In recent decisions, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court has made clear its view that corporations are people, with all the attendant rights. They are entitled to free speech, which in their case means spending lots of money to bend the political process to their ends. They are entitled to religious beliefs, including those that mean denying benefits to their workers. Up next, the right to bear arms?
There is, however, one big difference between corporate persons and the likes of you and me: On current trends, were heading toward a world in which only the human people pay taxes.
Were not quite there yet: The federal government still gets a tenth of its revenue from corporate profits taxation. But it used to get a lot more a third of revenue came from profits taxes in the early 1950s, a quarter or more well into the 1960s. Part of the decline since then reflects a fall in the tax rate, but mainly it reflects ever-more-aggressive corporate tax avoidance avoidance that politicians have done little to prevent.
(snip)
The most important thing to understand about inversion is that it does not in any meaningful sense involve American business moving overseas. Consider the case of Walgreen, the giant drugstore chain that, according to multiple reports, is on the verge of making itself legally Swiss. If the plan goes through, nothing about the business will change; your local pharmacy wont close and reopen in Zurich. It will be a purely paper transaction but it will deprive the U.S. government of several billion dollars in revenue that you, the taxpayer, will have to make up one way or another.