Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:02 PM Apr 2012

The Great Divergence: Why do unions work in Europe but not in America?

At the risk of being called un-American by Mitt Romney, let me point out that globalism has not rendered unions obsolete in Western Europe. During the 1970s (the decade that coined the term “deindustrialization”), union density actually increased in most industrialized European countries even as it decreased in the United States. ... Richard Freeman calculates that if average earnings for industrial workers in the United States had followed the pattern in these other countries—which faced the same pressures of global competition—then in 2005 the typical American industrial worker would have been paid $25 per hour instead of $16 (more than a 50% increase).

A lot of the difference can be attributed to the weakening of U.S. labor law with the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947 and after. Among other things, the penalty for firing a worker who tries to join a union is now so pitifully slight that bosses do it with impunity. One really interesting idea put forth by Richard D. Kahlenberg and Moshe Z. Marvit, in their new book Why Labor Organizing Should Be a Civil Right, is to extend legal protections under the Civil Rights Act to union membership. That way a worker whose boss fired him for trying to start a union could sue the boss, expose the company to the humiliation of the discovery process, and win significant monetary damages. Kahlenberg and Marvit argue that Americans understand the vocabulary of civil rights in a way that they don’t understand the vocabulary of labor rights.

It’s worth remembering that even at its peak in 1954, private-sector union membership was just a little under 40 percent. (Today it’s about 7 percent, or roughly where it stood before the New Deal.)

Finding ways to revive the labor movement is just about the toughest challenge facing liberalism today, but I don’t think it’s possible to make much headway reversing the inequality trend without it. I don’t pretend to have found a magic bullet, but Andy Stern, who as president of the Service Employees International Union from 1996 to 2010 saw more success in this area than just about anybody else, has a few ideas. He’d like to make it legal for unions to solicit outside funds, which is largely prohibited under the 1959 Landrum-Griffin Act. Union organizing is extremely expensive, which is why very little of it is being done today, and there’s a limit to how much labor unions can hit up their members. Stern would also like to negotiate wages industry-wide (as Reuther finally achieved with the car companies in the early 1950s) to remove wage-based price competition from the market. He also thinks the labor movement needs to globalize to keep up with the global economy.

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_book_club/features/2012/tim_noah_s_the_great_divergence/timothy_noah_great_divergence_book_unions_in_europe_.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Great Divergence: Why do unions work in Europe but not in America? (Original Post) pampango Apr 2012 OP
Because in Europe the companies work with the Unions... mojitojoe Apr 2012 #1
They don't have to contend with the Taft-Hartley law. n/t Cleita Apr 2012 #2
du rec. nt xchrom Apr 2012 #3
Features of German Labor and Employment Law bemildred Apr 2012 #4

mojitojoe

(94 posts)
1. Because in Europe the companies work with the Unions...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:04 PM
Apr 2012

...they aren't out to destroy them. Also, in Europe the companies look at employees as assets and not liabilities.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. Features of German Labor and Employment Law
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:17 PM
Apr 2012

---

In Germany, there is no such thing as “employment at will”. By law, German employees must have written employment contracts that reflect the key aspects of the employment relationship (e.g., parties to the contract, work to be performed, gross salary and benefits, vacation, starting date of employment, place of performance, notice periods).

Although an employment contract unlimited in time is typical for Germany, it is possible to agree on an employment contract with a limited term (and employers tend to increasingly make use of this possibility). Limited term employment contracts are, however, subject to restrictions under German labor and employment law. Generally, a limited term employment contract is permissible only when there is an objective reason for the limitation (e.g., substitution in case of illness, project work). However, an employer can always enter into (but not renew) a limited term employment contract for a period of up to two years, without restrictions.

All weekdays excluding Sundays and public holidays are considered to be working days. However, German employees normally work from Monday to Friday (five-day week).

Under a five-day week, the average working time is between 35 and 40 hours. The daily productive working time generally may not exceed eight hours. A daily working time of up to ten hours productive working time is possible if, over a period of six months, the average daily working time does not exceed eight hours.


http://www.wilmerhale.com/publications/whPubsDetail.aspx?publication=159
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Great Divergence: Why...