Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:00 PM Jul 2014

Here's that Hobby Lobby slippery slope in action



Who could have predicted that the U.S. Supreme Court was going to empower religious organizations to start screaming for federal exemptions to everything they find icky? Pretty much everyone, actually, saw that coming and here's the first of it. A group of faith leaders, including an Obama supporter, has asked the administration to allow them to continue to discriminate against the gays in their hiring practices.

Their call, in a letter sent to the White House Tuesday, attempts to capitalize on the Supreme Court case by arguing that it shows the administration must show more deference to the prerogatives of religion.

"We are asking that an extension of protection for one group not come at the expense of faith communities whose religious identity and beliefs motivate them to serve those in need," the letter states. […]

It comes from as group of faith leaders who are generally friendly to the administration, many of whom have closely advised the White House on issues like immigration reform. The letter was organized by Michael Wear, who worked in the Obama White House and directed faith outreach for the president's 2012 campaign. Signers include two members of Catholics for Obama and three former members of the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.


Read More:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/02/1311250/-Here-s-that-Hobby-Lobby-slippery-slope-in-nbsp-action#
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's that Hobby Lobby slippery slope in action (Original Post) sheshe2 Jul 2014 OP
All the SCROTUS did was open up a Pandora's Box. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #1
I know Uncle Joe and that's frightening. eom sheshe2 Jul 2014 #2
They basically decided that a corporation's (four or fewer owners) "religious rights" trump those Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #4
Do you have any idea if the decision can be overturned? sheshe2 Jul 2014 #6
A future Supreme Court dominated by Justices that believe in their oath to uphold and defend Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #7
This and so many more, what is funny about Hobby Lobby is the 3 Women randys1 Jul 2014 #28
The constitutional amendment that says corporations are not people and do not have JDPriestly Jul 2014 #11
Thanks for you input JD. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #13
Amending the relevant statute would work. Geoff R. Casavant Jul 2014 #15
Thank you Geoff for your input. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #17
religious rights or theocratic rights? BootinUp Jul 2014 #16
Alito even gave a virtual smirk in his decision and contemplated how a publicly traded corp could... MohRokTah Jul 2014 #22
And there are human opportunistic infections all around, who've been counting the minutes until calimary Jul 2014 #3
Precisely, calimary they will use this for everything under the sun. n/t Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #5
I know calimary. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #14
The nasty talkers on Catholic radio musette_sf Jul 2014 #35
Justice Ginsburg warned the idiots. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #9
I don't believe they needed warning. They knew/know, they just don't care because Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #12
You are right, they damn well knew what they were doing. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #20
Ginsburg warned US etherealtruth Jul 2014 #21
Kicking. Thank you. nt littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #8
We're on the road to "Biblical law" being imposed as the rule of the Nation. Makes you wonder how blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #10
For religious reasons they feel that their GAWD trumps the USA Constitution Iliyah Jul 2014 #18
A totally different beast here... bl968 Jul 2014 #19
This is how a theocratic cabal grabs power. Skidmore Jul 2014 #23
What about those whose religion is to burn Christians? TexinD Jul 2014 #24
Next it will be hiring women of childbearing age treestar Jul 2014 #25
Yes they so love the fetus. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #27
True TexinD Jul 2014 #29
Thanks a lot!!!! Adrahil Jul 2014 #33
This has been their plan all along! musette_sf Jul 2014 #36
Now now, your getting way ahead of the plan quakerboy Jul 2014 #30
Maybe the ACLU Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2014 #26
This is one hell of a mess S.C.O.T.U.S. made. William769 Jul 2014 #31
Hey you... sheshe2 Jul 2014 #32
Single Payer Health Insurance would fix this, IMO. But in the meantime, we need to rhett o rick Jul 2014 #34
Mahalo,she~ "#ScaliaLaw trending big-time right now" Cha Jul 2014 #37
Thanks Cha! sheshe2 Jul 2014 #38
So smart! Cha Jul 2014 #39

Uncle Joe

(58,354 posts)
4. They basically decided that a corporation's (four or fewer owners) "religious rights" trump those
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:15 PM
Jul 2014

of hundreds if not thousands of workers, this is in direct violation of the First Amendment.

The United States government is to pass no law giving respect to religion.

Businesses aren't churches, temples or synagogues, but this ruling puts them in that category, this decision can only bring about division and disaster as it undermines the Constitution.

One would think after all the demonization of other theocracies (rightfully so) around the world, the last thing the United States would want is to join their ranks.

If Supreme Court Justices can be impeached, I'm all for it, no doubt the Democrats will need to take firm control of the Congress first, that's just another reason why this fall's elections are so critical.



http://biztaxlaw.about.com/od/glossaryc/g/closelyheldcorp.htm

Definition:

A closely held corporation is a corporation in which more than half of the shares are held by fewer than 5 individuals. Closely held corporations are private companies, and are not publicly held. In a closely held corporation, if one of the shareholders wants to sell some or all of his/her shares, the sale must take place with one of the other existing shareholders, since no sale of shares can take place.

Uncle Joe

(58,354 posts)
7. A future Supreme Court dominated by Justices that believe in their oath to uphold and defend
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:28 PM
Jul 2014

the Constitution of the United States could overturn this atrocity of a decision.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
28. This and so many more, what is funny about Hobby Lobby is the 3 Women
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:11 PM
Jul 2014

who chose not to destroy Women, all 3 are VASTLY superior legal minds than those 5 FUCKS who decided the other way

yet they lost

Thom Hartmann says revolution within 2 yrs, I agree...he says political only i.e. voting, etc, I think there will be some pain along with it

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
11. The constitutional amendment that says corporations are not people and do not have
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:51 PM
Jul 2014

constitutional rights.

Public Citizen has an excellent suggestion for the text for a workable amendment.

You can't just clarify the limits on the rights of corporations because the conservatives will just create some alternative business form and then claim that it, inanimate and inhuman as it is, has equal rights.

We need to amend the Constitution to clarify just who is a person for purposes of the Constitution.

Geoff R. Casavant

(2,381 posts)
15. Amending the relevant statute would work.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:17 PM
Jul 2014

The Court did not decide these cases on Constitutional or First Amendment grounds, but on the language of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which apparently provides more broad guarantees than the First Amendment. Congress in theory can amend the RFRA to say corporations do not have these types of religious freedoms. It all depends on getting Congress to do so.

In other words, GOTV.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
22. Alito even gave a virtual smirk in his decision and contemplated how a publicly traded corp could...
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:31 PM
Jul 2014

determine its religion using state laws.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
3. And there are human opportunistic infections all around, who've been counting the minutes until
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:11 PM
Jul 2014

this worked out for them. You just watch. LGBT brothers and sisters - be ready for it. They're gonna use this to come for YOU, too. Learn from what's happened to us women and our right to choose - which is now on the ropes. Drop your guard for a single nanosecond and THIS is what happens. THIS is what WILL happen. Do not assume for an instant - that the right to marry whoever you love and with whom want to build a life and a family - that right you've fought for and struggled for and worked your asses off for - do NOT assume it's safe, even though the tide "seems" to have been turning in your favor at the moment.

There still exist LEGIONS of people who don't think you deserve such a right, or such protections. Not only that, but some of 'em think YOU are a sin. Your very selves. All things bad and sinful - godforsaken and worthy of being changed or fought or isolated or shunned or done away with altogether. Think I'm exaggerating? Think my hair's on fire while I write this? Think I'm just getting hysterical or something? Look at what's happened to Roe v Wade. Feels like pre-Nazi Germany around here sometimes, doesn't it.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
14. I know calimary.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:02 PM
Jul 2014

I am right there with you in outrage and to all those yesterday that told us not to worry our pretty little heads. I am worried and I am outraged.

musette_sf

(10,200 posts)
35. The nasty talkers on Catholic radio
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jul 2014

were discussing EXACTLY this thing yesterday. This vermin now thinks they are empowered to go after marriage equality.

Uncle Joe

(58,354 posts)
12. I don't believe they needed warning. They knew/know, they just don't care because
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:51 PM
Jul 2014

corporate supremacy over the state and in turn over the people is their ideology.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
20. You are right, they damn well knew what they were doing.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jul 2014

This might interest you, Uncle Joe.

"The Most Partisan Supreme Court Justice Of All"

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/07/02/3455366/the-most-partisan-justice/

I was going to post it but thought many would not bother to read. It's a great take on Alito.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
21. Ginsburg warned US
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jul 2014

The psycho 5 knew exactly what they were doing ... planning the effects of their decision decades into the future

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
10. We're on the road to "Biblical law" being imposed as the rule of the Nation. Makes you wonder how
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:50 PM
Jul 2014

many Judges and politicians in powerful positions in this Country are in cahoots with the extreme far right Cult of Christian Dominionism (New Apostolic Reformation theology movement)??? I know they operate the Presidents Prayer Breakfast every year in Washington DC, and strong rumor has it that they helped author Uganda's notorious genocide bill called KILL THE GAYS in 2009.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
18. For religious reasons they feel that their GAWD trumps the USA Constitution
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:22 PM
Jul 2014

and it will be ok to murder any one who opposes them. Those five jackass justices did will haunt the United States of America for some time or until sane people can replace these closed minded ideologist.

Vote Vote Vote Vote the GOPers out!

bl968

(360 posts)
19. A totally different beast here...
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:24 PM
Jul 2014

No one is forcing these groups to accept government money, if they choose to do they agree to any reasonable requirements and restrictions that go along with it.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
23. This is how a theocratic cabal grabs power.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jul 2014

You can feel the door slamming shut. Thanks, sheshe2, for the article.

TexinD

(35 posts)
24. What about those whose religion is to burn Christians?
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jul 2014

In the good old days.. okay, a few thousand years ago... burning of Christians for sport was okay.

Can we discriminate against them? Protest outside their doors with bullhorns, calling them murders and terrorists?

How many churches get burned down or bombed vs. others?

The Supreme court (bad side) has royally fucked America. About the ONLY countries that don't have Separation of Church and State are the Islamic ones.

How long before women lose the right to vote and we can stone them because they dishonored someone?!

If Christians *DID* follow the bible to the letter, they would be killing women just like the Muslims in Pakistan.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
25. Next it will be hiring women of childbearing age
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jul 2014

They don't believe they should be working. Married ones, at least. I'm sure that's a lot of them's religious belief.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
27. Yes they so love the fetus.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jul 2014

They are such hypocrites, and pro-life my ass! They don't give a damn about mother or child!

Kinda makes you want to puke, doesn't it treestar.

TexinD

(35 posts)
29. True
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:28 PM
Jul 2014

Actually, that is TRUE.

Think of how many JOBS would be available if all those nasty evil women were terminated, other than a few lady-jobs (grooming, answering the phone - wait, those jobs are now Chinese and computer) - Women must be barefoot and pregnant!

Single mothers = too bad! You're a whore, no matter the circumstances.

Its plain to see this sick war on our sisters, our mothers, our daughters. They have ALREADY lost rights to their bodies. They are losing rights to their health. They are struggling with rights in the workforce and how long before they lose the right to vote?!

Abuse of women is worse in countries with less equal rights.

Judge Scalia has been vocal that WOMEN do not belong in the court room (must be awkward sitting next to that slimy turd).

I have run into a few college women who are republican, and yeah... they don't see it.

musette_sf

(10,200 posts)
36. This has been their plan all along!
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:23 PM
Jul 2014

Women that can't control their own destinies can't compete in the workplace. They want women OUT of the workplace and OUT of academia.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
30. Now now, your getting way ahead of the plan
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:29 PM
Jul 2014

Next comes the gays. Time enough to destroy each groups access to their rights one at a time, one has to have priorities.

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,568 posts)
26. Maybe the ACLU
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jul 2014

should sue to overturn this thing. Seriously, I can't see it standing, it's a weasel way to avoid the intent of the law which is to provide healthcare at a reasonable cost.

William769

(55,145 posts)
31. This is one hell of a mess S.C.O.T.U.S. made.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:41 PM
Jul 2014

All we can do is fight back! I may be Gay, but I am also a practicing Christian and in my faith this would never had happened. I don't know what God they worship, but It's not the God I worship. My God is all knowing & all loving. He preaches I don't care who you love just as long as you love.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
32. Hey you...
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:54 PM
Jul 2014

I may no longer be practicing, however I like what your God has to say. That is what he teaches.

Take care of yourself William.

We will indeed fight and will damn well do it together.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
34. Single Payer Health Insurance would fix this, IMO. But in the meantime, we need to
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:28 PM
Jul 2014

organize a boycott of Holly Lobby and other corporations that follow suit.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
37. Mahalo,she~ "#ScaliaLaw trending big-time right now"
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:14 PM
Jul 2014

Joy Reid ✔ @JoyAnnReid
Follow
#ScaliaLaw trending big-time right now.
3:18 PM - 2 Jul 2014 70 Retweets 44 favorites

This can't be said enough.. The Brilliance of George Takei..



TOD

Can't wait for a statement from the President on this whining..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's that Hobby Lobby s...