General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA few minutes before the polls close, the chief election judge comes outside
It's the second Tuesday in May, the date of the primary election here
In the last few weeks, I've really done all I could do to convince people to vote for progressives, so today I'm playing nonpartisan. Our gerrymandered legislature passed quite a few voting laws last years, and changes will continue until 2016. Everybody needs to know the score, and that's why I'm here. I have some nice wallet cards detailing the changes, plus a university-sponsored survey on people's voting experiences, and a way to report problems
Early in the day, I did this in my own town. Now I'm twenty miles away, working the last shift before the polls close
This is the rural south. Partisans hit citizens coming to vote: Can I tell you about my wonderful nephew?
Then we hit the voters as they leave: Can I offer you some information on changes in the voting laws? Did you have any trouble voting today? Would you be willing to take a short survey about your experience?
Not everybody wants the info
No, I think I know about it. I'm the mayor here. A tall man with relaxed manner, comfortably dressed, he offers his hand, which I shake. I apologize for not knowing who he was. There's no reason you should have recognized me. Do you live here in C? I tell him that, no, I actually live in D. Well, then, there's absolutely no reason you should have known who I am
The other fellow working with me is somehow collecting four surveys for every one I collect. I study this a bit, but he's just being himself
Through the last half hour, the partisans begin packing and leaving. On his way home, one comes by to see what I'm doing. He gets my short explanation with a copy of the wallet card. He listens and nods: Keep up the good work
The clouds become orange. The crowd of partisans has dispersed. I move closer to the NO CAMPAIGNING line
A few minutes before the polls close, the chief election judge comes outside and introduces herself to me. I ask how many are still voting. There are none inside. Polls close in two minutes. She's curious what people put on the survey. We've collected about sixty forms, but I really haven't looked at any of them. There are about 300 people collecting this data around the state, and we'll just ship the data off to the university for analysis. So I tell her what I remember people actually saying to me
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)In Minnesota there is a law against politicking within 100' of polling places.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)People usually respect it: if they don't, a complaint to the election judges producers results
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Where I vote you can look out the window in two directions and see signs within inches of where I am marking my ballot but it is 50 feet from the entry door. If you remove the glass I can touch (pull up) the sign while still standing in the building.
The law should be 50 feet from the polling place, not 50 feet from the entry door.
former9thward
(31,987 posts)There is a first amendment right to express your opinion to those voting. Do you also support the unconstitutional "free speech" zones?
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)You missed the point by at least 50 miles.
former9thward
(31,987 posts)Instead of throwing out an insult. Everyone screams GOTV, GOTV and then fights anything that does that. It makes me feel those shouting that have never done it.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,595 posts)Another excellent post...Thank you!
For doing the work, and for telling us about it.
This stuff is fascinating!
Squinch
(50,949 posts)sheshe2
(83,746 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)kracer20
(199 posts)Just seems that your story ended a bit premature.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)until the polls close; and nobody's in line to vote anymore, when the chief election judge comes outside for a short conversation
I guess I could had added something about being abducted by space aliens while driving home, but I thought that might obscure the main points of the story, so I stopped at what seemed to me a natural place to stop.
kracer20
(199 posts)I just thought there would be some description of what the people were saying, like you said they were in your last sentence.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I appreciate the 'Last Episode of the Sopranos' sudden cut off, but the information sounds interesting.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)but I don't mind telling you what I heard
Remember it was a primary and school board election, so mostly only the dedicated turned-out: in my town, that's about 15% of registered voters
Also we only approached folk leaving the polls. With some regularity, people responded to my Would you like some info about changes in the voting rules? with I've already voted! This seemed a strange reaction to me (since I was obviously approaching only people walking away from the polls), and in a few cases I got the lit into their hands anyway by explaining some of these changes don't occur until 2016
If I had a chance after offering the lit, then (whether they took the lit or not), I'd ask whether they had any problem voting today. In two shifts in two different towns, almost everyone reported no problems. I only heard about five problems reported
Two involved folk who didn't understand the ID rules. Photo ID won't be required from ALL voters until 2016, but NC has for some years required HAVA-type documents from first-time voters (such as a current utility bill with name and address), and one first-time voter talked to us about that on his way out
During my second shift, several people told me they thought the line inside moved too slowly. So when the election judge asked about the survey, I told her I hadn't been looking at the survey and then reported the comments I'd heard. She said the computer system had changed and the poll workers weren't comfortable with it yet; she thought they'd do better in the fall
If I could get lit into folks' hands, I tried to get them to do the university survey. That was a harder sell.
Some people assumed the lit attempted some persuasion -- but actually it only summarized in simple language the changes in the law. Similarly, a certain number of folk expected the survey to be something of a push-poll -- but it wasn't. So maybe five or six folk worked themselves up for an argument about voter photo ID, and I responded by saying that I was only trying to inform people about the actual changes in the law, which I suspect spared me some predictable rants