Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:37 PM May 2014

How we will deal with Climate Change

This is not a suggestion, it is a grim prediction.

Nothing much will be done. Then, at some point after the thing reaches a critical-mass stage somebody will attempt to cool the planet.

I don't mean reducing emissions of green-house gases to stop heating the planet. I mean cooling the planet. Litterally reducing the amount of solar energy reaching the planet.

There are ways to do this. For instance, the smoke from the full-on thermonuclear destruction of Siberia would cool the planet a great deal, being similar to the mini-ice age caused by the explosion of Krakatoa that blew incredible amounts of ash high into the atmosphere. (And that effect despite the tremendous emission of greenhouse gases from Krakatoa.) I don't know whether wholesale nuking of the Gobi desert or Autralian outback would do the trick... I don't know whether enough particulates would reach high enough atmosphere.

Or the ionosphere could be seeded with reflective space trash to increase Earth's albedo.

Or some other crazy ice-age inducing thing. We are very inventive when it becomes crazy-time.

The problem is, of course, that nobody knows how to fine tune such catastrophic approaches to a planetary thermostat.

But if the effects get as bad as folks predict then of course we would try something.

So just add all that to everyone's scenarios. Not only are we are likely to ignore the thing until it is past catastrophic and largely irreparable, we are likely to then spring into action.

That's just how we roll.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How we will deal with Climate Change (Original Post) cthulu2016 May 2014 OP
russians might not be happy with your suggestion--it might make alaska glow dembotoz May 2014 #1
Yeah, I don't know about induced Volcano activity cthulu2016 May 2014 #3
Maybe it's just the way it is , the extinction of our species oneofthe99 May 2014 #2
I think that at some point it will become more costly upaloopa May 2014 #4
Action depends on who it is costly for muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #5
I think more costly to corporations ect . upaloopa May 2014 #7
That day has come marions ghost May 2014 #6

dembotoz

(16,785 posts)
1. russians might not be happy with your suggestion--it might make alaska glow
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:45 PM
May 2014

which would also be problematic

i see mt st helen is building again
what if we set off a volcano or maybe a few-
less radiation
sucks for the locals...

frankly i do not know

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
3. Yeah, I don't know about induced Volcano activity
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:49 PM
May 2014

Volcanoes actually put tons of greenhouse gas in the air, so the last thing folks would want would be minor eruptions.

What made Krakatoa so notable was the one-time explosive force that got all that pumice into the high atmosphere, blocking the sun.

But when the earth was completely covered with ice for 20 million years (about 650 million years ago) what got us out of it was incredible super-volcano eruptions pumping all that methane and CO2 into the air.

Cuts both ways.

 

oneofthe99

(712 posts)
2. Maybe it's just the way it is , the extinction of our species
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:45 PM
May 2014

I never thought humans are meant to live forever anyways

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
4. I think that at some point it will become more costly
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:49 PM
May 2014

to ignore global warming than to live with it.
At that point there will be calls for new restrictions on emissions.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,270 posts)
5. Action depends on who it is costly for
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:02 PM
May 2014

For instance, economists generally agree the US healthcare payment system costs far more than other countries'; but it has hung around because those with money and power pay less under it. Similarly, global warming is ignored because those with money and power get more of each by ignoring it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How we will deal with Cli...