General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Columbus, Ohio be renamed, now that Columbus is considered to be a genocidal maniac?
Many streets and squares in Germany were named after Hitler, but needless to say, all have subsequently been renamed. Now that many consider Christopher Columbus to be little better than Hitler, one may question whether it is inappropriate to have a major city named after him.
7 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, Columbus, Ohio should be renamed. | |
0 (0%) |
|
No, Columbus, Ohio should not be renamed. | |
7 (100%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Everybody likes Columbo!
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)But of course, if it ever comes down to a vote.....let the people decide. TBH, I think "Scioto" would be a particularly good alternative name for the city, including for the fact that it's a Native American placename and that it sits on a river of that same name.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Not as bad as Hitler is a pretty low bar.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)What about Amherst, Massachusetts?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Dead Scalped Wannabe Indian Killer, South Dakota, kind rolls off the tongue, though.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)There's also a Custer County in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and South Dakota, and towns called "Custer" in Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington state.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The only reason she was there is because her great grand father had been a member of Custer's expedition, but got drunk and missed the boat when the rest of the Seventh Calvary went off to meet its demise.
LuvNewcastle
(16,837 posts)In Miss., we have a Columbus and a Columbia. There would be cities, counties, streets, squares, schools, and other places that would have to be renamed. In retrospect, it's unfortunate that all these places have been named for such a man as he was, and I don't care if people do change the names of some of those places, but I don't fault people for not changing them, either. Sooner or later, we have to face the fact that all past wrongs from history cannot be righted, and there are places named for bad people just about everywhere you go.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)and Columbus, GA, and Columbia, South Carolina.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)*gag*
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)after his firing of the striking of the air traffic controllers. Just seems like a big slap in the face to me.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)or maybe Flying Rat, Ohio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columba_(genus)
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Then it can be Script, Ohio.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Springslips
(533 posts)If we had to rename it we would go with the original name: Franklinton.
Not going to happen though.
One good thing is we'd have to get rid of the model of the Santa Maria floating in the Scioto. I mean come on, Columbus didn't actually float here.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)I went to grade school in Portsmouth, where the Scioto and the Ohio come together -- a 77 foot flood wall back in those days. '45 to early 50's. Grew up on Wood Hayes football, smile.
Enjoy your time in Columbus.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)you lose. Last time I checked, Columbus was not the leader of his country.
Why don't you look at the leader of the country that bankrolled Columbus and then continued sending "missions" to the "New World".
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)King County, Washington(where Seattle is located) was originally named after former Vice-President(and slave owner) William Rufus King, but a few years back county leaders decided it would be "renamed" after Martin Luther King, Jr. instead. Maybe Columbus, Ohio, could do something similar? Though admittedly I don't know any other famous people named Columbus.