Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington Post on verdict for Oscar Pistorius: (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2014 OP
I don't know how Pistorius escapes guilt for the lesser charge... Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #1
I don't know either...as for the rest, this is what happens normally to star athletes. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2014 #2
Well, his career is far more important than her life, obviously. What was her name, anyway? freshwest Sep 2014 #7
I hope rest of the verdict cwydro Sep 2014 #3
I hope so too, but who knows? CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2014 #4
I have hope in that judge. cwydro Sep 2014 #5
kick cwydro Sep 2014 #6

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
1. I don't know how Pistorius escapes guilt for the lesser charge...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 04:11 PM
Sep 2014

But that story is kind of all over the place...The writers seem to place more emphasis on Pistorius' post-trial career prospects and the Simpson comparisons than whether justice will be served...

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
7. Well, his career is far more important than her life, obviously. What was her name, anyway?
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 01:00 PM
Sep 2014


Like Crowley crying for the Stuebenville rapists. And like this story:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/125551308

No charges filed. Papers shredded to whitewash the rapist. Repeat sexual offender returned to school within a month. Principal promoted.

No one fired. School says it is satisfied with the way the whole thing was handled. Life goes on for the perpetrator and those who covered the whole thing up as usual.

Your take on the article in the OP is correct. They still made a little green off the case, and then threw in the rest for fun. While missing the big point that she (allegedly) had the right to justice, and to live. Move along folks, nothing to see here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Washington Post on verdic...