Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Moyers: The Ingenious Project to Save Our Climate Using an Ancient Legal Theory
The very agencies created to protect our environment have been hijacked by the polluting industries they were meant to regulate. It may just turn out that the judicial system, our children and their children will save us from ourselves.
The new legal framework for this crusade against global warming is called atmospheric trust litigation. It takes the fate of the Earth into the courts, arguing that the planets atmosphere its air, water, land, plants and animals are the responsibility of government, held in its trust to insure the survival of all generations to come. Its the strategy being used by Bill Moyers recent guest, Kelsey Juliana, a co-plaintiff in a major lawsuit spearheaded by Our Childrens Trust, that could force the state of Oregon to take a more aggressive stance against the carbon emissions.
Its the brainchild of Mary Christina Wood, a legal scholar who wrote the book, Natures Trust, tracing this public trust doctrine all the way back to ancient Rome.
Wood tells Bill: If this nation relies on a stable climate system, and the very habitability of this nation and all of the liberties of young people and their survival interests are at stake, the courts need to force the agencies and the legislatures to simply do their job.
The new legal framework for this crusade against global warming is called atmospheric trust litigation. It takes the fate of the Earth into the courts, arguing that the planets atmosphere its air, water, land, plants and animals are the responsibility of government, held in its trust to insure the survival of all generations to come. Its the strategy being used by Bill Moyers recent guest, Kelsey Juliana, a co-plaintiff in a major lawsuit spearheaded by Our Childrens Trust, that could force the state of Oregon to take a more aggressive stance against the carbon emissions.
Its the brainchild of Mary Christina Wood, a legal scholar who wrote the book, Natures Trust, tracing this public trust doctrine all the way back to ancient Rome.
Wood tells Bill: If this nation relies on a stable climate system, and the very habitability of this nation and all of the liberties of young people and their survival interests are at stake, the courts need to force the agencies and the legislatures to simply do their job.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/bill-moyers-ingenious-project-save-our-climate-using-ancient-legal-theory
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 916 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (28)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Moyers: The Ingenious Project to Save Our Climate Using an Ancient Legal Theory (Original Post)
madokie
Jan 2015
OP
tanyev
(42,515 posts)1. I just have a tiny quibble with his phrase "hijacked by the polluting industries".
I'd say "co-opted by the polluting industries with the assistance of primarily Republican lawmakers and administrations".
malaise
(268,692 posts)2. I agree
Rec
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)3. Great post.
Not only it being Bill Moyers last telecast, one of the last voices in America speaking for the "public trust", but for the hopeful optimism of Mary Christina Wood.
If it takes a legal challenge to force the government into acknowledging their 'constitutional' responsibility to serve the public trust or interest, it should at least be tried.
k&r
.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)4. k&r
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)5. So if the government gets the "keys" to all the land, water and air
what happens when the corporations co-opt the government?
I mean, far be it for me to suggest such a thing could happen but it might be a consideration.