Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCorporate Welfare Gets a Boost From Democrats
David Sirota: Corporate Welfare Gets a Boost From Democrats___ This tale starts 15 years ago when my old boss, U.S. Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, was trying to construct a left-right coalition to reform the bank. While a few libertarians were willing to voice free-market criticism of the bank, the impetus for reform was primarily among Democrats and the left. Indeed, Sanders failed 2002 amendment proposing to restrict the banks subsidies garnered only 22 Republican votes but had 111 Democratic backersmostly progressive legislators who, in the words of Sanders, saw the Export-Import Bank program as one of the most egregious forms of corporate welfare.
As Salons David Dayen reports, liberals in subsequent years highlighted how Enron, the failed energy giant, benefited from $675 million in Ex-Im loans; how Ex-Im gave an $18 million loan to a Chinese steel mill, which was later on accused of dumping steel into U.S. markets and hurting U.S. workers and how, Ex-Im loan guarantees helped build one of the largest coal plants in the world. By 2008, the progressive-themed criticism of the bank had become so central to Democrats agenda that Barack Obama used a presidential campaign speech in 2008 to lambast the bank as little more than a fund for corporate welfare.
Fast forward to the last few years. In 2012, Democrats rammed a bill reauthorizing the bank through the Senate, and Obama held a public ceremony to sign the reauthorization bill into law. At the same time, Republicans provided most of the congressional votes against the bank. And now, in the last few weeks, the GOPs new House majority leader is threatening to block the next authorization bill and thus completely shut the bank down.
. . . as the Export-Import Bank debate proves, money often trumps those purported principles to the point that parties will suddenly trade ideologies based on their perception of short-term interests.
In this case, the Republicans see an opportunity to humiliate Obama, and so they are momentarily ignoring their business benefactors who benefit from taxpayer subsidies. Meanwhile, Democrats are dropping their populist platitudes in favor of a chance to attract fundraising support from GOP-leaning business interests. As New Yorks Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer told National Journal about his efforts to use the Export-Import debate to court cash from the Chamber of Commerce: Ive said this to chamber President Tom Donohue and others: In many ways mainstream Democrats are closer to you than many Republicans.
read more: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/corporate_welfare_gets_a_boost_from_democrats_20140711
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 822 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corporate Welfare Gets a Boost From Democrats (Original Post)
bigtree
Jul 2014
OP
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Hypocrits one and all.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. Third Way, bay-bee!
Armstead
(47,803 posts)4. Arrrrrgh...But not surprising, alas
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)5. Is this the one Elizabeth Warren is considering supporting?
bigtree
(85,986 posts)6. is there something keeping you from answering this question of yours
Last edited Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:43 PM - Edit history (1)
. . . I'm not anxious to go running around the net for an answer.
I'll bet this is one of those campaign things. If you have something substantive to complain about with Warren then get on with it.
If you want to troll this thread, the least you can do is provide your own material.