Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:24 PM Jul 2014

There are posters who vigourously support HRC

for President who may be doing her more harm than good...

If being rude, insensitive and brash are what Hillary thinks her supporters need to be, I have to question her approach is improving HRC's image as strategized, or merely shutting up supporters of other candidates. Or maybe this is not the strategy of HRC, who seems like a friendly woman......I could wish.

I have not been won over by any HRC supporters in this group but I have become more in favor of candidates whose supporters are more objective in their support of others and less subjective than those supporters of HRC.....and less abrasive.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There are posters who vigourously support HRC (Original Post) fadedrose Jul 2014 OP
What the hell do you mean I am abrasive! hrmjustin Jul 2014 #1
You are so not abrasive.. one of the sweetest posters I know. And, all the other Hillary Cha Jul 2014 #16
I haven't been insulted or bullied fadedrose Jul 2014 #24
You just haven't seen my abrasive posts, fadedrose.. I'm Cha Jul 2014 #25
There isn't a day that goes by that I'm not insulted BainsBane Jul 2014 #29
Try being a <1000 post count Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #34
Or if you are new and post more than they think you should BainsBane Jul 2014 #37
You are very sweet Cha to say that. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #26
There is very little correlation between civility geek tragedy Jul 2014 #2
Agreed. freshwest Jul 2014 #7
are you fucking kidding? Skittles Jul 2014 #3
No I am not fucking, kidding or not, am on computer now...mt fadedrose Jul 2014 #4
er OK then Skittles Jul 2014 #6
Let the ass kicking begin. L0oniX Jul 2014 #36
As long as we don't have any divisiveness Mo Ramtor Jul 2014 #5
THANK YOU for your first post fadedrose Jul 2014 #9
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Jul 2014 #22
HRC put out a memo telling supporters to be abrasive? JaneyVee Jul 2014 #8
You didn't get it?? Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #35
To befair here there are plenty of abrasive Warren supporters here. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #10
Exactly.. and some really nice ones. no broad brushes here. Cha Jul 2014 #17
You got that right. Number23 Jul 2014 #19
I've noticed this phenomenon with supporters of EVERY candidate. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #32
i don't support Hillary but they are not the problem in this case JI7 Jul 2014 #11
A lot of posters are trying to promote their candidate and go too far and it becomes a Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #12
Just wait until the primaries roll around. NaturalHigh Jul 2014 #13
"I'm supporting HRC at this point" yortsed snacilbuper Jul 2014 #15
I'll support whoever can win the presidency. I think HRC has the most aggressive and capable RKP5637 Jul 2014 #30
Uh, Democratic Underground Tommy2Tone Jul 2014 #14
I just saw HRC on a Colbert Report rerun. delrem Jul 2014 #18
I would strongly advise her campaign- and her most earnest boosters- to not run on "inevitability" Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #20
Either you support her are you don't. Gman Jul 2014 #21
welcome to du gopiscrap Jul 2014 #23
"If being rude, insensitive and brash" - OH the irony! wyldwolf Jul 2014 #27
LOL BainsBane Jul 2014 #28
what probably happened is... wyldwolf Jul 2014 #31
There are posters who vigourously support themselves. Phlem Jul 2014 #33

Cha

(297,154 posts)
16. You are so not abrasive.. one of the sweetest posters I know. And, all the other Hillary
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 01:31 AM
Jul 2014

supporters I know are cyberbuds.. and they're nice. I don't support Hillary at this point in time but then I'm more concerned about the Midterm Elections than who's going to be the Dem Candidate in 2016.

But, fadedrose evidently has encountered some that I'm not aware of. fadedrose.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
24. I haven't been insulted or bullied
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 09:37 PM
Jul 2014

but some other posters have. Hillary does not handle non-supporters (some extremely rude) in this way and gets out of her situations by her wits, quick-thinking, and smiles. I probably will not vote for her if there's a primary, but (whether I vote for her or not), I have to complement her on her resilience....

I generally like people who lets stuff run down their backs without a clue that they've been insulted. (Obama does this well) . .

But I'm starting to think that there are other candidates who are equally resilient.

Cha, I keep telling you, you're just too nice for politics.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
25. You just haven't seen my abrasive posts, fadedrose.. I'm
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 09:47 PM
Jul 2014

really not too nice for politics. The bush error fixed me of that.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
29. There isn't a day that goes by that I'm not insulted
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 09:57 PM
Jul 2014

and they usually aren't Clinton supporters. Today I was called an anti-Semite. Yesterday I was called a fascist, Third Way, and libertarian for providing a critique of the capitalist state. Usually it revolves around man-hating or being too "extreme," or carrying about things that just aren't "real," like SCOTUS decisions establishing inequality under the law or violence against women.

If I posted an OP every time someone insulted me, I've had time for nothing else. Moreover, if I held a particular candidate responsible for the inane comments made around here, I'd be as out of it as the folks who can't tell Mussolini from Marx.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
34. Try being a <1000 post count
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jul 2014

I posted under another name. I hit 10,000 posts and walked away from that handle for personal reasons. Let me tell you -- starting over has been an eye opener. Many have been warm and welcoming, but there are some here who are complete jerks to lower post-count posters. This includes some I thought would know better.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
37. Or if you are new and post more than they think you should
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:33 PM
Jul 2014

They'll give you shit for that too. Of course it's all a way to make up for the fact they have no substantive response to make.

 

Mo Ramtor

(2 posts)
5. As long as we don't have any divisiveness
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:38 PM
Jul 2014

I don't think we should be too vocal on division otherwise the Tea Farty will get jiggy

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
35. You didn't get it??
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:23 PM
Jul 2014

Last month...from the "Ready for Hillary" folks. The abrasiveness memo?

Must've just been me

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
32. I've noticed this phenomenon with supporters of EVERY candidate.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:03 PM
Jul 2014

The candidate should never be judged by the supporters. That's like judging the message by the messenger. You don't stop breathing because Chris Christie says he likes air, and you don't change candidates simply because some or even most of the people you run across who support that candidate are asses. (Well, I say 'you don't' generically, but yes, sometimes some people are shallow enough to do so. Which is why the OP does have a point that applies no matter the candidate - you're a better ambassador for your candidate when you're (again, generic you, not you personally) not abrasive or condescending or insulting towards those you wish to win over.)

It may be old and trite, but 'You catch more flies with honey than vinegar' only got to be old and trite because the overall sentiment rings true.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
11. i don't support Hillary but they are not the problem in this case
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:46 PM
Jul 2014

first of all, you don't need to support her.

so far i would vote for Biden and Sanders over her of those who have been as maybe running. so why not just support who you want.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
13. Just wait until the primaries roll around.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 12:23 AM
Jul 2014

For what it's worth, I'm supporting HRC at this point (if she runs), but there's a long way to go before the voting starts.

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
15. "I'm supporting HRC at this point"
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 01:08 AM
Jul 2014

Me too, I picked Hillary to follow along with for the time being.

Nobody's perfect!

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
30. I'll support whoever can win the presidency. I think HRC has the most aggressive and capable
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:01 PM
Jul 2014

political machinery to do that. No candidate is ever perfect. I also like Elizabeth Warren. As you say, there's a long time before the voting starts. I just want to be sure we get a democratic president in 2016. Whichever democratic candidate can make that happen I'm with.

Tommy2Tone

(1,307 posts)
14. Uh, Democratic Underground
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 12:35 AM
Jul 2014

So supporting the next Democratic candidate for president is being some kind of a subversive?

delrem

(9,688 posts)
18. I just saw HRC on a Colbert Report rerun.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 03:24 AM
Jul 2014

Her laugh was so infectious. I just can't wait for 8 years solid, of that laugh.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
20. I would strongly advise her campaign- and her most earnest boosters- to not run on "inevitability"
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 04:53 AM
Jul 2014

Last edited Sun Jul 20, 2014, 05:25 AM - Edit history (1)

Again.

And maybe not do some lame Bob Shrum values voter campaign where we pretend the absolute most controversial position a candidate can take is whether Jesus is the "most influential" human ever, or only just the bestest.

She wants the nom, fine- a lot of us think she COULD be a strong candidate- but make the fucking sale, and that includes brave and clear policy initiatives and positions.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
21. Either you support her are you don't.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 11:24 AM
Jul 2014

The couple of hundred people here at DU scattered all over the 50 states who have the same complaint make no difference in helping Hillary win.

You should pardon Hillary people here who may be a bit aggressive. They put up with a whole lot of the same from the Obama supporters in 08.

You're either going to vote for her or you're not.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
28. LOL
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 09:55 PM
Jul 2014


Because Clinton posters are the only ones who are abrasive.

Nothing at all abrasive by calling anyone who doesn't share a posters complete contempt for Obama, Clinton, and essentially the majority of the Democratic Party and its voters as "fascist," "libertarian," "authoritarian," or "Third Way." All because their incomes aren't high enough, their skin not white enough, their chromosomes not Y enough, or their sexuality not straight enough so that it actually doesn't make a difference if a Democrat or Republican holds the Presidency, House, or Senate.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
31. what probably happened is...
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:01 PM
Jul 2014

The OP sad some rude, insensitive and brash stuff about Hillary except it wasn't rude, insensitive and brash because, well, the OP thinks he/she is merely speaking "truth to power" or some nonsense like that. So some Hillary supporter pushed back and was being rude, insensitive and brash for daring to defend that corporatist fascist DLC Dino...

... think it went down like that?

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
33. There are posters who vigourously support themselves.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 10:05 PM
Jul 2014


usually the ones that yammer the longest until people just get fed up and always has to have the last word. I just put one on ignore. Coincidentally a staunch Hillary supporter.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are posters who vig...