Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats should boycott latest Benghazi charade
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is trying to make the GOPs latest Benghazi theater more than partisan drama by asking Speaker John Boehner to appoint an equal number of Democrats and Republicans to the new investigative panel hes convening. The speaker is unlikely to do that, so Democrats should boycott this latest GOP fundraising stunt.
Five House committees have already investigated the Benghazi tragedy and issued biased reports; there have been two Senate committee reports plus the Accountability Review Boards findings. The bipartisan reports found errors on the part of State Department personnel and recommended staffing and other changes. But because none of the investigations were able to charge then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with incompetence, or prove that President Obama tried to cover up the truth to get re-elected, Republicans wont believe them, and insist theres more to investigate.
Thus we have the latest House Benghazi stunt and Democrats should stay away from it. Theres precedent for boycotting such a panel: Dems did so in 2005, when Republicans organized a sham investigation into how President Bush handled the Katrina catastrophe, when it became clear the effort was meant to be a whitewash, not a thorough probe.
....
Gowdys committee is best understood as as a base-energizing fundraising tool for the GOP, part of what Politicos Michael Hirsch calls the Benghazi industrial complex, engineered to damage Clinton so much she either cant run for president or decides its not worth the pain. Of course, Benghazi fever hasnt spread beyond the fever swamps of Obama hatred that afflict the GOPs far-right base. But thats enough to keep it alive, and potentially make it a potent midterm-election organizing tool. House Democrats should make that role clear by boycotting it.
Joan Walsh
Five House committees have already investigated the Benghazi tragedy and issued biased reports; there have been two Senate committee reports plus the Accountability Review Boards findings. The bipartisan reports found errors on the part of State Department personnel and recommended staffing and other changes. But because none of the investigations were able to charge then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with incompetence, or prove that President Obama tried to cover up the truth to get re-elected, Republicans wont believe them, and insist theres more to investigate.
Thus we have the latest House Benghazi stunt and Democrats should stay away from it. Theres precedent for boycotting such a panel: Dems did so in 2005, when Republicans organized a sham investigation into how President Bush handled the Katrina catastrophe, when it became clear the effort was meant to be a whitewash, not a thorough probe.
....
Gowdys committee is best understood as as a base-energizing fundraising tool for the GOP, part of what Politicos Michael Hirsch calls the Benghazi industrial complex, engineered to damage Clinton so much she either cant run for president or decides its not worth the pain. Of course, Benghazi fever hasnt spread beyond the fever swamps of Obama hatred that afflict the GOPs far-right base. But thats enough to keep it alive, and potentially make it a potent midterm-election organizing tool. House Democrats should make that role clear by boycotting it.
Joan Walsh
Should Benghazi hearings be off the table?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 602 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats should boycott latest Benghazi charade (Original Post)
Capt. Obvious
May 2014
OP
The Big Lie being given legitimacy by participating is only going to make it bigger. A boycott
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#2
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)1. Yes, boycott them. This is the 9th investigation.
Focus on jobs, economy and make them look crazy.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)2. The Big Lie being given legitimacy by participating is only going to make it bigger. A boycott
may force the RW corporate media to report honestly about the charade.
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)3. If they do go to the hearings
they should bring up all the Iraq war lies over and over.