Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Religion Founded ... (Original Post) Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 OP
Pacemakers aren't just for men. GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #1
and Birth Control isn't just for women. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #2
Wouldn't this reinforce the position that employers won't be supplying employee benefits? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #3
and .... wouldn't this be the point .... Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #4
That would be another roll of the dice. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #5
I see you typing and all I read is blah. blah. blah. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #6
Are you saying you have no concerns with effectively destroying the ACA while Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #7
I see you are still typing and I am still reading blah. blah. blah. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #8

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
3. Wouldn't this reinforce the position that employers won't be supplying employee benefits?
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:02 AM
Jul 2014

They nuke BC. We nuke pacemakers. They nuke something else. We nuke something beyond that to retaliate. In a short time the employer is completely decoupled from all health care.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
4. and .... wouldn't this be the point ....
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:04 AM
Jul 2014
In a short time the employer is completely decoupled from all health care.


SINGLE PAYER NOW

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. That would be another roll of the dice.
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:22 AM
Jul 2014

If this "nuclear war" occurs while the GOP holds one or both houses of Congress and/or the WH the end result may not be as rosy as you imagine. The effective destruction of the ACA without a single-payer replacement at the ready means people will still need insurance. That will mean the default re-emergence of private insurance. That would be a whole new can of political worms and by that time healthcare reform fatigue may well have set in.

I'm not telling anyone what to do or not to do except 1) "game it out" and 2) assume the other side is also playing the exact same game. I think that is a prudent course of action in any endeavor.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
7. Are you saying you have no concerns with effectively destroying the ACA while
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:34 AM
Jul 2014

the GOP possesses the ability to keep single-payer from passing?

That's very strange. Very, very strange.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Religion Founded ...