Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:55 PM Jul 2014

Afraid to Stoke Populist Ire, Obama Abandons 'Inequality' Rhetoric-

[
- Jon Queally, staff writer

As reported by the Washington Post on Saturday, President Obama is heeding the instructions and advice of pollsters and political consultants as the administration abandons its flirtation with populist rhetoric and a brief White House push to make the scourge of economic inequality a political issue.

Instead, according to officials who spoke to the Post's Zachary Goldfarb, the administration will pivot towards more "politically palatable" messaging less likely to draw critique from Wall Street and the political right.


According to Goldfarb's reporting, the shift in tactics hints at a broader repositioning of Democratic messaging ahead of the midterm elections and, perhaps, the 2016 presidential race. House and Senate strategists and their pollsters have concluded that they should focus less on the wealth gap and more on emphasizing that all Americans should have economic “opportunity” to get ahead or a “fair shot.”

“Both the White House and the Senate agreed that the decline of middle-class incomes was the most serious issue we face in this country, but the focus had to be on how to get middle-class incomes up, rather than drive other people’s incomes down,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), the messaging chief for Senate Democrats.

He added, “There are some who believe it’s better to talk about the negative parts of wealth that people have accumulated, but our polling data show people care less about that and more about how we’re going to help them.”

But many liberal Democrats, represented most prominently by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), have been pushing an increasingly populist economic agenda. Some warn against papering over the wealth gap with euphemisms.


On the progressive left, both inside and outside of the Democratic Party, much new energy is being funneled into the idea that a "new populist moment" is the only hope for reinvigorating a progressive agenda in the face of election cycles increasingly dominated by the interests of big money donors and corporate cash.

This month, The Nation magazine dedicated an entire issue to ideas around 'progressive strategies" for this new "populist moment." In one essay, written by Rev. William J. Barber, head of the North Carolina chapter of the NAACP and the chief political voice of the Moral Monday movement taking shape in the south, said that the only winnable strategy is one that transcends the major parties, the normal divisions, and focuses on deep forms of justice while articulating a clear vision.
"We need a transformative movement—state-based, deeply moral, deeply constitutional, pro-justice," he said. "We need to build for the long term, not around one issue or campaign.

More with commentary from Robert Borosage at:
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/07/05-0
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
1. outside of the article, where has Obama 'abandoned the 'equality' rhetoric?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:58 PM
Jul 2014

. . . the article offers nothing but innuendo and rumor.

here's an article just today, posted on the White House blog . . .

States Lead On Minimum Wage. Is Congress Listening?

In March, President Obama and I visited Central Connecticut State University with four New England governors who are leading the charge to reward hard work with a fair wage. Three weeks after our visit, Gov. Dannel Malloy of Connecticut signed a bill raising Connecticut’s minimum wage. And in the last month alone, Govs. Peter Shumlin of Vermont, Deval Patrick of Massachusetts and ? as recently as last Wednesday ? Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island have followed suit.



President Barack Obama delivers remarks on the minimum wage at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, Connecticut


These state leaders are answering the call of low-wage workers who want nothing more than the dignity of being able to support their families, men and women who have to make heartbreaking decisions every day about which bill to pay or which meal to skip. These governors and their legislatures are also listening to employers who understand that paying higher wages is a sound bottom-line investment, leading to more consumer spending, which helps businesses to compete and the economy to grow.

read: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/07/07/states-lead-minimum-wage-congress-listening


here's what the President said on July 1st:


Republicans in Congress, they’re patriots, they love their country, they love their families. They just have a flawed theory of the economy that they can’t seem to get past. They believe that all we should be doing is giving more tax breaks to those at the top, eliminating regulations that stop big banks or polluters from doing what they want, cut the safety net for people trying to work their way into the middle class, and then somehow the economy is going to get stronger and jobs and prosperity trickle down to everybody. That’s their worldview. I’m sure they sincerely believe it. It’s just not accurate. It does not work.

We know from our history our economy doesn’t grow from the top down; it grows from the middle out. We do better when you’ve got some construction workers on the job. They then go to a restaurant and they buy a new car. That means the workers there start doing better. Everybody does better. And we could be doing so much more if Republicans in Congress were less interested in stacking the deck in favor of those at the top or trying to score political points, or purposely trying to gridlock Washington, and just tried to get some things done to grow the economy for everybody. We could do so much more if we just rallied around an economic patriotism, a sense that our job is to get things done as one nation and as one people.

Economic patriotism would say that instead of protecting corporations that are shipping jobs overseas, let’s make sure they’re paying their fair share of taxes, let’s reward American workers and businesses that hire them. Let’s put people to work rebuilding America. Let’s invest in manufacturing, so the next generation of good manufacturing jobs are right here, made in the USA. That would be something to celebrate on the 4th of July.

Economic patriotism says that instead of stacking the deck in the favor of folks just at the top, let’s harness the talents and ingenuity of every American and give every child access to quality education, and make sure that if your job was stamped obsolete or shipped overseas, you’re going to get retrained for an even better job. )

Economic patriotism says that instead of making it tougher for middle-class families to get ahead, let’s reward hard work for every American. Let’s make sure women earn pay that’s equal to their efforts. Let’s make sure families can make ends meet if their child gets sick and they need to take a day off. Let’s make sure no American who works full-time ever has to live in poverty.

Let’s tell everybody they’re worth something. No matter who you are, no matter what you look like, where you come from, who you love, if you work hard, if you’re responsible, you can make it here in America. That’s what this country was founded on, that idea. That’s why I ran for this office. I think sometimes about what we could be accomplishing, what we could have accomplished this past year, what we could have accomplished the year before that. And typically what gets reported on is just the politics -- well, you know, they’re not doing this because they don’t want to give Obama a victory or oh, well, we don’t want to do this right now because maybe the midterm election is coming up and, oh, well, what’s happening with the polls. People don’t care about that. People just want to see some results. And objectively, if you look at the agenda I’m putting forward, the things that we’re trying to get done like just fixing bridges and roads, it really shouldn’t be controversial. It hasn’t been controversial in the past.

And so part of the reason that I’m going to be spending a lot of time over the next several weeks and months getting out there with ordinary folks is just to report to you it’s not as if I don’t know that you could use some help. I know. It’s not as if we don’t have good plans to put more people back to work and raise their incomes and improve the quality of education. We know how to do it. That’s not the reason it’s not happening. It’s not happening because of politics.

And the only folks that can fix that are going to be you -- the American people and voters. Sometimes in our culture right now we just get cynical about stuff and we just assume things can’t change because nothing seems to change in this town. But that’s not true. It can change as long as everybody gets activated, as long as people still feel hopeful and we don’t fall prey to cynicism.

read: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/01/remarks-president-economy

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. Seems it's in disagreement with Shumer and other Dems who feel "Populist Message" is bad news
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jul 2014

For Senate and House in the 2014 Mid-Terms and beyond. The Consultants and PooBahs are saying Dems need to move Rightward to compete with the Repugs. There's more of the article that's interesting at the link.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
11. article title and premise says 'Obama' abandoned talking about the issues of income inequality
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jul 2014

. . . never happened.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
12. It's original title of the article. We will have to see if Shumer's advice will tone
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jul 2014

dowb any of POB's comments going forward. Since, he's not running for re-election he may break with Shumer and the Politcal Consultants but he will be under terrible pressure not to be blamed for 2014 Mid-Terms if we lose the Senate.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Sen. Shumer thinks its the way to win in the 2014 Mid-Terms...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:06 PM
Jul 2014

so it seems Obama will have to tone it down...according to the article. There's more from Robert Borosage at the link about how Hillary is the likely candidate because others are "unlikely" to challenge her. So, the Progressive Left will have to do more grassroots organizing.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
9. 6 days ago:
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:12 PM
Jul 2014
President Obama:

"I just want to be clear -- Republicans in Congress, they’re patriots, they love their country, they love their families. They just have a flawed theory of the economy that they can’t seem to get past. They believe that all we should be doing is giving more tax breaks to those at the top, eliminating regulations that stop big banks or polluters from doing what they want, cut the safety net for people trying to work their way into the middle class, and then somehow the economy is going to get stronger and jobs and prosperity trickle down to everybody. That’s their worldview. I’m sure they sincerely believe it. It’s just not accurate. It does not work.

We know from our history our economy doesn’t grow from the top down; it grows from the middle out . . ."


read more: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/01/remarks-president-economy
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
6. This is a ridiculous article
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jul 2014

It's an election year. Obama never abandons populist rhetoric and policy when he needs people to vote, donate, and campaign.

It's only once he has their votes that he does that.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
10. The main problem with the watered down, right appeasing message is
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:14 PM
Jul 2014

it doesn't differentiate the Democrats from the republicans. The republicans always run on creating opportunity for everyone. Even though their policies do just the opposite, republicans claim to be for equal opportunity and the public usually buys it. We need to differentiate ourselves in a way that makes the Democratic approach compelling.

That said, running a populist campaign on inequality isn't a good approach either, because the right wing can easily counter that. They'll pull out the standard "socialist" charge and a majority of the voters will buy into it.

We have to be smart and address the growing inequality issue indirectly. So, the Democrats should be screaming about the corruption of government and society by powerful moneyed interests. Point out how the republican policies that allowed this will only make the situation worse if continued. Give examples that even the southerners can relate to. It doesn't require talking directly about inequality, just reinforcing what people already know about the declining middle class.

Add to that some BOLD Democratic policies to reverse this trend and the Democrats have a winning strategy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Afraid to Stoke Populist ...