General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConnecticut Governor Dan Malloy to Democrats: Grow a Pair
David FreedlanderIn his first term, Dan Malloy enacted a hugely ambitious progressive agenda. This fall, he ran on that recordand won. Now hes got some advice for his dejected fellow Democrats.
When Dan Malloy was elected governor of Connecticut in 2010, he was the first Democrat to win an open race in the Nutmeg State since 1980. It would have been reasonable to expect, then, something of a cautious approach, one wary of shifting political winds in an otherwise reliably blue state.
Instead, Malloy enacted one of the most ambitiously liberal agendas of any governor in the nation, from higher taxes on the wealthy to a higher minimum wage, guaranteed paid sick leave for workers, protections for gays and immigrants, strict new gun-control laws, looser marijuana-possession laws, allowing the unionization of daycare workers, and outlawing the death penalty.
The result? A 25,000-vote victory out of more than a million cast in Malloys reelection bid against Tom Foley.
Now, having barely survived in a race that was not conceded, Malloy has some advice for his fellow Democrats. But first he wants to clear up a few things.
-snip-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/19/connecticut-governor-dan-malloy-to-democrats-grow-a-pair.html
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)A Democrat clearly, proudly stating what he believes in? There's an idea.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)For the wins we need really need need need more like Aspen capitalism, where the overlords are nicer and no one says nothing about the roots connecting ever.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)winners don't lose!
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)from there and everyone expects leaders to do the right thing for the good of all.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)We don't know whether it would work in, say, Tennessee because there's not a Democrat with the balls enough to even TRY it.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)It might work, somewhere, in a red area - if a Dem steps up
and really speaks to our beliefs. Maybe if there is some
spark already?
Sadly, the Dem Mike Minter, who NYT wrote about- espousing our beliefs - worked his brains out and only managed to improve his lot by 6 percent ? But, it's definitely a start.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/03/opinion/lone-star-candidate.html
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)was a hotbed of left populism. Huey Long was to the LEFT of Roosevelt on economics. Of course it was mixed up with a LOT of racism too, but to me, this just shows that the possibility is there for an economic left populism to potentially be successful anywere.
And as I tell my Democratic friends in the Tennessee Dem establishment, why not at least TRY it. You're going to lose anyway and what you've been doing hasn't changed that, so why not?
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)center right (is there a "left right?" were behind Obama at the start. What I take from this is that the majority of American people are moved by what I call "emotional rhetoric". That, to me, is what is truly missing - someone who can take the whole healthcare for all message and speak about it in a way that evokes feelings of caring for fellow man. Never once, have I heard anyone speak in those terms. A la Robert Byrd, Mario Cuomo, Ted Kennedy. No wonder the right filled the void making Obamacare a dirty word that they spit out in hate. The giant elephant in the room is that they are espousing disdain for people without insurance and we have not a single voice saying "What, you don't care for the millions who can't see a doctor?" Obama did it last night - about immigrants - but I have not even heard him do the same thing about people without healthcare.
Yes, know the south used to be Dem - but that was before Rush Limbaugh and Fox who ruined it all, huh.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)Democratic. That was actually in my day as a young man. I was speaking of the south being left populist, probably more so than the rest of the country. As I said, in strictly economic terms, Huey Long was to the LEFT of Roosevelt. of course that was in the Thirties when the south was ravaged by the Depression more than the rest of the country also.
And I do agree that most of the people in '08, even the center-right ones WERE on the side of Obama. Case in point, I had a VERY conservative Mississippi cousin who hadn't voted for a Democrat since the Reagan era (at least) who voted for Obama in '08. A LOT of people bought into the "Change" mantra because they thought that the country was on the wrong track economically and that the Great Recession showed that. Then Obama went all-in on "bipartisanship" with people who made a conscious decision to be obstructionist and that pointed out the fact that nothing was going to change for them. People like my cousin. He went back to voting Republican after his hopes were dashed.
The problem was not that Obama was being obstructed. That should have been expected and accounted for. The problem was that Obama didn't point out the obstruction forcefully and often. When people are expecting a change in the governing philosophy and they don't get that change, they WILL look for "why". Each side SHOULD give a reason for that why. The Republicans DID give a reason why (bad policy by Obama) and the Democrats didn't. That was it in a nutshell.
The 2008 election could have been a watershed moment, not necessarily for the actual enactment of laws, that would have been difficult given the Republican policies of obstruction as history actually showed. But 2008 could have been a watershed election for changing the meme of governing that had been embraced by the citizenry since Reagan. Because that meme didn't change, our lot in life didn't change either and the Democratic Party is paying the price for that now.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)what a concept.
This is a real Democrat.Good for him and the people that put him in office.
samsingh
(17,595 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)and spent the money on things that help the people and not corporations? Insane!
Maybe you don't need corporate cash if you do your job and represent the PEOPLE (the human kind)!!! He may be on to something here!
jalan48
(13,859 posts)Just say no to Third Way Democrats?
calimary
(81,220 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 20, 2014, 01:07 PM - Edit history (1)
Glad you're here! I think we need to remind Dems that THEIR base - that is - US - is sick and tired of being ignored, and make it clear to them that THIS is the reason why Dems were dispirited and didn't bother voting in big enough numbers. WHY? Because too many of us were asking - vote for WHAT????? republi-CON? Or republic-CON Lite? Is that really the best we can do? Is that as far as we go as a party? How far away from your base will you go, Democrats? How much are you gonna try to NOT be for us and NOT be us and NOT stand for what WE stand for?
Every damn one of them should be asked this. WHY should we vote for you? Where's your case of why you're better? Or is all you've got the Alex Sink approach in Florida which is - "well, I kinda don't like it either but, but, but, we'll fix it..." ? WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT - "well, I don't really like it but we'll fix it"? WHAT THE HELL??? Where were the Dems who stood up tall and strong and roared - "I'M DAMN PROUD OF THE ACA!!!! I'M DAMN PROUD I was part of an idea that got millions of people health insurance they could finally afford! That saved us all money because that many FEWER Americans had to resort to the E.R. which is the most exorbitantly expensive health care there is!" Where were our musclemen and wonder-women? (Except for Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, that is.)
jalan48
(13,859 posts)I agree with you about Sanders and Warren. I wish they would run and at least get in the debates. As it is now the media won't even present "progressive" positions. Middle of the road Democrats like Obama and Clinton are presented as liberal and progressive candidates by the corporate media. The political spectrum is kept center-right, that's the choice America is presented with. Issues like the Keystone pipeline are so important all voices need to be listened to if a just solution is to be found. I hope people can begin to come to their senses on the issues that will really matter long term-for the health and well-being of future generations.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)CTyankee
(63,903 posts)I was told that CT is a blue state and that is true, but we lost some blue state governors when we shouldn't have.
Malloy is generally unpopular in CT so this win was a big surprise. Right up to the last day before the election the polls were in a dead heat. 47% to 47%. I was nervous. Early returns from the less urban areas said Foley was winning. But then, returns from the 3 biggest cities, New Haven, Bridgeport and Hartford, came in. We won by 27,000 votes.
I voted in New Haven and I am very proud of our city. We won by RELENTLESS GOTV and a well planned ground game that started early. Both my husband and I canvassed and phone banked. Early organizing cannot be stressed enough!
Cha
(297,150 posts)lives in Fairview, Connecticut.
It's a nice town.
As for Malloy, lots of people haven't liked him and I don't really get why. So he had plenty of headwinds going in to this election. Foley was just an empty shell, offering nothing but cutting taxes and slashing spending w/o specifics. Plus he was our own state version of Mitt Romney. I don't LOVE Malloy but I sure as hell supported him over Foley. I was surprised that Malloy did so well, actually...
Cha
(297,150 posts)I'm over here on Kauai. Saw pics on FB, though.
I love Dan Malloy from a far.. just what I know about him from the campaign and what he's implemented with the tax increase. And, this article from the OP.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)rather than a glaring, blatant, systemic corporate money/corruption problem.
We have united oligarchy, not gridlocked democracy.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Cha
(297,150 posts)A couple a snips//
"I always felt that when we got to a serious contest in October, we would be OK as long as we stayed true to our principles and talked about what we accomplished, he said. Tom Foley wanted it put out that there we raised taxes. And he talked about it month after month after month after month. But once people started to pay attention, I pointed out what we did with the money, which was lower the crime rate, increase graduation rates, invest in infrastructure, create a Housing Department, create an Energy Department, create a Department of Aging. We did all of these things. It was the right policy, and ultimately people came around.
"During the campaign, Malloy didnt just embrace his record and his party. He did what only a few Democrats were willing to do: Embrace Barack Obama. The president headlined a rally in Bridgeport in the days before the election, at a time when other candidates, like Alison Lundergan Grimes of Kentucky, wouldnt even cop to voting for Obama in his reelection bid."
It was so bizarre to me when this was going down in real time and now we Dan Malloy in the aftermath of his victory explaining why running as repub lites and letting the gop set the narrative was not a good idea if you really wanted to win.
It's like the Keystone thing.. the Dems who are buying into the lies propagated by the gop.. not bothering to explain what's really going on.
My Niece lives in Fairview, Connecticut.. Lucky her I say!
Cha
(297,150 posts)I made that decision 40 years ago when I became a Democrat, he said.
And if Democrats want to succeed going forward, Malloy suggests they follow his example.
Have a compass, he said. And then follow it.
brer cat
(24,559 posts)I believe that would be the accurate quote instead of "grow a pair". Maybe it is just me, but I find that very offensive.
Not blaming you, DonViejo...you quoted what the title was in the article. K&R for the content, less the crappy headline.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Can someone please explain why people are offended for that guy saying Americans are stupid?
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)[center][/center]
[right]December 11, 2013[/right]
[center]GOV. MALLOY: LAW GIVES CONSUMERS THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHATS IN THEIR FOOD
Connecticut Is First State To Require Labeling of Genetically Modified Organisms
[/center]
HARTFORD, CT) Joined by lawmakers and advocates, Governor Dannel P. Malloy today held a ceremonial bill signing in Fairfield to commemorate final passage of legislation, Public Act 13-183, which requires that certain foods intended for human consumption that are entirely or partially genetically engineered to be labeled as such.
I am proud that leaders from each of the legislative caucuses can come together to make our state the first in the nation to require the labeling of GMOs, said Governor Malloy. The end result is a law that shows our commitment to consumers right to know while catalyzing other states to take similar action.
Connecticuts GMO labeling law goes into effect only after four other states enact similar legislation. Additionally, any combination of northeastern states with a combined population of at least 20 million including Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey must adopt similar laws.
The bill also includes language that protects Connecticut farmers by ensuring regional adoption of the new labeling system before requiring local farms to analyze and label genetically engineered products. The bill signing was held Wednesday afternoon at Catch a Healthy Habit Café in Fairfield.
I want to thank Tara Cook-Littman, of GMO Free CT, and Representative Phil Miller whove been outspoken champions for GMO Labeling in the legislature, added Governor Malloy. I also want to be clear: This law does not ban anything. It requires the labeling of food products that have been modified with genetic engineering and do not occur naturally.
Families have the right to know whether the food they purchase has been genetically modified, said Senate President Donald E. Williams, Jr. (D-Brooklyn). Thanks to the work of grassroots advocates, Connecticut's first-in-the-nation GMO labeling legislation moves us closer to having the transparency we deserve to make informed, healthy choices.
Passing this bill is courageous and monumental, said Rep. Philip Miller (D-Essex). It is an affirmation for healthy, sustainable agriculture and responsible stewardship of our food supply. The ever growing grassroots efforts of Connecticut citizens has come to fruition with the passing of this legislation. I thank Governor Malloy for being a champion of our right to participate in building our economy as fully informed consumers and citizens.
This bill moves forward and reinforces our fundamental right to know what is in our food so we can make informed choices about what we feed our families, said Rep. Tony Hwang (R-Fairfield-Trumbull). Consumers may or may not wish to purchase foods that they know to be genetically modified, but they need the information made available to them to make those informed choices.
"I'm proud to have worked with Tara Cook-Littman and advocates to pass the first in the nation GMO labeling bill, said Rep. Brenda Kupchick (R-Fairfield). I'm hopeful the rest of the nation will follow Connecticut's lead.
As the catalyst for GMO labeling in the United States, Connecticut residents should feel proud. We are hopeful that legislators throughout the Northeast will follow the lead of Governor Malloy and all our legislative champions by passing laws that give consumers transparency in labeling. It is a great honor for all of us to stand with Governor Malloy as he signs the first in the nation GMO labeling law, said Tara Cook-Littman, director of GMO Free CT.
More than 60 countries have adopted mandatory labeling laws, including the European Union.
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R
K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R
K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R
etc.