Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ALBliberal

(2,335 posts)
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:41 PM Jul 2014

No contraception=more pregnancy/children=TURNOVER

Turnover yields workers that won't work long enough to vest in retirement plans. It also reults in lower salary (no annual increase). And women with kids more likely to work part time not even qualifying for benefits like health insurance. So very many ways this SCOTUS decision screws women and families.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No contraception=more pregnancy/children=TURNOVER (Original Post) ALBliberal Jul 2014 OP
Kick. Ilsa Jul 2014 #1
Agree 100% ALBliberal Jul 2014 #2
Women who don't want to be pregnant have always found ways to stop being pregnant REP Jul 2014 #3
More kids = bigger labor pool. moondust Jul 2014 #4
interesting ALBliberal Jul 2014 #5

Ilsa

(61,692 posts)
1. Kick.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:26 PM
Jul 2014

Dominionists and Opus Dei can't have women controlling their reproduction so that they develop financial independence.

REP

(21,691 posts)
3. Women who don't want to be pregnant have always found ways to stop being pregnant
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:58 PM
Jul 2014

This doesn't mean more workers; it means more injured and dead women. The one ray of hope is that information travels faster now, and it is easier to obtain pharmaceuticals to induce a miscarriage safely.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
4. More kids = bigger labor pool.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:19 PM
Jul 2014

Bigger labor pool = downward pressure on wages as well as submissive employees living in fear of losing their job and not finding another one. Slightly better than slavery/serfdom.

I don't know to what extent that logic still applies now that globalization has opened up an endless supply of accessible cheap labor all over the planet.

Interestingly, one of the main reasons feudalism ended in Europe was the plague shrank the supply of available labor. If neofeudalism gets established in today's world, it won't be defeated this time by shrinking the labor supply.

Jack Welch, corporatist extraordinaire, once suggested putting factories on barges so they can be moved from port to port (when workers and/or local governments start making demands they don't like).

ALBliberal

(2,335 posts)
5. interesting
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:52 PM
Jul 2014

Yes continual supply of uneducated supply of cheap labor might take us to a feudal system ... depressing!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No contraception=more pre...