"Well, Hubby's no John Wayne, I'll give you that." . . . Please come CAPTION Michelle Bachmann!!!

[skip fox]

Michelle (the-frozen-molasses-of-intellect) Bachmann is saying: "Listen, I've thought this through . . . all the way. . . . Since it takes the Senate to impeach the President, but the Senate won't vote on impeachment, then we, The House, can vote to impeach the Senate. . . . Simple as that. . . . After it's gone, we'll be the only ones left, so we'll by default have the constitutional power to get rid of Obama at last. . . . Don't you wonder why no one else thought of this? . . . Makes you suspicious, doesn't it?"




***********************************************************

Above CAPTION loosely based on the following story in Mother Jones:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/08/michele-bachmann-impeach-obama-cabinet

[underpants]

1. What, didn't you get that? My idea is to defund his lawless laws

From the article too

[liberal N proud]

2. If the Democrats lose the Senate, you can damn well believe they will impeach Obama

Just because they can.

[HERVEPA]

4. Totally incoorect post. Maybe think or learn a little more before you post?

Impeachment occurs in the house.

It is voted on in the Senate. You need 67 votes to convict. So if Rethugs get the senate, they still can't remove him

[skip fox]

6. The satirical point was the her intelligence in operation

is illogical, grasping, breathless, self-congratulatory, and dim at best.

I did think.

[R. P. McMurphy]

7. liberal N proud was referring to the Republicans in general

Maybe you should think and contemplate a bit more before you post a smart-ass reply.

[skip fox]

8. For over six decades people have been telling me what to say. Hasn't worked yet.

[HERVEPA]

11. I was not responding to you

I was responding to LNP who thought Republicans taking control of the senate could make a difference concerning impeachment (actually conviction).

[skip fox]

13. Got it. As you can see, I was born on the other side of the computer divide.

But I think the post you were responding to, and I have known the poster (having read his or her posts) for a long time, was speaking in the spirit of things, not the literal conditions/rules. I.e., if they win back the Senate they'll try surely to bring impeachment to a vote because they are able too and because that is their current nature.

[HERVEPA]

17. Got it Skip I think you're being generous, but I understand.

[skip fox]

18. Yes, generous. Why not?

a CAPTIONing thread should be filled with laughter and light, humor and intelligence.

I thought so long before I had a heart attack in the spring. Now even more so . . .

[HERVEPA]

21. Wish you a good recovery and a long healthy life.

[DetlefK]

5. And they will alienate the 70% of voters outside of the bubble.

Impeaching a black president that was repeatedly attacked by your party with racist accusations?
What could go wrong?

Impeaching a president on reasons that defy political precedent and common sense?
What could go wrong?

[skip fox]

19. exactly

The nits!

[lpbk2713]

3. Who am I to stop them from embarrassing themselves?

And making themselves look aboslutely batshit crazy?

I mean ... they do it so well. Always have.

[Coventina]

9. He's no Lil Wyane either.

[Johonny]

10. Enter 2016 GOP primary presidential race? Why yes I think there is an APP for that.

[L0oniX]

12. The spectacle of dumb.

[DefenseLawyer]

14. Oh Jehovah God!

Impeachment may not work, but the Rapture is a foolproof backup plan

[hifiguy]

15. A walking, talking Mount Everest of idiocy

and vacuity.

[aint_no_life_nowhere]

16. "Captain, tricorder readings indicate no humanoid lifeform present"

[skip fox]

20. ". . . nor operant intelligence within relelevant radius."