Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,053 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:44 PM Dec 2014

Elizabeth Warren Blasts FHFA's Mel Watt: "You Haven't Helped a Single Family"






Elizabeth Warren tore into FHFA director Mel Watt over his failure to develop a program for Fannie and Freddie to provide principal modifications to underwater borrowers at risk of foreclosure. She also got in a dig for his failure to stop the agencies from pursuing deficiency judgments. That means going after former homeowners when the sale of the house they lost didn’t recoup enough to cover the mortgage balance. In the stone ages, when banks kept the mortgage loans they made, they never pursued deficiency judgements. They knew there was no point in trying to get blood from a turnip. Not surprisingly, the sadistic Fannie/Freddie policy has also proven to be spectacularly unproductive in financial terms. An FHFA inspector general study found that recoveries were less than 1/4 of 1% of the amount sought. Moreover, since those mortgage balances were often inflated by junk fees and other dubious costs, and mortgage servicers have done a poor job of maintain properties (they are too often stripped of copper and appliances, or get mold), any deficiency might be significantly or entirely the servicer’s fault. ....................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/news/item/27771-elizabeth-warren-blasts-fhfa-s-mel-watt-you-haven-t-helped-a-single-family



21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren Blasts FHFA's Mel Watt: "You Haven't Helped a Single Family" (Original Post) marmar Dec 2014 OP
Bingo!!!! Wellstone ruled Dec 2014 #1
The access to their Social Security is actually illegal. But that does not keep banks from putting a jwirr Dec 2014 #5
k&r.... spanone Dec 2014 #2
My parents were denied a loan years ago for not having enough furniture. Ykcutnek Dec 2014 #3
Yeah, but 34 years ago she voted for Reagan so we're all supposed to hate her. Scuba Dec 2014 #4
Are the choices 'hate her' or 'make her President without any questions answered about her past Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #8
You've made such claims before but have not substantiated that they are based in fact ... Scuba Dec 2014 #10
I'm glad she has matured, but he was the WORST president WhiteTara Dec 2014 #18
What evidence do you have that she voted for Reagan twice? Scuba Dec 2014 #19
here is this info WhiteTara Dec 2014 #20
So none. I've seen Warren quoted that she was a Republican at one time. I've never ... Scuba Dec 2014 #21
She must be one of the only politicians I've ever known closeupready Dec 2014 #6
Mel Watt is one of the good guys and has been in that post less than a year Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #7
that's crap ProfessorPlum Dec 2014 #9
We have a Winner turbinetree Dec 2014 #11
Thanks Lizzie..... DeSwiss Dec 2014 #12
A modest quote from James Madison is rather interesting here-- Jackpine Radical Dec 2014 #16
He wasn't just shoveling the BS ut oh Dec 2014 #13
How can something called " Fannie and Freddie" be taken seriously? mahannah Dec 2014 #14
Thank God someone is calling these guys out. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #15
It all depends on who your definition of 'help' is. Octafish Dec 2014 #17
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. Bingo!!!!
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:02 PM
Dec 2014

We run across people on a regular basis who are getting clobbered by collection agencies for a deficiency from a foreclosure. And these folks are Seniors who,for one reason or another,did HELC's and got burned and know paying a big time penalty. Can you imagine having your Bank Accounts frozen or you IRA or 401k frozen or attached and you have your Social Security monthly payments in direct deposit and now you can't access it. The real kicker is these folks are in their seventies and eighties with zero fall back. Now these folks are either moving in with relatives or friends or are the new homeless. Just ain't right!!!!

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
5. The access to their Social Security is actually illegal. But that does not keep banks from putting a
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:28 PM
Dec 2014

hold on it. That is the main reason I have mine a Direct Express which is the banking system for the Social Security Department.

I was told this by legal aides when I tried to go bankrupt. As a senior they would not help me go bankrupt because my income is supposedly secure.

In the cases of the seniors who had theirs frozen because of a foreclosure I would assume that they had their direct deposit in the same bank as their housing loan. Bankers put themselves ahead of the needs of the seniors.

 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
3. My parents were denied a loan years ago for not having enough furniture.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:08 PM
Dec 2014

Then the second time they tried, the local FHA office was "out of funds."

They still rent and dad is nearing retirement.

What a fucking joke.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
4. Yeah, but 34 years ago she voted for Reagan so we're all supposed to hate her.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:16 PM
Dec 2014

Meanwhile, Hillary has "evolved" on same-sex marriage so her defending the Iraq war, taking money from banksters, advocating for the XL Pipeline and increased H1B Visas don't count.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
8. Are the choices 'hate her' or 'make her President without any questions answered about her past
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 03:04 PM
Dec 2014

bigoted, ignorant political and economic policies? She did not just 'vote for Reagan' she was a 25 year loyal Republican voter, prior to Reagan and deep into Bush. She voted for Reagan the second time when he had done nothing about AIDS with over 5,000 dead. I just watched America freak out over one dead tourist, so clearly that Reagan policy was hate based and hoping for gay and black people to die off. She voted for that, then she voted for Bush. She says she did those things because she supported supply side economics, which was the policy that destroyed the middle class.
Lots of stupid votes, lots of support for racist, homophobic bullshit. Opposition to choice. What would she trade away for a few pieces of her precious silver? In the past, she was willing to see gay people die without any acknowledgement, to ignore a mounting crisis for her own agenda. About 650,000 Americans have died from AIDS since Liz and Ron spent 7 years pretending it did not exist. 36 Million world wide. It's not a brand of stupid we can afford to play with.
Feel free to adore her, but this bit of acting as if she's the Uber Liberal is just unsupportable. It's not about Hillary. It's about Warren being a Republican, anti gay shithead when she was in her mid 40's and worth millions of dollars. Try to grasp that. Both of them can suck.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
18. I'm glad she has matured, but he was the WORST president
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 11:37 AM
Dec 2014

unless you count Dick Cheney. That she voted for him twice is the kicker. His was the stab in the gut to the middle class and we've been slowly bleeding to death ever since.

Don't misunderstand, I love Elizabeth Warren and I applaud her work in the Senate and I really would like to see her Senate Minority Leader in the next Congress. She would kick some ass for sure. But it might not be so hard today if people like her hadn't supported Bozo the Clown in the White House then.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
20. here is this info
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 03:06 PM
Dec 2014

For all those quaking on the right at the sight of an ascendant Warren, rest easy. Warren’s no lefty. In fact, Warren was a registered Republican into her 40s. When it comes to ideology, Warren makes for a rotten heir to Kennedy.

“I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets. I think that is not true anymore,” Warren says. “I was a Republican at a time when I felt like there was a problem that the markets were under a lot more strain. It worried me whether or not the government played too activist a role.”

Did she vote for Ronald Reagan, who ushered in much of the financial deregulation which Warren has devoted her life to stopping? “I’m not going to talk about who I voted for,” she says.
http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2011/10/25/elizabeth-warren-i-used-to-be-a-republican/

Now if we deduce that Allison voted for Obama because she is a democrat, wouldn't it follow that Elizabeth Warren voted for him twice as she was a republican?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
21. So none. I've seen Warren quoted that she was a Republican at one time. I've never ...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:39 PM
Dec 2014

... seen anything authoratative regarding when. Yet I see claims here on DU that "she voted for Reagan twice" and "cheered Reagan" when his team was making jokes about AIDS.

Some interesting claims that no one has been able to substantiate. Makes me suspicious.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
6. She must be one of the only politicians I've ever known
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:28 PM
Dec 2014

who gets more welcome every time I see her in the news, and ages like a fine wine, getting only better and better. K&R

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
7. Mel Watt is one of the good guys and has been in that post less than a year
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:33 PM
Dec 2014

I like Senator Warren, but her attacking him when he hasn't even been in office long enough to implement anything meaningful smacks of just posturing for the camera.

ProfessorPlum

(11,253 posts)
9. that's crap
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 03:34 PM
Dec 2014

What is his excuse for not doing any principal reduction? He doesn't have one, and she's right to point it out! He should get on it, tout de suite.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
11. We have a Winner
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 03:45 PM
Dec 2014

Thank you Ms. Warren hold the next congress's feet to the fire, because we know in the future hearings we are going to hear on the mortgage holder (home owner) should have known better.
This hemming and hawing we just witnessed is disgraceful.
There is a system in place to correct what has been going on since 2001 and before, and when the crash occurred in 2006-2008 the outright greed, derivatives, and the issue of who owns the paper on the mortgage actives kicked in based on lies, shows that the greed is still in place, and not one firm on wall street has been indicted, not one, all we have is fines, wahoo.
I remember Matt Tiabbi's recent article in Rolling Stone where one Elizabeth Payne (whistleblower) showed that the fix was and has been in for quite some time and all we have been getting is empty words from suits

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
12. Thanks Lizzie.....
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 03:54 PM
Dec 2014

...but they can't be shamed. They have none. You're stating of the obvious here, won't amount to a hill of beans. The rot is systemic and complete to the core.

When we reached this point with the oppression of the monarchy in the 1770s we concluded that a new form of government was needed. It's needed again against the oligarchy.

- We have no other choice. You don't put new wine into old skins.....

K&R

In the Bill of Rights of the United States, there is an attempt to secure certain freedoms and protections by way of mere text on paper. Now while I understand the value of this document and the temporal brilliance of it in the context of the period of its creation, that does not excuse the fact that it is a product of social inefficiency and nothing more. In other words, declarations of laws and rights are actually an acknowledgment of the failures of the social design.

There is no such thing as 'rights' - as the reference can be altered at will. The fourth amendment is an attempt to protect against state power abuse, that is clear. But it avoids the real issue, and that is: Why would the state have an interest to search and seize to begin with? How do you remove the mechanisms that generate such behavior? We need to focus on the real cause.

We have to understand that government as we know it today, is not in place for the well being of the public, but rather for the perpetuation of their establishment and their power. Just like every other institution within a monetary system. Government is a monetary invention for the sake of economic and social control and its methods are based upon self-preservation, first and foremost.

All a government can really do is to create laws to compensate for an inherent lack of integrity within the social order. In society today the public is essentially kept distracted and uninformed. This is the way that governments maintain control. If you review history, power is maintained through ignorance.


~Peter Joseph

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
16. A modest quote from James Madison is rather interesting here--
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 07:20 PM
Dec 2014
In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests, and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren Blasts F...