Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 05:49 AM Jul 2014

Euthanasia Should Be Legally Painless

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-07-15/euthanasia-should-be-legally-painless



Ever watched a loved one die in a hospital bed, insensate from morphine, hands that made dinner, earned the rent, wiped away tears and raised a child bruised and swollen after one too many stabbings to find a vein?

If not, you probably will, ears straining for the final rattle in the throat and the skipped breath. And you'll probably wonder: Is this the way life ends, not with a bang, not with rage against the dying of the light, but only the prolonged agony of awaiting the inevitable? And you may also start to think: Maybe the folks at Dignitas in Switzerland are onto something with their assisted-suicide program for the terminally ill?

And maybe the U.K. has noticed. Later this week, the House of Lords will debate "a bill to enable competent adults who are terminally ill to be provided at their request with specified assistance to end their own life," which is only the second stage in a long parliamentary process before it even gets to the House of Commons to have a chance of becoming law.

The Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland allow some form of assisted dying, as do the U.S. states of Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana and New Mexico. More countries, including the U.K., should follow suit.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
1. I couldn't agree more.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 05:58 AM
Jul 2014

The decision to end one's own life should be afforded dignity without judgement.

RKP5637

(67,102 posts)
2. Definitely! Why prolong pain and suffering, who is that being done for, to what benefit. I've
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:51 AM
Jul 2014

had several family members die horrific deaths in late age, and several with cancer when younger.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
3. My dad lived with the effects of Congestive Heart failure for many years.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:33 AM
Jul 2014

The last two years were tough to watch. By that point, my dad, mom and all of us kids were in agreement that we wished he would hurry up and go, not because of the enormous expense, but because he was suffering horribly. He had zero quality of life and wanted to go. He was too old for a transplant (unless everyone signed organ donor cards, which for some reason they don't), so there was nothing they could do. No one wants to die that hard! He said he had lost his dignity having so many nurses and assistants bath him, help him pee and crap. He was weak, and in pain constantly, and towards the last couple of years he was slowly suffocating. He would have probably taken his own life but for the suicide exclusion in his Life Insurance policy.

Miss you dad!

LisaLynne

(14,554 posts)
4. I'm sorry about your dad.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:42 AM
Jul 2014

It's hard enough to lose someone, but to have to watch them suffer is just not right. This is really something we as a society need to address.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
5. New Jersey legislature just gave up a feeble attempt to enact assisted suicide.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:51 AM
Jul 2014

Last edited Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:26 AM - Edit history (1)

This was followed in the Star-Ledger by op-eds from people worrying about heirs putting pressure on grandpa to pull the plug.

These people are really afraid of their own death and that Jesus won't be there for them. And guess what? They're right. There ain't no Jesus in the sky and he won't be waiting there for them.

They really piss me off.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
9. What I am really cranked off about is when they respond to this fear
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:27 AM
Jul 2014

by trying to run everyone else's life.

yellowwoodII

(616 posts)
6. So right
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 08:18 AM
Jul 2014

Here is another place where religions that we don't necessarily agree with are telling us what we can do with our bodies. So inhumane

dembotoz

(16,799 posts)
7. legally AND physically painless
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 08:47 AM
Jul 2014

it may sound perverse but i really liked the scene in Soylent Green where to old guy went off to the place where he
died.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
10. Hasten the day
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:38 AM
Jul 2014

In a civilized world even the terminally ill part should not be necessary. If we don't own our own lives, are we really free?

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
11. I am all for legally painless euthanasia. I hope to make use of it myself one day.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:50 PM
Jul 2014

I would much rather have the option of a painless, peacefull, controlled death in a hospital than to have to choose an ugly, painful, lonely death where family members would have to find my body and deal with the aftermath. I think a hospital death is much more humane and rational.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
12. Having to change dad's diapers kind of changes one's perspective.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:58 PM
Jul 2014

I watched my dad die slowly and painfully over the course of about 18 months from complications surrounding diabetes.

My dog is afforded more dignity than my father.

Warpy

(111,237 posts)
13. One thing I've noticed quite often among the dying
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 12:37 AM
Jul 2014

is that they start refusing pain medication when they're hours away from death. It seems to be something that they want to face with a clear head, even if it means all the pain comes crashing in. It's almost one of the signs that death is coming quickly.

I do know from the times I was close that pain becomes irrelevant, it's there but not important at all.

They have also had relatively few people take the chemical way out. My own mother didn't end up using it. Like too many people in Washington and Oregon, she felt it was sufficient to have it available in case things got too hard.

Everyone dying slowly should have the option. It's the only truly compassionate thing to do. Most will probably not use it as limited assisted suicide has already shown. It should be available because as soon as the fear of having it get too hard is taken away, people relax and enjoy what time they have left.

I suppose that's why the godly fight it. They seem to want us to wring every bit of misery out of a prolonged death that we can.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Euthanasia Should Be Lega...