Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to Playinghardball (Original post)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. There's something not working out mathematically there
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 07:37 PM
Aug 2014

Like if a woman agrees with her husband it doubles the votes for that person, but if she does not agree with her husband, his vote doesn't count. Or something. It can't go both ways. 2x = 2x. 1x + 1y is another couple. X gets three votes. Y only gets one vote. So it would have an effect on elections. Or something.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
2. That wasn't so long ago when I think ...
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:52 PM
Aug 2014

that my father was alive then. Just a little boy of nearly 4 years old, but still. I know someone who lived before women had the right to vote. Neither of my grandmothers were able to vote (if they were even then citizens yet).

We got the vote, but we still have a long way to go.

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
4. My grandmother and great grandmother were Suffragettes in NY
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 04:21 PM
Aug 2014

and I can recall seeing stuff similar to this in the scrapbooks my grandmother kept. I was able to salvage only one of her books from the Florida mildew. Unfortunately, it was from the 1930s and contains none of the Sufragette and opposition material.

Stupid arguments like this one were easy to dismiss. The real scare tactics to men were illustrative, showing a woman in an easy chair, smoking a cigar, while the man of the house was on his knees in the kitchen, scrubbing the floor. To men. any step toward equality was deeply threatening, as it still is today. It's why they oppose reproducitve health care for us so vehemently.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
5. "Petticoat rule" still scares the man pants off of Republicans.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 04:29 PM
Aug 2014

Yet equally insane justifications for suppressing the minority vote are treated this very day as not being insane....wonder if there will be a similar look back at the insane justifications of 2014 in 2114.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
7. Nothing new.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 04:40 PM
Aug 2014

Conservatives tend to be wrong about most things, as history often proves. The 19th Amendment is no exception to that rule.

-Laelth

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
8. Interesting that one of them is the complete opposite reason the RW could use now
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 05:35 PM
Aug 2014

for suppressing the vote:

"It is unwise to risk the good we already have for the evil which may occur."

could read:

"It is unwise to risk the evil we already have for the good which may occur."

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
9. I seem to remember hearing that women actually voted in the very first presidential election.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 06:43 PM
Aug 2014

But then it was decided that they needed to be protected from the trauma of such intense decision-making.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»94 years ago this week th...