General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI always thought that Monica was paid well to tempt Clinton.
I wonder how much she is being paid this go around? Why else would she crawl out from under her rock after all these years?
Orrex
(63,203 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)She's already becoming old news after only 1 day.
Well, except for Joe Scar.
Throd
(7,208 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Conspiracies are pretty difficult to keep hidden over time; people talk.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)but I think this is a useless thing to discuss.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)He should have known better and controlled himself, regardless of Lewinski's intentions.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)which is how she got her WH internship in the first place. Also, her father is (or was?) a Beverly Hills doctor. Money didn't mean that much to her because she had always had plenty of it.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Shit, I thought this was complete bullshit when it happened the first time & I was about 15 or 16. My dad & I used to get into arguments because he would badger my grandmother over what a terrible president she voted for over a damn blowjob.
Get over it & stop implying that she's a whore for doing it. Opportunistic maybe, whore unacceptable.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)When did this happen?!?!?
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)That's not a big deal, I thought they did more than that LOL
woolldog
(8,791 posts)If you were going to pay someone to seduce a President would you pick her? No. You would've picked someone a lot better looking.
Marshall III
(69 posts)President Clinton behaved like a pig. Despite being president "in the people's house", he was married, her boss, and twice her age. He humiliated himself, her, his family, his supporters and this country.
Any time a relationship takes place between a boss and subservient, the boss is absolutely wrong- every time!!!!!
Not to say that Monica is or was faultless, but Clinton could have and should have avoided the affair.
All that said, her "kiss and tell" attempt to jump in to the limelight is ugly and wrong, but expected and the price of doing this sort of business.
Best to take the lumps and let it pass, but there is no conspiracy theory or rationalization that makes any of it any better.
karynnj
(59,502 posts)I seriously doubt that anyone paid her to do anything. My own take was why did she (or anyone) think that doing something like flashing the President would not lead to being quickly and quietly shown the door for inappropriate behavior.
This is a case where no one other than Bill Clinton is responsible for the harm to his reputation and the hurt to his family and the Democratic party.
As to someone on the right paying Monica now - I doubt it. She is just continuing to seek attention and likely hopes to get money or a position out of this. To this point, Monica destroyed her own life through her actions. As a 19 year old, her likely future was that she would marry and live the life of privilege she was born to. It is sad that at 40, she is still trying to make something of her own (as well as the President's) poor taste. This is like a faded groupie still trying to trade on the biggest moment of her life.
I suspect that if it were the right, they would wait until maybe June 2016 - maybe sending her out for a book tour that summer before the Democratic convention. Imagine the lead up to the convention being filled with discussions that seemed like they were right out of 1998 when Bill Clinton confessed. (or August 2000 the weekend before a Democratic convention when there was a major TV confessional by the president or hearing in many interviews in June 2004 that Monica happened "because I could". ) Having it all come out again now, means it likely will not come out then.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)The person without self-control is responsible. (Can't believe I entered a Monica Lewinsky thread. What was I thinking?)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
Orrex
(63,203 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
Orrex
(63,203 posts)It depends whether we're treating "tempted" as a verb or an adjective, and it depends also on who is assumed to have agency in the transaction.
Sort of like:
Randome was offended by Orrex's ribald limericks
versus
Orrex's ribald limericks offended randome.
Who's at the reins?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)to tempt him...
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)I smell Koch brothers money.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)and even I am not blind enough to think she was paid or promised anything beforehand. She was living her dream. We are talking the Big Dog. No temptation needed. If it wasn't Monica, it would have been someone else. May have been.
Edit to add: Where do you get your info from. Assumptions can be drawn from what happened. Your assumptions seem to be based off something that is unknown. Many make assumptions based off of known details. Your assumption seems to be in conflict with the actual events.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Yes siree.
OK, sarcasm aside, yes, both JFK and he were serial adulterers. But really, who cares? They were both good presidents and I would infinitely prefer to have either of these men as president than someone like W who (AFAIK) never strayed from the marital bed.
madokie
(51,076 posts)the pukes were on a witch hunt and all they were getting for their troubles was a big ass bill so they had to do something for show.
moriah
(8,311 posts)No one is willing to put responsibility where it belongs -- on both their shoulders, equally.
Now she's got to either be an innocent victim or not just a "slut" but a whore as well? Because that's what you're saying, that she was paid for sex. Along with suggesting that a man can't think beyond his penis, but I'm sure others will mention that.
She's not a slut, whore, temptress, child, or victim of anything except possibly the media. She was a grown woman who was fully capable of making her own decisions, and happened to make a bad one that's haunted her the rest of her life. And that bad decision was NOT to give a man a blowjob -- it was to give a *married* man a blowjob.
Riftaxe
(2,693 posts)that is pretty fucking low even for DU.
otohara
(24,135 posts)I thought she was an Intern
More slut shaming OP