General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI knew this would happen! (Hobby Lobby backfire)
(BTW, these is the same Satan worshippers who wanted a Satanic monument in that government building that the "Christians wanted to keep a 10 Commandments monuments.)
Satanist Temple Demands 'Hobby Lobby' Style Religious Exemptions From Restrictions To Abortions
By John Amato July 28, 2014 3:24 pm - 18 Comments
The Supreme Courts Hobby Lobby decision, that allows for-profit companies to claim a religious exemption to contraception mandate has now spurred on a Satanist organization to challenge the court's ruling based on their religious freedom.
Oh, this is rich. The Satanist Temple group is demanding that their religious rights be upheld just like the Hobby Lobby corporation's were in the Supreme Court decision that gave credence to the myth that the Plan B pill causes abortions and that corporations not only are people, but they also have religious beliefs that can make them exempt from federal laws.
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/07/satanist-temple
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)<...>
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby, the Satanists point out, it strengthens their own quest to opt out of laws related to womens health care that go against their religious liberty. Because of the respect the Court has given to religious beliefs, and the fact that our our beliefs are based on best available knowledge, we expect that our belief in the illegitimacy of state mandated informational material is enough to exempt us, and those who hold our beliefs, from having to receive them, a spokesperson for the organization said in a statement.
<...>
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)3catwoman3
(23,975 posts)...who would freak out. She participates at a different, nonpolitical board, and I once saw her jump right on a very long thread with post 667 because the post count had reached 666, and she said "I just couldn't let that number stand."
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)This doesn't challenge a federal law that mandates insurance coverage for a given medical procedure, it's about state laws that mandate prerequisites for the performance of the procedure itself.
It'll still be an interesting case, just a whole 'nother case.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Each one is asking for an organization to be excluded from a law based upon religious belief. Different laws but the same reason for exclusion. Not a big stretch to consider both relevant to the same ruling.
In fact in ruling for Hobby Lobby the Supreme Court wasn't saying that corporations were exempt from a law they were saying that corporations could have a religion. Religions already have exemptions from several laws and/or mandates and this just allowed the exemption to include religious corporations.
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)rurallib
(62,410 posts)booley
(3,855 posts)Can they say all the restrictions place on them by the state for arbitrary reasons violate the clinic owner's religious beliefs?
niyad
(113,278 posts)to protections and exemptions.
crim son
(27,464 posts)will ensure that other belief systems are ignored. So freaking stupid.
kairos12
(12,857 posts)"Devil made him do it."
niyad
(113,278 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)psychiatric services since they think they are evil.
Or a Jehovah's Witness organization refusing to pay for insurance that covers blood transfusions.
LAGC
(5,330 posts)This crap like with Hobby Lobby is what happens when a majority of justices share the same faith and allow it to influence their decision-making.
packman
(16,296 posts)indifferent, uncaring, based on logic. Fill it with every court case from the dawn of time and let it perk along rendering unbiased decisions. Now, that would be interesting.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)in order to make the conflict-ridden decisions.
The computer would have to be a truly intelligent life-form before it could do that by itself.
bvf
(6,604 posts)the description of "intelligent life-form."
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Company could tell employees that they have to eat off site if they want to eat at lunch time or wait until the evening!
lululu
(301 posts)ha ha ha
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Or something.
JEB
(4,748 posts)BrainDrain
(244 posts)and I don't mean HE-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. Hey devil worshipers have feelings too you know.
IcyPeas
(21,863 posts)that someone knitted
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
dballance
(5,756 posts)As Justice Ginsberg rightly pointed out in her dissent the ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby beget far greater consequences than the 5 right-wing idiots could ever predict.
The hens are coming home to roost. Each and every one of the 5 who ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby deserve every bit of bird shit that falls upon them.
QuestForSense
(653 posts)They only think of themselves; i.e., all for me, but none for thee. That's their ideology in a nutshell.
dballance
(5,756 posts)Those 5 right-wing idiots have unleashed upon us no end of nightmares.
randys1
(16,286 posts)and Women....
Remember, these 5 men HATE Women, VICIOUSLY they hate Women, and they will NOT uphold their findings to apply to ANYTHING other than that which HATES Women and Minorities and Gays, if they can use the law to harm and hate minorities and Gays also, they will, but that is all...
Al Qaeda is in AWE of the terrorism the SC has visited upon us
perdita9
(1,144 posts)...then I guess I'll be joining the Church of Satan