Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTim Geithner’s anti-populist “blood lust”: How his stubbornness cost America
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/12/tim_geithners_anti_populist_blood_lust_how_his_stubborness_cost_america/Sometimes Democrats can be as bad as Beltway pundits in depicting genuine disagreements about policy and ideology as merely craven political posturing. I am reminded of that once again by the various buzzy excerpts of and commentary about former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithners new book Stress Test: Reflections on Financial Crises, which is out today.
Geithner quotes President Bill Clinton giving him advice about how to deal with the populist impulse to punish Wall Street malefactors: You could take Lloyd Blankfein into a dark alley and slit his throat, and it would satisfy them for about two days. Then the blood lust would rise again. He tells us that Sen. Elizabeth Warrens TARP oversight committee hearings often felt more like made-for-YouTube inquisitions than serious inquiries.
He casts White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer, who opposed the administrations ill-timed pivot toward deficit reduction and Grand Bargain hunting in 2011, as merely pandering to the Democratic base. Campaign strategist David Plouffe, meanwhile, is depicted as reflecting the conscience of the president when he reminds the team, We didnt run on a platform of permanently increasing the size of government. Maybe more damaging, Geithner accuses Pfeiffer of asking him to lie on a Sunday show and say Social Security didnt contribute to the deficit, again to placate the Democratic base. It wasnt a main driver of our future deficits, he writes, but it did contribute. That misleading argument has been a staple of Wall Street Democrats efforts to cut Social Security.
On one level Clintons quote shouldnt be surprising: His soft spot for Wall Street is well known, and Clintonian Third Way Democrats love to caricature the populist left as being motivated by hatred and blood lust. But its clear Clintons advice helped Geithner justify his own unwillingness to take seriously the genuine policy differences motivating the criticism of his progressive adversaries.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 627 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tim Geithner’s anti-populist “blood lust”: How his stubbornness cost America (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2014
OP
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)1. One of the many despicable choices made by
President Obama.