Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So then why is it wrong for Putin to visit Crimea but fine for Kerry to visit (Original Post) malaise May 2014 OP
Because we didn't invade Ukraine and annex it. Next question? nt geek tragedy May 2014 #1
+1 greatauntoftriplets May 2014 #2
+1. William769 May 2014 #3
The IMF did. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #5
The IMF does nothing without the malaise May 2014 #11
I think bush did panama. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #16
Yup. OilemFirchen May 2014 #13
Your taking the time to make a word salad. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #19
Lame metaphors aren't a substitute for reality. geek tragedy May 2014 #21
What's with all the cranky DUers this morning? lamp_shade May 2014 #4
Because taking a victory lap in territory you have annexed is bad form. nt msanthrope May 2014 #6
Like this fake celebration? malaise May 2014 #7
a more recent irrational exuberance. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #9
Yes indeed malaise May 2014 #14
Im less concerned about him than the women and minorities of Libya Jesus Malverde May 2014 #18
Indeed. We called it out then, be consistent and call it out, now. nt msanthrope May 2014 #10
Yeah, Putin is roughly on the level of the guy many of us want prosecuted for war crimes (nt) muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #17
When you control the bully pulpit you don't have to explain yourself. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #8
+1,000 malaise May 2014 #15
Kerry is a diplomat and Putin an invader treestar May 2014 #12
Thanks for switching from a Putin/Kerry comparison to a Putin/W comparison Nye Bevan May 2014 #20
It's an apt comparison. DemocraticWing May 2014 #22
Putin is to Crimea as Bush was Iraq. joshcryer May 2014 #23

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
5. The IMF did.
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:24 AM
May 2014

An invasion of debt, annexed with an interim government that imposes austerity and kills its own citizens.

Yatz is a banker and represents them well.

malaise

(268,701 posts)
11. The IMF does nothing without the
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:34 AM
May 2014

Washington Consensus.

Still maybe someone will explain why Reagan invaded Grenada and bombed the shite out of Panama?

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
16. I think bush did panama.
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:40 AM
May 2014

Grenada was fairly obvious. The US had just lost some 250 marines in Lebanon in a single attack and had to retreat. It was a humiliation that needed a distraction.


Beirut Barracks Bombings October 23, 1983
Grenada Invasion October 25, 1983

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
13. Yup.
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:37 AM
May 2014

They flew in on unicorns with Swarovski daggers and ray guns, and King Kerry of the IMFs was hailed throughout Banksterland!

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
21. Lame metaphors aren't a substitute for reality.
Sat May 10, 2014, 03:09 PM
May 2014

Lots of Putin's apologists here would have loved Reagan's Latin American policies .

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
9. a more recent irrational exuberance.
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:34 AM
May 2014


The humanitarian war waged to save women from roving rape gangs fueled by viagra

Replaced with a broken state ruled by sharia.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
18. Im less concerned about him than the women and minorities of Libya
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:55 AM
May 2014

They went from living in a secular society to being relegated to the stone ages.

The imposition of sharia and the ethnic cleansing of black Libyans are the biggest tragedies of that NATO adventure.

http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/07/07/libya-ethnic-cleansing/

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
8. When you control the bully pulpit you don't have to explain yourself.
Sat May 10, 2014, 10:32 AM
May 2014

Double standards do not apply.

One minute the mob is "protestors", the next they are "terrorists" to be liquidated.

The largest empire in the world, with troops on every continent can do as it wishes. Remember the victors write the history.

Anyone who questions the narrative is obviously an enemy to be derided and ridiculed.

Whats interesting about these empires, they do little for the regular people at home. Only insiders and elites profit.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
20. Thanks for switching from a Putin/Kerry comparison to a Putin/W comparison
Sat May 10, 2014, 12:09 PM
May 2014

halfway through the thread. The first one was pretty ridiculous but the second actually had some merit.

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
22. It's an apt comparison.
Sat May 10, 2014, 04:37 PM
May 2014

Putin is a homophobic, warmongering, human rights violating, corporatist bastard. He'd fit right in with the right-wing. People who defend him here are sickening.

joshcryer

(62,266 posts)
23. Putin is to Crimea as Bush was Iraq.
Sat May 10, 2014, 05:35 PM
May 2014

The Kerry analogy would be like Obama visiting Egypt after Mubarak was overthrown.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So then why is it wrong f...