Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:09 PM
dballance (5,756 posts)
If you have an actual issue to present please do so.
Otherwise please stop clogging the Jury System.
I just served on a jury where the alerter did not bother to provide an explanation of why he or she alerted. Not a single word about why he or she found a post offensive. It was obviously easy, very easy for him or her to click on buttons of disapproval. Unfortunately A lot more difficult to actually explain that disapproval. Yep, it actually does take some time to make an argument and explain one's self. The alerter must have clicked on the alert button and the submit buttons with wild abandon. Unfortunately the alerter didn't take the time to explain in the rather large text box what he found objectionable. That is correct. The alerter didn't provide the least bit of explanation for why he might have been offended. When I clicked through to the original complaint there was nothing, nothing at all explaining why he was offended and alerted. NOTHING! If you wish for me to hide a post you'd better give me an argument that is a lot more than NOTHING.
|
3 replies, 843 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
dballance | Jun 2014 | OP |
Electric Monk | Jun 2014 | #1 | |
quinnox | Jun 2014 | #2 | |
Skittles | Jun 2014 | #3 |
Response to dballance (Original post)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:13 PM
Electric Monk (13,869 posts)
1. Alerting: Too Meta
![]() (just kidding....) |
Response to dballance (Original post)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:15 PM
quinnox (20,600 posts)
2. If the alerter can't even bother to say why they are alerting, it's an auto-leave
in my opinion.
|
Response to dballance (Original post)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:16 PM
Skittles (147,798 posts)
3. you want I should kick some non-explaining alerting ass, dballance?
LEMME AT THEM!!!
|