General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs it time for Justice, Clarence Thomas?
Now that Bill Cosby and Jian (from the CBC) are getting called out for their despicable past ........... don't you think it is about time someone in the media does a comprehensive report on Justice Clarence Thomas? He lied to Congress to get his job on the Supreme Court ... Anita Hill was telling the truth .... and more women have come forward to say the same things as Anita Hill. Sound familiar ?Thomas is the most pathetic judge on the Supreme Court, never asks any questions and votes with Scalia every time. He needs to be brought up on perjury charges at the least. A great summary below for all of you who were not old enough to watch what happened. BTW, I watched the hearing and thought that Joe Biden was running a clown show.
[link:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/anita-hill-clarence-thomas/|
Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...he said he had no opinion on Roe v Wade. Blatant lie and not really challenged by Biden and the committee Dems.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)from some rightwing creep org's.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)wife. The man has no ethics whatsoever. And his work ethic is as absent.
Reliable fundie vote though, that was the reason he was nominated.mshould never have been confirmed, this toady of Scalia.
Response to Miigwech (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)but donald duck would be preferred to him and the same goes for scalia
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Treading cautiously there.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Clarence Thomas has a prett severe history of anti-black positions. Most of the time, he simply follows whatever Scalia says; and the few times those two men disagree on an issue, it's always been Thomas that is in the wrong.
Surely we ought to expect more than just "looking diverse in a photo" here, right?
Socal31
(2,484 posts)So I'll leave that alone.
I may be misinterpreting your post, but are you suggesting there is a right and wrong way for a Justice to vote depending on your skin color? That sounds dangerous to me.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Rather moot point though, since the poster I was replying to seems to have gotten a skid out on their butt...
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)and how COWARDLY democrats were. and the rethuglicons were just despicable.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)It seems that Democrats are still just as weak and ineffective today as they were during that hearing. I was so disappointed when Pres. Obama picked Biden as his VP running mate.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)it was an all-boys club ganging up and the women. very disappointed in the democrats....the rethuglicans were just disgusting pigs. that asshole specter makes my skin crawl every time i see his ugly mug. same with alan simpson...a disgusting PIG.
jillan
(39,451 posts)calling him a racist non-stop for going after Thomas.
Funny how things have changed. Now when we call them racist for going after Obama, they call us race baiters
Anyway - I read Joe's autobiography and remember reading how he felt like he was between a rock and hard place running those hearings.
I am a huge Biden fan, but that was definitely the low point in his career imho.
Brother Buzz
(36,375 posts)Miigwech
(3,741 posts)This is the best report by Steve Kornacki at Salon:
[link:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/anita-hill-clarence-thomas/|
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)until he is fitted for a toe tag. He has no shame.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)By Steve Kornacki
[link:http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/anita_hill_clarence_thomas/|
BootinUp
(47,078 posts)they still confirmed that jerk.
Hekate
(90,556 posts)But for good old Clarence it was "Judge Thomas" this and "Judge Thomas" that. That entire committee behaved like jerks and should be ashamed.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Unforgivable how he voted like a puppet .
reddread
(6,896 posts)while making it possible.
against all interests but white power and anti-equality extremists.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)that's how i knew the bastard was guilty. and all the his female defenders were women he would not harass, given his preferences. and i think his wife knows he did it too: that explains that bizarre phone call to Hill.
reddread
(6,896 posts)thats all there is to it for me.
BlueMTexpat
(15,365 posts)despicable man to get the medicine he deserves.
But he is not the only one who should.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... that I will never ever forget. "Long-dong silver" and "pubic hair on a coke can"... comes to mind. GHWBush chose him to replace Thurgood Marshall, because of the color of his skin. The whole thing was a farce. I watched every minute of it, called in to my Senator (a DINO who called himself a Democrat, yes, Richard Shelby.) I called back and gave his staff hell when he voted for him for confirmation, too.
Hekate
(90,556 posts)20score
(4,769 posts)What he did to Anita Hill and others is inexcusable. And to pretend he's qualified for the Supreme Court is laughable.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)and, yes, Thomas lied. They all lied in confirmation hearings. They are corporate tools, bought and paid for. There's no justice until each and every one of them is gone, and since that won't happen in my lifetime, we may not survive this corrupt Supreme Court.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)[link:http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2001/jul/010702.brock.html|
David Brook's book about how innocent Clarence Thomas was .... well ... from NPR interview:
"July 2, 2001 -- Journalist David Brock, whose 1993 book attacked the credibility of law professor Anita Hill, now says he printed lies about Hill following her testimony against then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. In an exclusive interview, NPR Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg talks to Brock about the confession, detailed in a forthcoming book.
Brock now says that, when he was writing for the conservative magazine The American Spectator and researching his book The Real Anita Hill, he was a tool of right wing activists who fed him false information about Hill. At the time, Brock tells Totenberg, he accepted the truthfulness of the information without checking. But he since has learned he helped spread lies, he says, and is trying to set the record straight in a memoir due out next month. Brock tells Totenberg he even tried to contact Hill in 1998 to apologize, but ultimately "didn't have the guts" to talk to her."
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...alert the "media" (mindless as they are).