Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
Wed May 14, 2014, 12:46 PM May 2014

In answer to the question about Timothy Geithner

Is this guy a complete and irretrievable douche nozzle?

I offer the following:

“Stress Test” takes a few direct jabs at Warren, whom he describes as “one of our most ardent and eloquent liberal critics”—right before slamming her. “Her criticisms of the financial rescue, if well intentioned, were mostly unjustified, and her TARP oversight hearings often felt more like made-for-YouTube inquisitions than serious inquiries,” Geithner writes. “She was worried about the right things, but she was better at impugning our choices—as well as our integrity and our competence —than identifying any feasible alternatives.”

Geithner’s more sustained attack, however, is on the kind of populism Warren has come to represent on the left, which he describes as “the Old Testament view” that “[t]he venal should be punished. The irresponsible shouldn’t be bailed out.” He cites the appetite for “Old Testament vengeance,” “Old Testament justice,” “Old Testament impulses,” “Old Testament populism,” “Old Testament cravings,” and so forth, no fewer than 18 times.


Oy.

Geither
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In answer to the question about Timothy Geithner (Original Post) Jeff In Milwaukee May 2014 OP
Ah, the L word. merrily May 2014 #1
Prosecuting "club" members for fraud and illegalities when they do it is "Old Testament"? JHB May 2014 #2

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. Ah, the L word.
Wed May 14, 2014, 12:57 PM
May 2014

Why is okay for wealth to be transferred to the rich, regardless of whether they've been naughty or nice?

And in which testament or which religion, for that matter, is venal okay?

"Old Testament" my ass. In the Old Testament, all kinds of heinous things were described flatly. Slavery? No condemnation. Banishing your wife's slave and your son with her without money or protection? No problem. Au contraire. Congrats. You founded three religions.

Offering your daughters up to be raped by angry villagers? No problem. You deserve to be saved while the village is destroyed (but your wife gets turned into a condiment that will soon melt in the rain for daring to take a backward glance).

Sen. Warren, also a former Republican, is talking very New Testament, like, oh, I don't know, the current Pope, perhaps the most famous living Christian (NT) guy in the world?

What Geithner really meant to say was, "She called me out publicly--and I am so far above that that I must punish her, ala the OT."

What was your question again?

JHB

(37,158 posts)
2. Prosecuting "club" members for fraud and illegalities when they do it is "Old Testament"?
Wed May 14, 2014, 01:03 PM
May 2014

Sounds like a man who has an excessively narrow definition of "feasible".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In answer to the question...