HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Fucking lying Prosecutor ...

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:00 PM

 

Fucking lying Prosecutor just said that all black witnesses testified that they saw Brown charge!

Wlson!

HE'S A FUCKING LIAR!! HE JUST SAID THAT BLACK WITNESSES TESTIFIED THAT THEY SAW MIKE BROWN CHARGE WILSON!!

When that reporter asked him what evidence he has, he says "he doesn't know". What a fucking liar!!!

71 replies, 8803 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 71 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fucking lying Prosecutor just said that all black witnesses testified that they saw Brown charge! (Original post)
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 OP
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #1
Dreamer Tatum Nov 2014 #3
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #4
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #7
pkdu Nov 2014 #15
GoneFishin Nov 2014 #18
AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #10
kwassa Nov 2014 #16
AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #27
U4ikLefty Nov 2014 #50
hugo_from_TN Nov 2014 #33
Yo_Mama Nov 2014 #61
Schema Thing Nov 2014 #5
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #9
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #13
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #14
Post removed Nov 2014 #19
jmowreader Nov 2014 #55
spanone Nov 2014 #2
Hayabusa Nov 2014 #6
noiretextatique Nov 2014 #12
Bettie Nov 2014 #60
ecstatic Nov 2014 #11
gollygee Nov 2014 #24
simak Nov 2014 #8
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #32
simak Nov 2014 #58
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #64
simak Nov 2014 #71
TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2014 #67
Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #17
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #20
Robbins Nov 2014 #22
LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #25
AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #28
Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #57
Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #56
Lurks Often Nov 2014 #63
Nevernose Nov 2014 #23
ucrdem Nov 2014 #21
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #26
AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #29
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #30
AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #31
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #35
TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2014 #68
Beausoir Nov 2014 #34
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #36
Beausoir Nov 2014 #38
Oktober Nov 2014 #49
Cha Nov 2014 #37
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #39
Robbins Nov 2014 #41
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #65
Beausoir Nov 2014 #42
Cha Nov 2014 #44
Beausoir Nov 2014 #45
Cha Nov 2014 #46
Beausoir Nov 2014 #48
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #40
Beausoir Nov 2014 #43
Oktober Nov 2014 #47
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #53
Oktober Nov 2014 #54
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #66
Recursion Nov 2014 #51
Lil Missy Nov 2014 #52
maced666 Nov 2014 #59
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #70
MaeScott Nov 2014 #62
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #69

Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:01 PM

1. He did not say that all black witnesses testified they saw Brown charge

He said that all the witnesses that testified they saw Brown charge were black.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:03 PM

3. +1 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:03 PM

4. I may have typed it wrong, but that doesn't negate his contradiction. He's speaking of the

 

*credible* witnesses. The only witnesses that he deemed credible were the ones that corroborated Wilson's side of the story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:07 PM

7. You don't have to agree with the decision

but you should at least be honest about what he said.

He said that the witnesses deemed as credible were the ones who's stories stayed consistent and that matched the physical evidence.

Not to mention the fact that he didn't get a vote in this - if he presented all of the evidence, it doesn't matter whether he found the witnesses credible or not; to indict or no indict was not his decision.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:22 PM

15. Now you add "deemed as credible"...how convenient....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:34 PM

18. To say he didn't get a vote or the decision was not his is either dishonest or

ill informed.

If he chose to sabotage the process he would have no problem doing so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:07 PM

10. The fact that you typed it wrong

 

by definition negates your point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnalystInParadise (Reply #10)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:27 PM

16. You're a piece of work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kwassa (Reply #16)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:13 PM

27. Thank you

 

so are you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnalystInParadise (Reply #27)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:31 AM

50. Enjoy your timeout

You earned it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:29 PM

33. lying about it doesn't help the cause

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #4)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:19 AM

61. It's what the grand jury found credible, not what he found credible.

And witnesses who changed their story after first testifying to events that were disproved by the forensic evidence are NOT credible, nor are witnesses who persist on telling of events that are disproved by the forensics.

This was a chaotic event and the end happened quite quickly. It is not surprising that eyewitness accounts would vary - many may not even have intended to lie. But the grand jury's job is to collect and sift the evidence, and a confused witness will have his/her story discounted.

The bottom line is that this cop wasn't indicted because there isn't probable cause.

I can't believe this guy was lying about the witness statements, because the Feds have everything, and they will not permit a distortion here. And the federal investigation is ongoing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:05 PM

5. well then, they can't be trusted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Schema Thing (Reply #5)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:07 PM

9. Apparently the grand jury disagrees with you

They seemed to believe those witnesses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #9)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:12 PM

13. I see all the racists have are here to cheerlead. Good-bye.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:15 PM

14. Got it

Anyone that corrects outright disinformation, as was posted in the OP, is a racist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #14)


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 03:33 AM

55. Isn't Ferguson somewhere around 70 percent black?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:02 PM

2. the prosecutor sounded more like darren wilson's defense atty......wtf?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spanone (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:05 PM

6. That's because

he was...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hayabusa (Reply #6)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:09 PM

12. +1000

yes, he was. what a fng surprise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hayabusa (Reply #6)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:09 AM

60. Yep, he was

there was never any intent to try to secure an indictment, it was a dog and pony show.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spanone (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:09 PM

11. +100000. He makes Angela Corey look good

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spanone (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:08 PM

24. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:07 PM

8. Blood evidence.

 

Apparently some of Brown's blood was found around 25 feet further from the Tahoe than his body. This has been interpreted as evidence Brown had turned around and headed back toward the cop.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to simak (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:25 PM

32. A matter for the jury to consider

with competing forensics experts and the opportunity to cross examine them. Right now, all we have is the police version, which places them in a conflict of interest between serving the public good and protecting one of their own. Without cross examination, the findings of the police lab are suspect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #32)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:01 AM

58. Perhaps.

 

However, I would not bring a murder charge against every policeman who shoots someone in the line of duty.

Beyond that, you would have to consider criteria for deciding which cases should result in a charge. I like to think that the racial makeup of the parties to the shooting would not be one of those criteria.

It sounds like a great deal of eyewitness testimony did not support an indictment once witnesses were provided with anonymity and protection. Shouldn't we be thinking witnesses are more reliable under those circumstances?

Also, a jury trial that results in an acquittal would still leave many people unsatisfied with the verdict. So for those individuals, trying Wilson and finding him not guilty would not be an improvement over this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to simak (Reply #58)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 09:16 AM

64. What matters is truth and justice

If the jury trial results in an aquittal, let the chips fall where they may. I'm not ready to claim that Wilson is a murderer. But as a retired California attorney of many years, I know how corrupt many prosecutors are. They are political animals with agendas beyond truth and justice.I find this McCullouch character very disturbing, especially because he went so far out of his way to present exculpatory evidence favorable to Wilson. That's simply not done. The prosecutor presents only his side of the case in seeking an indictment. Wilson should not have testified at all. After all, a grand jury proceeding is not a trial. As far as whether or not the eyewitness testimony supported an indictment, I'm not taking McCulloch's word for it by any means. The 4,000+ page transcript may shed more light. So far I don't know anything about the testifying witnesses, whether they were biased, had criminal records or other credibility issues, were in fact percipient, and why a prosecutor whose only job at the grand jury stage is to obtain an indictment would even call witnesses favorable to Wilson who he does not intend to cross examine. Witnesses not subject to cross examination and who have no fear of cross examination are not more reliable than those who have to state their observations in a court room in the light of day. Preliminary hearings before a judge to determine probable cause are much preferable to the Grand Jury process which has been met with a great deal of dismay among the legal community.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #64)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 09:46 PM

71. Do all fatal police shootings have to go to a hearing or a grand jury?

 

Aside from a judge or grand jury, what other procedures exist that could decline to advance the case for prosecution? If this was an open and shut, no-brainer justified shooting, what is the minimum procedure that must occur before the case can be closed?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #32)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 05:11 PM

67. Three different medical examiners testified

including the examiner for the FBI.

What is interesting about a grand jury is that they get to ask their own questions; they don't have to rely on the prosecutor to think for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:32 PM

17. Do you have any proof he was lying?

Curious

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Iamthetruth (Reply #17)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:34 PM

20. There was contradictory statements throughout. I'm not listening to ANY racists in my thread

 

tonight. I'm putting all racists on IGNORE. Good-bye!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #20)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:07 PM

22. I am with you

This has been disgrace.

And it's getting tiring for politicans to not critize police but tell public to be calm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #20)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:10 PM

25. As well. I can imagine what Disgustingest is like now.

 

fuck

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #20)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:14 PM

28. So is disagreement with you

 

enough to be labelled a racist? Because if you limit yourself like that, you will have troubles

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnalystInParadise (Reply #28)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:10 AM

57. The sad thing is

Just one look at my family portrait and you would have a hard time calling me a racist. I don't get mad at people like this, I feel sorry for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #20)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:08 AM

56. I feel sorry for you

You don't belong here, to call everyone a racist that does not follow your narrative of events for an incident you were not at is foolish. To call everyone a racist that does not agree with you deminishes the word racist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #20)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:34 AM

63. Everybody who disagrees with you is a racist? Seriously?

 

Says a lot more about you then it does about them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Iamthetruth (Reply #17)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:08 PM

23. He was definitely lying by omission n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:05 PM

21. It was pretty shameless.

You'd think he'd have gotten some advice, or maybe he did and didn't take it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:12 PM

26. Vote in a new prosecutor and go after Officer Wilson all over again

Double jeopardy doesn't attach with a grand jury's failure to indict, but only when a regular trial jury is empaneled. Make Wilson worry some more with a new grand jury. It would drive him crazy.

Block the streets with tens of thousands of protesters for as many months as it takes for McCullough to resign. Then demand a special election to vote in an honest D.A. and then reempanel a new grand jury to get it right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #26)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:15 PM

29. And the forensics evidence

 

will screw us again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnalystInParadise (Reply #29)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:20 PM

30. Do we even know what it indicates?

You seem to be suggesting that the D.A. actually considered all incriminating evidence to obtain an indictment, which seems unlikely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #30)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:25 PM

31. Initial analysis

 

(and I am open minded enough to reconsider my opinion if something changes) shows that Brown reached into the car, it also shows that he ran away and then from blood spatter patterns that he was in the process of coming back. The gunpowder residue and blood in the car and on both brown and wilson inside the car shows that the altercation started at the car, in direct opposition to at least one eyewitness. Forensics data like that is hard to overcome. Granted there could be more, but if that is all there is, we will never get a conviction. Any forensics specialist worth his or her salt can run laps around eyewitness accounts if they have blood, DNA, and chemicals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnalystInParadise (Reply #31)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:33 PM

35. Since none of the evidence considered by the grand jury has reached the light of day

and not one witness or forensics expert has been subject to cross examination, there really is no value whatever to the information you describe as "initial analysis". You do realize that witnesses before the grand jury aren't subject to cross examination to test their specific findings and their credibility in general? What the D.A. spouted tonight as part of worthless litany of the things HE found (and he refused to describe what the grand jury itself found to make up its mind) is not evidence. It's his personal opinion. We don't know what the actual evidence says.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #35)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 05:17 PM

68. I want to know how closely the testimony of the examiner for the FBI

aligned with the medical examiner for Ferguson.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:31 PM

34. You are WRONG. He said that most witnesses saw Brown charge. NO race was implied. I watched it.

 

Get your facts and your shit together.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beausoir (Reply #34)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:35 PM

36. Racists get out of this thread!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:37 PM

38. Your hysteria does not help.

 

You should have learned that by now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #36)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:20 AM

49. So to be clear...

 

You get to make a 'mistake'...

Get corrected on it...

Double down at which point it becomes a lie...

Then call anyone who reminds you of it a racist...

Classy...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:36 PM

37. McCulloch: All the witnesses who said Brown was advancing on Darren Wilson were black.

Matt Pearce ✔ @mattdpearce
Follow
McCulloch: All the witnesses who said Brown was advancing on Darren Wilson were black.
4:46 PM - 24 Nov 2014 80 Retweets 30 favorites

Joy Reid ✔ @JoyAnnReid
Follow
Former prosecutor Paul Butler on @TheLastWord: "AA men have no rights white police officers are bound to respect. That's why ppl are angry."
5:58 PM - 24 Nov 2014 152 Retweets 72 favorites

http://theobamadiary.com/2014/11/24/president-obama-to-make-a-statement-ferguson/#comment-1197921

Liberal_Stalwart

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #37)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:45 PM

39. Thank you, Cha! I know what I heard!!!

 

All of the evidence that was favorable to Wilson was heard by that Grand Jury. Anything that was contradictory to Wilson's testimony was ignored. Bottom line.

Racists who come to this thread will be put on FULL IGNORE. Fair warning!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #39)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:52 PM

41. I agree with you

Just to let you know not every white person Is blind to truth here.

Wilson executed Michale brown.And Mccullogh put Brown on trial.

It's all sickening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robbins (Reply #41)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 05:06 PM

65. I know. I do know this and I appreciate it. I really do. Thank you.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #37)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:54 PM

42. The time stamp on your copy and paste disproves your claim. 4:46PM? That's hours before

 

the live statement was read.

Stop making shit up. It does not help anyone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beausoir (Reply #42)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:08 AM

44. I'm not "making shit up".. So fucking chill. Matt Pierce is in LA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #44)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:13 AM

45. That is STILL wrong. Jesus. You don't even have the time correct.

 

This is not helpful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beausoir (Reply #45)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:15 AM

46. Like I said.. Chill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #46)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:20 AM

48. Oh...cool.

 

You knowingly post misinformation....get caught at it and just want peeps to chill.

Got it.

I like your style.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:48 PM

40. Or better yet - put enormous political pressure on Gov. Nixon to appoint a special prosecutor to go

after Officer Wilson again, since jeopardy doesn't attach to a grand jury failure to indict.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #40)

Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:56 PM

43. The Brown family will go after Civil Damages. They will go after $$$$$$$$$$$

 

They will not be awarded any civil damages, but they will try. I don't blame them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:17 AM

47. All or some?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Oktober (Reply #47)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 03:08 AM

53. Stop being a smart ass. The only witness' testimony that were accepted were the ones that confirmed

 

Wilson's version of events. So yes, ALL of them. Really, I'm not in the mood for this bullshit. Stop it!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #53)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 03:22 AM

54. I ask only because I watched it as well...

 

... And that isn't what he said.

Maybe you should review it again...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Oktober (Reply #54)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 05:07 PM

66. And again, only those witnesses who corroborated Wilson's account were accepted as credible

 

witnesses, so of course, those were going to be the ones who's word were taken as truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:32 AM

51. Skimming the transcript, that seems to be what most of the witnesses said

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 12:39 AM

52. It's true, some witnesses saw Brown charge Wilson

He also said that some who initially said Brown had his hand up later admitted they didn't witness the incident/shooting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lil Missy (Reply #52)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:07 AM

59. Charged him like a football player was one quote.

 

Not on the ground, back to him, hands raised surrendering - was all a lie.
Eric Holder knew all this. Why he left town so quickly and has not had a problem with the decision.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to maced666 (Reply #59)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:06 PM

70. Holder left town? No he most certainly has not. Holder has been back to Ferguson many times.

 

There is an ongoing investigation.

Here's the medical report:

[img][/img]

Again, Wilson is a lying motherfucker!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lil Missy (Reply #52)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:22 AM

62. But the one with Brown clearly saw.

.....and was summarily dismissed.

Black folk have no rights that white police are bound to recognize....writ larger on Monday night.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 05:21 PM

69. I'm sure there will start to be more reports of this asshole's many LIES!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread