were completely empty - no one used them.
So, they set a limit on the high end, eventually. But, it still costs nearly a dollar a mile to drive 3 miles.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)I could totally see the TN Teabaggin' legislature voting for this.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)One enacts some stupid Alec legislation and they all follow.
GA is planning on doing the exact same thing to all the interstates here - without any help from Obama or DEMs. They simply take over the the center divide, build a new lane and charge lots of money to use it. I-75 is next, 575 right after.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Thanks for listing some of their strategies for everyone to see. This stuff is so destructive to society it's truly mind boggling.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Yeah, that's the way the law is written.......corruption written in. There are no competitive bids on this garbage, just an opening bid and 90 days for others to try to one up that bid.
Georgia's DOT has long been corrupt - under DEMs and Teapublicans.
No break downs on the bids, just amounts offered? Good grief.
Just more reason to fight this garbage.
Gothmog
(145,130 posts)It is easy to use. The same toll tag is also keyed to my office building parking garage so that I can park without having to open my window
Bonx
(2,053 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)ancianita
(36,025 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)And costs less to implement.
And doesn't involve corporate scumbag contractors.
And doesn't involve the creation of YET another database of our movements to satisfy some LEO wet dream.
And doesn't involve yet more paperwork.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Good luck with that.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Tells you all you need to know about who is gonna actually benefit from the tolls then.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)and not know how much was deducted from their checking account until they get their bank statement.
elleng
(130,865 posts)Hard for me to understand the big fuss. I've been paying for my travel up and down the NE corridor for years. We PAY for our roads.
frylock
(34,825 posts)to get to a jobsite isn't affected?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... give a rats ass what a burden this would be to the financially disadvantaged. No sacrifice is too great for "those" people.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts).... and get back to me about how toll roads have advanced
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)got your talking points and then you all started saying the same thing at once. Certainly separated the people who actually think through the consequences of things from the people who recite their lines.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...that all popped up in a short span of time.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Seriously, you guys were completely radio silent until the hive mind kicked in. It was creepier than normal.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The fact that more than one person may not see highway tolls as the equivalent of Nazi death camps (seriously posted in one of the toll threads) is not a conspiracy.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I mean, unless it takes you 45 minutes to all come up with the same bad arguments independently.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The best part is picking up my big fat check at the end of the month, knowing that you get nothing.
However, since I post using my real name, it's fairly easy to figure out exactly who I am and what I do for a living.
How much of my income do you estimate I make from posting on DU?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I was told we got 10% for everyone we sign up.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)You got a good deal my sign up commission is only 5.75%!
Who was your recruiter...
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But I think he was running a special promotion at the time.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Well that's why we don't talk about pay in the American Workforce... You gonna start a thread about that or should I?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)We'll see how things work on with commissions on the interstate tolls.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I had to make my numbers.
Sid
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)bang alongside the idea of toll roads...Which is exactly how libertarians claim we should pay for infrastructure.
We hate libertarians and their ideas! Until the president promotes them. Then we post every bad argument we can think of in defense of them, and act shocked that people have counters for those arguments, like libertarians didn't come up with those same shitty arguments years ago.
Apparently now you're not a progressive unless you support flat taxes.
Autumn
(45,057 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)In the future they'll all be privatized so we can pay our corporate overlords even more. Fantastic!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)"Positively, the electronic tolling will help promote efficiencies and safety and hopefully ease some of the traffic congestion," said state Sen. Karen Spilka, D-Ashland.
But Spilka said she also worries it is a sign tolls are here for the long-term on the Pike, something that is concerning especially if tolls are not added to other major roads.
The state Department of Transportation plans to have its first all-electronic tolling system operating on the Tobin Bridge later this year through a $2.47 million project, agency spokesman Michael Verseckes said in an email.
"There will be a period of testing the system to ensure it properly functions before the existing tolling equipment and booths are removed and demolished," Verseckes said.
MassDOT will then convert the Turnpike and harbor tunnels. Those systems are expected to be effective by the summer of 2016.
The equipment and 10 years of maintenance are expected to cost about $120 million. MassDOT also faces a monthly charge totaling an estimated $258 million over 10 years.
"Aside from the estimated cost of converting to the all-electronic system, maintenance of the system and back office operations, MassDOT is expecting to save $50 million annually by eliminating its current cash collection expenses such as payroll and associated benefits, toll plaza facility utilities and upkeep, equipment maintenance and replacement, and toll collection software upgrades," Verseckes said.
The electronic tolling gantries will be installed along the main highway as opposed to exits. The system will read E-ZPass transponders. If a car does not have a transponder, its license plate will be recorded and the person to whom the car is registered will receive a bill in the mail.
http://m.wcvb.com/news/state-gears-up-to-go-allelectronic-on-tolls/25691568
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Out of curiosity? Or either?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)It works well, though there is talk of automating speeding tickets when the system can calculate you exceeded the speed limit by 20% between two open road toll bars. Since it has a date and time stamp for each toll bar, speed can be calculated accurately.
Illinois also has a brilliant example how technology being outsourced to a third party is disastrous, which would be parking meters in Chicago.
ancianita
(36,025 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)you have to remove the transponder and throw it in the glove compartment or some other enclosed space else you'll be charged a toll. Of course, then you need to remember to mount it back on the dash before you reach a toll road without the HOV exception, else...
The technology is so great that if you don't have a transponder mounted on the windshield/dash you'll get charge the toll and an arm and a leg in convenience fees/penalties.
The technology is so great that there will be a database of your movements available with lots of possibilities.
The technology is so great that in the future tolls may be demand based and driving the same stretch of road during rush hour may cost many times more than in off-peak times. If you think that's a good idea, consider that many people who have to travel at peak times will just clog up local roads rather than pay the steep premium.
The technology is great. HOT lanes are the wave of the future.
ancianita
(36,025 posts)(Couldn't resist.) 10 yrs ago Chicago leased -- I thought it sold it, but maybe not -- the Chicago Skyway and Toll Road around the bottom of Lake Michigan. Tolls have almost doubled, but it's faster than S.R. 80.
Response to MohRokTah (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Some small percentage will be used for maintenance, but most of it will go to dividends and shareholders.