Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed May 7, 2014, 04:24 AM May 2014

Los Angeles now spending more on Wall Street fees than on maintaining roads

Los Angeles councilman Paul Koretz has called for banks NY Mellon and Dexia to return $65 million in “unfair profits and termination payments” they received between 2008 and 2014. This follows a report (embedded below) revealing that the city spent more than $200 million in fees to Wall Street in 2013 alone. Koretz says he may push the city to take punitive action against the financial institutions involved if they do not renegotiate the deal.

The report, published by the union-backed Fix LA Coalition, notes that “the City of Los Angeles last year spent more on Wall Street fees than it did on our streets.” Indeed, the report notes the city “paid Wall Street $204 million in fees, spending only $163 million on the Bureau of Street Services.”

The fees are connected to the controversial interest-rate-swap deal cemented by Los Angeles in 2006. It is a deal similar to those engineered by Wall Street in cities across the country. Those deals have made headlines in recent years in some of the country’s most high-profile municipal budget crises.

For instance, a recent study by former Goldman Sachs investment banker Wallace Turbeville found that an interest-rate swap deal was a primary driver of Detroit’s fiscal crisis. Noting that the banks used the city’s bankruptcy to demand “upwards of $250-350 million in swap termination payments,” Turbeville concluded that “a strong case can be made that the banks that sold these swaps may have breached their ethical, and possibly legal, obligations to the city in executing these deals.” (A court recently reduced the amount the city has to pay Wall Street to unwind the deals).


http://pando.com/2014/05/06/los-angeles-now-spending-more-on-wall-street-fees-than-on-maintaining-roads/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Los Angeles now spending more on Wall Street fees than on maintaining roads (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter May 2014 OP
, blkmusclmachine May 2014 #1
In my area, the city has put a lot of money into removing car lanes and putting in little-used bike JDPriestly May 2014 #2
Our town added a bike trail a couple of years ago Blue_Adept May 2014 #4
Dedicated bike trails make a lot of sense. JDPriestly May 2014 #5
Wall St drove Detroit into bankruptcy with their frauds Demeter May 2014 #3
Please explain how swaps are "fraud." Dreamer Tatum May 2014 #9
Tell me why we bailed these fuckers out again. Enthusiast May 2014 #6
The interest-rate swap deals worked out great for cities and states in the "boom" years but Hestia May 2014 #7
k/r nationalize the fed May 2014 #8

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. In my area, the city has put a lot of money into removing car lanes and putting in little-used bike
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:57 AM
May 2014

lanes but not fixing sidewalks so that people can walk safely.

I think the bike lanes were part of some boondoggle federal program. It's not about bikes v. cars. We already had bikeways on sidestreets. Changing a few stop signs so that bikes could have more of a right-of-way on the sidestreets would have been a better solution for both the bike-riders and the car-drivers. But no. Bike lanes had to be. Rarely do I see any bike riders. They are mostly only present on weekends, especially weekend evenings when there are not so many cars anyway. It's a ridiculous waste.

Blue_Adept

(6,384 posts)
4. Our town added a bike trail a couple of years ago
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:09 AM
May 2014

Replaced a long disused train track that hadn't been operating for 20 years. Turned it into a pretty nice walking/bike trail.

My father can't understand why it exists because he never sees anybody on it at all. Complains about it regularly enough too.

Of course, he hasn't left the house in five or six years other than to go to a doctors appointment that takes him by it.

Doesn't stop him from complaining though that he never sees anyone on it.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. Dedicated bike trails make a lot of sense.
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:42 AM
May 2014

But replacing a car lane with a bike lane on a heavily traveled street makes no sense. Not yet anyway. If the goal is to get people to ride bikes instead of taking their car, then you want to make using a bike as safe and easy as possible. I think that having a special lane for themselves on very busy thoroughfares in cities is an ego thing for a lot of American bike riders. Sometimes their are no safer side-street alternatives. But when they are, the safest alternative should be the choice.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. Wall St drove Detroit into bankruptcy with their frauds
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:05 AM
May 2014

but LA is a slightly larger fish, in a better protected state.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
6. Tell me why we bailed these fuckers out again.
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:59 AM
May 2014

This is not right! Why do we have to put up with shyster bankers?

Stay completely the fuck away from interest-rate swap deals.

 

Hestia

(3,818 posts)
7. The interest-rate swap deals worked out great for cities and states in the "boom" years but
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:21 AM
May 2014

after 2008, it's been draining those budgets. It seems to be something Goldman-Sacs came up with - big surprise.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Los Angeles now spending ...