General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThanks Monica!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4917740http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024919131
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024919406
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024918443
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024915152
NOTE-
This meme does not exist until now, I take full credit and will be waiting for jpg's to be created!
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)the rapid pace our news whizzes by, I'm thinking Monica may be about as useful to the GOP, come 2016, as Benghazi.
Maybe Monica would have been more useful to stopping the climb in Hillary's poll numbers had they waited until early 2016.
Repukers must really be worried about Hillary's popularity, even with their # 1 charmer Jeb, to dust off Mz Lewinsky..
Old news already.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)but I wish folks would turn off the damn television and quit worrying about every non-story wallpapered all over cable "news."
It would be difficult for me to agree more with this sentiment. News, and especially cable "news," exists to lead people around by the nose so they pay attention to stupid, ridiculous things that don't affect them in any way, and to keep them for paying attention to the things that do affect them. Lewinski was a non-story when it happened and it's even less of a story now.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Team Clinton has orchestrated Monica and the magazine outlet to get it all out there, create the "consentual sex" talking points, deal with it and let it get tucked away well before her 2016 run. They are in charge of the timing of all of this and leaving very little to happenstance. The content of Monica's message and the timing is being controlled.
I can't see this being any sort of an accidental timing thing. This is way old story. There are too many more recent Republican scandals that have not been ressurected, but mark my words, they will be ressurected at a more opportune time.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I really wonder if this isnt an effort on the Clintons part to get that story out of the way, Ms. Cheney said, during a Fox News appearance on Tuesday evening. Would Vanity Fair publish anything about Monica Lewinsky that Hillary Clinton didnt want in Vanity Fair?
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/7/lynn-cheney-hillary-clinton-prodded-monica-lewinsk/#ixzz312ekYfRN
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Well, maybe not an A-list, probably B or C list
pintobean
(18,101 posts)every DUer's odds of serving on a jury by 69%.
Thanks Monica!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)*****
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
She's still awfully cute.