Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 01:38 PM Apr 2012

You know, Zimmy's chorus have been showing up on every show that will have them from

CNN to the Home shopping Network, trying to convince people of the fact that somehow zimmy had blood on his face, etc. After that police video came out showing him dressed as if he just got dressed in clothes he just picked up from the dry cleaners. Then we find out that any first Aid was given him the the back seat of the police cruiser.

Did anyone ever consider that the blood on his face wasn't zimmy's BUT Trayvons? After all, 3 eyewitnesses described him as placing his hands on his head and forehead. 2 of those 3 witnesses saw zimmy straddling with HIS HANDS ON HIS BACK. Now, considering that the cops said that they "cleaned him up", isn't it possible or perhaps, PROBABLE that the blood was transferred from Trayvon's dead body to zimmy's head? Wouldn't explain the fact that he had no blood on his shirt because he wasn't actively bleeding? I wonder if the blood that was "cleaned" off of zimmy was saved for forensic examination?

I think that that makes sense when you think about it.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know, Zimmy's chorus have been showing up on every show that will have them from (Original Post) Ecumenist Apr 2012 OP
Cops that cleaned blood off him destroyed evidence. kestrel91316 Apr 2012 #1
A good thing they "cleaned him up." It showed he had no injuries. mainer Apr 2012 #2
While he could have washed up, HockeyMom Apr 2012 #3
No, I know that he didn't have his clothes cleaned. I pointed out that cleanliness because had Ecumenist Apr 2012 #4
did you see the ANSWER to the question of last night? grasswire Apr 2012 #5
Where is the question from last night? Ecumenist Apr 2012 #6
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
1. Cops that cleaned blood off him destroyed evidence.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 02:13 PM
Apr 2012

"But there warn't no crime here ma'am. The boy SAID that n----r attacked him and that's what happened."

mainer

(12,022 posts)
2. A good thing they "cleaned him up." It showed he had no injuries.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 02:15 PM
Apr 2012

If he were still covered in Trayvon's blood, it would be hard to see how pristine he was in the police station.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
4. No, I know that he didn't have his clothes cleaned. I pointed out that cleanliness because had
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 03:39 PM
Apr 2012

he had an acutal nose injury, with the increase adrenaline levels and heart rate, he would have been a mess , IF HE HAD NOSE ISSUES UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES HE CLAIMS TO HAVE UNDERGONE.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
5. did you see the ANSWER to the question of last night?
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 03:41 PM
Apr 2012

check it out.

And some may want to examine just who the defenders of Zim are, in light of the answer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know, Zimmy's chorus ...